Abstract
This investigation evaluates the effect of Hurricane Mitch on women’s reproductive outcomes throughout Nicaragua. This research aim is achieved by analyzing a unique Nicaraguan Living Standards Measurement Study panel dataset that tracks women’s fertility immediately before and at two time points after Hurricane Mitch, combined with satellite-derived municipality-level precipitation data for the 10-day storm period. Results show higher odds of post-disaster fertility in municipalities receiving higher precipitation levels in the immediate post-Hurricane Mitch period. However, fertility normalizes between disaster and non-disaster areas 4 to 6 years after the storm. These findings suggest that the disruptive effects of a natural disaster such as Hurricane Mitch can have an initial stimulative effect on fertility but that effect is ephemeral.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To clarify, even though the medium-term post-Hurricane Mitch fertility period assessed is 5 to 7 years after the storm, the actual effect period is 4 to 6 years post-Hurricane Mitch when accounting for the 9-month conception to birth period.
Conceptually, to maintain as large a sample size as possible from which to calculate TFRs and ASFRs and given no justifiable reason to exclude women lost to follow-up in these calculations, all reproductive-aged women by study year (1998, 2001, and 2005) were evaluated. This differs from the subset of reproductive-aged women—accounting for women lost to follow-up—that were used in the respective longitudinal logistic regression findings displayed in Table 3.
References
Acosta, P. (2011). School attendance, child labour, and remittances from international migration in El Salvador. J Dev Stud, 47(6), 913–936. doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.563298.
Agadjanian, V., & Prata, N. (2002). War, peace, and fertility in Angola. Demography, 39(2), 215–231.
Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1974). Interaction between quantity and quality of children. Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital (pp. 81–90): UMI.
Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1976). Child endowments and quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ, 84(4), S143–S162. doi:10.1086/260536.
Belsky, J. (1999). Modern evolutionary theory and patterns of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 141–161). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2014). At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Blanc, A. K. (2004). The role of conflict in the rapid fertility decline in Eritrea and prospects for the future. Stud Fam Plan, 35(4), 236–245.
Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Popul Dev Rev, 271–291.
Buekens, P., Xiong, X., & Harville, E. (2006). Hurricanes and pregnancy. Birth, 33(2), 91–93.
Carta, G., D’Alfonso, A., Colagrande, I., Catana, P., Casacchia, M., & Patacchiola, F. (2012). Post-earthquake birth-rate evaluation using the brief cope. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 25(11), 2411–2414.
Cohan, C. L., & Cole, S. W. (2002). Life course transitions and natural disaster: marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. J Fam Psychol, 16(1), 14.
Cupples, J. (2007). Gender and Hurricane Mitch: reconstructing subjectivities after disaster. Disasters, 31(2), 155–175.
Dilley, M. (2005). Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis (Vol. 5). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.
Elsner, J. B., Kossin, J. P., & Jagger, T. H. (2008). The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature, 455(7209), 92–95.
Evans, R. W., Hu, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2010). The fertility effect of catastrophe: US hurricane births. J Popul Econ, 23(1), 1–36.
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132. doi:10.2307/3088292.
Filmer, D., & Scott, K. (2012). Assessing asset indices. Demography, 49(1), 359–392.
Finlay, J. (2009). Fertility response to natural disasters: the case of three high mortality earthquakes. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Girard, C., & Peacock, W. G. (1997). Ethnicity and segregation: post-hurricane relocation (pp. 191–205): Routledge, London.
Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P., Mathews, T., Martin, J., & Ventura, S. (2009). The effect of Hurricane Katrina: births in the US Gulf Coast region, before and after the storm. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, 58(2), 1–28 32.
Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1999). Pair bonds as attachments: evaluating the evidence. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 336–354). New York: Guilford Press.
Heuveline, P., & Poch, B. (2007). The Phoenix population: demographic crisis and rebound in Cambodia. Demography, 44(2), 405–426.
Hosseini Chavoshi, M., & Abbasi-Shavazi, M. (2015). Demographic consequences of the 2003 Bam Earthquake in Iran. In H. James & D. Paton (Eds.), The consequences of disasters: demographic, planning, and policy implications. Springfield, Il: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Popul Environ, 26(4), 273–302.
Jakobsen, K. T. (2012). In the eye of the storm—the welfare impacts of a hurricane. World Dev, 40(12), 2578–2589.
Knutson, T. R., McBride, J. L., Chan, J., Emanuel, K., Holland, G., Landsea, C., et al. (2010). Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci, 3(3), 157–163.
Lin, C.-Y. C. (2010). Instability, investment, disasters, and demography: natural disasters and fertility in Italy (1820–1962) and Japan (1671–1965). Popul Environ, 31(4), 255–281.
Lindstrom, D. P., & Berhanu, B. (1999). The impact of war, famine, and economic decline on marital fertility in Ethiopia. Demography, 36(2), 247–261.
Loebach, P. (2016). Household migration as a livelihood adaptation in response to a natural disaster: Nicaragua and Hurricane Mitch. Popul Environ, 1–22.
Lott, N., McCown, S., Graumann, A., Ross, T., & Lackey, M. (1999). Mitch: the deadliest Atlantic hurricane since 1780. Retrieved May 17, 2016, from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/mitch/mitch.html
McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. J Popul Econ, 18(2), 229–260.
Morris, S. S., Neidecker-Gonzales, O., Carletto, C., Muguia, M., Medina, J. M., & Wodon, Q. (2002). Hurricane Mitch and the livelihoods of the rural poor in Honduras. World Dev, 30(1), 49–60.
Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: the impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 97(3), 551–566.
Nobles, J., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2015). The effects of mortality on fertility: population dynamics after a natural disaster. Demography, 52(1), 15–38.
Premand, P. (2010). Hurricane Mitch and consumption growth of Nicaraguan agricultural households. Well-being and Social Policy, 6(1), 17–54.
Rodgers, J. L., John, C. A. S., & Coleman, R. (2005). Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma City bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999. Demography, 42(4), 675–692.
Tong, V. T., Zotti, M. E., & Hsia, J. (2011). Impact of the Red River catastrophic flood on women giving birth in North Dakota, 1994–2000. Matern Child Health J, 15(3), 281–288.
UNICEF. (2014). The state of the World’s children 2014 in numbers: every child counts. Revealing disparities, Advancing Children’s Rights: ERIC.
United Nations. (1999). Nicaragua. Evaluación de los daños ocasionados por el Huracán Mitch, 1998. Sus implicaciones para el desarrollo económico y social y el medio ambiente. Mexico: Comision Economica para America Latina y El Caribe.
United Nations. (2011). World Fertility Report 2009: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, New: York.
Van den Berg, M. (2010). Household income strategies and natural disasters: dynamic livelihoods in rural Nicaragua. Ecol Econ, 69(3), 592–602.
Vatsia, U., & Chowdhury, S. (2010). Fertility decline in Nicaragua, 1980–2006, a case study. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Webster, P. J., Holland, G. J., Curry, J. A., & Chang, H.-R. (2005). Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science, 309(5742), 1844–1846.
World Bank. (2015). World development indicators 2015. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Manuel Hernandez for the creation of the Hurricane Mitch rainfall intensity variable and Lauren Gaydosh and Elizabeth Lawrence for their invaluable comments during the drafting of this manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under a Pathway to Independence Award (K99 HD079586), a Population Research Training grant (T32 HD007168), and the Population Research Infrastructure Program (P2C HD050924) awarded to the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, J. Fertility after natural disaster: Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua. Popul Environ 38, 448–464 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-017-0271-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-017-0271-5