Abstract
Aims
The standard litterbag method isolates soil or litter from decomposing roots by a dense nylon mesh that is likely to underestimate root decomposition rate. Thus, we evaluated the effect of direct contact between roots and soil or litter during root decomposition.
Methods
Schima superba and Cleyera japonica order 1–3, 4–5, and 6 roots were decomposed using two types of litterbags at two soil horizons: standard litterbags (R_O, pure root in O horizon; R_A, pure root in A horizon) and mixed litterbags (R + L_O, mixed root with semi-decomposed litter in O horizon; and R + HS_A, mixed root with humus soil in A horizon). The mass and nutrient dynamics were measured in one year of decomposition.
Results
After one year of decomposition, litterbag types and soil horizons significantly affected root mass and nutrient dynamics. Litterbags mixed with humus soil and litter increased 1–3 order root decomposition rate by 139–143% and 42–89%, respectively. Furthermore, 1–3 order roots had a significantly different decomposition rate than higher-order roots, but standard and mixed litterbags showed the opposite effect. The decomposition rate of 1–3 order roots appears to be more sensitive to litterbag type than higher-order roots.
Conclusions
Directly contact between root and soil or litter was important for root decomposition in corresponding soil layers. Standard litterbags significantly underestimate the decomposition rate of lower-order roots in the early stages of decomposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ågren GI, Hyvönen R, Berglund SL, Hobbie SE (2013) Estimating the critical N: C from litter decomposition data and its relation to soil organic matter stoichiometry. Soil Biol Biochem 67:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.010
Aulen M, Shipley B, Bradley R (2012) Prediction of in situ root decomposition rates in an interspecific context from chemical and morphological traits. Ann Bot 109:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr259
Bocock KL, Gilbert OJW (1957) The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions. Plant Soil 9:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01398924
Bonner MT, Castro D, Schneider AN, Sundström G, Hurry V, Street NR, Näsholm T (2019) Why does nitrogen addition to forest soils inhibit decomposition? Soil Biol Biochem 137:107570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107570
Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108:583–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329030
Chen G, Tu L, Peng Y, Hu H, Hu T, Xu Z, Liu L, Tang Y (2017) Effect of nitrogen additions on root morphology and chemistry in a subtropical bamboo forest. Plant Soil 412:441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3074-z
Dornbush ME, Isenhart TM, Raich JW (2002) Quantifying fine-root decomposition: an alternative to buried litterbags. Ecology 83:2985–2990. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2985:QFRDAA]2.0.CO;2
Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N (2012) Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 50:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.011
Fan P, Guo D (2010) Slow decomposition of lower order roots: a key mechanism of root carbon and nutrient retention in the soil. Oecologia 163:509–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1541-4
Freschet GT, Cornwell WK, Wardle DA, Elumeeva TG, Liu W, Jackson BG, Onipchenko VG, Soudzilovskaia NA, Tao J, Cornelissen JHC (2013) Linking litter decomposition of above- and below-ground organs to plant-soil feedbacks worldwide. J Ecol 101:943–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12092
Gallardo A, Schlesinger WH (1994) Factors limiting microbial biomass in the mineral soil and forest floor of a warm-temperate forest. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90225-9
Gill RA, Burke IC (2002) Influence of soil depth on the decomposition of Bouteloua gracilis roots in the shortgrass steppe. Plant Soil 241:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016146805542
Gill RA, Jackson RB (2000) Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 147:13–31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x
Goebel M, Hobbie SE, Bulaj B, Zadworny M, Archibald DD, Oleksyn J, Reich PB, Eissenstat DM (2011) Decomposition of the finest root branching orders: linking belowground dynamics to fine-root function and structure. Ecol Monogr 81:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2390.1
Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004) Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia 140:450–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1596-1
Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333714
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7362–7366. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.14.7362
Kurz-Besson C, Coûteaux MM, Thiéry JM, Berg B, Remacle J (2005) A comparison of litterbag and direct observation methods of Scots pine needle decomposition measurement. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2315–2318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.022
Langley JA, Hungate BA (2003) Mycorrhizal controls on belowground litter quality. Ecology 84:2302–2312. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0282
Li A, Fahey TJ, Pawlowska TE, Fisk MC, Burtis J (2015) Fine root decomposition, nutrient mobilization and fungal communities in a pine forest ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 83:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.019
Li X, Minick KJ, Luff J, Noormets A, Miao G, Mitra B, Domec J-C, Sun G, McNulty S, King JS (2020) Effects of microtopography on absorptive and transport fine root biomass, necromass, production, mortality and decomposition in a coastal freshwater forested wetland, southeastern USA. Ecosystems 23:1294–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00470-x
McClaugherty CA, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1984) Decomposition dynamics of fine roots in forested ecosystems. Oikos 42:378–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544408
Minerovic AJ, Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Blackwood CB (2018) Physical and microbial mechanisms of decomposition vary in importance among root orders and tree species with differing chemical and morphological traits. Soil Biol Biochem 124:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.006
Nelson D, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of soil analysis part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. ASA-SSSA, Madison, pp 539–579
Palacios-Vargas JG, Castaño-Meneses G, Gómez-Anaya JA, Martínez-Yrizar A, Mejía-Recamier BE, Martínez-Sánchez J (2007) Litter and soil arthropods diversity and density in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in Western Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 16:3703–3717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9109-7
Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American Trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/3100029
Sanaullah M, Chabbi A, Leifeld J, Bardoux G, Billou D, Rumpel C (2011) Decomposition and stabilization of root litter in top- and subsoil horizons: What is the difference? Plant Soil 338:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0554-4
Sayer EJ, Tanner EVJ, Cheesman AW (2006) Increased litterfall changes fine root distribution in a moist tropical forest. Plant Soil 281:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-6334-x
Silver WL, Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100740
Subke JA, Hahn V, Battipaglia G, Linder S, Buchmann N, Cotrufo MF (2004) Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity. Oecologia 139:551–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1540-4
Sun T, Mao Z, Han Y (2013) Slow decomposition of very fine roots and some factors controlling the process: a 4-year experiment in four temperate tree species. Plant Soil 372:445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1755-4
Sun T, Dong L, Zhang L, Wu Z, Wang Q, Li Y, Zhang H, Wang Z (2016) Early stage fine-root decomposition and its relationship with root order and soil depth in a Larix gmelinii plantation. Forests 7:234. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100234
Wallenstein MD, Burns RG (2011) Ecology of extracellular enzyme activities and organic matter degradation in soil: a complex community-driven process. In: Methods of soil enzymology. pp 35–54
Wang FC, Fang XM, Ding ZQ, Wan SZ, Chen FS (2016a) Effects of understory plant root growth into the litter layer on the leaf litter decomposition of two woody species in a subtropical forest. For Ecol Manag 364:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.003
Wang W, Wu X, Hu K, Liu J, Tao J (2016b) Understorey fine root mass and morphology in the litter and upper soil layers of three Chinese subtropical forests. Plant Soil 406:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2878-1
Waring BG (2012) A meta-analysis of climatic and chemical controls on leaf litter decay rates in tropical forests. Ecosystems 15:999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9561-z
Whalen ED, Smith RG, Grandy AS, Frey SD (2018) Manganese limitation as a mechanism for reduced decomposition in soils under atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Soil Biol Biochem 127:252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.025
Xiong Y, Fan P, Fu S, Zeng H, Guo D (2013) Slow decomposition and limited nitrogen release by lower order roots in eight Chinese temperate and subtropical trees. Plant Soil 363:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1290-8
Yue K, Yang W, Peng Y, Zhang C, Huang C, Xu Z, Tan B, Wu F (2016) Dynamics of multiple metallic elements during foliar litter decomposition in an alpine forest river. Ann for Sci 73:547–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0549-2
Zhang X, Wang W (2015) The decomposition of fine and coarse roots: their global patterns and controlling factors. Sci Rep 5:9940. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09940
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071591). Guantao Chen was supported by the China Scholarship Council. We thank all anonymous reviewers for their very helpful and constructive comments that greatly improved the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest or competing interests.
Additional information
Responsbile Editor: Rémi Cardinael.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Gt., Chen, Yq., Peng, Y. et al. Standard litterbags underestimate early-stage lower-order root decomposition rate in a subtropical forest, China. Plant Soil 469, 335–346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05098-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05098-2