Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological traits associated with reductions in grain number in wheat and barley under waterlogging

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Negative effects of waterlogging on wheat and barley yield are expressed mainly through reductions in grain number per plant. Physiological traits associated with reductions in grain number of wheat and barley plants waterlogged at different growth stages during preanthesis were evaluated.

Methods

Two pot experiments were carried out under contrasting environments, where wheat and barley plants were exposed to waterlogging at four different ontogenic stages, from emergence to anthesis. Physiological traits associated with grain number determination were measured at anthesis and at physiological maturity.

Results

Waterlogging occurring during the spike growth period significantly reduced grain number per plant up to 70% in wheat and 60% in barley. Reductions in grain number per plant in wheat were mainly related to decreases in grain number per spike, while in barley grain number reductions were related to decreases in the number of spikes. In both species waterlogging produced spike growth reductions that were associated with reductions in the number of fertile florets per spike, without effects on fruiting efficiency.

Conclusions

The effect of waterlogging on grain number per plant differed between wheat and barley. Waterlogging reduced grain establishment in wheat by affecting the growth capacity of spikes and, consequently, reducing the number of fertile florets per spike. In barley, the main effect of waterlogging was through reductions in the number of spikes per plant, without significant changes in grain number per spike. These differences between species open ways to analyze the impact of different management practices (i.e. nitrogen fertilization, plant population) as alternative to mitigate the negative effect of waterlogging on grain yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbate PE, Andrade FH, Culot JP (1995) The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat. J Agric Sci 124:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbate PE, Andrade FH, Lázaro L, Bariffi JH, Berardocco HG, Inza VH, Marturano F (1998) Grain yield increase in recent argentine wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 38:1203–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzueta I, Abeledo LG, Mignone CM, Miralles DJ (2012) Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions. Eur J Agron 41:92–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2006a) Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.). Field Crop Res 96:466–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2006b) Yield responsiveness in two- and six-rowed barley grown in contrasting nitrogen environments. J Agron Crop Sci 192:178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2008a) Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley. Field Crop Res 107:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2008b) Radiation effects on potential number of grains per spike and biomass partitioning in two- and six-rowed near isogenic barley lines. Field Crop Res 107:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2010) Nitrogen and radiation effects during the active spike-growth phase on floret development and biomass partitioning in 2- and 6-rowed barley isolines. Crop Pasture Sci 61:578–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong W (1979) Aeration in higher plants. In: Woolhouse HW (ed) Advances in Botanical Research, vol 7. Academic Press Inc., London, pp 225–332

  • Belford RK (1981) Response of winter wheat to prolonged waterlogging under outdoor conditions. J Agric Sci 97:557–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell RQ, Belford RK, Gales K, Dennis CW, Prew RD (1980) Effects of waterlogging at different stages of development on the growth and yield of winter wheat. J Sci Food Agric 31:117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell R, Belford R, Gales K, Thomson R, Webster C (1984) Effects of waterlogging and drought on winter wheat and winter barley grown on a clay and a sandy loam soil. Plant Soil 80:53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de San Celedonio RP, Abeledo LG, Miralles DJ (2014a) Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley. Plant Soil 378:265–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de San Celedonio RP, Micheloud JR, Abeledo GL, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (2014b) Riesgo de anegamiento en trigo (Tritucum aestivum L.) para distintas localidades de la región triguera argentina. Ci Suelo 32:233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • de San Celedonio RP, Abeledo LG, Brihet JM, Miralles DJ (2016) Waterlogging affects leaf and Tillering dynamics in wheat and barley. J Agron Crop Sci 202:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de San Celedonio RP, Abeledo LG, Mantese AI, Miralles DJ (2017) Differential root and shoot biomass recovery in wheat and barley with transient waterlogging during preflowering. Plant Soil 417:481–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2011) InfoStat Profesional. FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina, Grupo InfoStat

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante A, Savin R, Slafer GA (2010) Floret development of durum wheat in response to nitrogen availability. J Exp Bot 61:4351–4359

  • Ferrante A, Savin R, Slafer GA (2013) Floret development and grain setting differences between modern durum wheats under contrasting nitrogen availability. J Exp Bot 64:169–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA (1975) Yield potential of dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Sci 15:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J Agric Sci 105:447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA (2007) Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. J Agric Sci 145:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García del Moral MB, García del Moral LF (1995) Tiller production and survival in relation to grain yield in winter and spring barley. Field Crop Res 44:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ (2003) Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat. Field Crop Res 81:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ (2005) Floret development and survival in wheat plants exposed to contrasting photoperiod and radiation environments during stem elongation. Funct Plant Biol 32:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González FG, Miralles DJ Slafer GA (2011) Wheat floret survival as related to pre-anthesis spike growth. J Exp Bot 62:4889–4901

  • Herzog M, Striker GG, Colmer TD, Pedersen O (2016) Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat–a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant Cell Environ 39:1068–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E and Viega L (2011) Caracterización preliminar de cultivares de trigo y cebada por su comportamiento al estrés hídrico. In: Castro AJ, Hoffman E, Viega L (ed) Limitaciones para la productividad de trigo y cebada. CYTED, Montevideo, pp 53–57

  • Kirby EJM (1988) Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage to anthesis. Field Crop Res 18:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti J, Savin R, Slafer GA (2015) Wheat yield as affected by length of exposure to waterlogging during stem elongation. J Agron Crop Sci 201:473–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miralles DJ, Katz SD, Colloca A, Slafer GA (1998) Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height. Field Crop Res 59:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miralles DJ, Richards RA, Slafer GA (2000) Duration of the stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:931–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Olgun M, Metin Kumlay A, Cemal Adiguzel M, Caglar A (2008) The effect of waterlogging in wheat (T. Aestivum L.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science 58:193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma FN (1984) Effects of flooding on soils. In: Koslowski TT (ed) Flooding and plant growth. Academic Press Inc, Orlando, pp 10–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Prystupa P, Savin R, Slafer GA (2004) Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to N×P fertilization in barley. Field Crop Res 90:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D, Zhang H, Palta JA, Colmer T, Turner NC (2009) Waterlogging affects the growth, development of tillers, and yield of wheat through a severe, but transient, N deficiency. Crop Pasture Sci 60:578–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre K, Van Ginkel M, Rajaram S, Ortiz-Monasterio I (1994) Tolerance to waterlogging losses in spring bread wheat: effect of time of onset on expression. Annual Wheat Newsletter 40:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Setter TL, Waters I (2003) Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant Soil 253:1–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setter TL, Burguess P, Waters I, Kuo J (1999) Genetic diversity of barley and wheat for waterlogging tolerance in Western Australia. Proceeding of the 9th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, Melbourne

  • Slafer GA, Elia M, Savin R, García GA, Terrile II, Ferrante A, Miralles DJ, González FG (2015) Fruiting efficiency: an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield. Food and Energy Security 4:92–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington SR, Cartwright PM, Wall PC (1983) A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistil development in barley and wheat. Ann Bot 51:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res (Oxf) 14:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by projects from the National Agency for Science Promotion (ANPCyT, PICT 1245) and the University of Buenos Aires (UBACYT 20020120100258BA). R.P. de San Celedonio has a scholarship from the National Council for Scientific Research (CONICET).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romina P. de San Celedonio.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de San Celedonio, R.P., Abeledo, L. & Miralles, D.J. Physiological traits associated with reductions in grain number in wheat and barley under waterlogging. Plant Soil 429, 469–481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3708-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3708-4

Keywords

Navigation