Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interplay between soil drying and root exudation in rhizosheath development

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Wetting-drying cycles are important environmental processes known to enhance aggregation. However, very little attention has been given to drying as a process that transports mucilage to inter-particle contacts where it is deposited and serves as binding glue. The objective of this study was to formulate and test conceptual and mathematical models that describe the role of drying in soil aggregation through transportation and deposition of binding agents.

Methods

We used an ESEM to visualize aggregate formation of pair of glass beads. To test our model, we subjected three different sizes of sand to multiple wetting-drying cycles of PGA solution as a mimic of root exudates to form artificial aggregates. Water stable aggregate was determined using wet sieving apparatus.

Results

A model to predict aggregate stability in presence of organic matter was developed, where aggregate stability depends on soil texture as well as the strength, density and mass fraction of organic matter, which was confirmed experimentally. The ESEM images emphasize the role of wetting-drying cycles on soil aggregate formation.

Conclusions

Our experimental results confirmed the mathematical model predictions as well as the ESEM images on the role of drying in soil aggregation as an agent for transport and deposition of binding agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abiven S, Menasseri S, Angers DA, Leterme P (2007) Dynamics of aggregate stability and biological binding agents during decomposition of organic materials. Eur J Soil Sci 58(1):239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abiven S, Menasseri S, Chenu C (2009) The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability—a literature analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 41(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alagoez Z, Yilmaz E (2009) Effects of different sources of organic matter on soil aggregate formation and stability: a laboratory study on a lithic rhodoxeralf from turkey. Soil Tillage Res 103(2):419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albalasmeh AA, Ghezzehei TA (2013a) Adhesion of anionic extracellular polymers with quartz sand. Plant Soil (in review)

  • Albalasmeh AA, Ghezzehei TA (2013b) Role of root exudates on rhizosphere water dynamics: effects on capillary potential and osmotic potential. Vadose Zone J (in review)

  • Albalasmeh AA, Berhe AA, Ghezzehei TA (2013) A new method for rapid determination of carbohydrate and total carbon concentrations using UV spectrophotometry. Carbohydr Polym 97(2):253-261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barre P, Hallett PD (2009) Rheological stabilization of wet soils by model root and fungal exudates depends on clay mineralogy. Eur J Soil Sci 60(4):525–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley R (1982) sand rhizosheath of an arid zone grass. Plant Soil 66(3):417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carminati A, Vetterlein D (2013) Plasticity of rhizosphere hydraulic properties as a key for efficient utilization of scarce resources. Ann Bot 112(2):277–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W (1996) Measurement of rhizosphere respiration and organic matter decomposition using natural 13c. Plant Soil 183:263–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chenu C, Guerif J (1991) Mechanical strength of clay-minerals as influenced by an adsorbed polysaccharide. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55(4):1076–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnes S, Dexter A, Bartoli F (2000a) Wetting and drying cycles in the maize rhizosphere under controlled conditions. Mechanics of the root-adhering soil. Plant Soil 221:253–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnes S, Hallett P, Bengough A, Young I (2000b) Root- and microbial-derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51(3):435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaff MA, Classen AT, Castro HF, Schadt CW (2010) Labile soil carbon inputs mediate the soil microbial community composition and plant residue decomposition rates. New Phytol 188(4):1055–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de León-González F, Celada-Tornel E, Hidalgo-Moreno CI, Etchevers-Barra JD, Gutiérrez-Castorena MC, Flores-Macías A (2006) Root–soil adhesion as affected by crop species in a volcanic sandy soil of Mexico. Soil Tillage Res 90(1–2):77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Yang Y, Ling W, Kong H, Zhu X (2011) Gradient distribution of root exudates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rhizosphere soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1694–1703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gessa C, Deiana S (1990) Fibrillar structure of Ca polygalacturonate as a model for a soil-root interface. Plant Soil 129(2):211–217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gessa C, Deiana S (1992) Ca-polygalacturonate as a model for a soil-root interface. Plant Soil 140(1):1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzehei TA, Or D (2000) Dynamics of soil aggregate coalescence governed by capillary and rheological processes. Water Resour Res 36(2):367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimal JY, Frossard E, Morel JL (2001) Maize root mucilage decreases adsorption of phosphate on goethite. Biol Fertil Soils 33(3):226–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guinel F, McCully M (1986) Some water-related physical properties of maize root-cap mucilage. Plant Cell Environ 9(8):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale MG, Foy CL, Shay FJ, Brady NC (1971) Factors affecting root exudation, vol 23. Academic Press, pp 89–109

  • Hart T, Lynch J, Chamberlain A (2001) Anion exclusion in microbial and soil polysaccharides. Biol Fertil Soils 34(3):201–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, North GB, Nobel PS (1993) Soil sheaths, photosynthate distribution to roots, and rhizosphere water relations for Opuntia ficus-indica. Int J Plant Sci 154:425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Darrah P (1993) Re-sorption of organic compounds by roots of zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 153:47–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper W, Rosenau R (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn, vol 9. American Society of Agronomy/Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 425–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma W, Li XX, Li CJ (2011) Modulation of soil particle size and nutrient availability in the Maize Rhizosheath. Pedosphere 21(4):483–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCully ME (1999) Root xylem embolisms and refilling. Relation to water potentials of soil, roots, and leaves, and osmotic potentials of root xylem sap. Plant Physiol 199:1001–1008. URL: http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/119/3/1001.short

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A, Killham K (1991) A novel method of quantifying root exudation in the presence of soil microflora. Plant Soil 133:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel J, Andreux F, Habib L, Guckert A (1987) Comparison of the adsorption of maize root mucilage and polygalacturonic acid on montmorillonite homoionic to divalent lead and cadmium. Biol Fertil Soils 5(1):13–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morel J, Habib L, Plantureux S, Guckert A (1991) Influence of maize root mucilage on soil aggregate stability. Plant Soil 136(1):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JAW, Bending GD, White PJ (2005) Biological costs and benefits to plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 56(417):1729–1739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar EKS (1976) Uptake of Zn65 from dry soil by plants. Plant Soil 44(1):267–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Old KM, Nicolson TH (1975) Electron microscopical studies of the microflora of roots of sand dune grasses. New Phytol. 74:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olness A, Clapp C (1975) Influence of polysaccharide structure on dextran adsorption by montmorillonite. Soil Biol Biochem 7(2):113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park E, Sul W, Smucker A (2007) Glucose additions to aggregates subjected to drying/wetting cycles promote carbon sequestration and aggregate stability. Soil Biol Biochem 39(11):2758–2768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Hallett PD, Zhang B, Horn R (2011) Physical response of rigid and non-rigid soils to analogues of biological exudates. Eur J Soil Sci 62(5):676–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phares DJ, Smedley GT, Flagan RC (2000) Effect of particle size and material properties on aerodynamic resuspension from surfaces. J Aerosol Sci 31(11):1335–1353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RP, Erlitz Y, Bier R, Bernhardt ES (2008) New approach for capturing soluble root exudates in forest soils. Funct Ecol 22(6):990–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid J, Goss M (1981) Effect of living roots of different plant-species on the aggregate stability of two arable soils. J Soil Sci 32(4):521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid J, Goss M (1982) interactions between soil drying due to plant water-use and decreases in aggregate stability caused by maize roots. J Soil Sci 33(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid C, Mexal J (1977) Water stress effects on root exudation by lodgepole pine. Soil Biol Biochem 9(6):417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson E, Firestone M (1992) Relationship between desiccation and exopolysaccharide production in a soil pseudomonas sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 58(4):1284–1291

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey L, McCully M, Canny M (1995) The expansion of maize root-cap mucilage during hydration .1. kinetics. Physiol Plant 93(1):38–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sideri D (1936) On the formation of structure in soil ii synthesis of aggregates, on the bonds uniting clay with sand and clay with humus. Soil Sci 42(6):461–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Hopper SD, Shane MW (2011) Sand-binding roots in Haemodoraceae: global survey and morphology in a phylogenetic context. Plant Soil 348(1–2):453–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sprent JI (1975) Adherence of sand particles to soybean roots under water stress. New Phytol 74:461–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland IW (2001) Exopolysaccharides in biofilms, flocs and related structures. Water Sci Technol 43(6):77–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall J, Oades J (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33(2):141–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traore O, Groleau-Renaud V, Plantureux S, Tubeileh A, Boeuf-Tremblay V (2000) Effect of root mucilage and modelled root exudates on soil structure. Eur J Soil Sci 51(4):575–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HC (1990) Effects of inceptive motion on particle detachment from surfaces. Aerosol Sci Technol 13(3):386–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watt M, McCully M, Jeffree C (1993) Plant and bacterial mucilages of the maize rhizosphere: comparison of their soil binding properties and histochemistry in a model system. Plant Soil 151:151–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watt M, McCully ME, Canny MJ (1994) Formation and Stabilization of Rhizosheaths of Zea mays L. (Effect of Soil Water Content). Plant Physiol 106:179–186

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Hallett PD, Zhang G (2008) Increase in the fracture toughness and bond energy of clay by a root exudate. Eur J Soil Sci 59(5):855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding by United States Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture-Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (USDA-NIFA-AFRI) under award number 2010-65107-20484. The authors thank Dr. Markus Berli and Dr. Thomas Gebrenegus for their helpful comments and suggestions. The authors thank Michael Dunlap for the help provided with the SEM and ESEM works through Imaging and Microscopy Facility (IMF) at University of California, Merced.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teamrat A. Ghezzehei.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Tim Simon George.

Appendices

Appendix A Geometrical considerations

Recall the dimensionless of Young–Laplace equation (Eq. 5)

$$ \psi = \frac{1}{r_1}-\frac{1}{r_2} $$
(21)

From the right angle triangle in Fig. 9 using Pythagorean equation we have

$$ ({r_1}+{r_2})^2+1=({r_2}+1)^2 $$
(22)
Fig. 9
figure 9

Dimensionless geometric definitions of capillary water

By solving Eqs. 21 and 22 simultaneously using the Solve function of Mathematica (Wolfram Inc., Champaign, IL), analytical expression for r 1 and r 2 can be written as

$$ r_1= \frac{4}{3+\sqrt{9-8 \psi }} $$
(23)
$$ r_2=-\frac{r_1}{r_1 \psi -1} = \frac{4}{3+ \sqrt{9-8 \psi }-4 \psi } $$
(24)

From Fig. 9 we can calculate the half wetting angle (φ) as

$$ \varphi = ArcCos(\frac{1}{1 + r_2}) $$
(25)

Appendix B Pendular liquid volume

The liquid-vapor interface is described by equation of circle in the x-z plane as

$$ f(z)= \sqrt{r_2^2-z^2}+r_1+r_2 $$
(26)

the total volume (V t ) retained behind the interface is a solid of revolution around the z axis, given by

$$ V_t = \pi \int_0^c (f(z))^2 dz $$
(27)

which can be calculated by substituting Eq. 26 in Eq. 27

$$\begin{array}{rll} V_t&=&\pi \left(-\frac{c^3}{3}+c \left(\text{r1} \left(\sqrt{\text{r2}^2-c^2}+2 \text{r2}\right)\right.\right. \\ && \quad\left.\left. +\,\text{r2} \left(\sqrt{\text{r2}^2-c^2}+2 \text{r2}\right)+\text{r1}^2\right)\right. \\ &&\quad\left. +\,\text{r2}^2 (\text{r1}+\text{r2}) \sin ^{-1}\left(\frac{c}{\text{r2}}\right)\right) \end{array}$$
(28)

The volume of solid (V s ) behind the meniscus represented by spherical cap of radius R and cap c, given by

$$ V_s = \frac{1}{3}\pi c^2 (3-c) $$
(29)

where c is obtained from simple geometric relation from Fig. 9 as

$$ c = \frac{r_2}{1 + r_2} $$
(30)

The volume of liquid (V l ) can be found by subtracting Eq. 29 from Eq. 28, given by

$$ V_l=\frac{\pi r_2 \left(3 (r_2+1)^2 \left(2 r_1+\sqrt{\frac{r_2^3 (r_2+2)}{(r_2+1)^2}}+2 r_2+r_2 (r_2+1) \sec ^{-1}(r_2+1)\right)-2 r_2 (2 r_2+3)\right)}{3 (r_2+1)^3} $$
(31)

The ratio of the liquid volume to the solid volume is obtained by substituting Eqs. 23 and 24 in Eq. 31, then divided by the solid volume (4/3 π)

$$ \begin{array}{lll} &&\frac{V_l}{V_s} \\&& =\frac{3 \left(\frac{4}{-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3}+1\right)^2 \left(\frac{4 \sqrt{2} \sqrt{-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+5}}{8 \psi ^2-4 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+6\right) \psi +5 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)}+\frac{8}{-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3}+\frac{8}{\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3}+\frac{4 \left(-4 \psi + \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+7\right) \sec ^{-1}\left(\frac{4}{-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3}+1\right)}{\left(-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)^2}\right)-\frac{8 \left(-12 \psi +3 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+17\right)}{\left(-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)^2}}{\left(\frac{4}{-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3}+1\right)^3 \left(-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)} \end{array} $$
(32)

The ratio of the liquid volume to the solid volume (Eq. 32) was fitted over a wide range of potential using the sum of squared error (sse) to the following equation:

$$ \frac{\emph{v}_L}{\emph{v}_S} =\left(1 + (c \psi)^d \right)^{-1} $$
(33)

where c = 7/5 and d = 5/4

Similarly, the width of the capillary meniscus (r 1) can be expressed as a function of the capillary pressure by solving Eq. 31 for r 1 then substitute r 2 from Eq. 24

$$ r_1 = \frac{16 \left(-128 \psi ^6+64 \left(3 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+28\right) \psi ^5-272 \left(5 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+29\right) \psi ^4+32 \left(113 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+507\right) \psi ^3-8 \left(574 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+2167\right) \psi ^2+60 \left(47 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+156\right) \psi -675 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)\right)}{\left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right) \left(-4 \psi +\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+7\right) \left(-8 \psi ^2+4 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+6\right) \psi -5 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)\right) \left(-16 \psi ^3+12 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+5\right) \psi ^2-4 \left(5 \sqrt{9-8 \psi }+18\right) \psi +9 \left(\sqrt{9-8 \psi }+3\right)\right)} $$
(34)

The width of the capillary meniscus (r 1) was fitted over a wide range of potential using the sum of squared error (sse) to the following equation:

$$ r_1 = \frac{2}{3}\left(1 + (a \psi)^b \right)^{-1/2} $$
(35)

where a = 3/8 and b = 9/10.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albalasmeh, A.A., Ghezzehei, T.A. Interplay between soil drying and root exudation in rhizosheath development. Plant Soil 374, 739–751 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1910-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1910-y

Keywords

Navigation