Abstract
Aims
Regrowth of dual-purpose canola after grazing is important for commercial success and the aim of this research was to investigate the effects of defoliation on the development, growth, photosynthesis and allocation of carbohydrates.
Methods
We conducted two pot experiments in which defoliation was conducted at multiple intensities with scissors. Experiment 1 determined changes in flowering date due to defoliation while Experiment 2 investigated the effects of defoliation on growth, photosynthesis and allocation of carbohydrates in canola.
Results
Time to the appearance of the first flower was delayed by up to 9 days after the removal of all leaves at the start of stem elongation (GS30), and up to 19 days if the elongating bud was also removed. Stem growth rate decreased by 56–86 % due to defoliation and tap roots did not increase in mass when plants were completely defoliated. Leaf area continued to expand at the same rate as in un-defoliated plants. The new leaf area established per gram of regrowth biomass over 20 days was 158 cm2.g-1 for the complete defoliation treatments compared with 27 cm2.g−1 for the half-defoliated treatment and 13 cm2.g−1 for the un-defoliated treatment. Despite a reduction in total biomass of up to 60 %, the proportion of dry matter partitioned to the leaves was 18 % for all treatments within 20 days after defoliation. Total non-structural carbohydrate levels were reduced rapidly in the stem by day two (predominately sucrose) and the tap root by day four (predominately starch) after defoliation and did not recover to match un-defoliated plant levels within 20 days. Residual leaves on defoliated plants maintained photosynthetic rate compared with the same leaf cohorts on un-defoliated plants in which photosynthetic rate decreased to 39 % by day 12.
Conclusions
The rapid recovery of leaf area in defoliated canola was facilitated by the sustained high photosynthetic rate in remaining leaves, rapid mobilisation of stored sugars (stem) and starch (root), and a cessation of root and stem growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyce PJ, Volenec JJ (1992) Taproot carbohydrate concentrations and stress tolerance of contrasting alfalfa genotypes. Crop Sci 32:757–761
Clarke JM (1978) The effects of leaf removal on yield and yield components of Brassica napus. Can J Plant Sci 58:1103–1105
Davidson RL (1969) Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover. Ann Bot 33:561–569
Evans AS (1991) Whole-plant responses of Brassica campestris (Cruciferae) to altered sink-source relations. Am J Bot 78:394–400
Harrison MT, Kelman WM, Moore AD, Evans JR (2010) Grazing winter wheat relieves plant water stress and transiently enhances photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol 37:726–736
Hocking PJ, Stapper M (2001) Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components. Aust J Agric Res 52:623–634
Hocking PJ, Kirkegaard JA, Angus JF, Gibson AH, Koetz EA (1997) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49:107–125
Hodgkinson KC (1974) Influence of partial defoliation on photosynthesis, photorespiration and transpiration by lucerne leaves of different ages. Aust J Plant Physiol 1:561–578
Khan NA (2003) Changes in photosynthetic biomass accumulation, auxin and ethylene level following defoliation in Brassica juncea. Braz J Plant Physiol 1:125–128
Khan NA, Lone PM (2005) Effects of early and late season defoliation on photosynthesis, growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 17:181–186
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Kelman WM, Marcroft SJ, Lieschke A, Howe GN, Graham JM (2008) Dual-purpose canola—a new opportunity in mixed farming systems. Aust J Agric Res 59:291–302
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Hamblin PJ, Graham JM, Lilley JM (2012a) Refining crop and livestock management for dual-purpose spring canola (Brassica napus). Crop & Pasture Science 63:429–443
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Lilley JM, McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Morrison MJ (2012b) Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments. Field Crops Research 125:61–68
Lawson AR, Kelly KB, Sale PWG (2000) Defoliation frequency and cultivar effects on the storage and utilisation of stolon and root reserves in white clover. Aust J Agric Res 51:1039–1046
Li R, Volenec JJ, Joern BC, Cunningham SM (1996) Seasonal changes in nonstructural carbohydrates, protein, and macronutrients in roots of alfalfa, red clover, sweetclover, and birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci 36:617–623
Lunn GD, Spink JH, Stokes DT, Wade A, Clare RW, Scott RK (2001) Canopy management in winter oilseed rape. Home Grown Cereals Authority OS49
Major DJ (1975) Stomatal frequency and distribution in rape. Can J Plant Sci 55:1077–1078
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Growth, recovery and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) in the medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63:635–646
Meier U (1997) Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH-monograph. Berlin, Blackwell Science
Mendham NJ, Salisbury PA (1995) Physiology: Crop Development, Growth and Yield. In: Kimber S, McGregor DI (eds) Brassica oilseeds. production and utilization. CAB International: Wallingford, England, pp 11–64
Noquet C, Avice JC, Rossato L, Beauclair P, Henry MP, Ourry A (2004) Effects of altered source-sink relationships on N allocation and vegetative storage protein accumulation in Brassica napus L. Plant Science 166:1007–1018
Pechan PA, Morgan DG (1985) Defoliation and its effects on pod and seed development in oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.). J Exp Bot 36:458–468
Ramachandran S, Buntin GD, All JN (2000) Response of canola to simulated diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) defoliation at different growth stages. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80
Richards JH (1993) Physiology of plants recovering from defoliation. Grasslands for our world 46–54
Rossato L, Laine P, Ourry A (2001) Nitrogen storage and remobilization in Brassica napus L. during the growth cycle: nitrogen fluxes within the plant and changes in soluble protein patterns. J Exp Bot 52:1655–1663
Smith JP, Holzapfel BP (2009) Cumulative responses of semillon grapevines to late season perturbation of carbohydrate reserve status. Am J Enol Vitic 60:461–470
Spink JH (1992) Winter oilseed rape: effect of partial defoliation. Home Grown Cereals Authority
Susko DJ, Superfisky B (2009) A comparison of artificial defoliation techniques using canola (Brassica napus). Plant Ecol 202:169–175
Thurling N, Vijendra Das LD (1979) The relationship between pre-anthesis development and seed yield of spring rape (Brassica napus L.). Aust J Agric Res 31:25–36
Van den Boogaard R, Grevsen K, Thorup-Kristensen K (2001) Effects of defoliation on growth of cauliflower. Sci Hortic 91:1–16
Virgona JM, Gummer FAJ, Angus JF (2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen Use. Aust J Agric Res 57:1307–1319
Volenec JJ, Ourry A, Joern BC (1996) A role for nitrogen reserves in forage regrowth and stress tolerance. Physiol Plant 97:185–193
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Kirstina Lamont from the National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Wagga Wagga, for conducting the carbohydrate analysis and for the helpful comments provided on the manuscript by Professor Derrick Moot, Lincoln University, New Zealand. Funding support to Dr McCormick was provided by an Australian Postgraduate Award and E H Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation PhD top up stipend. Dr Kirkegaard’s time on the project was funded by GRDC Project CSP00085.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Martin Weih.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCormick, J.I., Virgona, J.M. & Kirkegaard, J.A. Regrowth of spring canola (Brassica napus) after defoliation. Plant Soil 372, 655–668 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1776-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1776-z