Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of historic grazing on steppe soils on the northern Tibetan Plateau

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Few studies have focused on changes in the physical and chemical properties of soils that are induced by grazing at high altitudes. Our aim was to identify potential responses of soil to grazing pressure on the semiarid steppe of the northern Tibetan Plateau and their probable causes.

Methods

Fractal geometry to describe soil structure, soil dynamics, and physical processes within soil is becoming an increasingly useful tool that allows a better understanding of the performance of soil systems. In this study, we sampled four experimental areas in the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau under different grazing intensities: ungrazed, lightly grazed, moderately grazed and heavily grazed plots. Fractal methods were applied to characterise particle-size distributions and pore patterns of soils under different grazing intensities.

Results

Our results reveal a highly significant decrease in the fractal dimensions of particle size distributions (D 1 ) and the fractal dimensions of all pores (D 2 ) with increasing grazing intensity. Soil organic carbon (SOC), total N and total P concentrations increased significantly with decreasing grazing intensity. We did not find differences in soil pH in response to grazing.

Conclusions

Grazing induced a significant deterioration of the physical and chemical topsoil properties in the semiarid steppe of the northern Tibetan Plateau. Fractal dimensions can be a useful parameter for quantifying soil degradation due to human activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bisigato AJ, Laphitz RML, Carrera AL (2008) Non-linear relationships between grazing pressure and conservation of soil resources in Patagonian Monte shrublands. J Arid Environ 72:1464–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos A, Oleschko K, Etchevers J, Hidalgo C (2007) Exploring the effect of changes in land use on soil quality on the eastern slope of the Cofre de Perote Volcano (Mexico). For Ecol Manage 248:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filgueira RR, Fournier LL, Sarl GO, Piro A, Aragón A (1997) Aplicación de la matemática fractal a la fragmentacion de un suelo. Ciencia del Suelo (Argentina) 15:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Filgueira RR, Fournier LL, Sarli GO, Aragón A, Rawls WJ (1999) Sensitivity of fractal parameters of soil aggregates to different management practices in a Phaeozem in central Argentina. Soil Tillage Res 52:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foth HD (1990) Fundamentals of soil science. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AB, Tanaka DL, Hofmann L, Follett RF (1995) Soil carbon and nitrogen of northern Great Plains grasslands as influenced by long-term grazing. J Range Manage 48:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu H, Pei SF, Wan CG, Sosebee RE (2009) Fractal dimension of soil particle size distribution along an altitudinal gradient in the Alxa Rangeland, Western Inner Mongolia. Arid Land Res Manag 23:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez D, Allmaras RR, Huggins DR, Nater EA (1998) Mass, surface, and fragmentation fractal dimensions of soil fragments produced by tillage. Geoderma 86:261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajnos M, Korsunskaia L, Pachepsky Y (2000) Soil pore surface properties in managed grasslands. Soil Tillage Res 55:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatano R, Kawamura N, Ikeda J, Sakuma T (1992) Evaluation of the effect of morphological features of flow paths on solute transport by using fractal dimensions of methylene blue staining pattern. Geoderma 53:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISSCAS (Institute of Soil Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (1978) Physical and chemical analysis methods of soils. Shanghai Science Technology Press, Shanghai, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusoff K (1988) Influence of sheep grazing on soil chemical properties and growth of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Malaysia. Agrofor Syst 7:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak E, Pachepsky YA, Sokolowski S, Sokolowska Z, Stepniewski W (1996) A modified number-based method for estimating fragmentation fractal dimensions of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1291–1297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Hao X, Zhao M, Han G, Willms WD (2008) Influence of historic sheep grazing on vegetation and soil properties of a Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 128:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SZ, Zhou L, Qiu CS, Zhang JP, Fang YP, Gao WS (1999) Study on grassland degradation and desertification in the Tibetan Plateau. Tibet People’s Press, Lhasa (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipieca J, Hatanob R, Słowińska-Jurkiewicz A (1998) The fractal dimension of pore distribution patterns in variously-compacted soil. Soil Tillage Res 47:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1951) Adaptation d’un message sur la ligne de transmission, I & II. Comptes Rendus (Paris) 232:1638–1640

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (2004) Fractals and chaos: the Mandelbrot set and beyond. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Mena M, Deeks LK, Williams AG (1999) An evaluation of a fragmentation fractal dimension technique to determine soil erodibility. Geoderma 90:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarron JK, Knapp AK, Blair JM (2003) Soil C and N responses to woody plant expansion in a mesic grassland. Plant Soil 257:183–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millan H, Gonzalez-Posasa M, Aguilar M (2003) On the fractal scaling of soil data, particle-size distributions. Geoderma 122:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff JC, Reynolds RL, Belnap J, Lamothe P (2005) Multi-decadal impacts of grazing on soil physical and biogeochemical properties in southeast Utah. Ecol Appl 15:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleschko K, Fuentes C, Brambila F, Alvarez R (1997) Linear fractal analysis of three mexican soils in different management systems. Soil Technology 10:207–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky Y (2000) Fractals in soil science. Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam

  • Pei SF, Fu H, Wan CG (2008) Changes in soil properties and vegetation following exclosure and grazing in degraded Alxa desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Age Ecosyst 124:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peth S, Horn R (2006) Consequences of grazing on soil physcial and mechanical properties in forest and tundra environments. In: Forbes BC et al (eds) Ecology Studies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 217–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Słowinska-Jurkiewicz A, Domżał H (1991) The structure of the cultivated horizon of soil compacted by the wheels of agricultural tractors. Soil Till Res 19:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit A, Kooijman AM (2001) Impact of grazing on the input of organic matter and nutrients to the soil in a grass-encroached Scots pine forest. For Ecol Manage 142:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens M, Kölbl A, Totsche KU, Kögel-Knabner I (2008) Grazing effects on soil chemical and physical properties in a semiarid steppe of Inner Mongolia (P.R. China). Geoderma 143:63–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su YZ, Zhao HL, Zhao WZ, Zhang TH (2004) Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating desertification. Geoderma 122:43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Anderson SH (2008) CT-measured pore characteristics of surface and subsurface soils influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers. Geoderma 145:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XD, Li MH, Liu SZ, Liu GC (2006) Fractal characteristics of soils under different land-use patterns in the arid and semiarid regions of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Geoderma 134:56–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JH, Liu SZ, Zhong XH (2006) Distribution of soil organic carbon and phosphorus on an eroded hillslope of the rangeland in the northernTibet Plateau, China. Eur J Soil Sci 57:365–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KZCX2-YW-QN314) and the One Hundred Young Persons Project of Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. SDSQB-2010-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaodan Wang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Alexia Stokes.

Appendix

Appendix

Equation 2 was derived from a modified number-based method for estimating fractal dimensions of soils. The following algorithm was extracted from Kozak et al. (1996).

As suggested by Mandelbrot (1982), the fractal dimension, D, is defined as

$$ N(x > {x_{{\min }}}) = kx_{{\min }}^D $$
(A1)

where x min is a linear size, N (x > x min ) is the number of objects with linear sizes, x, greater than x min and k is a constant.

According to Eq. A1, the number of soil particles greater than x n is calculated as

$$ N(x > {x_n}) = \sum\limits_{{i = 1}}^n {\frac{{M({x_{{i - 1}}} > x > {x_i})}}{{{c_i}{\rho_i}\bar{x}_i^3}}} $$
(A2)

where M is a set of relative masses of soil particles and n is the total number of classes. The symbol ρ i designates the particle density, and c i is the constant related to the particle shape. In a fraction of sizes x i-1 > x > x i , the number of particles, N (x i-1 > x > x i ), is related to the mass of this fraction, M (x i-1 > x > x i ), as

$$ N({x_{{i - 1}}} > x > {x_i}) = \frac{{M({x_{{i - 1}}} > x > {x_i})}}{{{c_i}{\rho_i}\bar{x}_i^3}} $$
(A3)

where \( {\bar{x}_i} \) is a characteristic particle size. A common assumption is that

$$ {\bar{x}_i} = \frac{{{x_{{i - 1}}} + > {x_i}}}{2} $$
(A4)

If we treat the mass of the ith fraction, M (x i-1 > x > x i ) as a sum of the masses of the P subfractions,

$$ M({x_{{i - 1}}} > x > {x_i}) = \sum\limits_{{j = 1}}^p {M({y_{{j - 1}}} > y > {y_j})} $$
(A5)

where

$$ {y_0} = {x_{{i - 1}}},{y_j} = {x_{{i - 1}}} + ({x_i} - {x_{{i - 1}}})\frac{j}{p},{y_p} = {x_i},j = 1,2, \ldots, p $$
(A6)

If the particle size distribution satisfies Eq. A1, the number of particles of sizes y j-1  > y > y j is equal to

$$ N({y_{{j - 1}}} > y > {y_j}) = k\left( {y_j^{{ - D}} - y_{{j - 1}}^{{ - D}}} \right) $$
(A7)

Substituting the above into Eq. A3, we have

$$ M({y_{{j - 1}}} > y > {y_j}) = k{c_j}{\rho_j}\bar{y}_j^3\left( {y_j^{{ - D}} - y_{{j - 1}}^{{ - D}}} \right) $$
(A8)

We assume that within a given fraction i, c j and ρ j are constants equal to c i and ρ i . Then, as the value of subfraction p approaches infinity, we derive the following from Eqs. A4 and A8 applied to the right-hand side of Eq. A5:

$$ \frac{{M({x_{{i - 1}}} > x > {x_i})}}{{{c_i}{\rho_i}k}} = \mathop{{\lim }}\limits_{{p \to \infty }} \sum\limits_{{j = 1}}^p {\left( {y_j^{{ - D}} - y_{{j - 1}}^{{ - D}}} \right)\bar{y}_j^3} $$
(A9)

Using Taylor’s expansion, we derive

$$ \mathop{{\lim }}\limits_{{p \to \infty }} \sum\limits_{{j = 1}}^p {\left( {y_j^{{ - D}} - y_{{j - 1}}^{{ - D}}} \right)\bar{y}_j^3} = D\int {_x^{{{x_{{i - 1}}}}}} {y^{{2 - D}}}dy $$
(A10)

Integration in Eq. A10 yields Eq. 2:

$$ \frac{{M({x_{{i - 1}}} > x > {x_i})}}{{{c_i}{p_i}k}} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\frac{D}{{3 - D}}\left( {x_{{i - 1}}^{{3 - D}} - x_i^{{3 - D}}} \right),\quad D \ne 3} \\ {3\ln (\frac{{{x_{{i - 1}}}}}{{{x_i}}}),\quad D = 3} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Yan, Y. & Cao, Y. Impact of historic grazing on steppe soils on the northern Tibetan Plateau. Plant Soil 354, 173–183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1053-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1053-y

Keywords

Navigation