Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of physical and chemical properties of spent foundry sands pertinent to beneficial use in manufactured soils

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As of 2007, of the 2,000 United States foundries, 93% produce ferrous or aluminum castings, generating 9.4 million tons of non-hazardous spent foundry sand (SFS) annually. Only 28% of the SFS is beneficially used. The U.S. EPA Resource Conservation Challenge identifies SFS as a priority material for beneficial use, with soil blending as a potential reuse option. The objectives of this work were to measure: (1) select chemical and physical properties important to soil quality and function and (2) total and soluble elemental content of 39 SFSs, in order to evaluate SFS suitability as a component in manufactured soils. Total elemental concentration of the SFS was lower than natural background soil levels for most elements analyzed, suggesting limited to no contamination of the virgin sand during metal casting. Pore water elemental concentrations were generally below detection. However, both total and soluble elemental content indicate a potential contribution of plant nutrients. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) planted in SFS mixtures had a median germination rate of 96.9% relative to the control. Blending SFS at varying ratios with other materials will allow “tailoring” of a manufactured soil’s chemical and physical properties to meet specific growing needs. The SFS organic carbon, clay, and plant nutrient content are benefits of SFS that may make them good candidates as manufactured soil components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Foundry Society (2007) Foundry industry benchmarking survey: industry practices regarding the disposal and beneficial reuse of foundry sand.

  • ASTM (2002) Standard E1963, Standard guide for conducting terrestrial plant toxicity tests . ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soil, 12th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey P (2002) Sand/binders/sand preparation and coremaking. Foundry Manage Technol 130:39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • De Koff J, Lee BD, Dungan RS (2008) Amelioration of hardsetting properties in waste foundry sands. J Environ Qual 37:2332–2338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1996) Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Sci Soc Am J Spec Publ 49, Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI

  • Dungan RS (2006) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phenolics in ferrous and non-ferrous waste foundry sands. J Res Sci Technol 3:203–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dungan RS, Dees N (2007) Use of spinach, radish, and perennial ryegrass to assess the availability of metals in waste foundry sands. Water Air Soil Pollut 183:213–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dungan RS, Kukier U, Lee BD (2006) Blending foundry sands with soil: effect on dehydrogenase activity. Sci Total Environ 357:221–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dungan RS, Lee BD, Shouse P, De Koff JP (2007) Saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils blended with waste foundry sands. Soil Sci 10:751–758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dungan RS, Hwue J, Chaney RL (2009) Concentrations of PCDD/PCDFs and PCBs in spent foundry sands. Chemosphere 75:1232–1235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RD, Richardson CJ (1986) Aluminate toxicity as a factor controlling plant growth in bauxite residue. Environ Toxicol Chem 5:905–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis:physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, pp 383–411

  • Kinraide TB (1990) Assessing the rhyizotoxicity of the aluminate ion Al(OH) 4 . Plant Physiol 94:1620–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay BJ, Logan TJ (2005) Agricultural reuse of foundry sand. J Res Sci Technol 2:3–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy EL (1998) Sand and organic amendment influences on soil physical properties related to turf establishment. Agron J 90:411–419

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeague JA, Day JH (1993) Ammonium oxalate extraction of amorphous iron and aluminum. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel J-L (1997) Bioavailability of trace elements to terrestrial plants. In: Tarradellas J et al (eds) Soil ecotoxicolgy. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3-chemical methods. SSSA Book Series 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes JD (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3-chemical methods. SSSA Book Series 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger RS, Papendick RI (1986) Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DB, Cannon WF, Woodruff LG, Garrett RB, Klassen R, Kilburn JE, Horton JD, King HD, Goldhaber MB, Morrison JM (2005) Major -and trace-element concentrations in soils from two continental-scale transects of the United States and Canada. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1253/pdf/OFR1253.pdf

  • Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3 chemical methods. SSSA Book Series 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils Method 3051 SW-846. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Contract laboratory program statement of work for inorganic analysis, multimedia, multiconcentration. Document ILM04.0. U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Beneficial reuse of foundry sand: a review of state practices and regulations. Sectors Strategies Division, Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation, Washington DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2006) State toolkit for developing beneficial reuse programs for foundry sand. EPA100-R-06-003 www.epa.gov/sectors

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Resource conservation challenge www.epa.gov/osw/rcc/index.htm

  • USDA-NRCS (2009) Soil texture calculator, www.soils.usda.gov/technical/aids/investigations/texture/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Dayton.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Peter Christie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dayton, E.A., Whitacre, S.D., Dungan, R.S. et al. Characterization of physical and chemical properties of spent foundry sands pertinent to beneficial use in manufactured soils. Plant Soil 329, 27–33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0120-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0120-0

Keywords

Navigation