Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of rhizosphere components using visible–near infrared spectral images

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To establish new techniques for automatic classification of rhizosphere components, we investigated the utility of visible (VIS) and near–infrared (NIR) spectral images of the rhizosphere under two soil moisture conditions (mean volumetric water content: 0.39 and 0.16 cm3 cm−3). Spectral reflectance images of the belowground parts of hybrid poplar cuttings (Populus deltoides × P. euramericana, I45/51) grown in a rhizobox were recorded at 120 spectral bands ranging from 480 to 972 nm. We examined which wavelengths were suitable and the number of spectral bands needed to accurately classify live roots of four age classes, dead roots, leaf mold, and soil. VIS reflectance (<700 nm) of live roots first increased and then decreased with age, whereas NIR reflectance (≥700 nm) was stable in mature roots. The reflectance of dead roots was lower than that of mature roots in both the VIS and NIR spectral regions. VIS reflectance did not differ among dead roots, leaf mold, and soil, but the NIR reflectance was clearly lower in soil than in the other materials. The reflectance of leaf mold and soil increased mainly in the NIR spectral region with reducing soil moisture, but this increase did not affect the order of reflectance intensity among the rhizosphere components in general. Although the most suitable spectral bands statistically selected for classifying rhizosphere components differed somewhat between moist and dry conditions, the spectral bands 580–679 nm (VIS) and 848–894 nm (NIR) provided high reliability under both conditions. Classification accuracy was higher when using two to five VIS–NIR images (overall accuracy ≥87.8%) than three VIS images (red, green, and blue; accuracy <67.1%). The high accuracy with VIS–NIR was mainly due to successful separation of leaf mold and soil. Irrespective of soil moisture condition, the overall accuracy tended to be stable at 92–94% with use of four VIS–NIR images. The spectral bands effective in wet soil conditions could also be used for classification in dry conditions, with overall accuracies >86.9%. These results suggest that automatic image analysis using VIS–NIR images at four spectral bands, including red and NIR, allows for accurate classification of the growth stage or live/dead status of roots and distinguishes between leaf mold and soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DAP:

Days after planting

EVA:

Ethylene vinyl acetate

NIR:

Near-infrared

UV:

Ultraviolet

VIS:

Visible

VWC:

Volumetric water content

References

  • Aase JK, Tanaka DL (1991) Reflectance from four wheat residue cover densities as influenced by three soil backgrounds. Agron J 83:753–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldakheel YY, Danson FM (1997) Spectral reflectance of dehydrating leaves: measurements and modelling. Int J Remote Sens 18:3683–3690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen WA, Gausman HW, Richardson AJ, Thomas JR (1969) Interaction of isotropic light with a compact plant leaf. J Opt Soc Am 59:1376–1379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini E, Facini O, Nerozzi F, Rossi F, Rotondi A (1997) Leaf characteristics and optical properties of different woody species. Trees 12:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas LH, Eissenstat DM, Lakso AN (2000) Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning. New Phytol 147:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conel JE, van den Bosch J, Grove CI (1993) Application of a two-stream radiative transfer model for leaf lignin and cellulose concentrations from spectral reflectance measurements. Part 2. In: Green RO (ed) Summaries of the Fourth Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, pp 45-51

  • Daughtry CST (2001) Discriminating crop residues from soil by shortwave infrared reflectance. Agron J 93:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daughtry CST, McMurtrey JE III, Chappele EW, Dulaney WP, Irons JR, Satterwhite MB (1995) Potential for discriminating crop residues from soil by reflectance and fluorescence. Agron J 87:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TP, Curran PJ, Plummer SE (1998) LIBERTY: modeling the effects of leaf biochemical concentration on reflectance spectra. Remote Sens Environ 65:50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates DM, Keegan HJ, Schleter JC, Weidner VR (1965) Spectral properties of plants. Appl Opt 4:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gausman HW (1974) Leaf reflectance of near-infrared. Photogramm Eng 40:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Gausman HW, Allen WA (1973) Optical parameters of leaves of 30 plant species. Plant Physiol 52:57–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon D, David J-F (2001) The use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to study chemical changes in the leaf litter consumed by saprophagous invertebrates. Soil Biol Biochem 33:2159–2161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon D, Houssard C, Joffre R (1999) Using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content in heterogeneous plant material. Oecologia 118:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeraman DA, Crown PH, Juma NG (1993) A color composite technique for detecting root dynamics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) from minirhizotron images. Plant Soil 157:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1992) The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73:1094–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hishi T (2007) Heterogeneity of individual roots within the fine root architecture: causal links between physiological and ecosystem functions. J For Res 12:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hishi T, Takeda H (2005) Life cycles of individual roots in fine root system of Chamecyparis obtusa Sieb. et Zucc. J For Res 10:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons JR, Weismiller RA, Peterson GW (1989) Soil reflectance. In: Asrar G (ed) Theory and applications of optical remote sensing. Wiley, New York, pp 66–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemoud S, Baret F (1990) PROSPECT: a model of leaf optical properties spectra. Remote Sens Environ 34:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Carter GA (1998) Variability in leaf optical properties among 26 species from a broad range of habitats. Am J Bot 85:940–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher W (2001) Physiological plant ecology, 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 513

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Asner GP (2002) Moisture effects on soil reflectance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:722–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Öhrvik J (2004) Interactive effects of soil warming and fertilization on root production, mortality, and longevity in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden. Glob Chang Biol 10:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Pregitzer K, Morén A-S, Nylund J-E, Göran IÅ (2005) Measuring fine root turnover in forest ecosystems. Plant Soil 276:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagler PL, Daughtry CST, Goward SN (2000) Plant litter and soil reflectance. Remote Sens Environ 71:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagler PL, Inoue Y, Glenn EP, Russ AL, Daughtry CST (2003) Cellulose absorption index (CAI) to quantify mixed soil–plant litter scenes. Remote Sens Environ 87:310–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Ledford J, Reilly CD, Miller NE, O’Neill EG (2004) Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9689–9693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oguma H, Tsuchida S, Fujinuma Y (2002) The development of a hyper-spectral camera system for forest monitoring. J Remote Sens Soc Jpn 22:588–597 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavanian AM, Silk WK (1988) Effect of temperature on spatial and temporal aspects of growth in the primary maize root. Plant Physiol 87:529–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA, Jia X (1999) Remote sensing digital image analysis, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 363

    Google Scholar 

  • Roumet C, Picon-Cochard C, Dawson LA, Joffre R, Mayes R, Blanchard A, Brewer MJ (2006) Quantifying species composition in root mixtures using two methods: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and plant wax markers. New Phytol 170:631–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Sveinbjornsson B, Allen MF, Maurer GE (2003) Coupling fine root dynamics with ecosystem carbon cycling in black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecol Monogr 73:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schowengerdt RA (1983) Digital image classification. In: Schowengerdt RA (ed) Techniques for image processing and classification in remote sensing. Academic, New York, pp 129–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp RE, Silk WK, Hsiao TC (1988) Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials. I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol 87:50–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slaton MR, Hunt ER Jr, Smith WK (2001) Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics. Am J Bot 88:278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Zuin A (1996) Root growth dynamics of Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera) and leeks (Allium porrum L.) as reflected by root length, root colour and UV fluorescence. Plant Soil 185:271–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, George E, Groenwold J (2000) Root observations and measurements at (transparent) interfaces with soil. In: Smit AL, Bengough AG, Engels C, van Noordwick M, Pellerin S, van de Geijn SC (eds) Root methods: a handbook. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 235–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner ER, Baumgardner MF (1981) Characteristics in reflectance of surface soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1161–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain PH, Davis SM (1978) Remote sensing: the quantitative approach. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J Exp Bot 49:419–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twomey SA, Bohren CF, Mergenthaleret JL (1986) Reflectance and albedo differences between wet and dry surfaces. Appl Opt 25:431–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Burch WH, Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ (1995) Accuracy of visible and ultraviolet light for estimating live root proportions with minirhizotrons. Ecology 76:2330–2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt M, Silk WK, Passioura JB (2006) Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial development of the rhizosphere. Ann Bot 97:839–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells CE, Eissenstat DM (2001) Marked differences in survivorship among apple roots of different diameters. Ecology 82:882–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand CL, Richardson AJ (1992) Relating spectral observations of the agricultural landscape to crop yield. Food Struct 11:249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Withington JM, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM (2006) Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecol Monogr 76:381–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to Dr. Y. Fujinuma, Dr. T. Takeda (National Institute for Environmental Studies), and Mr. R. Fukushi (Pasco Corporation) for technical support in the data analysis. This research was supported by Funding to Promote Creative Research in National Institute for Environmental Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuro Nakaji.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Hinsinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakaji, T., Noguchi, K. & Oguma, H. Classification of rhizosphere components using visible–near infrared spectral images. Plant Soil 310, 245–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9478-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9478-z

Keywords

Navigation