Abstract
A variety of plant species have been genetically modified to accumulate vaccine antigens for human and animal health and the first vaccine candidates are approaching the market. The regulatory burden for animal vaccines is less than that for human use and this has attracted the attention of researchers and companies, and investment in plant-made vaccines for animal infectious disease control is increasing. The dosage cost of vaccines for animal infectious diseases must be kept to a minimum, especially for non-lethal diseases that diminish animal welfare and growth, so efficient and economic production, storage and delivery are critical for commercialization. It has become clear that transgenic plants are an economic and efficient alternative to fermentation for large-scale production of vaccine antigens. The oral delivery of plant-made vaccines is particularly attractive since the expensive purification step can be avoided further reducing the cost per dose. This review covers the current status of plant-produced vaccines for the prevention of disease in animals and focuses on barriers to the development of such products and methods to overcome them.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Vaccination continues to be the most important and cost-effective way to control animal and human infectious disease. No other means has had such an impact in increasing welfare by decreasing morbidity and mortality. Since the days of Jenner’s discovery more than 200 years ago, successful vaccination strategies have been established against numerous animal and human diseases. Although vaccine technology has made substantial progress, the basic concept remains the same. The majority of licensed animal vaccines against virus or bacteria are either live-attenuated or killed. Live-attenuated vaccines are generally efficient and induce strong immune responses. However, their manufacture and use present potential risks, including contamination risk during the manufacturing process and the possibility to revert their virulence in vivo. While inactivated vaccines cannot replicate in vivo and are safer to use, they often have lower levels of immunogenicity and share the same risks during the manufacture.
Recombinant subunit vaccines can circumvent the risks associated with the production of whole cell vaccines and there is increasing regulatory demand for such products in animal infectious disease control. To conquer a disease with a subunit vaccine, identification of a suitable antigen with the ability to elicit a protective immune response is a critical early step. Known protective antigens can be expressed in transgenic plants. This could offer new vaccination strategies (e.g. oral applications vs. injections) due to the low costs of production and delivery. For new antigen discovery, plant transient expression systems are competitive to the other available production platforms in terms of time and scalability (Gleba et al. 2007).
Possibility to deliver plant-made vaccines (PMV) orally has been the focus of many studies. Oral delivery is attractive for its simplicity, and increases likelihood for local mucosal immune responses at sites of infection. However, the amount of antigen needed for oral delivery is high when compared to parenteral administration (Streatfield and Howard 2003b). A successful oral vaccine must survive the gastrointestinal conditions and must stimulate the mucosal immune system and provide protection against subsequent infections. The intestinal epithelium has a dual function. It allows penetration of nutrients and macromolecules important for growth and development, while providing a barrier to potentially harmful micro-organisms (Mestecky et al. 2005). The diet of all animals consists of a complex mixture of proteins and other macromolecules that are potentially antigenic. Since these food antigens usually do not elicit immune responses, the mucosal immune system apparently can distinguish between harmful pathogenic antigens and harmless food antigens (Holmgren et al. 2003). Pathogenic antigens tend to elicit immunosurveilance, leading to an active immune defense, whereas soluble food antigens usually activate an immunosuppressive state known as oral tolerance. However, certain soluble antigens, including cholera toxin (CT), heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli (LT), and some lectins that bind enterocytes efficiently, such as F4 fimbriae in pigs (Van den Broeck et al. 1999), can elicit immune responses upon oral administration (Strober et al. 1998). The exact mechanisms behind the induction of these opposite mucosal functions are not completely understood, but unresponsiveness is the default to soluble antigens (Holmgren et al. 2003). The mucosal immune response can be elicited either by transporting the antigen through specialized antigen sampling cells, designated M-cells, or by the receptor-mediated transport through epithelial enterocytes (Strober et al. 1998; Neutra and Kozlowski 2006). The transported antigens are captured by underlying antigen-presenting cells, which are activated by the co-stimulatory signals and can elicit the immune response at immunocompetent sites (Neutra and Kozlowski 2006). In addition, dendrite cells can capture microorganisms or particulated antigens directly from the luminal content of the intestine (Rescigno et al. 2001; Rimoldi and Rescigno 2005).
The concept of oral vaccination by crudely processed plant material expressing antigens has been demonstrated on humans in several studies (Tacket et al. 1998, 2000, 2004; Kapusta et al. 1999; Thanavala et al. 2005). Direct guidelines for human medicine have hindered progress of these products behind the first preliminary clinical trials and the interest on human-use plant-made pharmaceuticals (PMP) has focused towards purified products.
The regulatory load for animal pharmaceuticals is less than that for human use, and for veterinary purposes the oral vaccination by feeding of transgenic plants remains very attractive. Efficacy of PMVs has been proved in target animals such as pigs and chicken (Lamphear et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2004; Guerrero-Andrade et al. 2006; Joensuu et al. 2006b). Veterinary PMPs have been summarized in 2005 (Streatfield 2005; Rice et al. 2005) and 2007 (Floss et al. 2007). In this review, we reflect the current status of the advantages and challenges of vaccine antigen expression in plants and give an overview on applications designed to overcome animal infectious disease.
Expression of vaccine antigens in plants
Plant species for vaccine antigen expression
Leafy feed/food crops used for vaccine antigen production include alfalfa (Wigdorovitz et al. 1999a), lettuce (Kapusta et al. 1999), spinach (Modelska et al. 1998), and white clover (Lee et al. 2001). The legumes alfalfa and white clover are widely cultivated, high in protein and are capable of nitrogen fixation, which reduces both production costs and environmental load. Lettuce and spinach are regularly consumed by humans and thus, are potential delivery vehicles for human oral vaccines. The non-food model plant Arabidopsis has also been used for vaccine antigen production, but its small size probably limits its use to small-scale proof of principle studies (Gomez et al. 1998).
Using the logic that fruit and vegetable crops can be consumed raw or processed into various palatable forms without cooking, they have also been utilized in vaccine antigen production. Reported examples include bananas (Kumar et al. 2005), tomatoes (McGarvey et al. 1995), cherry tomatillos (Gao et al. 2003), potatoes (Haq et al. 1995), melons (Nagesha et al. 2007), and carrots (Bouche et al. 2003). Seed legumes, pigeon pea (Satyavathi et al. 2003), soybean (Piller et al. 2005), and peanut (Khandelwal et al. 2004) have been used to produce vaccine antigens. Maize (Streatfield et al. 2001), rice (Yang et al. 2007), and barley (Joensuu et al. 2006a) are the cereal crops that have been used for seed-based vaccine antigen production.
Non-food crop species like tobacco are an attractive option for recombinant protein production because they minimize regulatory barriers by eliminating the risk of entry into the food chain. The leaves are harvested before flowering, significantly reducing the potential for gene leakage into the environment through pollen or seed dispersal. Unlike seeds or tubers, tobacco leaves are perishable and will not persist in the environment. Therefore, tobacco is now recognized as the platform of choice for biopharmaceutical production and is the most common plant species used for the production of vaccine antigens (Table 1). There are well-established transformation and regeneration techniques available for tobacco and it is relatively easy to propagate and grow on a laboratory scale. Under field conditions, tobacco can produce over 50,000 kg/ha of fresh biomass in a single season (Woodlief et al. 1981). For oral administration of vaccine antigens in intact leaf tissue, certainly a low cost approach, the presence of nicotine alkaloids could limit the use of tobacco but low-nicotine tobacco platforms that are suitable for direct oral administration have been developed (Menassa et al. 2007).
Properties of host plant tissues for antigen production
Vaccine antigens have been expressed in fresh plant tissues such as leaves (Mason et al. 1992), fruits (McGarvey et al. 1995), tubers (Haq et al. 1995), and taproots (Bouche et al. 2003), or in mature seeds (Streatfield et al. 2001). Harvested fresh plant tissues usually need processing or freezing to preserve the antigen in a stable form, while mature seeds are desiccated and allow long-term storage at ambient temperatures. As well, fruits, tubers, and taproots can be stored for a limited time, especially in a chilled environment. Vaccine antigens have also been expressed in undifferentiated plant cell cultures such as, cell suspensions (Smith et al. 2002), somatic embryos (Kang et al. 2006), and callus cultures (Kapusta et al. 1999).
High overall protein content in the target plant tissue is beneficial for high-level accumulation of recombinant proteins. This demand is fulfilled by leafy crops, and in applications were the antigen is targeted to seeds. However, only a minor proportion of the fruit and tuber tissues is protein, limiting the amount of antigen which can be expressed and delivered in these tissues. Antigen expression levels of individual potato tubers (Tacket et al. 2000) and tomato fruits (Sandhu et al. 2000) have been reported to vary. To increase long-term storage and to concentrate the antigen, these tissues may need to be processed with such techniques as freeze-drying, followed by grinding or powdering. Batch processing homogenizes the raw material and allows products with more uniform antigen dosage to be manufactured. Similarly, leafy crops have to be processed to homogenize the starting material. If the vaccine antigen is produced in the grains, the batch-to-batch variation can be monitored directly from the harvested seeds, and the material can be delivered in an unprocessed form to animals. However, carefully selected processing techniques can be used to increase the palatability and antigen concentration (Streatfield et al. 2003).
Plant vaccine expression systems
In the context of using plants as antigen production and delivery systems, there are three main options for engineering a plant to produce immunologically active peptides. The first is to integrate the DNA encoding the gene of interest into the nuclear or organelle genome of the plant to generate stable transgenic plants that express the antigen either constitutively or in specific tissues. Stable transgenic plants are most commonly obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer or by bombardment with DNA-coated high-velocity gold/tungsten particles, both followed by appropriate tissue culture procedures. In Arabidopsis and some other species the laborious tissue culture steps can be avoided by Agrobacterium floral dip and vacuum infiltration methods. (for reviews see: Clough 2005, Curtis 2005). The second option is to integrate the genetic material encoding the immunologically active protein or peptide into the genome of a plant virus and to use that to infect the plants. This transient expression system is initiated by virus inoculation of plants. The protein or peptide is then expressed either on the surface of the virus particle as a fusion epitope with the viral coat protein or as an autonomous protein produced as a by-product of the virus infection. The third option is a transient gene expression system known as agroinfiltration that uses infiltration with engineered Agrobacterium. The main characteristics, along with the major advantages and disadvantages of these expression systems are discussed below.
Transgenic plants
The major advantage of stable transgenic plants over transient protein production systems is that the protein production trait is heritable and is therefore transmitted over multiple generations, making scale-up simple, and allowing the establishment of seed stock to ensure long-term availability of starting material (Kirk and Webb 2005). The production of antigenic proteins in tissues of transgenic plants that are applicable for consumption presents the possibility that these tissues can be consumed directly, providing an “edible vaccine” which obviates the need to purify the vaccine protein. As purification of pharmaceutical proteins often account for more than 50% of the final cost (Streatfield and Howard 2003a), it is often the limiting step in commercialization of such products and is particularly important in the production of vaccines for livestock where profit margins can be very narrow. Oral delivery of vaccine antigens within plants following limited processing (e.g. grinding) may be an attractive low-cost way of improving animal health.
Drawbacks of using transgenic plants as a production platform include the time required to regenerate and analyze the transformants, the unpredictability of expression and accumulation and the scale-up time needed for seed production. The generation of sufficient transgenic plant material for protein analysis may take several months, and despite advancements in the field some plant species are recalcitrant with respect to transformation. In addition, low yield of the antigenic protein can also be a significant barrier. However, recent progress in plastid transformation has enabled very high-level expression of foreign proteins in transgenic plants. These transplastomic plants have been reported to accumulate immunologically active peptides in amounts of up to 33.1% of total soluble protein (Molina et al. 2004). Plastid transformation currently works efficiently only in solanaceous plants, such as tobacco (Svab and Maliga 1993), tomato (Ruf et al. 2001), and potato (Sidorov et al. 1999), but it has been introduced into other crop species, including carrot (Kumar et al. 2004a), cotton (Kumar et al. 2004b), soybean (Dufourmantel et al. 2004) and oilseed rape (Hou et al. 2003).
Transient expression with viral vectors
Plant viral expression systems have generally been more efficient than transgenic plant-based production systems in terms of the yield of foreign protein that can be expressed per gram of plant tissue. When virus-based production systems are used for antigen production, the chimeric virus particles or free foreign protein must usually be purified from infected leaf tissues. If the immunogenic peptide is expressed in the form of an epitope fused to the plant viral coat protein, the recombinant viral particles can be simply purified from infected tissues. In addition, virions are often remarkably stable structures. However, strict limitations are present in the size of the insert that can be introduced into the virus genome and successfully assembled into virions (Yusibov et al. 1997). This is usually not the case with peptides or proteins expressed as an autonomous by-product of the virus infection or in transgenic plants. In contrast to transgenic plant material (particularly seeds, tubers, fruits), storing leaf tissue of virus-infected plants is not very practical. However, purified plant virus particles can be stored for long periods of time under appropriate conditions. Further advantages of plant virus platform expression include savings in time and labor. Various genetic constructs can be tested and scaled up in a matter of weeks. This is an important feature for a vaccine production system against emerging new pathogenic variants. However, the bulk-scale production of antigens is inconvenient since the recombinant plant viruses need to be generated in vitro and inoculated into individual plants, and genetic stability of the virus must be monitored through multiple passages.
While it is possible to inoculate field-grown plants with the viral vectors to transiently express the vaccine antigen, the risk of spread of the modified plant viruses would be very high, and the use of this system must therefore be limited to contained environments such as greenhouses. Examples in which epitopes of vaccine antigens have been successfully displayed as a part of chimeric plant viruses include cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) (Dalsgaard et al. 1997), tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) (Koo et al. 1999), alfalfa mosaic virus (AlMV) (Yusibov et al. 2005), plum pox potyvirus (PPV) (Fernandez-Fernandez et al. 1998), and potato virus X (PVX) (Marusic et al. 2001). Successful co-expression of antigens has been employed with TMV (Wigdorovitz et al. 1999b), PVX (Franconi et al. 2002), and PPV (Fernandez-Fernandez et al. 2001).
Transient expression with agroinfiltration
In agroinfiltration, the Agrobacterium culture is forced into intact or harvested plant leaf tissues by pressure, the transgene being expressed in plant cells for few days and subsequently harvested for the foreign protein (Kapila et al. 1997). Inhibition of gene silencing in agroinfiltrated leaves was shown to increase recombinant protein yields up to 50-fold (Voinnet et al. 2003). Agroinfiltration is very convenient for preliminary laboratory-scale testing for transformation vector capacity, and for the production of small amounts of purified recombinant proteins, and is now being scaled up, thus becoming an efficient production platform. Large-scale agroinfiltration is currently being utilized for antigen and antibody production by the Canadian biotechnology company Medicaco (www.medicaco.com) that is processing alfalfa and tobacco plants (D’Aoust et al. 2005). The German company Icon Genetics (www.icongenetics.com) has established an agroinfiltration-based application called magnifection, which combines the transfection efficiency of Agrobacterium and the high expression yield of viral vectors (Marillonnet et al. 2005). Recently, magnifection has shown a great promise for rapid and up to gram-magnitude scalable production system for antigens and antibodies (Giritch et al. 2006; Santi et al. 2006). Similarly to transient viral expression, agroinfiltration-based production needs contained environment and requires purification of recombinant protein after the harvest, and has limitations in scalability compared to expression in transgenic plants.
Plant-made vaccine antigens for animal infectious disease control
Published studies of vaccine candidates expressed in plants for animal infectious disease control are summarized in Table 1. The majority of these applications are against viral pathogens. The likely reason for this is not a lack of potential microbial pathogens but a lack of cost-effective means to treat animal virus infections, whereas microbe infections can usually be controlled by antibiotics. However, the recent and forthcoming bans on non-therapeutic use of antibiotics will increase the demand for new treatment options to promote animal health. European Union banned the use of all antibiotics for growth promotion purposes in January 2006 (Anonymous 2005) and similar bills to preserve antibiotics for medical treatment have been proposed in US government in February 2007 (Anonymous 2007b). Most of the plant-produced vaccines have only preliminary been tested in laboratory animals (mainly mice), but the most advantageous examples show protection in the target species following oral delivery (Lamphear et al. 2002; Khandelwal et al. 2003a; Zhou et al. 2004; Guerrero-Andrade et al. 2006). In some instances, vaccination of animals also serves to protect human health. Rabies (McGarvey et al. 1995; Yusibov et al. 2002; Ashraf et al. 2005), O157:H7 EHEC (Judge et al. 2004), and avian influenza (Mihaliak and Webb 2005) are examples of target diseases for which plant-produced vaccines are under development and that would offer protection to both animals and humans.
Applications for poultry
A chinese research group has successfully developed an edible potato-based vaccine against chicken infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) (Zhou et al. 2003, 2004). Sliced tubers expressing viral S1 glycoprotein were administered in three doses over two weeks, and a week after the last administration the chickens were challenged with IBV. Orally immunized chickens developed a virus-specific antibody response and were protected against IBV. Wu et al. (2004) succeeded in vaccinating chickens against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Chickens orally immunized with Arabidopsis crude extracts were protected in a manner similar to animals, who had received a commercial injectable vaccine. The efficacy of this vaccine was verified in three replicate experiments (10 chickens per group) with identical results (Wu et al. 2004).
Including the first FDA-approved plant-produced vaccine made in tobacco cell culture (Vermij and Waltz 2006), Newcastle disease virus has been the target of many recent studies for a plant-made vaccine. Virus surface glycoprotein F and HN epitopes have been displayed on the surface of Cucumber mosaic virus particles (Zhao and Hammond 2005; Natilla et al. 2006). Chimeric virus particles were assembled in tobacco leaves, but their immunogenicity was not determined. Full length glycoproteins were expressed in transgenic potato (Berinstein et al. 2005) and tobacco (Hahn et al. 2007) leaves, and maize (Guerrero-Andrade et al. 2006) and rice seeds (Yang et al. 2007). The antigens were shown to be immunogenic and protective in chickens after oral delivery.
Applications for cattle
Transgenic peanut plants expressing bovine rinderpest virus hemaglutinin were reported to raise immune responses in cattle (Khandelwal et al. 2003a). Cows were fed three times with 5–7.5 g of transgenic leaf tissue. This oral vaccine was able to raise virus-specific antibodies, which also neutralized the virus in vitro. Immunogenicity of a TMV-based vaccine against bovine herpes virus (BHV) was studied in cattle (Perez Filgueira et al. 2003). Immunogenic glycoprotein D was produced as a by-product in TMV-inoculated tobacco plants, and the crude plant extract emulsified in oil and subsequently injected into cows was able to raise specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Most importantly, these animals were protected against BHV to a similar level as cows vaccinated with the commercial vaccine.
Foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) infects many meat- and milk-producing domestic animals, including cows. In an Argentinean laboratory, a vaccine against FMDV has been extensively developed. This vaccine is based on the viral structural VP1 protein, and expression has been reported in Arabidopsis (Carrillo et al. 1998), potato tubers (Carrillo et al. 2001), and alfalfa leaves (Wigdorovitz et al. 1999a; Dus Santos et al. 2002; Dus Santos and Wigdorovitz 2005). Alfalfa was chosen as a platform for oral delivery and protective immune response was reported in mice (Wigdorovitz et al. 1999a).
The same authors have also developed a plant-produced vaccine against bovine rotavirus infections. Epitopes of rotavirus VP4 protein were expressed with a TMV-based transient system (Perez Filgueira et al. 2004) and in transgenic alfalfa plants (Wigdorovitz et al. 2004). Immunogenicity was again determined in a mouse model. Most importantly, alfalfa-fed mice developed a virus-specific antibody response, with pups subsequently being protected against viral challenge by passive lactogenic immunity (Wigdorovitz et al. 2004). Furthermore, the expression of bovine rotavirus VP6 protein has been reported in transplastomic tobacco plants (Birch-Machin et al. 2004) and potato tubers (Matsumura et al. 2002).
A Canadian group has investigated a plant-produced vaccine against bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis, “shipping fever” caused by Mannheimia haemolytica. Transgenic white clover (Lee et al. 2001) and alfalfa (Ziauddin et al. 2004) plants expressing a fragment of leucotoxin fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) were generated, and the immunogenicity of this fusion protein was established in rabbits after intramuscular injection. The generated antibodies also neutralized a related leucotoxin in vitro. Recently, Dow AgroSciences launched license agreement to produce the leucotoxin antigen it their plant-cell-based platform (Anonymous 2007a).
The colonization factor of O157:H7 bovine diarrhea-causing enterohemorraghic E. coli (EHEC) was expressed in tobacco plants (Judge et al. 2004). His-tagged intimin was purified from plant extracts and injected intraperitoneally in mice. Alternatively, mice were fed the transgenic plant material. In the following EHEC challenge, reduced E. coli shedding was observed in the parenterally immunized group as well as in mice that had received an oral boost after being intraperitoneally primed.
Applications for swine
Development of a plant-produced vaccine against porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) has been carried out by several research groups. Neutralizing virus spike protein antigens have been expressed in the leaf tissue of transgenic tobacco (Tuboly et al. 2000) and Arabidopsis plants (Gomez et al. 1998), in potato tubers (Gomez et al. 2000), and in maize seeds (Streatfield et al. 2001). Plant-produced spike protein antigens were immunogenic in mice following parenteral or oral administration (Gomez et al. 1998, 2000). Tuboly et al. (2000) immunized weaned piglets intraperitoneally with crude tobacco extracts and detected virus-specific neutralizing antibodies after three injections. The use of maize seeds as an edible delivery vehicle against TGEV has been studied by Streatfied and colleagues. The efficacy of this plant-made vaccine has been presented in multiple experiments with piglets (Streatfield et al. 2001; Lamphear et al. 2002). In addition, it was found that the antigen was stable during storage in various conditions and authors were able to concentrate the antigen with milling techniques (Lamphear et al. 2002).
Development against a plant-produced vaccine against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has been established by a Korean research group. PEDV-neutralizing epitope has been expressed in tobacco (Bae et al. 2003; Kang et al. 2005b), potato (Kim et al. 2005) and in rice seeds (Oszvald et al. 2007). The tobacco-derived protein was also reported to raise virus-specific antibodies in mice after an oral delivery (Bae et al. 2003).
Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) expressing F5 fimbriae causes diarrhea in various farm animals, including pigs, chickens, and cows, whereas F4+ ETEC is pathogenic only for pigs (Van den Broeck et al. et al. 2000). The major subunit protein of F4 fimbriae have been expressed in the leaves of tobacco (Huang et al. 2003; Joensuu et al. 2004; Liang et al. 2006), alfalfa (Joensuu et al. 2006b) and in seeds of barley (Joensuu et al. 2006a) while the F5 fimbrial subunit was expressed in leaves of soybean plants (Piller et al. 2005; Garg et al. 2007).
F4 subunit vaccine was shown to be immunogenic and partially protective after oral delivery to weaned piglets (Joensuu et al. 2006b). The immunogenicity of F5 ETEC vaccine was confirmed by vaccinating mice parenterally with crude leaf extracts (Piller et al. 2005). In addition to these candidate vaccines based on colonization factors, the expression of ETEC heat-labile toxin subunit B in plants has been widely studied. LT-B forms homopentamers to mediate the binding of the toxin to enterocytes. The autoassembly of these pentamers has been observed when the LT-B encoding gene was expressed in transgenic plants. Successful examples include tobacco and (Kang et al. 2005c), lettuce leaves (Kim et al. 2007), potato tubers (Haq et al. 1995; Mason et al. 1998; Lauterslager et al. 2001), and maize (Streatfield et al. 2001; Chikwamba et al. 2002) and soybean seeds (Moravec et al. 2007). Orally administered plant-made LT-B was able to protect mice against subsequent challenge with the LT-holotoxin and the immunogenicity of this antigen was also shown in humans (Tacket et al. 1998, 2004).
Optimizing antigen yield in transgenic plants
Oral immunization of herds of farm animals with subunit vaccines requires bulk-scale production of the antigens and low expression levels still remains to be one of the major hurdles for vaccine production in transgenic plants (Table 1). High expression levels are equally important for adequate-sized oral doses and cost-effective purification of vaccine antigens. The overall biomass yield of the crop species and the intrinsic protein content of the plant tissue define the capacity of the chosen production system. However, multiple factors determine the final antigen content of the production platform. To achieve high yields, the expression construct design must consider all stages of gene expression, from transcription to protein stability.
Transcription and mRNA stability
The promoter selected to control the transcription of the transgene is perhaps the most important component of the expression construct. Several promoters have been identified to provide high levels of gene expression in plants. The most commonly used promoter to control antigen expression in dicotyledonous plant species is the strong and constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (CaMV 35S). A version of CaMV 35S with a duplicated transcriptional enhancer region is also used to increase gene expression (Smith et al. 2002; Warzecha et al. 2003; Dong et al. 2005). Another strong candidate promoter is the synthetic Super promoter (Ni et al. 1995), which has been successfully used to drive vaccine antigen expression in plants (Tuboly et al. 2000; Pogrebnyak et al. 2005). For expression of vaccine antigens in the potato, the auxin-inducible mannopine synthase (mas) P1, P2 dual promoter system has been widely used by Langridge and colleagues (Arakawa et al. 1997, 1998, 2001; Yu and Langridge 2001), while other groups have preferred the tuber-specific patatin promoter (Mason et al. 1996; Lauterslager et al. 2001). In maize, the CaMV 35S promoter can be used to accumulate vaccine antigens in seeds (Chikwamba et al. 2002). However, more efficient antigen production has been achieved with maize seed-specific globulin-1 and γ-zein promoters (Chikwamba et al. 2002; Streatfield and Howard 2003a). In general, the most widely used promoter to control transgene expression in monocotyledonous plants has been the constitutive maize ubiquitin-1 promoter (Christensen and Quail 1996). For seed-specific gene expression in dicotyledonous plants, phaseolin and arcelin promoters derived from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) have shown high accumulation of recombinant antibodies (De Jaeger et al. 2002; Van Droogenbroeck et al. 2007).
After transcription, the mature transcript has to be protected from premature degradation and transported efficiently to the cytoplasmic translation machinery. As a result, post-transcriptional processing events like capping, splicing, polyadenylation can have a major effect on the levels of protein produced in the plant cell (Gutierrez et al. 1999). Introduction of introns into the expression construct has been shown to increase the stability of mRNA (Topfer et al. 1993). Particularly in monocot plants, the introduction of introns elevates the expression levels of marker genes (Callis et al. 1987; Maas et al. 1991). Polyadenylation signals also strongly influence the stability of mRNA and the level of gene expression in plant cells (Ingelbrecht et al. 1989; Hunt 1994). The most widely used polyadenylation signals in vaccine applications include those from the CaMV 35S transcript (Huang et al. 2001; Piller et al. 2005), the soybean vegetative storage protein (vsp) (Richter et al. 2000; Vieira da Silva et al. 2002), and the Agrobacterium nopaline synthase (nos) and octopine synthase (ocs) genes (Mason et al. 1992; Aziz et al. 2002). Richter et al. (2000) did a direct comparison of three different polyadenylation signals in potato and found that plants with vsp and potato proteinase inhibitor 2 (pin2) polyadenylation signals accumulated hepatitis virus B surface antigen (HBsAg) in quantities several times higher than plants transformed with expression vectors with the nos-terminator, indicating that post-transcriptional effects contributed strongly to the enhanced accumulation hepatitis B surface antigen. Generation of synthetic antigen-encoding genes enables the elimination of potential internal methylation and polyadenylation sites, mRNA secondary structure hairpins, and premature transcriptional termination sites to ensure efficient transcription and stability of the generated transcript (Dong et al. 2005).
Translation
Initiation of mRNA translation is often a rate-limiting step in polypeptide synthesis in plants (Kawaguchi and Bailey-Serres 2002). Translation initiation can be optimized by matching the translational start site to the Kozak consensus for plants (Joshi et al. 1997). After initiation, the rate of translation may become limited by a lack of suitable tRNAs. Indeed, genes of foreign origin may have sub-optimal codon composition for the plant translational machinery, and increased levels of protein expression have been reported in plants after modification of the gene-coding sequences of bacterial origin (Perlak et al. 1991; Adang et al. 1993; Horvath et al. 2000). Similarly, optimization of gene sequences for plant codon usage has enhanced the expression of various vaccine antigens such as E. coli heat labile enterotoxin subunit B (LT-B) (Mason et al. 1998) and cholera toxin subunit B (CT-B) (Kang et al. 2004a). For example, LT-B accumulation was enhanced 5- to 40-fold in potato tubers when a codon-optimized gene was used instead of an unmodified LT-B gene (Mason et al. 1998) However, reports of the effectiveness of codon optimization of genes of viral origin are limited, perhaps viral gene expression is already optimized for expression in eukaryotes and codon optimization has limited impact.
RNA leader sequences of plant viral origin have been identified to boost antigen expression in plants (Dowson Day et al. 1993). The most widely used 5′ untranslated regions used in antigen applications include 5′ leader sequences from tobacco etch virus (TEV) (Thanavala et al. 1995; Mason et al. 1996; Richter et al. 2000; Dong et al. 2005) and the TMV Ω element (Richter et al. 2000; Matsumura et al. 2002; Biemelt et al. 2003).
Subcellular targeting: optimal yield and glycosylation
The subcellular environment in which the recombinant protein accumulates will influence its folding, assembly, and post-translational modification. Factors such as surrounding pH and presence of chaperones or proteases can affect antigen stability and therefore accumulation. Recombinant proteins can be directed to the secretory pathway by a N-terminal signal peptide, and both plant or native signals appear to work equally well. Secreted proteins are co-translationally synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and transported by default through the Golgi network to the apoplast, or in the presence of a suitable signal directed to the vacuole (Matsuoka and Nakamura 1991). In the apoplast, depending on the protein’s size and structure, it can be retained in the cell wall matrix or secreted from the cell. The ER is an oxidizing environment with an abundance of molecular chaperones and very few proteases. Comparative analysis with recombinant antibodies has shown that they accumulate more efficiently when targeted to the secretory pathway than to the cell cytoplasm (Schillberg et al. 1999). This has also been shown with vaccine antigens; Richter et al. (2000) targeted the synthesis of HBsAg to the apoplast or vacuoles and found 2- to 7-fold accumulation level enhancements compared with cytoplasm-targeted potato plants. Streatfield et al. (2003) studied the subcellular targeting of LT-B in maize seeds, and reported that targeting to the apoplast and vacuoles increased the expression level 3080-fold and 20,000-fold, respectively, compared to the cytoplasm. Secreted proteins can be retained in the ER though the use of a C-terminal (SE)H/KDEL peptide (Munro and Pelham 1987). This further enhanced the accumulation of recombinant antibodies than the targeting into the secretory pathway (Conrad and Fiedler 1998). Similarly, a 4-fold increase in LT-B accumulation was shown in tobacco and potato plants when the protein was retained in the ER (Haq et al. 1995). In contrast accumulation LT-B retained in the ER of maize seeds was one-tenth of that when the protein was secreted (Streatfield et al. 2003).
Recombinant proteins can also be targeted to organelles like the mitochondria and plastids. This can be done by adding N-terminal transit peptides, which are recognized by the organelle transport machinery delivering the proteins to organelles (Glaser and Soll 2004). Richter et al. (2000) were unable to detect viral protein HBsAg when it was targeted to chloroplasts. In maize seeds, targeting bacterial LT-B to the plastids led to a 7-fold increase compared with cytosolic targeting, but did not reach the levels obtained with apoplast, ER, or vacuolar targeting (Streatfield et al. 2003). In contrary, FaeG, the major subunit of ETEC F4 fimbria accumulated higher levels in chloroplasts than cytosol, ER or apoplast (Huang et al. 2003; Van Molle et al. 2007).
Candidate vaccine antigens include proteins or peptides of viral or bacterial origin as well as tumor and autoantigens. Proteins of bacterial origin are not glycosylated, but other antigens including viral surface proteins are often heavily glycosylated by the host cell. Appropriate glycosylation of vaccine antigens can be achieved by appropriate subcellular targeting. When glycosylation is desired, the antigen should be directed to the ER. The level of glycosylation can be affected by retaining the antigen peptide in the ER instead of being secreted through the Golgi apparatus, where further carbohydrate groups will be added (Faye et al. 2005). Correct glycosylation can be a prerequisite (Yelverton et al. 1983) or alter (Judge et al. 2004) the immunogenicity of vaccine antigens. Glycosylation can be avoided by targeting the accumulation of the antigen to the cytoplasm or to intracellular plant organelles. Alternatively, the addition of carbohydrates can be prevented by mutating the putative glycosylation sites on the antigen peptide. Mammals and plants have a similar structure of core high-mannose glycans, but some differences in glycosylation do exist. Plant glycans use a α-1,3 fucose linkage rather than the α-1,6 fucose linkage found in mammals, have additional β-1,2 xylose linkages, and lack the sialic acid moieties typical of mammalian glycosylation (Faye et al. 2005). Completely mammalized plant glycosylation has not been reported to date, but has been of a considerable interest (For review see Saint-Jore-Dupas et al. 2007).
Fusion proteins
Fusing peptides or whole proteins of poor stability to other known stable proteins can improve the stability of the selected antigen in the plant tissues and during the subsequent vaccine delivery. This approach is commonly used for peptides produced with the plant virus expression system, and has also been used to optimize the antigen expression in stably transformed plants. Such vaccine antigen fusion partners include green fluorescence protein (GFP) (Molina et al. 2004; Ziauddin et al. 2004), CT-B (Arakawa et al. 2001; Yu and Langridge 2001; Kim et al. 2004; Molina et al. 2004, 2005), CT-A (Yu and Langridge 2001), and β-glucuronidase (GUS) (Gil et al. 2001; Dus Santos et al. 2002). Antigen fusion with marker genes also allows antigen production to be screened conveniently. The Canadian company Sembiosys Genetics Inc. (www.sembiosys.ca) has established a production system in which recombinant proteins are expressed in oilseed crops as a fusion with oleosin (Parmenter et al. 1995). Fusion proteins accumulate in oil bodies and can be extracted using a simple extraction procedure and the recombinant protein can be released from its fusion partner by proteolytic cleavage. Another application based on protein fusions has been introduced by the Spanish company ERA Biotech (www.erabiotech.com). It has introduced a production system in which recombinant proteins are fused with peptides derived from storage proteins and accumulate host-independently in ER-derived protein bodies that can be separated by their high density. Similarly, fusions with elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) can simplify purification procedure of recombinant proteins. ELP can undergo reversible thermal denaturation and can be used for temperature based non-chromatographic separation (Meyer and Chilkoti 1999). ELP-fusions have been also reported to enhance expression levels of recombinant proteins in plants (Scheller et al. 2006; Patel et al. 2007).
Transplastomy
Chloroplast transformation can provide better gene expression capacity than nuclear genetic engineering. This is mainly because of the high transgene copy number; a single cell can possess up to 10 000 copies of the plastid genome (Daniell et al. 2004). Transgenes are introduced into the chloroplast genome by site-specific integration, and despite the high accumulation level of transcripts, transgene silencing has not been reported in transplastomic plants (Lee et al. 2003; Dhingra et al. 2004). Similarly, lack of post-transcriptional gene silencing was evident with the accumulation of bacterial Cry toxins in over 46% of total soluble protein (TSP) in transplastomic tobacco lines (De Cosa et al. 2001). In addition, chloroplasts offer a contained environment within a plant cell where potentially plant-toxic compounds have been successfully expressed (Lee et al. 2003; Leelavathi et al. 2003). As a drawback, chloroplasts cannot complete all protein post-transcriptional modifications and are best suited for expression of proteins that do not require complicated assembly or glycosylation. Successful examples of vaccine antigen expression in tobacco chloroplasts include CT-B (Daniell et al. 2001), the TetC fragment of the tetanus toxoid (Tregoning et al. 2003) and an anthrax protective antigen (Aziz et al. 2005).
Risks and regulatory issues associated with the use of plants for the production of vaccine antigens
Kirk et al. (2005) have examined vaccine antigen production in plants and listed gene transfer, allergenicity, oral tolerance, inconsistent dosage, worker exposure, and detrimental effects to the environment as the six main risks. They suggest several ways to mitigate risk including stewardship, active risk management and production quality standards (Kirk et al. 2005). Pharma Planta, an European consortium for biopharmaceuticals produced in plants has looked at the situation and showed that the complexities of the regulation of genetically modified crops intertwined with the regulation of pharmaceutical products creates a challenging environment for approvals (Sparrow et al. 2007). What is clear from both of these papers is that regulatory issues at the transgenic plant level, and the product safety and efficacy level are as important as the technical challenges associated with engineering plants to produce vaccines antigens. While there have long been efforts to produce vaccine antigens in whole plants and although the work has matured to the point of field testing and clinical evaluation, the first plant based veterinary vaccine to be approved by any regulatory authority in the world was produced in a sealed and sterile plant cell culture (Vermij and Waltz 2006). The oral vaccine for Newcastle disease of chickens was approved by the United States Department of Agriculture and registered in January of 2006 by Dow AgroScience. The fact that this vaccine and not one from either field or greenhouse production went forward first might speak for the importance of pharmaceutical regulations that require product uniformity, safety and efficacy at their core and that avoiding regulatory barriers though the judioscious choice of production platform might be the best way to advance vaccine antigens produced in plants.
Although all manner of crop platforms have been considered for the production of vaccine antigens, the reasons for the choice of a particular platform were not always clear but appeared to be more about easy access to enabling technologies like expression vectors and transformation protocols than production capability or biosafety. Driven by interest in oral vaccines and the GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status of many crops the prevailing belief was that food crops like maize or rice were the ideal platforms. Beginning in the late 1990s our laboratory recognized that food crops would be a regulatory barrier and focused our efforts on developing a non-food platform (Brandle et al. 1998). In early 2000, the Canadian regulatory agencies also began to understand the risk associated with the use of food crops and actually issued a one year moratorium on field testing in 2001 to allow regulation to catch up to technology development (Canadian Food Inspection Agency 2000). The outcome was the recommendation that food or feed crops not be used as platforms for recombinant pharmaceutical production. Although there was not much reaction from the industry at that point, what followed was a strong catalyst for change. In what became known as the Prodigene affair, a Texas based plant recombinant protein company failed in its responsibility for post-harvest monitoring and contaminated a soybean crop with maize producing a vaccine (Hileman 2003). The company was fined and eventually ceased operations. In the years that followed that event the number of molecular farming field tests on maize conducted in the US dropped from 13 in 2001 to two in 2003, most likely the result of the clear understanding of the liability associated with the use of food crops (Fox 2006). Since that event the calls for the exclusive use of non-food crops have been quite loud and many investigators switched to non-food or contained systems (Anonymous 2004; Fox 2006; Murphy 2007). Constrained by their intellectual property portfolios and technological capabilities, those research programs that could not change suffered the consequences of the unwillingness of the regulatory system to accommodate their systems along with a great deal of public resistance (Fox 2005, 2006; Waltz 2006). Given all of the product safety and efficacy challenges that are already associated with bringing a recombinant vaccine antigen to market, the best platform must be the one that does not add to the regulatory burden. In fact Kirk et al. (2005) speak to the fact that edible “plant made vaccines” should no longer be thought of as food at all, but instead as PMVs that are regulated by the USDA or FDA and prescribed by a physician or veterinarian. The use of non-food crops as production platforms would go a long way to completing that shift in thinking.
Conclusion
The first PMVs to reach the market will most likely be for veterinary use since their regulatory processes are less stringent than for human vaccines. To prove their full potential as a production platform, transgenic plants expressing vaccine antigens must follow the foot steps of plant cell culture based vaccines approved by the FDA. Oral delivery is the most economical and convenient way to administer these veterinary vaccines. Only a limited amount of studies have addressed the efficacy of PMVs in the final host and more efforts have to be pointed to optimize the antigen dosage and administration schedule to prove the full value of oral delivery of PMVs.
The bans on prophylactic use for livestock antibiotics drive demand towards new products to promote animal health. Due to recent advances on transient plant expression systems they can now compete with current vaccine production platforms in terms of yield and speed. The economical feasibility of many veterinary applications still relies on the open-field cultivation and oral administration of transgenic plants. Many vaccine antigens are highly host specific and pharmacologically inactive and non-toxic in secondary hosts. Safety of each application needs to be evaluated separately, but the health or environmental effects of most veterinary vaccine-producing plants might not significantly differ from the existing approved GM crop cultivars. Additionally, several strategies have been developed to improve containment and safety of plant biopharming. One of the major issues confronting the public perception of biopharming in food crops is the potential to contaminate the human food chain. Production of veterinary vaccines in non-food or dedicated feed crops might be the needed step towards the acceptance and approval for open-field production of PMVs.
Abbreviations
- AlMV:
-
alfalfa mosaic virus
- CaMV:
-
cauliflover mosaic virus
- CPMV:
-
cowpea mosaic virus
- CT:
-
cholera toxin of Vibrio cholerae
- CT-B:
-
cholera toxin B subunit of Vibrio cholerae
- EHEC:
-
enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli
- ELP:
-
elastin-like polypeptide
- ER:
-
endoplasmic reticulum
- ETEC:
-
enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
- FDA:
-
Food and Drug Administration agency in United States
- FMDV:
-
foot and mouth disease virus
- GFP:
-
green fluorescence protein of Aequorea Victoria
- GM:
-
genetically modified
- GRAS:
-
generally recognized as safe
- GUS:
-
beta glucuronidase of Escherichia coli
- HbsAg:
-
hepatitis virus B surface antigen
- IBDV:
-
chicken infectious bursal disease virus
- IBV:
-
chicken infectious bronchitis virus
- LT:
-
heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli
- LT-B:
-
heat-labile enterotoxin subunit B of Escherichia coli
- PEDV:
-
porcine epidemic diarrhea virus
- PMP:
-
plant-made pharmaceutical
- PMV:
-
plant-made vaccine
- PPV:
-
plum pox potyvirus
- PVX:
-
potato virus X
- TEV:
-
tobacco etch virus
- TGEV:
-
transmissible gastroenteritis virus
- TMV:
-
tobacco mosaic virus
- TSP:
-
total soluble protein
- USDA:
-
United States Department of Agriculture
References
Adang MJ, Brody MS, Cardineau G et al (1993) The reconstruction and expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cryIIIA gene in protoplasts and potato plants. Plant Mol Biol 21:1131–1145
Anonymous A (2004) Drugs in crops—the unpalatable truth. Nat Biotechnol 22:133–133
Anonymous A (2005) Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect. http://europa eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction do?reference=IP/05/1687&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Cited 1 Oct 2007
Anonymous A (2007a) Dow AgroSciences and University of Guelph sign license agreement to develop plant-cell vaccine to protect cattle from shipping fever. http://www.dowagro.com/animalhealth/resources/news/20070827b.htm . Cited 2 Oct 2007
Anonymous A (2007b) Preservation of antibiotics for medical treatment. http://www.govtrackus/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-962 Cited 1 Oct 2007
Arakawa T, Chong DKX, Langridge WHR (1998) Efficacy of a food plant-based oral cholera toxin B subunit vaccine. Nat Biotechnol 16:292–297
Arakawa T, Chong DKX, Merritt JL et al (1997) Expression of cholera toxin B subunit oligomers in transgenic potato plants. Transgenic Res 6:403–413
Arakawa T, Yu J, Langridge W (2001) Synthesis of a cholera toxin B subunit-rotavirus NSP4 fusion protein in potato. Plant Cell Rep 20:343–348
Ashraf S, Singh PK, Yadav DK et al (2005) High level expression of surface glycoprotein of rabies virus in tobacco leaves and its immunoprotective activity in mice. J Biotechnol 119:1–14
Aziz MA, Sikriwal D, Singh S et al (2005) Transformation of an edible crop with the pagA gene of Bacillus anthracis. FASEB J 19:1501–1503
Aziz M, Singh S, Kumar PA et al (2002) Expression of protective antigen in transgenic plants: a step towards edible vaccine against anthrax. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 299:345–351
Bae JL, Lee JG, Kang TJ et al (2003) Induction of antigen-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses by feeding animals transgenic plants expressing the antigen. Vaccine 21:4052–4058
Berinstein A, Vazquez-Rovere C, Asurmendi S et al (2005) Mucosal and systemic immunization elicited by Newcastle disease virus (NDV) transgenic plants as antigens. Vaccine 23:5583–5589
Biemelt S, Sonnewald U, Galmbacher P et al (2003) Production of human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles in transgenic plants. J Virol 77:9211–9220
Birch-Machin I, Newell CA, Hibberd JM et al (2004) Accumulation of rotavirus VP6 protein in chloroplasts of transplastomic tobacco is limited by protein stability. Plant Biotechnol J 2:261–270
Bouche FB, Marquet-Blouin E, Yanagi Y et al (2003) Neutralising immunogenicity of a polyepitope antigen expressed in a transgenic food plant: a novel antigen to protect against measles. Vaccine 21:2065–2072
Brandle J, Kenward K, Davis P et al (1998) Non-food crop plant bioreactor. Patenet Co-operation Treaty Application # CA2188220
Callis J, Fromm M, Walbot V (1987) Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. Genes Dev 1:1183–1200
Candian Food Inspection Agency (2000) Interim Amendment to Dir2000-07 for Confined Research Field Trials of Pnts for Plant Molecular Farming. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/dir/dir0007ie.shtml Cited 1 Oct 2007
Carrillo C, Wigdorovitz A, Oliveros JC et al (1998) Protective immune response to foot-and-mouth disease virus with VP1 expressed in transgenic plants. J Virol 72:1688–1690
Carrillo C, Wigdorovitz A, Trono K et al (2001) Induction of a virus-specific antibody response to foot and mouth disease virus using the structural protein VP1 expressed in transgenic potato plants. Viral Immunol 14:49–57
Castanon S, Marin MS, Martin-Alonso JM et al (1999) Immunization with potato plants expressing VP60 protein protects against rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus. J Virol 73:4452–4455
Castanon S, Martn-Alonso JM, Marn MS et al (2002) The effect of the promoter on expression of VP60 gene from rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus in potato plants. Plant Sci 162:87–95
Chikwamba R, McMurray J, Shou H et al (2002) Expression of a synthetic E. coli heat labile enterotoxin B sub unit (LT B) in maize. Mol Breed 10:253–265
Christensen AH, Quail PH (1996) Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Transgenic Res 5:213–218
Clemente M, Curilovic R, Sassone A et al (2005) Production of the main surface antigen of Toxoplasma gondii in tobacco leaves and analysis of its antigenicity and immunogenicity. Mol Biotechnol 30:41–50
Clough S (2005) Floral dip: an Agrobacterium-mediated germ line transformation. Methods Mol Biol 286:91–102
Conrad U, Fiedler U (1998) Compartment-specific accumulation of recombinant immunoglobulins in plant cells: an essential tool for antibody production and immunomodulation of physiological functions and pathogen activity. Plant Mol Biol 38:101–109
Curtis I (2005) Production of transgenic crops by the floral-dip method. Methods Mol Biol 286:103–110
D’Aoust MA, Lerouge P, Busse U et al (2005) Efficient and reliable production of pharmaceuticals in alfalfa. In: Fischer R, Schillberg S (eds) Molecular farming, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co
Dalsgaard K, Uttenthal A, Jones TD et al (1997) Plant-derived vaccine protects target animals against a viral disease. Nat Biotechnol 15:248–252
Daniell H, Cohill PR, Kumar S et al (2004) Chloroplast genetic engineering. In: Daniell H, Chase C (eds) Molecular biology and biotechnology of plant organelles. 1st edn. Springer, Dordrecht
Daniell H, Lee S, Panchal T et al (2001) Expression of the native cholera toxin B subunit gene and assembly as functional oligomers in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. J Mol Biol 311:1001–1009
De Cosa B, Moar W, Lee SB et al (2001) Overexpression of the Bt cry2Aa2 operon in chloroplasts leads to formation of insecticidal crystals. Nat Biotechnol 19:71–74
De Jaeger G, Scheffer S, Jacobs A et al (2002) Boosting heterologous protein production in transgenic dicotyledonous seeds using Phaseolus vulgaris regulatory sequences. Nat Biotechnol 12:1265–1268
Dhingra A, Portis Jr AR, Daniell H (2004) Enhanced translation of a chloroplast-expressed RbcS gene restores small subunit levels and photosynthesis in nuclear RbcS antisense plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6315–6320
Dong JL, Liang BG, Jin YS et al (2005) Oral immunization with pBsVP6-transgenic alfalfa protects mice against rotavirus infection. Virology 339:153–163
Dowson Day MJ, Ashurst JL, Mathias SF et al (1993) Plant viral leaders influence expression of a reporter gene in tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 23:97–109
Dufourmantel N, Pelissier B, Garcon F et al (2004) Generation of fertile transplastomic soybean. Plant Mol Biol 55:479–489
Dus Santos MJ, Wigdorovitz A, Trono K et al (2002) A novel methodology to develop a foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) peptide-based vaccine in transgenic plants. Vaccine 20:1141–1147
Dus Santos MJ, Wigdorovitz A (2005) Special feature: transgenic plants for the production of veterinary vaccines. Immunol Cell Biol 83:229–238
Faye L, Boulaflous A, Benchabane M et al (2005) Protein modifications in the plant secretory pathway: current status and practical implications in molecular pharming. Vaccine 23:1770–1778
Fernandez-Fernandez MR, Martinez-Torrecuadrada JL, Casal JI et al (1998) Development of an antigen presentation system based on plum pox potyvirus. FEBS Lett 427:229–235
Fernandez-Fernandez MR, Mourino M, Rivera J et al (2001) Protection of rabbits against rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus by immunization with the VP60 protein expressed in plants with a potyvirus-based vector. Virology 280:283–291
Floss DM, Falkenburg D, Conrad U (2007) Production of vaccines and therapeutic antibodies for veterinary applications in transgenic plants: an overview. Transgenic Res 16:315–332
Fox JL (2005) Beer giant blindsides Ventria’s pharmacrop. Nat Biotechnol 23:636
Fox JL (2006) Turning plants into protein factories. Nat Biotechnol 24:1191
Franconi R, Di Bonito P, Dibello F et al (2002) Plant-derived human papillomavirus 16 E7 oncoprotein induces immune response and specific tumor protection. Cancer Res 62:3654–3658
Gao Y, Ma Y, Li M et al (2003) Oral immunization of animals with transgenic cherry tomatillo expressing HBsAg. World J Gastroenterol 9:996–1002
Garg R, Tolbert M, Oakes JL et al (2007) Chloroplast targeting of FanC, the major antigenic subunit of Escherichia coli K99 fimbriae, in transgenic soybean. Plant Cell Rep 26:1011–1023
Gil F, Brun A, Wigdorovitz A et al (2001) High-yield expression of a viral peptide vaccine in transgenic plants. FEBS Lett 488:13–17
Gil F, Titarenko E, Terrada E et al (2006) Successful oral prime-immunization with VP60 from rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus produced in transgenic plants using different fusion strategies. Plant Biotechnol J 4:135–143
Giritch A, Marillonnet S, Engler C et al (2006) Rapid high-yield expression of full-size IgG antibodies in plants coinfected with noncompeting viral vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14701–14706
Glaser E, Soll J (2004) Targeting signals and import machinery of plastids and plant mitochondria. In: Daniell H, Chase C (eds) Molecular biology and biotechnology of plant organelles. 1st edn. Springer, Dordrecht
Gleba Y, Klimyuk V, Marillonnet S (2007) Viral vectors for the expression of proteins in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:134–141
Gomez N, Carrillo C, Salinas J et al (1998) Expression of immunogenic glycoprotein S polypeptides from transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus in transgenic plants. Virology 249:352–358
Gomez N, Wigdorovitz A, Castanon S et al (2000) Oral immunogenicity of the plant derived spike protein from swine-transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus. Arch Virol 145:1725–1732
Guerrero-Andrade O, Loza-Rubio E, Olivera-Flores T et al (2006) Expression of the Newcastle disease virus fusion protein in transgenic maize and immunological studies. Transgenic Res 15:455–463
Gutierrez RA, MacIntosh GC, Green PJ (1999) Current perspectives on mRNA stability in plants: multiple levels and mechanisms of control. Trends Plant Sci 4:429–438
Hahn BS, Jeon IS, Jung YJ et al (2007) Expression of hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein of Newcastle disease virus in transgenic tobacco. Plant Biotechnol Rep 1:85–92
Haq TA, Mason HS, Clements JD et al (1995) Oral immunization with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in transgenic plants. Science 268:714–716
Hileman B (2003) Clashes over agbiotech. Chem Eng News 81:25–33
Holmgren J, Czerkinsky C, Eriksson K et al (2003) Mucosal immunisation and adjuvants: a brief overview of recent advances and challenges. Vaccine 21:S89–S95
Horvath H, Huang J, Wong O et al (2000) The production of recombinant proteins in transgenic barley grains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1914–1919
Hou B-K, Zhou Y-H, Wan L-H et al (2003) Chloroplast transformation in oilseed rape. Transgen Res 12:111–114
Huang LK, Liao SC, Chang CC et al (2006) Expression of avian reovirus δC protein in transgenic plants. J Virol Meth 134:217–222
Huang Y, Liang W, Pan A et al (2003) Production of FaeG, the major subunit of K88 Fimbriae, in transgenic tobacco plants and its immunogenicity in mice. Infect Immun 71:5436–5439
Huang Y, Liang W, Wang Y et al (2005) Immunogenicity of the epitope of the foot-and-mouth disease virus fused with a hepatitis B core protein as expressed in transgenic tobacco. Viral Immunol 18:668–677
Huang Z, Dry I, Webster D et al (2001) Plant-derived measles virus hemagglutinin protein induces neutralizing antibodies in mice. Vaccine 19:2163–2171
Hunt AG (1994) Messenger RNA 3′ end formation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:47–60
Ingelbrecht ILW, Herman LMF, Dekeyser RA et al (1989) Different 3′ end regions strongly influence the level of gene expression in plant cells. Plant Cell 1:671–680
Joensuu JJ, Kotiaho M, Riipi T et al (2004) Fimbrial subunit protein FaeG expressed in transgenic tobacco inhibits the binding of F4ac enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to porcine enterocytes. Transgenic Res 13:295–298
Joensuu JJ, Kotiaho M, Teeri TH et al (2006a) Glycosylated F4 (K88) fimbrial adhesin FaeG expressed in barley endosperm induces ETEC-neutralizing antibodies in mice. Transgenic Res 15:359–373
Joensuu JJ, Verdonck F, Ehrstrom A et al (2006b) F4 (K88) fimbrial adhesin FaeG expressed in alfalfa reduces F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli excretion in weaned piglets. Vaccine 24:2387–2394
Joshi CP, Zhou H, Huang X et al (1997) Context sequences of translation initiation codon in plants. Plant Mol Biol 35:993–1001
Judge NA, Mason HS, O’Brien AD (2004) Plant cell-based intimin vaccine given orally to mice primed with intimin reduces time of Escherichia coli O157:H7 shedding in feces. Infect Immun 72:168–175
Kang T, Loc N, Jang M et al (2004a) Modification of the cholera toxin B subunit coding sequence to enhance expression in plants. Mol Breed 13:143–153
Kang TJ, Han SC, Kim MY et al (2004b) Expression of non-toxic mutant of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin in tobacco chloroplasts. Protein Expr Purif 38:123–128
Kang TJ, Lee WS, Choi EG et al (2006) Mass production of somatic embryos expressing Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit in Siberian ginseng. J Biotechnol 121:124–133
Kang T-J, Kim Y-S, Jang Y-S et al (2005a) Expression of the synthetic neutralizing epitope gene of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in tobacco plants without nicotine. Vaccine 23:2294–2297
Kang T-J, Seo J-E, Kim D-H et al (2005b) Cloning and sequence analysis of the Korean strain of spike gene of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and expression of its neutralizing epitope in plants. Protein Expr Purif 41:378–383
Kang TJ, Han SC, Yang MS (2005c) Expression of the B subunit of E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin in tobacco using a herbicide resistance gene as a selection marker. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 81:165–174
Kang TJ, Loc NH, Jang MO et al (2003) Expression of the B subunit of E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin in the chloroplasts of plants and its characterization. Transgenic Res 12:683–691
Kapila J, De Rycke R, Van Montagu M et al (1997) An Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression system for intact leaves. Plant Sci 122:101–108
Kapusta J, Modelska A, Figlerowicz M et al (1999) A plant-derived edible vaccine against hepatitis B virus. FASEB J 13:1796–1799
Karaman S, Cunnick J, Wang K (2006) Analysis of immune response in young and aged mice vaccinated with corn-derived antigen against Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. Mol Biotechnol 32:31–42
Kawaguchi R, Bailey-Serres J (2002) Regulation of translational initiation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:460–465
Khandelwal A, Lakshmi SG, Shaila MS (2003a) Oral immunization of cattle with hemagglutinin protein of rinderpest virus expressed in transgenic peanut induces specific immune responses. Vaccine 21:3282–3289
Khandelwal A, Renukaradhya GJ, Rajasekhar M et al (2004) Systemic and oral immunogenicity of hemagglutinin protein of rinderpest virus expressed by transgenic peanut plants in a mouse model. Virology 323:284–291
Khandelwal A, Sita GL, Shaila MS (2003b) Expression of hemagglutinin protein of rinderpest virus in transgenic tobacco and immunogenicity of plant-derived protein in a mouse model. Virology 308:207–215
Khandelwal A, Vally KJM, Geetha N et al (2003c) Engineering hemagglutinin (H) protein of rinderpest virus into peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as a possible source of vaccine. Plant Sci 165:77–84
Kim TG, Ruprecht R, Langridge WHR (2004) Synthesis and assembly of a cholera toxin B subunit SHIV 89.6p Tat fusion protein in transgenic potato. Protein Expr Purif 35:313–319
Kim TG, Kim MY, Kim BG et al (2007) Synthesis and assembly of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit in transgenic lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Protein Expr Purif 51:22–27
Kim YS, Kang TJ, Jang YS et al (2005) Expression of neutralizing epitope of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in potato plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 82:125–130
Kirk DD, McIntosh K, Walmsley AM et al (2005) Risk analysis for plant-made vaccines. Transgenic Res 14:449–462
Kirk DD, Webb SR (2005) The next 15 years: taking plant-made vaccines beyond proof of concept. Immunol Cell Biol 83:248–256
Kohl T, Hitzeroth II, Stewart D et al (2006) Plant-produced cottontail rabbit papillomavirus L1 protein protects against tumor challenge: a proof-of-concept study. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13:845–853
Koo M, Bendahmane M, Lettieri GA et al (1999) Protective immunity against murine hepatitis virus (MHV) induced by intranasal or subcutaneous administration of hybrids of tobacco mosaic virus that carries an MHV epitope. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7774–7779
Kumar GBS, Ganapathi TR, Revathi CJ et al (2005) Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic banana plants. Planta 222:484–493
Kumar S, Dhingra A, Daniell H (2004a) Plastid-expressed betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in carrot cultured cells, roots, and leaves confers enhanced salt tolerance. Plant Phys 136:2843–2854
Kumar S, Dhingra A, Daniell H (2004b) Stable transformation of the cotton plastid genome and maternal inheritance of transgenes. Plant Mol Biol 56:203–216
Lamphear BJ, Streatfield SJ, Jilka JA et al (2002) Delivery of subunit vaccines in maize seed. J Controlled Release 85:169–180
Langeveld JPM, Brennan FR, Martinez-Torrecuadrada JL et al (2001) Inactivated recombinant plant virus protects dogs from a lethal challenge with canine parvovirus. Vaccine 19:3661–3670
Lauterslager TGM, Florack DEA, Van Der Wal TJ et al (2001) Oral immunisation of naive and primed animals with transgenic potato tubers expressing LT-B. Vaccine 19:2749–2755
Lee KY, Kim DH, Kang TJ et al (2006) Induction of protective immune responses against the challenge of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by the oral administration of transgenic tobacco plant expressing ApxIIA toxin from the bacteria. FEMS Imm Med Microbiol 48:381–389
Lee RWH, Strommer J, Hodgins D et al (2001) Towards development of an edible vaccine against bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis using transgenic white clover expressing a Mannheimia haemolytica A1 leukotoxin 50 fusion protein. Infect Immun 69:5786–5793
Lee SB, Kwon HB, Kwon SJ et al (2003) Accumulation of trehalose within transgenic chloroplasts confers drought tolerance. Mol Breed 11:1–13
Leelavathi S, Gupta N, Maiti S et al (2003) Overproduction of an alkali- and thermo-stable xylanase in tobacco chloroplasts and efficient recovery of the enzyme. Mol Breed 11:59–67
Legocki AB, Miedzinska K, Czaplinska M et al (2005) Immunoprotective properties of transgenic plants expressing E2 glycoprotein from CSFV and cysteine protease from Fasciola hepatica. Vaccine 23:1844–1846
Li Y, Sun M, Liu J et al (2006) High expression of foot-and-mouth disease virus structural protein VP1 in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Cell Rep 25:329–333
Liang W, Huang Y, Yang X et al (2006) Oral immunization of mice with plant-derived fimbrial adhesin FaeG induces systemic and mucosal K88ad enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-specific immune responses. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 46:393–399
Maas C, Laufs J, Grant S et al (1991) The combination of a novel stimulatory element in the first exon of the maize Shrunken-1 gene with the following intron 1 enhances reporter gene expression up to 1000-fold. Plant Mol Biol 16:199–207
Marconi G, Albertini E, Barone P et al (2006) In planta production of two peptides of the Classical Swine Fever Virus (CSFV) E2 glycoprotein fused to the coat protein of potato virus X. BMC Biotechnol 6:29
Marillonnet S, Thoeringer C, Kandzia R et al (2005) Systemic Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transfection of viral replicons for efficient transient expression in plants. Nat Biotechnol 23:718–723
Martin-Alonso JM, Castanon S, Alonso P et al (2003) Oral immunization using tuber extracts from transgenic potato plants expressing rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus capsid protein. Transgenic Res 12:127–130
Marusic C, Rizza P, Lattanzi L et al (2001) Chimeric plant virus particles as immunogens for inducing murine and human immune responses against human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 75:8434–8439
Mason HS, Ball JM, Shi JJ et al (1996) Expression of Norwalk virus capsid protein in transgenic tobacco and potato and its oral immunogenicity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5335–5340
Mason HS, Haq TA, Clements JD et al (1998) Edible vaccine protects mice against Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT): potatoes expressing a synthetic LT-B gene. Vaccine 16:1336–1343
Mason HS, Lam DMK, Arntzen CJ (1992) Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11745–11749
Matsumura T, Itchoda N, Tsunemitsu H (2002) Production of immunogenic VP6 protein of bovine group A rotavirus in transgenic potato plants. Arch Virol 147:1263–1270
Matsuoka K, Nakamura K (1991) Propeptide of a precursor to a plant vacuolar protein required for vacuolar targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:834–838
McGarvey PB, Hammond J, Dienelt MM et al (1995) Expression of the rabies virus glycoprotein in transgenic tomatoes. Nat Biotechnol 13:1484–1487
Menassa R, Du C, Yin ZQ et al (2007) Therapeutic effectiveness of orally administered transgenic low-alkaloid tobacco expressing human interleukin-10 in a mouse model of colitis. Plant Biotechnol J 5:50–59
Mestecky J, Moldoveanu Z, Elson CO (2005) Immune response versus mucosal tolerance to mucosally administered antigens. Vaccine 23:1800–1803
Meyer DE, Chilkoti A (1999) Purification of recombinant proteins by fusion with thermally-responsive polypeptides. Nat Biotechnol 17:1112–1115
Mihaliak CA, Webb SR (2005) Plant-cell-produced vaccines for animal health. Feed Info News Service. http://www.dowagro.com/PublishedLiterature/dh_004d/0901b8038004d659.pdf?filepath=/PublishToInternet/InternetDOWAGRO/animalhealth/pdfs/noreg/010-99016&fromPage=BasicSearch Cited 1 Oct 2007
Modelska A, Dietzschold B, Sleysh N et al (1998) Immunization against rabies with plant-derived antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2481–2485
Molina A, Hervas-Stubbs S, Daniell H et al (2004) High-yield expression of a viral peptide animal vaccine in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Biotechnol J 2:141–153
Molina A, Veramendi J, Hervas-Stubbs S (2005) Induction of neutralizing antibodies by a tobacco chloroplast-derived vaccine based on a B cell epitope from canine parvovirus. Virology 342:266–275
Moravec T, Schmidt MA, Herman EM et al (2007) Production of Escherichia coli heat labile toxin (LT) B subunit in soybean seed and analysis of its immunogenicity as an oral vaccine. Vaccine 25:1647–1657
Munro S, Pelham HR (1987) A C-terminal signal prevents secretion of luminal ER proteins. Cell 48:899–907
Murphy DJ (2007) Improving containment strategies in biopharming. Plant Biotechnol J 5:555–569
Nagesha N, Ramanjini Gowda PH, Husudana SN et al (2007) Genetic transformation of cantaloupe melon (Cucumis melo L.) with the rabies virus glycoprotein gene (PRGSpRgp) and immunisation studies in mice. J Horticult Sci Biotechnol 82:383–386
Natilla A, Hammond RW, Nemchinov LG (2006) Epitope presentation system based on cucumber mosaic virus coat protein expressed from a potato virus X-based vector. Arch Virol 151:1373–1386
Neutra MR, Kozlowski MR (2006) Mucosal vaccines the promises and the challenges. Nature rev 6:148–158
Ni M, Cui D, Einstein J et al (1995) Strength and tissue specificity of chimeric promoters derived from the octopine and mannopine synthase genes. Plant J 7:661–676
Nicholas BL, Brennan FR, Martinez-Torrecuadrada JL et al (2002) Characterization of the immune response to canine parvovirus induced by vaccination with chimaeric plant viruses. Vaccine 20:2727–2734
Oszvald M, Kang TJ, Tomoskozi S et al (2007) Expression of a synthetic neutralizing epitope of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus fused with synthetic B subunit of Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin in rice endosperm. Mol Biotechnol 35:215–223
Parmenter DL, Boothe JG, Rooijen GJH et al (1995) Production of biologically active hirudin in plant seeds using oleosin partitioning. Plant Mol Biol 29:1167–1180
Patel J, Zhu H, Menassa R et al (2007) Elastin-like polypeptide fusions enhance the accumulation of recombinant proteins in tobacco leaves. Transgenic Res 16:239–249
Perez Filgueira DM, Mozgovoj M, Wigdorovitz A et al (2004) Passive protection to bovine rotavirus (BRV) infection induced by a BRV VP8* produced in plants using a TMV-based vector. Arch Virol 149:2337–2348
Perez Filgueira DM, Zamorano PI, Dominguez MG et al (2003) Bovine herpes virus gD protein produced in plants using a recombinant tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) vector possesses authentic antigenicity. Vaccine 21:4201–4209
Perlak FJ, Fuchs RL, Dean DA et al (1991) Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3324–3328
Piller KJ, Clemente TE, Mu Jun S et al (2005) Expression and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli K99 fimbriae subunit antigen in soybean. Planta 222:6–18
Pogrebnyak N, Golovkin M, Andrianov V et al (2005) Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) S protein production in plants: development of recombinant vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9062–9067
Prasad V, Satyavathi VV, Sanjaya et al (2004) Expression of biologically active hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein of Peste des petits ruminants virus in transgenic pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.]. Plant Sci 166:199–205
Rescigno M, Urbano M, Valzasina B et al (2001) Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria. Nat Immunol 2:361–367
Rice J, Ainley WM, Shewen P (2005) Plant-made vaccines: biotechnology and immunology in animal health. Anim Health Res Rev 6:199–209
Richter LJ, Thanavala Y, Arntzen CJ et al (2000) Production of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic plants for oral immunization. Nat Biotechnol 18:1167–1171
Rigano MM, Alvarez ML, Pinkhasov J et al (2004) Production of a fusion protein consisting of the enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin B subunit and a tuberculosis antigen in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 22:502–508
Rimoldi M, Rescigno M (2005) Uptake and presentation of orally administered antigens. Vaccine 23:1793–1796
Ruf S, Hermann M, Berger IJ et al (2001) Stable genetic transformation of tomato plastids and expression of a foreign protein in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19:870–875
Rymerson RT, Babiuk L, Menassa R et al (2003) Immunogenicity of the capsid protein VP2 from porcine parvovirus expressed in low alkaloid transgenic tobacco. Mol Breed 11:267–276
Saint-Jore-Dupas C, Faye L, Gomord V (2007) From planta to pharma with glycosylation in the toolbox. Trends Biotechnol 25:317–323
Sandhu JS, Krasnyanski SF, Domier LL et al (2000) Oral immunization of mice with transgenic tomato fruit expressing respiratory syncytial virus-F protein induces a systemic immune response. Transgen Res 9:127–135
Santi L, Giritch A, Roy CJ et al (2006) Protection conferred by recombinant Yersinia pestis antigens produced by a rapid and highly scalable plant expression system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:861–866
Satyavathi VV, Prasad V, Khandelwal A et al (2003) Expression of hemagglutinin protein of Rinderpest virus in transgenic pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] plants. Plant Cell Rep 21:651–658
Scheller J, Leps M, Conrad U (2006) Forcing single-chain variable fragment production in tobacco seeds by fusion to elastin-like polypeptides. Plant Biotechnol J 4:243–249
Schillberg S, Zimmermann S, Voss A et al (1999) Apoplastic and cytosolic expression of full-size antibodies and antibody fragments in Nicotiana tabacum. Transgenic Res 8:255–263
Sidorov VA, Kasten D, Pang S-Z et al (1999) Stable chloroplast transformation in potato: use of green fluorescent protein as a plastid marker. Plant J 19:209–216
Smith ML, Keegan ME, Mason HS et al (2002) Factors important in the extraction, stability and in vitro assembly of the hepatitis B surface antigen derived from recombinant plant systems. Biotechnol Prog 18:538–550
Smith ML, Lindbo JA, Dillard-Telm S et al (2006) Modified tobacco mosaic virus particles as scaffolds for display of protein antigens for vaccine applications. Virology 348:475–488
Sparrow P, Irwin J, Dale P et al (2007) Pharma-Planta: road testing the developing regulatory guidelines for plant-made pharmaceuticals. Transgenic Res 16:147–161
Streatfield SJ (2005) Plant-based vaccines for animal health. Revue Scientifique et Technique 24:189–199
Streatfield SJ, Howard JA (2003a) Plant production systems for vaccines. Exp Rev Vaccines 2:763–775
Streatfield SJ, Howard JA (2003b) Plant-based vaccines. Int J Parasitol 33:479–493
Streatfield SJ, Jilka JM, Hood EE et al (2001) Plant-based vaccines: unique advantages. Vaccine 19:2742–2748
Streatfield SJ, Lane JR, Brooks CA et al (2003) Corn as a production system for human and animal vaccines. Vaccine 21:812–815
Strober W, Kelsall B, Marth T (1998) Oral tolerance. J Clinic Immunol 18:1–30
Svab Z, Maliga P (1993) High-frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimeric aadA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:913–917
Tacket CO, Mason HS, Losonsky G et al (1998) Immunogenicity in humans of a recombinant bacterial antigen delivered in a transgenic potato. Nat Med 4:607–609
Tacket CO, Mason HS, Losonsky G et al (2000) Human immune responses to a novel norwalk virus vaccine delivered in transgenic potatoes. J Infec Dis 182:302–305
Tacket CO, Pasetti MF, Edelman R et al (2004) Immunogenicity of recombinant LT-B delivered orally to humans in transgenic corn. Vaccine 22:4385–4389
Thanavala Y, Yang YF, Lyons P et al (1995) Immunogenicity of transgenic plant-derived hepatitis B surface antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3358–3361
Thanavala Y, Mahoney M, Pal S et al (2005) Immunogenicity in humans of an edible vaccine for hepatitis B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3378–3382
Topfer R, Maas C, Horicke-Grandpierre C et al (1993) Expression vectors for high-level gene expression in dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. Meth Enzymol 217:66–78
Tregoning JS, Nixon P, Kuroda H et al (2003) Expression of tetanus toxin Fragment C in tobacco chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Res 31:1174–1179
Tuboly T, Yu W, Bailey A et al (2000) Immunogenicity of porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus spike protein expressed in plants. Vaccine 18:2023–2028
Usha R, Rohll JB, Spall V et al (1993) Expression of an animal virus antigenic site on the surface of a plant virus particle. Virology 197:366–376
Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Goddeeris BM (1999) Receptor-dependent immune responses in pigs after oral immunization with F4 fimbriae. Infect Immun 67:520–526
Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Oudega B et al (2000) The F4 fimbrial antigen of Escherichia coli and its receptors. Vet Microbiol 71:223–244
Van Droogenbroeck B, Cao J, Stadlmann J et al (2007) Aberrant localization and underglycosylation of highly accumulating single-chain Fv-Fc antibodies in transgenic Arabidopsis seeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1430–1435
Van Molle I, Joensuu JJ, Buts L et al (2007) Chloroplasts assemble the major subunit FaeG of Escherichia coli F4 (K88) fimbriae into strand-swapped dimers. J Mol Biol 368:791–799
Vermij P, Waltz E (2006) USDA approves the first plant-based vaccine. Nat Biotechnol 24:233–234
Vieira da Silva J, Garcia AB, Vieira Flores VM et al (2002) Phytosecretion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli pilin subunit A in transgenic tobacco and its suitability for early life vaccinology. Vaccine 20:2091–2101
Voinnet O, Rivas S, Mestre P et al (2003) An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus. Plant J 33:949–956
Walmsley AM, Alvarez ML, Jin Y et al (2003) Expression of the B subunit of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin as a fusion protein in transgenic tomato. Plant Cell Rep 21:1020–1026
Waltz E (2006) Hawaiian pharmacrops not compliant. Nat Biotechnol 24:1186
Warzecha H, Mason HS, Lane C et al (2003) Oral immunogenicity of human papillomavirus-like particles expressed in potato. J Virol 77:8702–8711
Wen SX, Teel LD, Judge NA et al (2006) A plant-based oral vaccine to protect against systemic intoxication by Shiga toxin type 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7082–7087
Wigdorovitz A, Carrillo C, Dus Santos MJ et al (1999a) Induction of a protective antibody response to foot and mouth disease virus in mice following oral or parenteral immunization with alfalfa transgenic plants expressing the viral structural protein VP1. Virology 255:347–353
Wigdorovitz A, Mozgovoj M, Dus Santos MJ et al (2004) Protective lactogenic immunity conferred by an edible peptide vaccine to bovine rotavirus produced in transgenic plants. J Gen Virol 85:1825–1832
Wigdorovitz A, Perez Filgueira DM, Robertson N et al (1999b) Protection of mice against challenge with foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) by immunization with foliar extracts from plants infected with recombinant tobacco mosaic virus expressing the FMDV structural protein VP1. Virology 264:85–91
Woodlief WG, Chaplin JF, Campbell CR et al (1981) Effect of variety and harvest treatments on protein yield of close-grown tobacco. Tob Sci 25:83–86
Wu H, Singh NK, Locy RD et al (2004) Immunization of chickens with VP2 protein of infectious bursal disease virus expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana. Avian Dis 48:663–668
Yang ZQ, Liu QQ, Pan ZM et al (2007) Expression of the fusion glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus in transgenic rice and its immunogenicity in mice. Vaccine 25:591–598
Yelverton E, Norton S, Obijeski JF et al (1983) Rabies virus glycoprotein analogs: biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Science 219:614–619
Yu J, Langridge WHR (2001) A plant-based multicomponent vaccine protects mice from enteric diseases. Nat Biotechnol 19:548–552
Yusibov V, Hooper DC, Spitsin SV et al (2002) Expression in plants and immunogenicity of plant virus-based experimental rabies vaccine. Vaccine 20:3155–3164
Yusibov V, Mett V, Mett V et al (2005) Peptide-based candidate vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 23:2261–2265
Yusibov V, Modelska A, Steplewski K et al (1997) Antigens produced in plants by infection with chimeric plant viruses immunize against rabies virus and HIV-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5784–5788
Zelada AM, Calamante G, de la Paz SM et al (2006) Expression of tuberculosis antigen ESAT-6 in Nicotiana tabacum using a potato virus X-based vector. Tuberculosis 86:263–267
Zhao Y, Hammond RW (2005) Development of a candidate vaccine for Newcastle disease virus by epitope display in the cucumber mosaic virus capsid protein. Biotechnol Lett 27:375–382
Zhou J, Wu J, Cheng L et al (2003) Expression of immunogenic S1 glycoprotein of infectious bronchitis virus in transgenic potatoes. J Virol 77:9090–9093
Zhou JY, Cheng LQ, Zheng XJ et al (2004) Generation of the transgenic potato expressing full-length spike protein of infectious bronchitis virus. J Biotechnol 111:121–130
Ziauddin A, Lee RWH, Lo R et al (2004) Transformation of alfalfa with a bacterial fusion gene, Mannheimia haemolytica A1 leukotoxin50-gfp: Response with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains LBA4404 and C58. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 79:271–278
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s Matching Investment Initiative program. The Academy of Finland is acknowledged for providing a fellowship for JJJ. Andrew Conley is thanked for critical comments and helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joensuu, J.J., Niklander-Teeri, V. & Brandle, J.E. Transgenic plants for animal health: plant-made vaccine antigens for animal infectious disease control. Phytochem Rev 7, 553–577 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-008-9088-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-008-9088-2