Abstract
This article responds to Janet Kourany’s proposal, in Philosophy of Science after Feminism, that scientific practices be held to the ideal of ‘socially responsible science’, to produce results that are not only cognitively sound, but also significant in the light of values ‘that can be morally justified’. Kourany also urges the development of ‘contextualized philosophy of science’—of which feminist philosophy of science is exemplary—that is ‘politically engaged’ and ‘activist’, ‘informed by analyses of the actual ways in which science interacts with the wider society in which it occurs, the ways in which science is shaped by and in turn shapes society’, and that can contribute to understanding both the cognitive and social dimensions of science. Although I share Kourany’s commitment to contextualized philosophy of science, I question her proposed ideal of ‘socially responsible science’ and the grounds she provides for adopting it. My argument leads me to defend rehabilitating the traditional ideal of the ‘neutrality’ of science, which I reinterpret as the ideal of ‘inclusiveness and evenhandedness’.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kourany, J. (2010). Philosophy of science after feminism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lacey, H. (1999). Is science value free? London: Routledge.
Lacey, H. (2005a). Values and objectivity in science. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lacey, H. (2005b). On the interplay of the cognitive and the social in scientific practices. Philosophy of Science, 72, 977–988.
Lacey, H. (2012). Reflections on science and technoscience. Scientiae Studia, 10, 103–128.
Lacey, H. (2013). On the co-unfolding of scientific knowledge and viable values. In P. E. Bour, G. Heinzmann, W. Hodges, & P. Schroeder-Heister (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science. London: College Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Comments on Janet Kourany’s Philosophy of Science after Feminism, Pacific APA, Seattle, April 6, 2012. All page references in the text are to this work (Kourany 2010).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacey, H. Rehabilitating neutrality. Philos Stud 163, 77–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0074-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0074-6