Skip to main content
Log in

Risk, Rights, and Restitution

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “Imposing Risks,” Judith Thomson gives a case in which, by turning on her stove, she accidentally causes her neighbor’s death. She claims that both the following are true: (1) she ought not to have caused her neighbor’s death; (2) it was permissible for her to turn her stove on. In this paper it is argued that it cannot be that both (1) and (2) are true, that (2) is true, and that therefore (1) is false. How this is so is explained, and the implications of this position regarding the relation between rights and duties is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Åqvist (1967) ArticleTitle‘Good Samaritans, Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives, and Epistemic Obligations’ Noûs 1 361–379

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Feldman (1986) Doing the Best We Can D. Reidel Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • W.N. Hohfeld (1919) Fundamental Legal Conceptions Yale University Press New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Jackson (1991) ArticleTitle‘Decision-theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection’ Ethics 101 461–482 Occurrence Handle10.1086/293312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Jackson R. Pargetter (1986) ArticleTitle‘Oughts, Options, and Actualism’ Philosophical Review 95 233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • G.E. Moore (1912) Ethics Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Parfit (1984) Reasons and Persons Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Rescher (1983) Risk University Press of America Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • W.D. Ross (1930) The Right and the Good Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Schroeder (1995) ‘Causation, Compensation, and Moral Responsibility’ D.G. Owen (Eds) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law Clarendon Press Oxford 347–361

    Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Smith (1989) ArticleTitleReview of Thomson (1986) Philosophical Review 98 414–418

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Thomson (1986) Rights, Restitution, and Risk Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Thomson (1990) The Realm of Rights Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Thomson (1991) ArticleTitle‘Self-Defense’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 283–310

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Waldron (1995) ‘Moments of Carelessness and Massive Loss’ D.G. Owen (Eds) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law Clarendon Press Oxford 387–408

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Zimmerman (1994) ArticleTitle‘Rights, Compensation, and Culpability’ Law and Philosophy 13 419–450

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Zimmerman (1996) The Concept of Moral Obligation Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Zimmerman (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Plea for Accuses’ American Philosophical Quarterly 34 229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Zimmerman (2005) ‘The Relevance of Risk to Wrongdoing’ R. Feldman (Eds) et al. The Good, the Right, Life, and Death Ashgate Press Aldershot 151–170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Zimmerman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmerman, M.J. Risk, Rights, and Restitution. Philos Stud 128, 285–311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7800-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7800-7

Navigation