Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion – Empiricism versus Metaphysics

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • J. Ladyman (2000) ArticleTitle‘What’s Really Wrong with Constructive Empiricism?: van Fraassen and the Metaphysics of Modality’ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 837–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J. (in press a): ‘The Epistemology of Constructive Empiricism’, in P. Clark and R. Young (eds.), van Fraassen’s Philosophy of Science, Mind Occasional Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ladyman, J. (in press b): ‘Constructive Empiricism and Modality: A reply to van Fraassen and Monton’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

  • Nagel, J. (2000): ‘The Empiricist Conception of Experience’, Philosophy 75

  • B.C. van Fraassen (2000) ArticleTitleThe False Hopes of Traditional Epistemology Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • B.C. van Fraassen B. Monton (2003) ArticleTitle‘Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism’ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 405–422

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Ladyman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ladyman, J. Discussion – Empiricism versus Metaphysics. Philos Stud 121, 133–145 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5487-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5487-4

Navigation