Abstract
Cardiophenomenology aims at refining the neuro-phenomenological approach created by F. Varela as a new paradigm, jointly based on Husserl’s a priori dynamics of the living present and an experiment on anticipatory time-dynamics of visual motor perception. In order to do so, we will situate the paradigm of neurophenomenology at the cardio-vascular level, focusing on the emotional dynamics of lived experience and thus refining the dialogue, more precisely, the generative mutual constraints between first- and third-person analysis. In this article we present the theoretical hypothesis of cardiophenomenology, which places the bodily-emotional heartsystem at its core, as an intrinsic part of the cognitive system. The latter therefore needs to be enlarged in order to include an enactive embodied cardiac-affective dimension. Here we present five main arguments for the necessary inclusion of the bodily-emotional heartsystem in the cognitive system: first, two pragmatic operational arguments (experiential and methodological), then three theoretical ones (cognitive, homological and ontological-laden). A direct methodological-pragmatic consequence is the actual operativity of the generative mutual constraints based on an experiential (lived)-experimental (organic) continuity of the embodied cardiac-affective fold inherent in the subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babo-Rebelo, M. C., Richter, G., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2016). Neural responses to heartbeats in the default network encode the self in spontaneous thoughts. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(30), 7829–7840 782.
Bitbol, M. (2014). La conscience a-t-elle une origine ? Des neurosciences à la pleine conscience : une nouvelle approche de l’esprit. Paris: Flammarion.
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219 Available at http://consc.net/papers/facing.html.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coghill, G. E. (1929). Anatomy and the problem of behaviour. NewYork: Mac Millan.
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666.
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Harper.
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co..
Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling of the brain. New York: Harvest Books.
Depraz, N. (2001). Lucidité du corps: De l’empirisme transcendantal en phénoménologie. Heidelberg: Springer.
Depraz, N. (2008). The rainbow of emotions: At the crossroads of neurobiology and phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review, 41(July), 237–259.
Depraz, N. (2009). The ‘failing’ of meaning: First steps into a first person experiential approach, C. Petitmengin ed., Journal of Consciousness Studies, Special Issue, First-person Methodologies, pp. 90–117.
Depraz, N. (2011). Lire et écrire en phénoménologue: Sartre et l’accès au vécu ‘en première personne, In: L’écriture et la lecture : des phénomènes miroir ? L’exemple de Sartre (N. Depraz & N. Parant eds.), Rouen, PUHR, coll. “Rencontres philosophiques”, n°2.
Depraz, N. 2013. “The surprise of non sense”, Enactive cognition at the edge of sense making, M. Cappuccio & T. Froese (eds.), Palgrave MacMillan.
Depraz, N. (2014). Attention et vigilance. A la croisée de la phénoménologie et des sciences cognitives, Paris, P.U.F., Epiméthée.
Depraz, N. (2015). La surprise. Une dynamique circulaire de verbalisation multivectorielle. In La surprise à l’épreuve du langage et des langues, N. Depraz & Cl. Serban eds., Paris, Hermann.
Depraz, N. (2018a). A descriptive science of first-person experience. For an Experiential Phenomenology (2013). A Companion to Ricoeur’s Freedom and Nature, ed. Scott Davidson Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2018, p. 175–189.
Depraz, N. (2018b). Shock, twofold dynamics, cascade: three signatures of surprise. The micro-time of the surprised body. In N. Depraz & A. Celle (Eds.), Surprise at the intersection of philosophy and linguistics. Boston: Benjamins Press, Emotion and Consciousness series, submitted.
Depraz, N. (2018c). Surprise,Valence, Emotion. The multivectorial integrative cardiophenomenology of surprise. In N. Depraz & A. Steinbock (Eds.), Surprise, an emotion? Heidelberg: Springer in press.
Depraz, N., Desmidt T. (2015). “Cardiophénoménologie” in: La naturalisation de la phénoménologie vingt ans après, Les cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg (J.-L. Petit), 38, P.U.S.
Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware. A Pragmatics of Experiencing: Boston/Amsterdam, Benjamins Press.
Depraz, N, Gyemant M., Desmidt T. (2017). A First-Person Analysis Using Third Person-Data as a Generative Method. A Case Study of Surprise in Depression. In: Constructivist Foundations Vol. 12, n°2, Neurophenomenology, A. Riegler & C. Valenzuela eds., 2017, 192–218.
Desmidt, T., Lemoine, M., Belzung, C., & Depraz, N. (2014). The temporal dynamic of emotional emergence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9377-8.
Garfinkel, S., Minati, L., Gray, M. A., Seth, A. K., Dolan, R. J., & Critchley, H. D. (2014). Fear from the heart: Sensitivity to fear stimuli depends on individual heartbeats. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(19), 6573–6582.
Gesell, A., & Amatruda, C. S. (1945). The Embryology of Behavior. The Beginnings of the Human Mind. New York: Harper and Brothers. MacKeith 1988. French text. L’embryologie du comportement. Les débuts de la pensée humaine (Paris, PUF, 1953).
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations (1928–1932). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl E. (1991). Collected works: On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917). Kluwer Academic Pub.
Jänig, W. (1996). Neurobiology of visceral afferent neurons: Neuroanatomy, functions, organ regulations and sensations. Biological Psychology, 42(1–2), 29–51.
Jänig, W. (2006). Integrative action of the autonomic nervous system. Cambreidge University Press.
Lachaux, J.-P., et al. (2007). A blueprint for real-time functioning mapping via human intracranial recordings. PLoS One, 10, e1094.
Lutz, A., Lachaux, J.-P., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(3), 1586–1591. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032658199.
Maturana, U., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoeisis and Cognition. The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Nature. Course Notes from the College de France, am. Trans., Robert Vallier, Evanston, IL : Northwestern University Press. French text: Paris, Seuil, 1968-1995, p. 189–197.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). In T. Baldwin (Ed.), “Eye and mind” (1964) in: Basic Writings. London: Routledge.
Petitmengin, C. (scientific director). (2018). https://www.microphenomenology.com/home
Petitmengin, C., Navarro, V., & Le Van Quyen, M. (2007). Anticipating seizure: Pre-reflective experience at the Center of Neurophenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(3), 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.006.
Pickard, H. (2003). Emotions and other minds. In Philosophy and the emotions, ed. Anthony Hatzimoysis. Royal Institute of philosophy supplement 52. London: Cambridge University Press.
Preston, L. (2008). The edge of awareness, Gendlin’s contribution to explorations of the implicit. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 3(4), 347–369 https://doi.org/10.1080/15551020802337419.
Ricœur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre (Paris: Seuil, 2015), Am. trans. Blamey K. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roy, J.-M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 1–80). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schulz, A., Reichert, C. F., Richter, S., Lass-Hennemann, J., Blumenthal, T. D., & Schächinger, H. (2009). Cardiac modulation of startle: effects on eye blink and higher cognitive processing. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 265–271.
Terhaar, J., Viola, F. C., Bär, K. J., & Debener, S. (2012). Heartbeat evoked potentials mirror altered body perception in depressed patients. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 1950–1957.
Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart-brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of Neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81–88.
Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.
Varela, F. J. (1997a). The body’s self. Healing emotions. Ed. D. Goleman. Boston: Shambhala.
Varela F. J. (1997b). The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature: Searching for generative mutual constraints”. Alter: Revue de Phénoménologie: “Veille, rêve, sommeil” n°5, p. 355-385.
Varela F. J. (1999). The specious present. Neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Naturalizing Phenomenology, J.-L. Petit, F. J. Varela, J.-M. Roy & B. Pachoud eds., Stanford U.P.
Varela, F. J. et al. (1989). The embodied mind, MIT Press.
Varga, S., & Heck, D. H. (2017). Rhythms of the body, rhythms of the brain: Respiration, neural oscillations, and embodied cognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 56, 77–90.
Vermersch, P. (1994/2011). L’entretien d’explicitation. Paris: ESF.
Acknowledgements
We thank Bruno Brizard (PHD Student, INSERM U930, François-Rabelais University, Tours), Maria Gyemant (Associate Post-doc, CNRS ENS, Husserl-Archives (UMR 8547), Paris) for their support and work, respectively in providing the third person technical data and in taking part in the analysis of the microphenomenological interviews, and Emily Hammond for the linguistic revision of the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Depraz, N., Desmidt, T. Cardiophenomenology: a refinement of neurophenomenology. Phenom Cogn Sci 18, 493–507 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9590-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9590-y