Skip to main content
Log in

The artifactual mind: overcoming the ‘inside–outside’ dualism in the extended mind thesis and recognizing the technological dimension of cognition

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explains why Clark’s Extended Mind thesis is not capable of sufficiently grasping how and in what sense external objects and technical artifacts can become part of our human cognition. According to the author, this is because a pivotal distinction between inside and outside is preserved in the Extended Mind theorist’s account of the relation between the human organism and the world of external objects and artifacts, a distinction which they proclaim to have overcome. Inspired by Charles S. Peirce’s philosophy of mind, in particular, the author tries to find a way out of this ‘inside–outside’ fallacy. External objects, artifacts or processes should, according to him, not be conceived as inanimate and unintelligent matter utilised by a separately living, inner mental sphere that has set certain pre-established goals for itself. Mind has rather an artifactual character. It is not extended by an inner biological cognitive core but rather unfolds itself through objects and artifacts. Mind as such is, especially in our modern technological culture, shaped by virtue of and through technical artifacts. Recognizing this artifactual dimension of mind will, the author concludes, enable a more critical analysis of contemporary claims that ascribe certain original and irreducible features to thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Peirce termed, probably independently from Husserl, his overall approach as “phenomenology.” Later he uses the notion “phaneroscopy” for his method. See Aydin (2007a) for a comparison between Peirce’s and Husserl’s phenomenology.

References

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010). Defending the bounds of cognition. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 67–80). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, C. (2007a). Charles S. Peirce: Fenomenologie van Een, Twee en Drie. In C. Aydin (Ed.), De vele Gezichten van de Fenomenologie (pp. 197–218). Kampen/Kapellen: Klement/Pelckmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, C. (2007b). Naar een proces-pragmatische grondslag voor het identiteitsbegrip: Peirce over potentialiteit, interactie en regulariteit. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 69(1), 35–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, C. (2009). On the significance of ideals: Peirce and the good life. Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society, 45(3), 422–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. P. (1998). The private language argument. Language & Communication, 18, 325–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1988). Individualism and self-knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 85(11), 649–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of mind: an integrative theory of self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: mind, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2010). Coupling, constitution, and the cognitive kind: a reply to Adams and Aizawa. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 81–100). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. (2004). Why worry about the Tractatus? In B. Stocker (Ed.), Post-analytic tractatus (pp. 167–192). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartnall, T. (2005). Does the world leak into the mind? Active externalism, “internalism”, and epistemology. Cognitive Science, 29, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2003). Who’s on first? Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1641/1985). Meditations on First Philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch (trans.). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1999). The mind’s awareness of itself. Philosophical Studies, 95, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework, Summary Report, SRI Project No. 3578, AFOSR-3223, Contract AF 49(638)-1024 (online: http://sloan.stanford.edu/mousesite/EngelbartPapers/B5_F18_ConceptFrameworkInd.html).

  • Gallagher, S., & Crisafi, A. (2009). Mental institutions. Topoi, 28, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. M. (2007). Ascent routines for propositional attitudes. Synthese, 159, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R. (1993). Authors and artifacts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93, 155–178.

  • Hurley, S. (2010). The varieties of externalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 101–154). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2011). Enculturating the supersized mind. Philosophical Studies, 152, 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, P., & Read, R. (2005). Memento: a philosophical investigation. In R. Read & J. Goodenough (Eds.), Film as philosophy: essays in cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: University Press (The Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran, A. H., & Verbeek, P. P. (2010). Trusting our selves to technology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 23(3–4), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, M. D. (2012). Extended cognition and fixed properties: steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11, 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kockelkoren, P. (2003). Technology: art, fairground and theatre. Rotterdam: NAi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelkoren, P. (2007). The artist as researcher? In P. Kockelkoren (Ed.), Mediated vision (pp. 129–152). Rotterdam: Veenman and ArtEZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, V. (2006). Towards a true neutral stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 494–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, V. (2010). De Vrije wil bestaat niet. Over wie er echt de baas is in het brein. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, P. (1988). Mind at large: knowing in the technological age. Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, C. (2007). Introspection and authoritative self-knowledge. Erkenntnis, 67(2), 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris, L. (2008a). At the potter’s wheel: an argument for material agency. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris, L. (2008b). Beads for a plastic mind: the ‘Blind Man’s Stick’ (BMS) hypothesis and the active nature of material culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(3), 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marty, R. (1997). 76 definitions of the sign by C. S. Peirce. Arisbe website: http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/resources/76defs/76defs/htm.

  • McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1996). The medium is the message. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menary, R. (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29, 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menary, R. (2009). Intentionality, cognitive integration and the continuity thesis. Topoi, 28, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Livonen, A., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385(30), 432–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1887). Logical machines. The American Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935, 1958). Collected Papers of C.S. Peirce, Ch. Hartshorne & P. Weiss; A. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press (abbreviation in text: CP followed by the conventional ‘[volume].[page]’-notation).

  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: how to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 389–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1910). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, K., & Toth, N. (1993). Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. New York/London: Simon and Schuster.

  • Selinger, E., & Engström, T. (2008). A moratorium on cyborgs: computation, cognition, and commerce. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagestad, P. (1993). Thinking with machines: intelligence augmentation, evolutionary epistemology, and semiotic. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 16(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagestad, P. (1999). Peirce's inkstand as an external embodiment of mind. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35(3), 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (2008). Material agency, skills and history: distributed cognition and the archaeology of memory. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: history, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (2013). 'The feel of the world': exograms, habits, and the confusion of types of memory. In Kania, K. (Ed.), Philosophers on Memento. London: Routledge.

  • Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., & Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 521–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, E. (2003). Our own devices: the past and future of body technology. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, C. M. (2008). On mediation and material agency in the Peircean semeiotic. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. (2004). Is language the ultimate artefacts? Language Sciences, 26, 693–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books (BB). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2008). Internalism, externalism, and transcendental idealism. Synthese, 160, 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article incorporates reworked and further developed excerpts from my Dutch article 'Het uiterlijk van het innerlijk: Extended Mind, technologie en de binnen-buiten scheiding,’ Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 74/2012, p. 701–728.

The author would like to thank Peter-Paul Verbeek and the other members of the Philosophy of Human-Technology Relations Group, and Philip Brey for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciano Aydin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aydin, C. The artifactual mind: overcoming the ‘inside–outside’ dualism in the extended mind thesis and recognizing the technological dimension of cognition. Phenom Cogn Sci 14, 73–94 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9319-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9319-x

Keywords

Navigation