Abstract
This paper explains why Clark’s Extended Mind thesis is not capable of sufficiently grasping how and in what sense external objects and technical artifacts can become part of our human cognition. According to the author, this is because a pivotal distinction between inside and outside is preserved in the Extended Mind theorist’s account of the relation between the human organism and the world of external objects and artifacts, a distinction which they proclaim to have overcome. Inspired by Charles S. Peirce’s philosophy of mind, in particular, the author tries to find a way out of this ‘inside–outside’ fallacy. External objects, artifacts or processes should, according to him, not be conceived as inanimate and unintelligent matter utilised by a separately living, inner mental sphere that has set certain pre-established goals for itself. Mind has rather an artifactual character. It is not extended by an inner biological cognitive core but rather unfolds itself through objects and artifacts. Mind as such is, especially in our modern technological culture, shaped by virtue of and through technical artifacts. Recognizing this artifactual dimension of mind will, the author concludes, enable a more critical analysis of contemporary claims that ascribe certain original and irreducible features to thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Peirce termed, probably independently from Husserl, his overall approach as “phenomenology.” Later he uses the notion “phaneroscopy” for his method. See Aydin (2007a) for a comparison between Peirce’s and Husserl’s phenomenology.
References
Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43–64.
Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010). Defending the bounds of cognition. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 67–80). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Aydin, C. (2007a). Charles S. Peirce: Fenomenologie van Een, Twee en Drie. In C. Aydin (Ed.), De vele Gezichten van de Fenomenologie (pp. 197–218). Kampen/Kapellen: Klement/Pelckmans.
Aydin, C. (2007b). Naar een proces-pragmatische grondslag voor het identiteitsbegrip: Peirce over potentialiteit, interactie en regulariteit. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 69(1), 35–78.
Aydin, C. (2009). On the significance of ideals: Peirce and the good life. Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society, 45(3), 422–443.
Baker, G. P. (1998). The private language argument. Language & Communication, 18, 325–356.
Burge, T. (1988). Individualism and self-knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 85(11), 649–663.
Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of mind: an integrative theory of self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: mind, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2010). Coupling, constitution, and the cognitive kind: a reply to Adams and Aizawa. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 81–100). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
Conant, J. (2004). Why worry about the Tractatus? In B. Stocker (Ed.), Post-analytic tractatus (pp. 167–192). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Dartnall, T. (2005). Does the world leak into the mind? Active externalism, “internalism”, and epistemology. Cognitive Science, 29, 135–143.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.
Dennett, D. C. (2003). Who’s on first? Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 19–30.
Descartes, R. (1641/1985). Meditations on First Philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch (trans.). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Dretske, F. (1999). The mind’s awareness of itself. Philosophical Studies, 95, 103–124.
Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework, Summary Report, SRI Project No. 3578, AFOSR-3223, Contract AF 49(638)-1024 (online: http://sloan.stanford.edu/mousesite/EngelbartPapers/B5_F18_ConceptFrameworkInd.html).
Gallagher, S., & Crisafi, A. (2009). Mental institutions. Topoi, 28, 45–51.
Gordon, R. M. (2007). Ascent routines for propositional attitudes. Synthese, 159, 151–165.
Hilpinen, R. (1993). Authors and artifacts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93, 155–178.
Hurley, S. (2010). The varieties of externalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 101–154). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. (2011). Enculturating the supersized mind. Philosophical Studies, 152, 437–446.
Hutchinson, P., & Read, R. (2005). Memento: a philosophical investigation. In R. Read & J. Goodenough (Eds.), Film as philosophy: essays in cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: University Press (The Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology).
Kiran, A. H., & Verbeek, P. P. (2010). Trusting our selves to technology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 23(3–4), 409–427.
Kirchhoff, M. D. (2012). Extended cognition and fixed properties: steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11, 287–308.
Kockelkoren, P. (2003). Technology: art, fairground and theatre. Rotterdam: NAi.
Kockelkoren, P. (2007). The artist as researcher? In P. Kockelkoren (Ed.), Mediated vision (pp. 129–152). Rotterdam: Veenman and ArtEZ.
Lamme, V. (2006). Towards a true neutral stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 494–501.
Lamme, V. (2010). De Vrije wil bestaat niet. Over wie er echt de baas is in het brein. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
Levinson, P. (1988). Mind at large: knowing in the technological age. Greenwich: JAI.
Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. La Salle: Open Court.
Macdonald, C. (2007). Introspection and authoritative self-knowledge. Erkenntnis, 67(2), 355–372.
Malafouris, L. (2008a). At the potter’s wheel: an argument for material agency. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.
Malafouris, L. (2008b). Beads for a plastic mind: the ‘Blind Man’s Stick’ (BMS) hypothesis and the active nature of material culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(3), 401–414.
Marty, R. (1997). 76 definitions of the sign by C. S. Peirce. Arisbe website: http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/resources/76defs/76defs/htm.
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1996). The medium is the message. London: Penguin.
Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 329–344.
Menary, R. (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29, 621–632.
Menary, R. (2009). Intentionality, cognitive integration and the continuity thesis. Topoi, 28, 31–43.
Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Livonen, A., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385(30), 432–434.
Peirce, C. S. (1887). Logical machines. The American Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 165–170.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935, 1958). Collected Papers of C.S. Peirce, Ch. Hartshorne & P. Weiss; A. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press (abbreviation in text: CP followed by the conventional ‘[volume].[page]’-notation).
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: how to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 389–428.
Russell, B. (1910). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108–128.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Schick, K., & Toth, N. (1993). Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. New York/London: Simon and Schuster.
Selinger, E., & Engström, T. (2008). A moratorium on cyborgs: computation, cognition, and commerce. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 327–341.
Skagestad, P. (1993). Thinking with machines: intelligence augmentation, evolutionary epistemology, and semiotic. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 16(2), 157–180.
Skagestad, P. (1999). Peirce's inkstand as an external embodiment of mind. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35(3), 551–561.
Sutton, J. (2008). Material agency, skills and history: distributed cognition and the archaeology of memory. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.
Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: history, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Sutton, J. (2013). 'The feel of the world': exograms, habits, and the confusion of types of memory. In Kania, K. (Ed.), Philosophers on Memento. London: Routledge.
Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., & Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 521–560.
Tenner, E. (2003). Our own devices: the past and future of body technology. New York: Knopf.
Watts, C. M. (2008). On mediation and material agency in the Peircean semeiotic. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.
Wheeler, M. (2004). Is language the ultimate artefacts? Language Sciences, 26, 693–715.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books (BB). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zahavi, D. (2008). Internalism, externalism, and transcendental idealism. Synthese, 160, 355–374.
Acknowledgments
This article incorporates reworked and further developed excerpts from my Dutch article 'Het uiterlijk van het innerlijk: Extended Mind, technologie en de binnen-buiten scheiding,’ Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 74/2012, p. 701–728.
The author would like to thank Peter-Paul Verbeek and the other members of the Philosophy of Human-Technology Relations Group, and Philip Brey for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aydin, C. The artifactual mind: overcoming the ‘inside–outside’ dualism in the extended mind thesis and recognizing the technological dimension of cognition. Phenom Cogn Sci 14, 73–94 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9319-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9319-x