Skip to main content
Log in

Self-reported clinical pharmacy service provision in Austria: an analysis of both the community and hospital pharmacy sector—a national study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background With expansion of more advanced clinical roles for pharmacists we need to be mindful that the extent to which clinical pharmacy services are implemented varies from one country to another. To date no comprehensive assessment of number and types of services provided by either community or hospital pharmacies in Austria exists. Objective To analyse and describe the number and types of clinical pharmacy services provided in both community and hospital pharmacies, as well as the level of clinical pharmacy education of pharmacists across Austria. Setting Austrian community and hospital pharmacies. Method An electronic questionnaire to determine number and types of clinical pharmacy services provided was send to all chief pharmacists at all community (n = 1365) and hospital pharmacies (n = 40) across Austria. Besides current and future services provision, education and training provision were also assessed. Main outcome measure Extent of and attitude towards CPS in Austria. Results Response rates to the surveys were 19.1% (n = 261/1365) in community and 92.5% (n = 37/40) in hospital pharmacies. 59.0% and 89.2% of community and hospital pharmacies, respectively, indicated that the provision of clinical pharmacy services in Austria has increased substantially over the past 10 years. Fifty-one percent of community pharmacies reported to provide a medication review service, while 97.3% of hospitals provide a range of services. Only 18.0% of community pharmacies offer services other than medication review services at dispensing. Binary regressions show that provision of already established medication management is a predictor for the willingness of community pharmacists to extend the range of CPS (p < 0.01), while completed training in the area of clinical pharmacy is not (p > 0.05). More hospital than community pharmacists have postgraduate education in clinical pharmacy (17.4% vs 6.5%). A desire to complete postgraduate education was shown by 28.3% of community and 14.7% of hospital pharmacists. Lack of time, inadequate remuneration, lack of resources and poor relationship between pharmacists and physicians were highlighted as barriers. Conclusion Both community and hospital pharmacists show strong willingness to expand their service provision and will need continued support, such as improved legislative structures, more supportive resources and practice focused training opportunities, to further these services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austrian Federal Government. Zusammen. Für unser Österreich. Regierungsprogramm 2017–2022. 2017. https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/documents/131008/569203/Regierungsprogramm_2017-2022.pdf/b2fe3f65-5a04-47b6-913d-2fe512ff4ce6. Accessed 17 Dec 2018.

  2. LeBlanc JM, Seoane-Vazquez E, Dasta JF. Survey of hospital pharmacist activities outside of the United States. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(16):1748–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gums J. Changing the direction of clinical pharmacy outside the united states: time to step up. Pharmacother. 2013;33(2):122–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulajeva A, Labberton L, Leikola S, Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä M, Geurts MME, de Gier JJ, Airaksinen M. Medication review practices in European countries. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10:731–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian Pharmacists Association. A review of pharmacy services in Canada and the Health and Economic Evidence. 2016. https://www.pharmacists.ca/cpha-ca/assets/File/cpha-on-the-issues/Pharmacy%20Services%20Report%201.pdf. Accessed 06 Oct 2018.

  6. Rose O, Derendorf H, Erzkamp S, Fujita K, Hartl A, Hoti K, et al. Development of clinical pharmacy services in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Canada, Germany, Japan, Kosovo, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Thailand, USA and correlation with educational standards, level of research, and implementation practices. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP203264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bladh L, Ottosson E, Karlsson J, Klintberg L, Wallerstedt SM. Effects of a clinical pharmacist service on health-related quality of life and prescribing of drugs: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(9):738–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bond CA, Raehl CL. 2006 national clinical pharmacy services survey: clinical pharmacy services, collaborative drug management, medication errors, and pharmacy technology. Pharmacother. 2008;28(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunting B, Cranor CW. The Asheville Project: long-term clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes of a community-based medication therapy management program for asthma. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2006;46(2):133–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bunting BA, Smith BH, Sutherland SE. The Asheville Project: clinical and economic outcomes of a community-based long-term medication therapy management program for hypertension and dyslipidemia. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2008;48(1):23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The Asheville Project: long-term clinical and economic outcomes of a community pharmacy diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;43(2):173–84.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Christensen M, Lundh A. Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008986.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nkansah N, Mostovetsky O, Yu C, Chheng T, Beney J, Bond CM et al. Effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000336.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Santschi V, Chiolero A, Colosimo AL, Platt RW, Taffé P, Burnier M et al. Improving blood pressure control through pharmacist interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Westerlund T, Marklund B. Assessment of the clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacy interventions in drug-related problems. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34(3):319–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Munyombwe T, Closs SJ. Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication review in chronic pain management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(11):1006–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JK, Grace KA, Taylor AJ. Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296(21):2563–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stemer G, Laml-Wallner G, Kuegler I, Poelzleitner P, Messner S, Steininger S et al. Comprehensive evaluation of clinical pharmacists’ interventions in a large Austrian tertiary care hospital. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci Pract. 2012;19:529–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pharmacists ACO. Apotheke in Zahlen 2018. Vienna: Österreichische Apothekerkammer; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Langer T, Spreitzer H, Ditfurth T, Stemer G, Atkinson J. Pharmacy practice and education in Austria. Pharmacy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6030055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morak S, Vogler S, Walser S, Kijlstra N. Understanding the pharmaceutical care concept and applying it in practice. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Health; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Austrian Chamber of Pharmacists. Medikamente im Griff. 2017. https://www.apotheker.or.at/Internet/OEAK/newspresse.nsf/webPages/9EB7B28C7318AD5FC125806700296957?OpenDocument. Accessed 17 Dec 2018.

  23. Strasser D, Kretschmer E. GEMED Mulitprofessionelles Geriatrisches Medikationsmanagement in stationären Alteneinrichtungen. 2018.https://www.gemed.at/index.php/home. Accessed 17 Dec 2018.

  24. Frontini R, Miharija-Gala T, Sykora J. EAHP Survey 2010 on hospital pharmacy in Europe: Part 1 General frame and staffing. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2012;19:385–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frontini R, Miharija-Gala T, Sykora J. EAHP Survey 2010 on hospital pharmacy in Europe: parts 4 and 5. Clinical services and patient safety. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2013;20:69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. EAHP. European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy Survey Results 2016. 2017. https://www.eahp.eu/publications/survey/content/2018-statements-survey. Accessed 08 Oct 2018.

  27. EAHP. European Hospital Pharmacy Survey 2010. 2010. https://www.eahp.eu/publications/survey/eahp-2010-survey-hospital-pharmacy-practice-europe. Accessed 17 Dec 2018.

  28. Hsieh HE, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Allenet B, Bedouch P, Rose FX, Escofier L, Roubille R, Charpiat B et al. Validation of an instrument for the documentation of clinical pharmacists' interventions. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28(4):181–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. The Austrian Association of Hospital Pharmacists and Austrian Society of Hospital Pharmacy. Mission Statement. 2018. https://www.aahp.at/images/stories/Aktuelles/2018/Mission-Statement-2018-bunt.pdf Accessed 12 Jun 2019.

  31. Martins SF, van Mil JWF, da Costa FA. The organizational framework of community pharmacies in Europe. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37:896–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. van Mil JWF, de Boer WO, Tromp THFJ. European barriers to the implementation of pharmaceutical care. Int J Clin Pharm. 2001;9:163–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. NHS England. Improving health and patient care through community pharmacy—Evidence resource pack. 2013. https://nellpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/comm-pharmacy-resource.pdf. Accessed 09 Feb 2019.

  34. Scottish Government. Pharmacy. 2018. https://www2.gov.scot/Topics/Health/NHS-Workforce/Pharmacists/Pharmacy. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.

  35. Hossain LN, Fernandez-Llimos F, Luckett T, Moullin JC, Durks D, Franco-Trigo L et al.. Qualitative meta-synthesis of barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of community pharmacy services: perspectives of patients, nurses and general medical practitioners. BMJ Open. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Marquis J, Schneider MP, Spencer B, Bugnon O, Du Pasquier S. Exploring the implementation of a medication adherence programme by community pharmacists: a qualitative study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(5):1014–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Niquille A, Lattmann C, Bugnon O. Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators. Pharm Pract. 2010;8(1):35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Berbatis CG, Sunderland VB, Joyce A, Bulsara M, Mills C. Enhanced pharmacy services, barriers and facilitators in Australia’s community pharmacies: Australia’s National Pharmacy Database Project. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15:185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. American College Of Clinical Pharmacy Clinical Practice Affairs Committee. Clinical pharmacy practice in the noninstitutional setting A white paper from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Pharmacother. 1992;12(4):358–64.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Doucette WR, Nevis J, Randal C, McDonough PR. Factor affecting collaborative care between pharmacists and physicians. Pharm. 2005;1(4):565–78.

    Google Scholar 

  41. McDonough RP, Doucette WR. Developing collaborative working relationships between pharmacists and physicians. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2001;41(55):682–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No special funding was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Deibl.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 6 Questionnaire Overview. Hospital pharmacies reported number of pharmacists in total and full-time equivalents (FTE)

6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deibl, S., Mueller, D., Kirchdorfer, K. et al. Self-reported clinical pharmacy service provision in Austria: an analysis of both the community and hospital pharmacy sector—a national study. Int J Clin Pharm 42, 1050–1060 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01066-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01066-5

Keywords

Navigation