Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The incidence of potential drug–drug interactions in elderly patients with arterial hypertension

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To assess the incidence and type of potential, clinically significant drug–drug interactions in elderly outpatients with arterial hypertension. Setting Three community pharmacies in Croatia. Method Eligible patients were aged 65 or older, treated for arterial hypertension and received 2 or more drugs. Potential interactions were identified by Lexi-Interact software. The software categorized each potential interaction according to clinical significance in five groups: (A) No known interaction; (B) Specified agents may interact, but there is little to no evidence of clinical concern; (C) Specified agents may interact in a clinically significant manner. Monitoring therapy is suggested; (D) The two medications may interact in a clinically significant manner. Modification of therapy is suggested; (X) Contraindicated combination. Interactions of level C, D and X were considered clinically significant. Main outcome measure The incidence and type of potential drug–drug interactions. Results There were 265 patients included in the study. Potential, clinically significant drug interactions were identified in 240 (90.6%) patients, out of which 97.9% had interactions with clinical significance C, 20.4% D, and 0.8% X. The median number of drug interactions per patient was 4. We identified 215 drug combinations with the potential to cause clinically significant interaction, out of which 83.3% had clinical significance C, 16.3% clinical significance D, and 0.4% clinical significance X. Conclusion Drug–drug interactions are common in elderly hypertensive patients. Computer-based screening could help pharmacists and physicians to recognize potential, clinically significant interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doucet J, Chassagne P, Trivalle C, Landrin I, Pauty MD, Kadri N, et al. Drug–drug interactions related to hospital admissions in older adults: a prospective study of 1000 patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:944–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker ML, Visser LE, van Gelder T, Hofman A, Stricker BH. Increasing exposure to drug-drug interactions between 1992 and 2005 in people aged > or = 55 years. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(2):145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stafford AC, Tenni PC, Peterson GM, Jackson SL, Hejlesen A, Villesen C, et al. Drug-related problems identified in medication reviews by Australian pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(2):216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(1):6–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ElDesoky ES. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic crisis in the elderly. Am J Ther. 2007;14(5):488–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, Rothschild J, Debellis K, Seger AC, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Köhler GI, Bode-Böger SM, Busse R, Hoopmann M, Welte T, Böger RH. Drug-drug interactions in medical patients: effects of in-hospital treatment and relation to multiple drug use. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;38(11):504–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg RM, Mabee J, Chan L, Wong S. Drug–drug and drug–disease interactions in the ED: analysis of a high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:447–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Republic of Croatia—Central Bureau of Statistics. Women and men in Croatia. http://www.dzs.hr/ (2009). Cited 21 Apr 2010.

  10. Croatian National Institute of Public Health. Cardiovascular diseases in Republic of Croatia. http://www.hzjz.hr/epidemiologija/kron_mas/kvb_bilt.pdf (2004). Cited 21 Apr 2010.

  11. Erceg M, Hrabak-Zerjavić V, Ivicević Uhernik A. Regional characteristics of arterial hypertension in adult population of Croatia. Acta Med Croatica. 2007;61(3):293–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prisant LM. Now or never: optimal antihypertensive therapy in the elderly. Prev Cardiol. 2008;11(4):201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Straubhaar B, Krähenbühl S, Schlienger RG. The prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in patients with heart failure at hospital discharge. Drug Saf. 2006;29(1):79–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannheimer B, Ulfvarson J, Eklöf S, Bergqvist M, von Bahr C. A clinical evaluation of the Janus Web Application, a software screening tool for drug-drug interactions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:1209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lexi-Comp ONLINE. Lexi-Interact. http://online.lexi.com/crlsql/servlet/crlonline?a=in (2010). Cited 21 Apr 2010.

  16. Carter BL, Lund BC, Hayase N, Chrischilles E. The extent of potential antihypertensive drug interactions in a Medicaid population. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(11):953–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hohl CM, Dankoff J, Colacone A, Afilalo M. Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:666–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glintborg B, Andersen SE, Dalhoff K. Drug-drug interactions among recently hospitalised patients-frequent but mostly clinically insignificant. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;61:675–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mackenzie IS, MacDonald TM. Treatment of osteoarthritis in hypertensive patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11(3):393–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gyamlani G, Geraci SA. Secondary hypertension due to drugs and toxins. South Med J. 2007;100(7):692–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Becker ML, Kallewaard M, Caspers PW, Visser LE, Leufkens HG, Stricker BH. Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug–drug interactions: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(6):641–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon SL, Schaffer SD. Herbal, prescribed, and over-the-counter drug use in older women: prevalence of drug interactions. Geriatr Nurs. 2006;27(2):118–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pavlicević I, Kuzmanić M, Rumboldt M, Rumboldt Z. Interaction between antihypertensives and NSAIDs in primary care: a controlled trial. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;15(3):E372–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Benson M, Marangou A, Russo MA, Durocher J, Collaku A, Starkey YY. Patient preference for sustained-release versus standard paracetamol (acetaminophen): a multicentre, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(5):1321–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Republic of Croatia—Agency for Medical Products and Medical Devices. http://www.almp.hr/?ln=hr&w=publikacije&d=promet_lijekova_2008 (2008). Cited 21 Apr 2010.

  26. Radosević N, Gantumur M, Vlahović-Palcevski V. Potentially inappropriate prescribing to hospitalised patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(7):733–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheen AJ. Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update. Drug Saf. 2005;28(7):601–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mogensen CE. New concepts in blood pressure-lowering management in diabetic patients: the case for early ACE inhibitor combination therapy with diuretics. J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Delafuente JC. Understanding and preventing drug interactions in elderly patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48(2):133–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tornio A, Niemi M, Neuvonen M, Laitila J, Kalliokoski A, Neuvonen PJ, et al. The effect of gemfibrozil on repaglinide pharmacokinetics persists for at least 12 h after the dose: evidence for mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2C8 in vivo. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(3):403–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnell K, Fastbom J. The use of benzodiazpines and related drugs amongst older people in Sweden: associated factors and concomitant use of other psychotropics. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(7):731–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Assem-Hilger E, Jungwirth S, Weissgram S, Kirchmeyr W, Fischer P, Barnas C. Benzodiazepine use in the elderly: an indicator for inappropriately treated geriatric depression? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(6):563–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(4):380–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Belic S., Kosovec-Hadwiger T. and Barlovic H. for their assistance with data extraction.

Funding

The study received no external funding.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors of this manuscript had any conflict of interests in connection with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srecko Marusic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bacic-Vrca, V., Marusic, S., Erdeljic, V. et al. The incidence of potential drug–drug interactions in elderly patients with arterial hypertension. Pharm World Sci 32, 815–821 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-010-9442-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-010-9442-5

Keywords

Navigation