Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recall of drug utilization depends on subtle structural questionnaire characteristics

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To test the hypothesis that questionnaire organization affects the recall of antimalarial drugs utilization. Setting Maputo, Mozambique. Methods Treatment of last malaria episode was assessed using two alternative versions (A and B) of a questionnaire, which differed only by the order each proposed drug was presented in the response options (version A: quinine and most frequently used drugs presented first; version B: less frequently used drugs first and quinine at the end). Questionnaires A or B were randomly assigned to each of 32 classes in a private University in Maputo, Mozambique. Within each classroom all subjects received the same questionnaire version, and a similar number of participants fulfilled questionnaires A (n = 249) and B (n = 255). Main outcome measures Recall of the antimalarial drugs utilization in a previous malaria episode. Results Mefloquine and clindamycin were not used by any subject in the last malaria episode. The overall recall of quinine utilization was higher with questionnaire A (19.5% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.006) and the use of artemisinine/artesunate was reported more frequently by subjects inquired with questionnaire B (16.5% vs. 7.3%, P = 0.012). When considering subjects reporting more than one malaria episode, the recall of quinine utilization was higher with questionnaire A (20.0% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.004), and the use of artemisinine/artesunate was reported more frequently by subjects inquired with questionnaire B (18.3% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.069). No differences were observed among those having had only one malaria episode, neither for quinine (22.2% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.807) or artemisinine/artesunate (5.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.701). Conclusion The structure of the questionnaire used to collect self-reported information about antimalarial treatments influences the recall, even when close ended questions asking for specific drugs are used. Among subjects having been treated for malaria more than once, the first antimalarial drugs being asked were more likely to be selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heerdink ER, Leufkens HG, Koppedraaijer C, Bakker A. Information on drug use in the elderly: a comparison of pharmacy, general-practitioner and patient data. Pharm World Sci. 1995;17(1):20–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klungel OH, de Boer A, Paes AH, Herings RM, Seidell JC, Bakker A. Influence of question structure on the recall of self-reported drug use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(3):273–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwarz A, Faber U, Borner K, Keller F, Offermann G, Molzahn M. Reliability of drug history in analgesic users. Lancet. 1984;2(8412):1163–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman MT, Nomura AM, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN. Agreement between interview information and physician records on history of menopausal estrogen use. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(5):815–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. West SL, Savitz DA, Koch G, Strom BL, Guess HA, Hartzema A. Recall accuracy for prescription medications: self-report compared with database information. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(10):1103–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Brandt PA, Petri H, Dorant E, Goldbohm RA, Van de Crommert S. Comparison of questionnaire information and pharmacy data on drug use. Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1991;13(2):91–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson RE, Vollmer WM. Comparing sources of drug data about the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(11):1079–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gmel G. Changing the order of questions on drug use in the Swiss Health Survey–does it effect prevalence assessment?. Soz Praventivmed. 1999;44(3):126–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell AA, Cottler LB, Shapiro S. Effect of questionnaire design on recall of drug exposure in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123(4):670–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005;27(3):281–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. International Travel and Health: situation as on 1 January 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. ISBN: 92 4 158036 4.

  12. Dgedge M, Novoa A, Macassa G, Sacarlal J, Black J, Michaud C, et al. The burden of disease in Maputo City, Mozambique: registered and autopsied deaths in 1994. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(6):546–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Romagosa C, Ordi J, Saute F, Quinto L, Machungo F, Ismail MR, et al. Seasonal variations in maternal mortality in Maputo, Mozambique: the role of malaria. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12(1):62–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saute F, Aponte J, Almeda J, Ascaso C, Vaz N, Dgedge M, et al. Malaria in southern Mozambique: incidence of clinical malaria in children living in a rural community in Manhica district. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003;97(6):655–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D, Burton AH, Brendel KA, Smith DC. Epi Info, version 6.04d: a word processing, database, and statistics for epidemiology in microcomputers. Atlanta, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1996.

  16. Bland M. Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature [document on the Internet]. 2003 [updated 2005 Jan 12; cited 01/07/2007]; Available from: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/∼mb55/talks/clusml.htm.

  17. Bland JM. Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters TJ, Richards SH, Bankhead CR, Ades AE, Sterne JA. Comparison of methods for analysing cluster randomized trials: an example involving a factorial design. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(5):840–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ. 2004;328(7451):1312–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blumenschein K, Johannesson M. Use of contingent valuation to place a monetary value on pharmacy services: an overview and review of the literature. Clin Ther. 1999;21(8):1402–17; discussion 1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted with the support of the ISCTEM (Higher Institute of Sciences and Technology from Mozambique).

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Lunet.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Structure of the questionnaire A * used to evaluate malaria treatment †

figure a

* in questionnaire B, the antimalarial drugs are presented in the following order: clindamycin, tetracyclines/doxycycline, halofantrine, artemisinine/artesunate, mefloquine, lumefantrine + artemether, chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, quinine);

† a full questionnaire version is available from the authors by request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lunet, N., Bastos, J., Cumaio, F. et al. Recall of drug utilization depends on subtle structural questionnaire characteristics. Pharm World Sci 30, 175–181 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9161-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9161-8

Keywords

Navigation