Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Analysis of Returned Medicines in Primary Care

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The number of pharmaceutical items issued on prescription is continually rising and contributing to spiralling healthcare costs. Although there is some data highlighting the quantity, in terms of weight of medicines returned specifically to community pharmacies, little is known about the specific details of such returns or other destinations for wasted medications. This pilot study has been designed to investigate the types and amounts of medicines returned to both general practices (GPs) and associated local community pharmacies determining the reasons why these medicines have been returned.

Method: The study was conducted in eight community pharmacies and five GP surgeries within East Birmingham over a 4-week period.

Main outcome Measure: Reason for return and details of returned medication.

Results: A total of 114 returns were made during the study: 24 (21.1) to GP surgeries and 90 (78.9) to community pharmacies. The total returns comprised 340 items, of which 42 (12.4) were returned to GPs and 298 (87.6) to pharmacies, with the mean number of items per return being 1.8 and 3.3, respectively. Half of the returns in the study were attributed to the doctor changing or stopping the medicine; 23.7 of returns were recorded as excess supplies or clearout often associated with patients’ death and 3.5 of returns were related to adverse drug reactions. Cardiovascular drugs were most commonly returned, amounting to 28.5 of the total drugs returned during the study.

Conclusions: The results from this pilot study indicate that unused medicines impose a significant financial burden on the National Health Service as well as a social burden on the United Kingdom population. Further studies are examining the precise nature of returned medicines and possible solutions to these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FA Stevenson SM Greenfield M Jones A Nayak CP Bradley (1999) ArticleTitleGPs’ perceptions of patient influence on prescribing Fam Pract 16 IssueID3 255–61 Occurrence Handle10.1093/fampra/16.3.255 Occurrence Handle10439979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Health (2000) The National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease HMSO London

    Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Health (2001) The National Service Framework for Diabetes HMSO London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prescriptions Dispensed in the Community Statistics for 1991 to 2001: England. London: Department of Health, 2002. ISBN 1 84182 572 7

  5. InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Health (2001) Community Pharmacies in England and Wales: 31 March 2001 HMSO London

    Google Scholar 

  6. RH. Jackson (1999) ArticleTitleCase for monitoring Pharm J 263 IssueID7073 861

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hospital Episode Statistics. London: Department of Health, 2002. Available via http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/02/86/64/04028664.pdf. Accessed March 2003

  8. DW Kolpin ET Furlong MT Meyer EM Thurman SD Zaugg LB Barber et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance Environ Sci Technol 36 IssueID6 1202–11 Occurrence Handle10.1021/es011055j Occurrence Handle11944670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D Isacson C. Olofsson (1999) ArticleTitleDrugs up in smoke: a study of caseated drugs in Sweden Pharm World Sci 21 IssueID2 96–99 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008626306770 Occurrence Handle10380238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T-J Grainger-Rousseau DW Fielding MA Smith D Daws D Desrosiers (1999) ArticleTitleWhat’s left in the medicine cabinet? The British Columbia EnviRx Project Pharmacotherapy 19 IssueID4 527

    Google Scholar 

  11. TM. Morgan (2001) ArticleTitleThe economic impact of wasted prescription medication in an outpatient population of older adults J Fam Pract 50 IssueID9 779–81 Occurrence Handle11674911

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. TJ Bradley WH. Williams (1975) ArticleTitleEvaluation of medicines returned in Manchester DUMP campaign Pharm J 215 542

    Google Scholar 

  13. DW Harris DS Karandikar MG Spencer RH Leach AC Bower GA. Mander (1979) ArticleTitleReturned-medicines campaign in Birmingham Lancet 1 IssueID8116 599–601 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(79)91020-1 Occurrence Handle85178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. EM McGovern S Tennant M. Mackay (2002) ArticleTitleAudit of returned medicines to community pharmacy Pharm World Sci 24 IssueID3 A11–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Grant (2001) ArticleTitleReturn of waste medicines to a community pharmacy Prescriber 12 IssueID4 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  16. G Hawksworth D Wright H. Chrystyn (1996) ArticleTitleA detailed analysis of the day to day unwanted medicinal products returned to community pharmacies for disposal J Soc Admin Pharm 13 IssueID4 215–22

    Google Scholar 

  17. SPSS.http://www.spss.com. Accessed August 2001

  18. InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Health (2002) Prescription Cost Analysis Data 2001 HMSO London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Langley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langley, C., Marriott, J., Mackridge, A. et al. An Analysis of Returned Medicines in Primary Care. Pharm World Sci 27, 296–299 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-0354-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-0354-8

Key words

Navigation