Skip to main content
Log in

Solubility at the Molecular Level: Development of a Critical Aggregation Concentration (CAC) Assay for Estimating Compound Monomer Solubility

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In drug discovery research the formation of soluble compound aggregates is a major cause of false positives, false negatives, and distorted values in High-Throughput Screening assays that measure either binding or functional activity. These aggregation-based artifacts lead to serious distortions in the SAR which are critical to successful lead optimization. In this work we introduce a new approach by which the “critical aggregation concentration” (CAC) is determined, thereby overcoming limitations inherent to traditional solubility methods and enabling estimation of small molecule monomer solubility.

Methods

The theoretical and experimental basis of a new confocal Static Light Scattering plate reader assay is presented.

Results

Tests conducted with model systems, commercial compounds, and Abbott library compounds show that the CAC assay can measure aqueous monomer solubilities reproducibly and reliably, achieving a sensitivity of ~0.2 μm, which is an improvement of approximately two orders of magnitude over nephelometry.

Conclusions

Determination of compound monomer solubilities in a screening format is possible for the first time with the cSLS-CAC methodology. It is currently in routine use in Abbott’s drug discovery program, and has enabled identification of many compound induced artifacts in binding or activity assays that are missed by traditional kinetic solubility measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

API:

active pharmaceutical ingredient

CAC:

critical aggregation concentration

cSLS:

confocal static light scattering

DLS:

dynamic light scattering

SAR:

structure-activity relationships

SLS:

static light scattering

References

  1. Di L, Kerns EH. Biological assay challenges from compound solubility: strategies for bioassay optimization. Drug Discovery Today. 2006;11:446–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alsenz J, Kansy M. High throughput solubility measurement in drug discovery and development. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2007;59:546–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng BY, Simeonov A, Jadhav A, Babaoglu K, Inglese J, Shoichet BK, Austin CP. A high-throughput screen for aggregation-based inhibition in a large compound library. J Med Chem. 2007;50:2385–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seidler J, McGovern SL, Doman TN, Shoichet BK. Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs. J Med Chem. 2003;46:4477–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frenkel YV, Clark AD, Das K, Wang YH, Lewi PJ, Janssen PAJ, Arnold E. Concentration and pH dependent aggregation of hydrophobic drug molecules and relevance to oral bioavailability. J Med Chem. 2005;48:1974–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coan KED, Shoichet BK. Stoichiometry and physical chemistry of promiscuous aggregate-based inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:9606–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McGovern SL, Caselli E, Grigorieff N, Schoichet BK. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. J Med Chem. 2002;45:1712–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rishton GM. Nonleadlikeness and leadlikeness in biochemical screening. Drug Discovery Today. 2003;8:86–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goode DR, Totten RK, Heeres JT, Hergenrother PJ. Identification of promiscuous small molecule activators in high-throughput enzyme activation screens. J Med Chem. 2008;51:2346–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan L, Ho Q, Tsutsui K, Takahashi L. Comparison of chromatographic and spectroscopic methods used to rank compounds for aqueous solubility. J Pharm Sci. 2001;90:521–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dehring KA, Workman HL, Miller KD, Mandagere A, Poole SK. Automated robotic liquid handling/laser-based nephelometry system for high throughput measurement of kinetic aqueous solubility. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004;36:447–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan H, Semin D, Wacker M, Cheetham J. An automated screening assay for determination of aqueous equilibrium solubility enabling SPR study during drug lead optimization. J Lab Autom. 2005;10:364–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugano K, Kato T, Suzuki K, Keiko K, Sujaku T, Mano T. High throughput solubility measurement with automated polarized light microscopy analysis. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:2115–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoelke B, Gieringer S, Arit M, Saal C. Comparison of nephelometric, UV-spectroscopic, and HPLC methods for high-throughput determination of aqueous drug solubility in microtiter plates. Anal Chem. 2009;81:3165–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heikkila T, Karjalainen M, Ojala K, Partola K, Lammert F, Augustijns P, Urtti A, Yliperttula M, Peltonen L, Hirvonen J. Equilibrium drug solubility measurements in 96-well plates reveal similar drug solubilities in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and human intestinal fluid. Int J Pharm. 2011;405:132–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerns EH, Di L, Carter GT. In vitro solubility assays in drug discovery. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:879–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamashita T, Dohta Y, Nakamura T, Fukami T. High-speed solubility screening assay using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry in drug discovery. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1182:72–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhattachar SN, Wesley JA, Seadeek C. Evaluation of the chemiluminescent nitrogen detector for solubility determinations to support drug discovery. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;41:152–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bevan CD, Lloyd RS. A high-throughput screening method for the determination of aqueous drug solubility using laser nephelometry in microtiter plates. Anal Chem. 2000;72:1781–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodwin JJ. Rationale and benefit of using high throughput solubility screens in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2006;3:67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Attwood D, Fletcher P. Total intensity and quasielastic light scattering studies on the association of amphiphilic drugs in aqueous electrolyte solutions. J Coll Int Sci. 1987;115:104–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taboada P, Attwood D, Ruso JM, Garcia M, Mosquera V. Static and dynamic light scattering study on the association of some antidepressants in aqueous electrolyte solution. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2000;2:5175–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pecora R. Dynamic Light Scattering: Applications of Photon Correlation Spectroscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. VanAken T, Foxall-VanAken S, Castleman S, Ferguson-Miller S. Alkyl glycoside detergents: synthesis and applications to the study of membrane proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1986;125:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Affymetrix, Inc. Anatrace 2011–2012 product catalog. Available at: http://media.affymetrix.com/support/technical/anatrace/docs/2011-12_Anatrace_products_catalog.pdf

  26. Gardner CR, Walsh CT, Almarsson O. Drugs as materials: valuing physical form in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:926–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brouwers J, Brewster ME, Augustijns P. Supersaturating drug delivery system: The answer to solubility-limited oral bioavailability? J Pharm Sci. 2009;98(8):2549–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Murdande SB, Pikal MJ, Shanker RM, Bogner RH. Aqueous solubility of crystalline and amorphous drugs:Challenges in measurement. Pharm Dev Tech. 2011;16(3):187–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baird JA, Taylor LS, Evaluation of amorphous solid dispersion properties using thermal analysis techniques. Adv Drug Deli Rev. 2011.

  30. Fang H, Qiu L, Vitkin E, Zaman MM, Andersson C, Salahuddin S, Kimerer LM, Cipolloni PB, Modell MD, Turner BS, Keates SE, Bigio I, Itzkan I, Freedman SD, Bansil R, Hanlon EB, Perelman LT. Confocal light absorption and scattering spectroscopic microscopy. Appl Opt. 2007;46(10):1760–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao Y, Li LB, Zhai G. Preparation and characterization of Pluronic/TPGS mixed micelles for solubilization of camptothecin. Colloids Surf B. 2008;64:194–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimm BH. The scattering of light and the radial distribution function of high polymer solutions. J Chem Phys. 1948;16(12):1093–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wyatt P. Light scattering and the absolute characterization of macromolecules. Anal Chimi Acta. 1993;272(193):1–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sandison DR, Webb WW. Background rejection and signal-to-noise optimization in confocal and alternative fluorescence microscopes. Appl Opt. 1994;33(4):603–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments & DISCLOSURES

We thank numerous Abbott GPRD Discovery colleagues for help in measuring compound solubilities by other methods, and Drs. Jonathan Greer and Vincent Stoll for support and discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmund Matayoshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Matayoshi, E. Solubility at the Molecular Level: Development of a Critical Aggregation Concentration (CAC) Assay for Estimating Compound Monomer Solubility. Pharm Res 29, 1745–1754 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-012-0730-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-012-0730-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation