Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biblical Inerrancy and Depressive Symptoms

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of investigators have studied biblical inerrancy (i.e., the belief that the Bible is inspired by God, free from error, and should be interpreted literally). However, there has been little research on the relationship between biblical inerrancy and mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study is to address this gap in the literature. This is accomplished by estimating a latent variable model that was designed to empirically evaluate the following relationships: (1) Blacks, people with less education, and conservative Christians are more likely to have a strong belief in biblical inerrancy; (2) people with a strong belief in biblical inerrancy are more likely to experience demonic spiritual struggles when they are faced with stressful events; (3) individuals who experience demonic spiritual struggles are more likely to feel that the sacred aspects of their lives have been threatened; and (4) greater sacred loss is associated with more depressive symptoms. Data from a recent nationwide survey (N = 2332) provide support for each of these relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Five types of spiritual struggles are included in the shortened measure that was developed by Exline et al. (2014): divine (“I felt angry at God”), demonic (“I felt as though the devil was trying to turn me away from good), interpersonal (“I was frustrated or annoyed by the actions of religious/spiritual people”), moral struggle (“I worried my actions were morally or spiritually wrong”), and ultimate-meaning (“I felt as though my life had no deep meaning”). We examined the bivariate correlation between belief in biblical inerrancy and each type of spiritual struggles in order to see whether strong biblical inerrancy beliefs are more likely to be associated with demonic struggles. The following correlations were observed: biblical inerrancy and divine struggles (r = .031; ns.), interpersonal struggles (r = −.039; ns.), demonic struggles (r = .238; p < .001), moral struggles (r = .091; p < .001), and struggles involving ultimate-meaning (r = −.023; ns.). These data support our decision to focus specifically on demonic struggles in Fig. 1.

References

  • Allen, G. E., & Want, K. T. (2014). Examining religious commitment, perfectionism, scrupulosity, and well-being among LDS individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Religion Data Archives. (2017). Quick facts. http://www.thearda.com/QuickStats/qs_102_p.asp

  • Atkinson, W. W. (1908). Mystic Christianity. New York: The Perfect Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barna, G. (2006). The state of the church, 2006. Ventura: The Barna Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, J. P., & Hempel, L. M. (2009). Sex and gender traditionalism among conservative Protestants: Does the difference make a difference? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, G. A., & Eddy, P. R. (2009). Across the spectrum: Understanding issues in evangelical theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academics.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeShon, R. P. (1998). A cautionary note on measurement error correlations in structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 3, 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2017). What predicts positive life events that influence the course of depression? A longitudinal examination of gratitude and meaning in life. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41, 444–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit, M., & du Toit, S. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User’s guide. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.

  • Ehrman, B. D. (2008). God’s problem: How the bible fails to answer our most important question - why we suffer. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. G., & McFarland, M. J. (2011). Religion and gambling among U.S. adults: Exploring the role of traditions, beliefs, practices, and networks. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esselmont, C., & Bierman, A. (2014). Marital formation and infidelity: An examination of the multiple roles of religious factors. Sociology of Religion, 75, 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Grubbs, J. B., & Yah, A. M. (2014). The religious and spiritual struggles scale: Development and initial validation. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo: John E. Fetzer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 571–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A., & Hout, M. (2006). The truth about conservative Christians: What they think and what they believe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut points for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N. (1987). Understanding the stress process: Linking social support with locus of control beliefs. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 589–593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N. (2004). Stressors in highly valued roles, meaning in life, and the physical health status of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, S287–S297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumrei, E. J., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2009). Divorce and the divine: The role of spirituality in adjustment to divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumrei, E. J., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2011). Spiritual stress and coping model of divorce: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 973–985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1962). The personality and career of Satan. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., MacFarland, J., Kewal-Ramanni, A., Zhang, A., & Wilkinson-Flicker, S. (2016). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups, 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religious coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2005). Sacred matters: Sanctification as a vital topic for the psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Smith, B. W., Koenig, H. G., & Parez, L. (1998). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 710–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Magyar, G. M., Benore, E., & Mahoney, A. (2005a). Sacrilege: A study of sacred loss and desecration and their implications for health and well-being in a community sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Murray-Swannk, N. A., Magyar, G. M., & Ano, G. G. (2005b). Spiritual struggle: A phenomenon of interest to psychology and religion. In W. R. Miller & H. D. Delaney (Eds.), Judeo-Christian perspectives on psychology: Human nature, motivation, and change (pp. 245–268). New York: Guilford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. L., Wortmann, J. H., & Edmondson, D. (2011). Religious struggle as a predictor of subsequent mental and physical well-being in advanced heart failure patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 426–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E., Lieberman, M., & Mullan, J. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E. (2010). Religion and verbal ability. Social Science Research, 39, 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E. (2011). Religion and scientific literacy in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 1134–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1997). The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography. Social Forces, 75, 957–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorotzkin, B. (1998). Understanding and treating perfectionism in religious adolescents. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 35, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2008). What Americans really believe. Waco: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. S., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2001). Traditional symbolic interactionism, role theory, and structural symbolic interactionism: The road to identity theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 211–231). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. J., & Chatters, L. M. (2010). Importance of religion and spirituality in the lives of African Americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites. Journal of Negro Education, 79, 280–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1991). Merging identify theory with stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udelman, D. L. (1982). Stress and immunity. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 37, 176–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology Volume 3 (pp. 361–389). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (40077).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal Krause.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krause, N., Pargament, K.I. Biblical Inerrancy and Depressive Symptoms. Pastoral Psychol 67, 291–304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0815-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0815-3

Keywords

Navigation