Skip to main content
Log in

Freud’s Wolf Man: A Case of Successful Religious Sublimation

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on Freud’s view that the case of Sergei Pankejeff, commonly known as Wolf Man, is an example of an unsuccessful religious sublimation. Freud focuses on the efforts by Sergei’s mother and his nurse to educate him in the Christian faith. He points out that, although these efforts were successful in making him into a piously religious boy, they contributed to the repression of his sexual attraction to his father, the arrest of his psychosexual development, and to an obsessional neurosis reflected in blasphemous thoughts and compulsive acts of religious piety. The authors suggest, however, that there was one feature of his early religious behavior that reflected a successful religious sublimation and explain why it was successful. They conclude that even small children may experience a successful religious sublimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In The Ego and the Id Freud (1923) pointed out that “due to the bisexuality originally present in children . . . a boy has not merely an ambivalent attitude towards his father and an affectionate object-choice towards his mother, but at the same time . . . displays an affectionate feminine attitude to his father and a corresponding jealousy and hostility towards his mother. It is this complicating element introduced by bisexuality that makes it so difficult to obtain a clear view of the facts in connection with the earliest object-choices and identifications, and still more difficult to describe them intelligibly” (p. 33).

  2. Freud’s concern here that the boy’s homosexual feelings toward his father are taking a passive (masochistic) form raises the role of the cultural or historical context in either inhibiting or promoting sublimations. If, as Freud makes clear in his writings on sublimation, there is a relationship between sublimation and cultural achievements, there may also be a relationship between sublimation and cultural attitudes. In this case, because passive homosexuality is considered a threat to masculinity, it is more likely to be viewed as a contributor to neurosis than as a means toward sublimation.

  3. We have chosen not to discuss chapters 7 (“Anal Eroticism and the Castration Complex”) and chapter 8 (“Fresh Material from the Primal Period”) because these chapters do not have direct bearing on the issue of religious sublimation. Furthermore, because it elaborates on the reasons why the religious sublimation was unsuccessful, chapter 9 picks up where chapter 6 leaves off.

  4. Because young Sergei kisses the holy pictures prior to going to bed, they may be thought of as functioning like “transitional objects” (Winnicott 1971). We are hesitant to say that they were, in fact, transitional objects for it is not normally the case that the child has multiple transitional objects. In addition, transitional objects are usually objects that are subject to tactile manipulation. In light of the fact that Segei’s kissing of the holy pictures may appear indistinguishable from the various obsessive thoughts and acts which he entertained and in which he engaged at the time, it is also useful to note Winnicott’s recognition of the fact that the transitional object may in some instances lend itself to “fetishism” or “the talisman of obsessive rituals” (p. 5). The possibility that the holy pictures were fetishes for young Sergei is certainly conceivable, but in his article on fetishism, Freud (1927) shows that the fetish usually derives from the child’s reaction to the observation of the anatomical differences between the sexes. For young boys, it typically has the shape of a penis and serves as a token of triumph over the threat of castration and a protection against it. We doubt that holy pictures on the wall functioned for young Sergei as fetishes in this sense.

References

  • Capps, D., & Carlin, N. (2009). Sigmund Freud and James Putnam: Friendship as a form of sublimation. Pastoral Psychology (forthcoming).

  • Deri, F. (1939). On sublimation. The psychoanalytic quarterly, 8, 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1907). Obsessive acts and religious practices. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological work of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 9, pp. 115–127. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1910). Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 11, pp. 59–137. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913). The occurrence in dreams of material from fairy tales. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12, pp. 279–301. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1916–1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vols. 15–16, pp. 1–482. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 17, pp. 1–123. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19, pp. 1–66. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1927). Fetishism. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 21, pp. 152–159. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 23, pp. 209–253. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. D. Rapaport (Ed.). New York: International Universities Press.

  • Johnson, L. (2001). The wolf man’s burden. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, U. (2008). Nineteen patients in analysis with Freud (1910–1920). American Imago, 65, 41–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankejeff, S. (1971). My recollections of Sigmund Freud. In M. Gardiner (Ed.), The Wolf-Man and Sigmund Freud, pp. 153–170. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1994). The historic expedition to America (1909): Freud, Jung and Hall the king-maker. St. Louis: Rana House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. Playing and reality, pp. 1–25. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Carlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlin, N., Capps, D. Freud’s Wolf Man: A Case of Successful Religious Sublimation. Pastoral Psychol 60, 149–166 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0212-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0212-z

Keywords

Navigation