Abstract
This essay addresses the issue of indigeneity in terms of local cultures. The authors do so in conversation with Kim, Yang, and Hwang’s recent book, Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context. The life and work of Virgilio Enriquez is reviewed briefly as an exemplary indigenous psychologist. He illustrates the possibility of an indigenous psychology with a local, regulative grammar of cognition, affect, behavior, and relationships. The accounts of the tower of Babel and Constantine point to the irreversible damage of homogenizing culture and imposing it on other cultures. We argue that the imposition of a local, particular Western psychology on a global scale might risk a similar cost. The authors propose that current research in indigenous psychologies might take more seriously the notion that culture is not monolithic but should be understood from the point of view of the analysis of power relationships. Secondly, the authors argue that the role of language has not received sufficient attention in terms of shaping thought and increasing the incommensurability between cultures. Thirdly, it is argued that positivist epistemology has dominated the field and that more hermeneutic approaches must be considered. Fourth, the question must be asked regarding who controls indigenous research. Too often control has been exogenous rather than in the hands of local leaders. Finally, it is suggested that North Americans would do well to examine and recognize the indigeneity of their own psychology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair, J. (2006). Creating indigenous psychologies insights from empirical social studies of the science of psychology. In U. Kim, K. Yang, & K. Hwang (Eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp.467–486). New York: Springer.
Berger, P. (1966) The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Bond, M. H. (1983). How language variation affects inter-cultural differentiation of values by Hong Kong bilinguals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 57–66.
Brock, A. C. (2006). Internationalizing the history of psychology. New York: New York University Press.
Burston, D., & Frie, R. (2006). Psychotherapy as a human science. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Covar, C. (1994). Foreword. In V. G. Enriquez (1994). Pagbabangong Dangal: Indigenous psychology and cultural empowerment. Quezon City: Pugad Lawin Press.
Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Descartes, R. (1960). Discourse on method and meditations. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Dueck, A. (2006). Thick clients, thin therapists and a Prozac god. Theology, News and Notes, Winter, 4–6.
Dueck, A., Cutiongco, R., & Ramos, Z. (2006). Patterns of Indigenizing Psychology in Puerto Rico and the Philippines. Presentation at the First World Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, Beijing, August, 2006.
Dueck, A., & Parsons, T. D. (2004). Integration discourse: Modern and postmodern. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 32, 232–247.
Dueck, A., & Reimer, K. (2003). Retrieving the virtues in psychotherapy: Thick and thin discourse. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 427–441.
Eco, U. (1995). The search for a perfect language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Enriquez, V. G. (1988). From colonial to liberation psychology: The indigenous perspective in Philippine psychology. Singapore: Southeast Asian Studies Program.
Enriquez, V. G. (1989). Indigenous psychology and national consciousness. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U. Kim & J. Berry (Eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 152–169). London: Sage.
Enriquez, V. G. (1994). Pagbabangong dangal: Indigenous psychology and cultural empowerment. Quezon City: Pugad Lawin Press.
Enriquez, V. G. (1995). From colonial to liberation psychology. Manila: De La Salle University Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Humanities Press.
Gabrenya, W. K., Jr. (2004). A sociology of science approach to understanding indigenous psychologies. In B. N. Setiadi, A. Supratiknya, W. J. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Ongoing themes in psychology and culture (pp. 131–149). Jakarta: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.
Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method. New York: Continuum Books.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
Gergen, K. J., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. The American Psychologist, 51, 496–503.
Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts, 1940–1970. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hwang, K-k. (2006). Constructive realism and Confucian relationalism: An epistemological strategy for the development of indigenous psychology. In U. Kim, K. Yang, & K. Hwang (Eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (73–108). New York: Springer.
Jenkins, P. (2002). The next Christendom: The coming of global Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Experience and research in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kim, U., Yang, G. & Hwang, K-k. (2006a). (Eds.) Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York, NY: Springer.
Kim, U., Yang, G., & Hwang, K.-k. (2006b). Contributions to Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding people in context. In Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 3–26). New York NY: Springer.
Kleinman, A., & Kleinman, J. (1985). Somatization: The interconnections in Chinese society among culture, depressive experiences and the meaning of pain. In A. Kleinman & B. Good (Eds.), Culture and depression: Studies in the anthropology and cross-cultural psychiatry of affect and disorder (pp. 429–490). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: University Press.
Lindbeck, G. (1984). The nature of doctrine: Religion and theology in a postliberal age. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Lindbeck, G., & Buckley, J. J. (2002). The church in a postliberal age. London: SCM.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Maggay, M. P. (2005). Towards contextualization from within: Some tools and culture themes. Retrieved from http://www.mpmaggay.blogspot.com.
Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2004). Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 190–201.
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York NY: Morrow.
McAdams, D. P. (2006). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. New York: Oxford University Press.
McAdams, D. P., Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (2006). Identity and story: Creating self in narrative. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.
Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 65–88.
Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. M. (2002). Cultural psychology, a new look: Reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 110–117.
Pe-Pua, R. E. (1982). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, metodo at gamit (Filipino psychology: Theory, method and application). Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
Pe-Pua, R. E. (2006) From decolonizing psychology to the development of a cross-indigenous perspective in methodology: The Philippine experience. In U. Kim, K. Yang, & K. Hwang (Eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (109–140). New York: Springer.
Pe-Pua, R., & Marcelino, E. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49–71.
Richardson, F. C., Fowers, B. J., & Guignon, C. B. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rieff, P. (1966). The triumph of the therapeutic: Uses of faith after Freud. New York: Harper & Row.
Ross, M., Xun, W. Q. E., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1040–1050.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Salazar, Z. (1989). Ang kamalayan at kaluluwa: Isang paglilinaw ng ilang konsepto sa kinagisnang sikilohiya. In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, metodo at gamit. Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.
Tanner, K. (1997). Theories of culture: A new agenda for theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Ting, S.-K. (2005). Effect of language and culture on bilingual Chinese verbal expression of self and depressive emotions. PhD dissertation, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology.
Ting, S.-K., & Dueck, A. (2006). Effect of language on bilingual Chinese’s self-construal and depressive feelings. Paper presentation at the First World Congress on Cultural Psychiatry, September, Beijing, China.
Trafimow, D., Silverman, E. S., Fan, R. M., & Law, J. S. F. (1997). The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the private self and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 107–123.
Tsai, J. L., Simeonova, D. I., & Watanabe, J. T. (2004). Somatic and social: Chinese Americans talk about emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1226–1238.
Wallner, F. G., & Jandl, M. J. (2006). The importance of constructive realism for the indigenous psychologies approach. In U. Kim, K. Yang, & K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (49–72). New York: Springer.
Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings. Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge & Paul.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
Wood, R. C. (2006). Performing the faith: An interview with George Lindbeck. Christian Century, 123, 28–35.
Ying, Y.-W., Lee, P. A., Tsai, J. L., Yeh, Y.-Y., & Huang, J. S. (2000). The conception of depression in Chinese American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 6, 183–195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dueck, A., Ting, SK. & Cutiongco, R. Constantine, Babel, and Yankee Doodling: Whose Indigeneity? Whose Psychology?. Pastoral Psychol 56, 55–72 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-007-0082-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-007-0082-1