Skip to main content
Log in

A Spatial Modelling Approach to Contagion Among Emerging Economies

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper takes a spatial modelling approach in specifying and testing for contagion among emerging market economies. Our approach enables us to estimate asymmetries such as the magnitude of contagion of one country upon others, as well as how that country in turn is affected, on average, by the events of others. The approach also enables us to test for contagion in a formal, straightforward way and to take account for distance and trade linkages among countries. The results suggest that contagion is a statistically significant factor in foreign exchange markets and, furthermore, its effects are not uniform across the countries considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahluwalia, P. (2000) “Discriminating Contagion: An Alternative Explanation of Contagious Currency Crises in Emerging Markets” IMF Working Paper, 00/14.

  • Baig, T. and I. Goldfaijn (1998) “Financial Market Contagion and the Asian Crisis” IMF Working Paper, 98/115.

  • Boyer, B., M. Gibson, and M. Loretan (1999) “Pitfalls in Tests for Changes in Correlations” Working Paper 597R, Federal Reserve Board, International Finance Division.

  • Bussière, M. and C. Mulder (1999) “External Vulnerability in Emerging Market Economies: How High Liquidity Can Offset Weak Fundamentals and the Effects of Contagion” IMF Working Paper, 99/88.

  • Calvo, G.A. (1999) “Contagion in Emerging Markets: When the Wall Street is a Carrier” University of Maryland, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candelon, B., A. Hecq, and WFC Verschoor (2005) “Measuring Common Cyclical Features during Financial Turmoil: Evidence of Interdependence not Contagion” Journal of International Money and Finance 24:317–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., R. Dornbusch, and Y. Park (2001) “International Financial Contagion: How it Spreads and How It can be Stopped” In S. Claessens and K.J. Forbes (eds.), International Financial Contagion. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti, G., M. Pericoli, and M. Sbracia (2002) “Some Contagion, Some Interdependence: More Pitfalls in tests of Financial Contagion” Journal of International Money and Finance 24:1177–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellas, H. and A. Stockman (1993) “Self-Fulfilling Expectations, Speculative Attack, and Capital Controls” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 25:721–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (2000) “Contagion” The World Economy 23:873–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. and R. Susmel (2001) “Volatility Dependence and Contagion in Emerging Markets” Journal of Development Economics 66:505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B., A.K. Rose, and C. Wyplosz (1996) “Contagious Currency Crises” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 98:463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K.J. and R. Rigobon (2001) “Measuring Contagion: Conceptual and Empirical Issues” In S. Claessens and K.J. Forbes (eds.), International Financial Contagion. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K.J. and R. Rigobon (2002) “No Contagion, Only Interdependence: Measuring Stock Market Co-Movements” Journal of Finance 57:2223–2261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratzscher, M. (2003) “On Currency Crises and Contagion” International Journal of Finance and Economics 8:109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, R. and A.K. Rose (1999) “Contagion and Trade Why are Currency Crises Regional?” Journal of International Money and Finance 18:603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, L.F. and R.O. Valdes (2001) “What Drives Contagion Trade, Neighbourhood, or Financial Links?” International Review of Financial Analysis 10:203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2001) “The Global Economy after September 11” World Economic Outlook. December, Washington D.C.

  • Kaminsky, G.L. and C.M. Reinhart (1999) “The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance of Payments Problems” American Economic Review 89:473–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G.L. and C.M. Reinhart (2000) “On Crises, Contagion and Confusion” Journal of International Economics 51:145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G.L. and C.M. Reinhart (2002) “Financial Markets in Time of Stress” Journal of Development Economics 69:451–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G.L., C.M. Reinhart, and C.A. Végh (2003) “The Unholy Trinity of Fiancial Contagion” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17:51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H.H. and I.R. Prucha (1998) “A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17:99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H.H. and I.R. Prucha (1999) “A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model” International Economic Review 40:509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, P. (1999) “Contagion: Monsoonal Effects, Spillovers and Jumps Between Multiple Equilibria” In P.R. Agenor, M. Miller, D. Vines, and A. Weber (eds.), The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Contagion and Consequences. Cambridge University Press.

  • Rigobon, R. (2002) “The Curse of Non-investment Grade Countries” Journal of Development Economics 69:423–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., D.A. Tornell, and A. Velasco (1996) “Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from 1995” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:147–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A. (1998) Common Fundamentals in the Tequila and Asian Crises. Mimeo. Harvard University.

  • Zhu, L. and J. Yang (2004) The Role of Psychic Distance in Contagion: A Gravity Model for Contagious Financial Crises. The George Washington University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry H. Kelejian.

Additional information

JEL Classification Numbers: F30, F32, C10

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelejian, H.H., Tavlas, G.S. & Hondroyiannis, G. A Spatial Modelling Approach to Contagion Among Emerging Economies. Open Econ Rev 17, 423–441 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-006-0357-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-006-0357-7

Keywords

Navigation