Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy-making and truthiness: Can existing policy models cope with politicized evidence and willful ignorance in a “post-fact” world?

  • Discussion and Commentary
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From “alternative facts” to “fake news,” in recent years the influence of misinformation on political life has become amplified in unprecedented ways through electronic communications and social media. While misinformation and spin are age-old tactics in policy making, and poor information and poorly informed opinion a constant challenge for policy analysts, both the volume of erroneous evidence and the difficulties encountered in differentiating subjectively constructed opinion from objectively verified policy inputs have increased significantly. The resulting amalgamation of unsubstantiated and verifiable data and well and poorly informed opinion raises many questions for a policy science which emerged in an earlier, less problematic era. This article examines these developments and their provenance and asks whether, and how, existing policy making models and practices developed and advocated during an earlier era of a sharper duality between fact and fiction have grappled with the new world of “truthiness,” and whether these models require serious revision in light of the impact of social media and other forces affecting contemporary policy discourses and processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. E. (1975). Public policy making. New York: Prager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Fallin Hunzaker, M. B., et al. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benegal, S. (2018). Overconfidence and the discounting of expertise: A commentary. Social Science & Medicine, 213, 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D., & Liu, Z. M. (2016). Media errors and the ‘nutty professor’: Riding the journalistic boundaries of the Sandy Hook shootings. Journalism, 17(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914552266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berling, T. V., & Bueger, C. (2017). Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum, 84, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, G. (2002). Evidence-based analysis and the work of policy shops. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björnberg, K. E., Karlsson, M., Gilek, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2017). Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg, M. (2018). Commencement speech of Michael Bloomberg, May 12. Downloaded from https://www.mikebloomberg.com/news/mike-bloomberg-delivers-2018-commencement-address-rice-university/ Accessed 18 May 2018.

  • Bogers, T., & Wernersen, R. (2014). How ‘social’ are social news sites? Exploring the motivations for using Reddit.Com. IConference 2014 Proceedings, March 1, 2014, pp. 329–344. https://doi.org/10.9776/14108.

  • Bovens, M., & t’Hart, P. (1996). Understanding policy fiascoes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (1974). The policy sciences emerge; To nurture and structure a discipline. Policy Sciences, 5, 239–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2012). Policy dynamics and change: The never-ending puzzle. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 451–472). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L. (2017). Policy science at an impasse: A matter of conceptual stretching? Politics & Policy, 45(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, C. C., & Sarin, R. K. (2002). Known, unknown, and unknowable uncertainties. Theory and Decision, 52(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015544715608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, J. L. (2014). Agnotology: Ignorance and absence or towards a sociology of things that aren’t there. Social Epistemology, 28(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.862880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curzon, H. F., & Kontoleon, A. (2016). From ignorance to evidence? The use of programme evaluation in conservation: Evidence from a Delphi survey of conservation experts. Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daviter, F. (2017). Policy analysis in the face of complexity: What kind of knowledge to tackle wicked problems? Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076717733325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate. Social Networks, 50, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • der Sluijs, V. (2005). Jeroen. “Uncertainty as a Monster in the Science-Policy Interface: Four Coping Strategies”. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water. Pollution Research, 52(6), 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossey, L. (2014). Agnotology: On the varieties of ignorance, criminal negligence, and crimes against humanity. EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing, 10(6), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2014.08.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N. (1988). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis. Policy Studies Review, 7(4), 720–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N. (1991). Assessing the impact of policy analysis: The functions of usable ignorance. Knowledge and Policy, 4, 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esberg, J., & Mummolo, M. (2018). Explaining misperceptions of crime. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3208303

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (Ed.). (1987). Confronting values in policy analysis: The politics of criteria. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). On governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. (1980). Legality and its discontents: A preliminary assessment of current theories of legalization and delegalization. In E. Blankenburg, E. Klausa, & H. Rottleuthner (Eds.), Alternative Rechtsforen Und Alternativen Zum Recht (pp. 11–26). Bonn: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (1980). Manipulatory politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordin, M. D. (2012). How lysenkoism became pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to velikovsky. Journal of the History of Biology, 45, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. M., Sorenson, M. E., & Warner, B. R. (2016). Ferguson on Facebook: Political persuasion in a new era of media effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. (2010). Ignorance and surprise: Science, society, and ecological design. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, M. (1992). Epistemology and policy analysis. In W. Dunn & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Advances in policy studies (pp. 291–329). New Brunswick: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, M., & Molnar, P. (Eds.). (2012). The content and context of hate speech: Rethinking regulation and responses. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2016). The unheavenly chorus: Political voices of organized interests on social media. Policy & Internet, 8(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512112453603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., McConnell, A., & Perl, A. (2016). Weaving the fabric of public policies: Comparing and integrating contemporary frameworks for the study of policy processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Nair, S. (2017). The central conundrums of policy formulation: Ill-structured problems and uncertainty. In M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation.

  • Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles & policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hula, R., Jackson-Elmoore, C., & Reese, L. (2007). Mixing God’s work and the public business: A framework for the analysis of faith-based service delivery. Review of Policy Research, 24(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., & Simmet, H. R. (2017). No funeral bells: Public reason in a post-truth age. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 751–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2013). The dark side of the boon? Credibility, selective exposure and the proliferation of online sources of political information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1862–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2016). Some like it lots: The influence of interactivity and reliance on credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. O. (1984). An introduction to the study of public policy. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D. (2002). Bounded rationality and public policy: Herbert A. Simon and the decisional foundation of collective choice. Policy Sciences, 35, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. A., & Lidsky, L. B. (2016). Of reasonable readers and unreasonable speakers: Libel law in a networked world. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, February 8, 2016. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2729625.

  • Kakutani, M. (2018). The death of truth: Notes on falsehood in the age of Trump. New York: Tim Duggan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth decay: An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. M., Hsu, J., Neiman, D., Kou, C., Bankston, L., Kim, S. Y., et al. (2018). The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissane, R. J. (2007). How do faith-based organizations compare to secular providers? Nonprofit directors’ and poor women’s assessments of FBOs. Journal of Poverty, 11(4), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Lerner, D. (1951). The policy orientation. In H. D. Lasswell (Ed.), The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method (pp. 3–15). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T (2000). Foucault, governmentality, and critique.

  • Lewandowsky, S., Oreskes, N., Risbey, J. S., Newell, B. R., & Smithson, M. (2015). Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community. Global Environmental Change, 33, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, A. J. (2018). Mobilizing doubt: The legal mobilization of climate denialist groups. Law & Policy. Accessed 18 May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D. C. (2009). Known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns and the propagation of scientific enquiry. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(3), 712–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macafee, T. (2013). Some of these things are not like the others: Examining motivations and political predispositions among political Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2766–2775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (2013). Public policy in an uncertain world: Analysis and decisions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M. (2012). Policy overreaction. Journal of Public Policy, 32(03), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1200013X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M. (2014). Policy persistence, risk estimation and policy underreaction. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9203-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M. (2015). Emotion-driven negative policy bubbles. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9228-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejias, U. A., & Vokuev, N. (2017). Disinformation and the media: The case of Russia and the Ukraine. Media, Culture and Society, 39(7), 1027–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. (2007). The policy analysis movement. In L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, & D. Laycock (Eds.), Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 71–84). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. (2018). Fake news, disinformation, manipulation and online tactics to undermine democracy. Journal of Cyber Policy, 3(1), 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., & Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning–Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science and Medicine, 211, 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Bernstein, D. M., Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2012). Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 969–974. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (Export ed.). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packwood, A. (2002). Evidence-based policy: Rhetoric and reality. Social Policy & Society, 1(3), 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, S. (2017). A birther and a truther: The influence of the authoritarian personality on conspiracy beliefs. Politics & Policy, 45(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, L. (2017). Resisting the suppression of science. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(17), 1607–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 13–39). Westview: Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, I. (2002). Making sense of ‘what works’: Evidence based policymaking as instrumental rationality? Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (Eds.). (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. SUNY Series in Public Policy. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. (2017). Alternative facts and public affairs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(3), 775–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, C. L. (1977). The public use of private interests. Washington: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1969). The analysis of corruption in developing nations. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 11(03), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500005363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1967). The logic of heuristic decision making. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of decision and action (pp. 1–35). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (Eds.). (2018). Misinformation and Mass Audiences. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A. (2015). Deconstructing facts and frames in energy research: Maxims for evaluating contentious problems. Energy Policy, 86, 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T. M., Aarts, N., Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Dewulf, A. (2018). Social media hypes about agro-food issues: Activism, scandals and conflicts. Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2018). Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? Policy & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15333033030897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syuntyurenko, O. V. (2015). Network technologies for information warfare and manipulation of public opinion. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 42(4), 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. W. (2018). The continuous expansion of citizen participation: A new taxonomy. European Political Science Review, 10(1), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, L. H. (1972). Policy science: Analysis or ideology? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(1), 66–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasu, N., Ang, B., Teo, T.-A., Jayakumar, S., Faizal, M., & Ahuja, J. (2018). Fake news: National security in the post-truth era. In Policy Report. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. January 2018. Available at https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PR180313_Fake-News_WEB.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2018.

  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnier, J.-P. (2013). On agnotology as built-in ignorance. Africa Spectrum, 48(1), 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, D. J. (1992). The distribution and use of policy knowledge in the policy process. In W. N. Dunn & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Advances in policy studies since 1950 (pp. 383–418). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban Studies and Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Anthony Perl

  2. Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Michael Howlett

  3. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    M. Ramesh

Authors
  1. Anthony Perl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Howlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ramesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Howlett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perl, A., Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. Policy-making and truthiness: Can existing policy models cope with politicized evidence and willful ignorance in a “post-fact” world?. Policy Sci 51, 581–600 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9334-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9334-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation