Skip to main content
Log in

Communication and competition in environmental studies

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

College-bound students and graduate students interested in environmental studies and environmental science have hundreds of programs to choose from, and potential suitors in the academy are eager to be noticed. This article considers how purveyors of environment-related degree programs and majors use branding and other communication strategies as they compete for students and other coveted resources. Departmental and degree nomenclature is examined so as to discern how academic institutions respond to changing intellectual fashions and popular interest in environmental affairs. This analysis is aided by Harold D. Lasswell’s insights into the politics of communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Romero and Silveri (2006) document two “waves” of new “environmental programs” in the periods 1965–1976 and 1988–2005. In all, they tally more than 2,175 new “programs” emerging during the two waves, combined. The authors use “degrees” and “programs” interchangeably. Romero and Silveri (2006: 10) specify that of the 2,175 programs offered in the environmental field in 2005, 621 were at the bachelor’s level and 274 were at the master’s level; the remainder were doctoral or law degree programs. Organizational forms of interdisciplinary environmental programs are more clearly presented in CEDD’s national survey. Vincent (2009b) notes that approximately one-third of programs in CEDD’s survey are in stand-alone academic units (e.g., a department of environmental studies or college of environmental sciences). More programs still were housed in an academic unit that offered environmental studies or environmental sciences among other majors or degree programs (Vincent 2009b). This was especially true of environmental science programs.

  2. Soulé and Press (1998), for example, criticize contemporary environmental studies curricula for lacking core intellectual foundations and rigor. They surmise that eclectic combinations of natural and social scientists, who typically compose environmental studies programs, tend not to agree on common intellectual foundations for the field. Hence, they inevitably fail to design majors with structure and coherence. In contrast, Maniates and Whissel’s (2000) survey of environmental studies curricula find comparatively few cases of the “anything goes” or scattershot approach predicted by the critics; Maniates and Whissel are unconvinced that multidisciplinary faculties are necessarily prone to conflict or to develop shallow curricula.

  3. Whereas the University of Colorado at Boulder Environmental Studies Program website indicates that the program separated from the Department of Geography in 1993 (University of Colorado at Boulder 2009), other sources mark 1994 as the date of separation (Anonymous 1998).

  4. The comparatively negligible expected increase in the number of employees in the “forest fire inspectors and prevention specialists” job category (200 additional employees between 2008 and 2018) raises serious questions about America’s preparedness to combat expected increases in climate change-induced wildfires (see, United States Global Change Research Program 2009, especially, p. 66, 79, 82, 95, 100, 112, and 131).

  5. Environmental “health” workers in the “environmental scientists and specialists, including health,” occupational category:

    conduct research or perform investigation for the purpose of identifying, abating, or eliminating sources of pollutants or hazards that affect either the environment or the health of the population. Utilizing knowledge of various scientific disciplines may collect, synthesize, study, report, and take action based on data derived from measurements or observations of air, food, soil, water, and other sources (United States Department of Labor 2009c).

    In the job category, “environmental scientist and protection technicians, including health,” an employee:

    performs laboratory and field tests to monitor the environment and investigate sources of pollution, including those that affect health. Under direction of an environmental scientist or specialist, may collect samples of gases, soil, water, and other materials for testing and take corrective actions as assigned (United States Department of Labor 2009d).

  6. The forestry profession’s recruitment efforts cannot be helped by reports of low job satisfaction among federally employed foresters. The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government 2009 survey placed the U.S. Forest Service at 206th out of 216 organizations ranked by overall employee satisfaction (Society of American Foresters 2009). See also, JobsRated.Com’s 2009 survey of “best” and “worst” occupations which rated “lumberjack” the single worst job from a list of 200 professions. The ranking was based on criteria such as work environment, physical demands, stress, income, and hours per week (JobsRated.Com 2009).

  7. Cohen (1988) derived four lessons from the demise of the geography department at Harvard: (1) struggling departments should not over-rely on a single, influential figure to save the program; (2) poor teaching does not help the departmental cause; (3) departments are weak that are characterized by intellectual fragmentation and lack of a common conceptual framework; and (4) size matters—small faculties are vulnerable, and if the faculty stays small, it must become adept at creating intellectual networks.

  8. These findings depart somewhat from Murphy (2007: 124–125) who marks the late 1980s as the “end of an era of decline” in geography programs; he records no “major loss” among geography departments since that time. The fact that our findings diverge from Murphy could be semantic, i.e., we catalogued dropped departments and graduate degree programs among all institutions of higher learning listed in Peterson’s, whereas Murphy makes reference to losses (or lack thereof) in “major” departments. Moreover, Murphy documents the emergence of 12 new graduate-level degree programs in geography between 1995 and 2005 (Murphy 2007: 127).

  9. YouTube’s “community guidelines” declare (YouTube 2009), “We’re not asking for the kind of respect reserved for nuns, the elderly, and brain surgeons. We mean don’t abuse the site. Every cool new community feature on YouTube involves a certain level of trust. We trust you to be responsible, and millions of users respect that trust. Please be one of them”.

  10. Though the meaning and significance of “land ethic” requires more commentary than a single excerpt from the concept’s inventor (Aldo Leopold), a pithy distillation is found in Leopold’s admonition to “…quit thinking about decent land-use as solely an economic problem. Examine each question in terms of what is ethically and esthetically right, as well as what is economically expedient. A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it does otherwise”. (Leopold 1968: 224–225).

References

  • Alexander, C (2007). Department of Geology no more; NU changes name. The daily Northwestern. 8 Jan.

  • Angelo, J. M. (2007). Gotta get a message to you. University Business: Solutions for Higher Education Management, February, 60–63.

  • Anonymous. (1956). Geography at Harvard. The Harvard Crimson. November 26.

  • Anonymous. (1998). ENVS reallocation request. Internal document of the University of Colorado at Boulder. On file with author.

  • Arden, C. (1995). Getting together anthropology, geography, and the field museum. UIC News. Feb. 22. Available at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/uicnews/articledetail.cgi?id=2799. Accessed 4 April 2008.

  • Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future. (2008). The Tallories Declaration: 10 Point Action Plan (1994 updated version). Available at http://www.ulsf.org/pdf/TD.pdf. Accessed on 11 March 2008.

  • Baker, M. A. (2006). Student and faculty employment attitudes in the geosciences: 2006. American Geological Institute Report GW-06-002. Available at: http://www.agiweb.org/workforce/gw-06-002.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Berman, J. (2009). College students are flocking to sustainability degrees, careers. USA Today. August 3.

  • Brough, H. (1992). Environmental studies: Is it academic? World Watch January/February: 26–33.

  • Brunner, R. D. (1994). Myth and American politics. Policy Sciences, 27, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D., & Willard, A. R. (2003). Professional insecurities. Policy Sciences, 36, 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun et al. (2005). We rise to play a greater part: Students, faculty, staff, and community converge in search of leadership from the top. 2005 update in support of Campus Sustainability Day III. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning. Available at: http://www.scup.org/asset/49750/scup-csd-101705.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2009.

  • Camill, P. (2009). Environmental literacy and the academy. AESS Newsletter, summer: 4–5.

  • Chapman, R. L. (2007). How to think about environmental studies. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 14, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNN. (2008). iReport. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/exchange/. Accessed 21 July 2008.

  • Cohen, S. B. (1988). Reflections on the elimination of geography at Harvard, 1947–51. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Columbia University. (2008). Mission: Solutions for sustainable development. Available at: http://www.earth.columbia.edu/articles/view/1791. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • DeBres, K. (1989). An early frost: Geography in Teachers College, Columbia and Columbia University, 1896–1942. The Geographical Journal, 155, 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P., & Steelman, T. A. (2001). Making public policy programs effective and relevant: The role of the policy sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, T. (2006). The greening of America’s campuses. New York Times. 8 January.

  • Hager, S., Straka, T., & Irwin, H. (2007). What do teenagers think of environmental issues and natural resources management careers? Journal of Forestry, 105, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiha, F. (2005). Employment and wages by major occupational group and industry. Occupational employment statistics. U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/2005/may/major.pdf page 2. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Iowa State University. (2002). New department will broaden education and research offerings. Available at: http://www.ag.iastate.edu/aginfo/news_detail.php?var1=580. Accessed 11 March 2008.

  • Iowa State University. (2007). Press release: Regents approve ISU College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Available at http://www.ag.iastate.edu/news/cals_newsrelease.php. Accessed 11 March 2008.

  • JobsRated.Com. (2009). The 10 worst jobs of 2009. Available at: http://www.careercast.com/jobs/content/JobsRated_10WorstJobs. Accessed: 30 December 2009.

  • Keane, C. & Martinez, C. (2008). US geoscience enrollments and degrees remain steady in 2007. Geoscience Currents 6. Available at http://www.agiweb.org/workforce/Currents-006-2007-Enrollments.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Kirp, D. L., Berman, E. P., Holman, P. R., Solomon, D., & Van Antwerpen, J. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliff, S. (2009). Green degrees in bloom. Newsweek. 12 August.

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1946a). Describing the contents of communications. In B. L. Smith, H. D. Lasswell, & R. D. Casey (Eds.), Propaganda, communication, and public opinion: A comprehensive reference guide (pp. 74–94). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1946b). Describing the effects of communications. In B. L. Smith, H. D. Lasswell, & R. D. Casey (Eds.), Propaganda, communication, and public opinion: A comprehensive reference guide (pp. 95–117). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1948a). The structure and function of communication in society. In B. Lyman (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 37–51). New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1948b). Attention structure and social structure. In B. Lyman (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 243–276). New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a free society: Studies in law, science and policy, vol I. New Haven: New Haven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1968). A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckert, M. K. (2006). Has the myth of the omnipotent forester become the reality of the impotent forester? Journal of Forestry, 104, 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniates, M. F., & Whissel, J. C. (2000). Environmental studies: The sky is not falling. BioScience, 50, 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2008). Marketing higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. B. (2007). Geography’s place in higher education in the United States. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Wildlife Federation. (2008). Campus environment 2008: A national report card on sustainability in higher education. Available at: http://www.nwf.org/campusEcology/docs/CampusReportFinal.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2009.

  • Northwestern University. (2006). October 2006 actions of the curricular review committee. Available at: http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/faculty/teaching/Oct2006GeolSciMajor.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2008.

  • Northwestern University. (2007). Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences: Alumni welcome. November 1. Available at: http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/current/people/alumni/index.html. Accessed 4 April 2008.

  • Northwestern University. (2008). Program of study: New major options. Available at: http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/undergraduate/programs.html. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Peterson’s. (1989a). Graduate and professional programs. Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s Guides, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (1989b). Graduate programs in the biological and agricultural sciences (book 3). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (1989c). Graduate programs in the physical sciences and mathematics (book 4). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (1989d). Graduate programs in engineering and applied sciences (book 5). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (1989e). Graduate programs in business, education, health and law (book 6). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (2006a). Graduate programs in the biological sciences (book 3). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (2006b). Graduate programs in the physical sciences, mathematics, agricultural sciences, the environment and natural resources (book 4). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (2006c). Graduate programs in engineering and applied sciences (book 5). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s. (2006d). Graduate programs in business, education, health, information studies, law and social work (book 6). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princeton Review. (2009a). Green honor roll. Available at: http://www.princeton.com/green-honor-roll.aspx. Accessed: 22 Dec 2009.

  • Princeton Review. (2009b). The green rating: How we score schools. http://www.princetonreview.com/green-rating-methodology.aspx. Accessed: 22 December 2009.

  • Riley, D. (2005). The Blog Herald blog count October 2005: Over 100 million blogs created. Blog Herald. October 10. Available at: http://www.blogherald.com/2005/10/10/the-blog-herald-blog-count-October-2005/. Accessed 21 July 2008.

  • Romero, A., & Silveri, P. (2006). Not all are created equal: an analysis of the environmental programs/departments in U.S. academic institutions from 1900 until May 2005. Journal of Integrative Biology, 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharik T. & Frisk, S. (2008). Reasons and reservations for enrolling in forestry degree programs: A survey of undergraduate students. Paper presented at the 7th biennial conference on university education in natural resources, Corvallis, Oregon. March 15-17, 2008. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1957/8512. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Society of American Foresters. (2009). Forest service and BLM rank low in employee satisfaction survey. The Forestry Source 14(17). Available at: http://www.safnet.org/members/secureDocument.cfm?docID=672. Accessed: 27 Dec 2009.

  • Soulé, M., & Press, D. (1998). What is environmental studies? BioScience, 48, 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor. (2009a). Occupational employment, training, and earnings. Bureau of Labor Statistics database. Selected occupational projections data. Available at: http://data.bls.gov/oep/noeted/empoptd.jsp. Accessed 18 Dec 2009.

  • United States Department of Labor. (2009b). Occupational variable data definitions. Bureau of Labor Statistics database. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_nem_definitions.htm. Accessed 18 Dec 2009.

  • United States Department of Labor. (2009c). Occupational employment, training, and earnings. Bureau of Labor Statistics database. Environmental scientists and specialists, including health. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/2008/may/oes192041.htm. Accessed 18 Dec 2009.

  • United States Department of Labor. (2009d). Occupational employment, training, and earnings. Bureau of Labor Statistics database. Environmental science and protection technicians, including health. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/2008/may/oes194091.htm. Accessed 18 Dec 2009.

  • United States Global Change Research Program. (2009). Global climate change impacts in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California at Riverside. (2000). Graduate council report to the Riverside Division Academic Senate, May 25. Available at: http://acadsen.ucr.edu/agenda/001107/MA-MS-disestab.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2008.

  • University of Colorado at Boulder. (2009). History: A brief history of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Available at: UCB, Environmental Studies Program, http://envs.colorado.edu/about/C114/History/. Accessed 13 Dec 2009.

  • University of Michigan. (2008). Logos for the School of Natural Resources and Environment. Available at: http://www.snre.umich.edu/newsroom/logos. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • University of Vermont. (2004). Dean’s message: RSENR committed to evolutionary change, adaptation, and fitness. The Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources: News for our alumni and friends, spring/summer. Available at: http://www.uvm.edu/envnr/news_events/alumnews/alumspring04.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2008.

  • University of Washington. (2008a). UW Regents approve proposed College of the Environment. June 12. Available at: http://uwnews.org/article.asp?articleID=42460. Accessed 28 July 2008.

  • University of Washington. (2008b). UW College of the Environment. Available at: http://www.washington.edu/provost/print/CoEnvQandA_18oct07.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • University of Washington. (2009). Message from the director. Available at: http://www.cfr.washington.edu/aboutTheSchool/msgDirector.shtml. Accessed: 30 Dec 2009.

  • University of Wisconsin. (2008). Wildlife ecology: University of Wisconsin. Available at: http://wildlife.wisc.edu/. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Vincent, S. (2009a). Growth in environmental studies and science programs, AESS Newsletter. Summer, 10, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, S. (2009b). Trends in environmental studies and science programs, AESS Newsletters, fall: 4–5.

  • Wilent, S. (2008). WSU to eliminate forestry degree program”. The Forestry Source, 13, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolberg, J., & Pokrywczynski, J. (2001). A psychographic analysis of generation Y college students. Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yale University. (2008). Yaleblog. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/blog/. Accessed 18 July 2008.

  • YouTube. (2009). YouTube community guidelines. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines. Accessed 31 Dec 2009.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tatyana Ruseva, Justin Naab, and Joel Bolinger are gratefully acknowledged for their help compiling and organizing data for this project. Helpful comments on prior drafts were provided by Susan Clark, Garry Brewer, William Ascher, and Shirley Vincent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew R. Auer.

Appendix I

Appendix I

Table 4 Environment-related degree programs dropped between 1989 and 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auer, M.R. Communication and competition in environmental studies. Policy Sci 43, 365–390 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9109-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9109-z

Keywords

Navigation