Skip to main content
Log in

The role of punishment in the spatial public goods game

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though contradicting with natural selection, cooperative behaviors widely exist in practice and seem to be an effective measure to maintain the functioning of complex systems. As revealed by previous studies, punishment is capable of promoting cooperation and therefore various types of punishment are proposed. Previously, scholars mainly focus on investigating either peer punishment or pool punishment, whereas in social and biological systems, an individual might function as different roles when facing different players. Thus, we mainly investigate these two types of punishment together and the effects of punishment-type transfer on the evolutionary dynamics are further provided with sufficient analyses in this manuscript. Role of different type of punishment on cooperation seems to be related to the number of punishers (being denoted as T) among corresponding neighbors. Simulations are conducted in order to investigate the effect of threshold reflecting the punishment-type switching on evolutionary dynamics, while peer punishment is proved to be more effective than pool punishment in promoting cooperation. We hope our findings here can shed some lights on the investigation of punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nowak, M.A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nowak, M.A., Sasaki, A., Taylor, C., Fudenberg, D.: Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations. Nature 428(6983), 646 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Darwin, C.: The origin of species. John Murray, London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pennisi, E.: How did cooperative behavior evolve. Science 309, 93 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colman, A.M.: The puzzle cooperation. Nature 440, 744–745 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Z., Jusup, M., Wang, R., et al.: Onymity promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments. Sci. Adv. 3(3), e1601444 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanimoto, J.: How does resolution of strategy affect network reciprocity in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games? Appl. Math. Comput. 301, 36–42 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu, P., Song, Z., Guo, H., et al.: Adaptive willingness resolves social dilemma in network populations. Chaos 29(11), 113114 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, H., Song, Z., Suncana, G., et al.: A novel route to cyclic dominance in voluntary social dilemmas. J. R. Soc. Interface 17(164), 20190789 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X.L., Jusup, M., Wang, Z., et al.: Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(1), 30–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanimoto, J.: Coevolution of discrete, mixed, and continuous strategy systems boosts in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma and chicken games. Appl. Math. Comput. 304, 20–27 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J., Meng, H., Wang, W., et al.: Evolution of cooperation on independent networks: the influence of asymmetric information sharing updating mechanism. Appl. Math. Comput. 340, 234–41 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, J., Deng, Z., Gao, B., et al.: Popularity-driven strategy updating rule promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game. Appl. Math. Comput. 353, 82–87 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, P., Wang, X., Jia, D., et al.: Investigating the coevolution of node reputation and edge-strategy in prisoner’s dilemma game. Appl. Math. Comput. 386, 125474 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Chu, C., Mu, C., Liu, J., et al.: Aspiration-based coevolution of node weights promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game. New J. Phys. 21, 063024 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, C., Guo, H., Li, Z., et al.: Coevolution of multi-game resolves social dilemma in network population. Appl. Math. Comput. 341, 402–407 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shu, F., Liu, X., Li, M.: Impacts of memory on a regular lattice for different population sizes with asynchronous update in spatial snowdrift game. Phys. Lett. A 382(20), 1317–1323 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fontanari, J.F., Rodrigues, F.A.: Influence of network topology on cooperative problem-solving systems. Theory Biosci. 135(3), 101–110 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, X., Su, X., Ma, J., Tian, H., Liu, R.: Evolutionary cooperation in networked public goods game with dependency groups. Complexity 2019, 1–8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mao, Y., Rong, Z., Xu, X., Tse, C. K.:The influence of extortion diversity on the evolution of cooperation in scale-free networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (pp. 886-889). IEEE (2016)

  22. Mao, Y., Xu, X., Rong, Z., Wu, Z.X.: The emergence of cooperation-extortion alliance on scale-free networks with normalized payoff. EPL 122(5), 50005 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shi, L., Shen, C., Geng, Y., et al.: Winner-weaken-loser-strengthen rule leads to optimally cooperative interdependent networks. Nonlinear Dyn. 96(1), 49–56 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia, D., Shen, C., Li, X., et al.: Ability-based evolution promotes cooperation in interdependent graphs. EPL 127, 68002 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pacheco, J.M., Traulsen, A., Nowak, M.A.: Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(25), 258103 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Szabó, G., Fáth, G.: Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys. Rep. 446(4–6), 97–216 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sigmund, K.: The Calculus of Selfishness. Princeton University, Princeton (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859), 1243–1248 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C., Gächter, S.: People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions. Nat. human Behav. 3(11), 1145–1153 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Purzycki, B.G., Apicella, C., Atkinson, C., et al.: Moralistic goods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature 530(7590), 327 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Szabó, G., Hauert, C.: Phase transitions and volunteering in spatial public goods games. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 118101 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hauert, C., Monte, S.D., Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Volunteering as red queen mechanism for cooperation in Public Goods Games. Science 296(5570), 1129–32 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Santos, F.C., Santos, M.D., Pacheco, J.M.: Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454(7201), 213–6 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qin, J., Chen, Y., Kang, Y., Perc, M.: Social diversity promotes cooperation in spatial multigames. EPL 118(1), 18002 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rand, D.G., Nowak, M.A.: The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. Nat. Commun. 2, 434 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Q., Liu, L., Chen, X.J.: Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the public goods game with individual disguise and peer punishment. Dyn Games Appl (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-019-00339-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sasaki, T., Okada, I., Uchida, S., Chen, X.J.: Commitment to Cooperation and Peer Punishment: Its Evolution. Games 6(4), 574–587 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Szolnoki, A., Szabó, G., Perc, M.: Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool punishment. Phys. Rev. E 83, 036101 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Szabó, G., Töke, C.: Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice. Phys. Rev. E 58, 69–73 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Szolnoki, A., Perc, M., Szabó, G.: Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games. Phys. Rev. E 80, 056109 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 “New Generation Artificial Intelligence” Major Project (Grant no. 2018AAA0100905), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62073263), the National 1000 Young Talent Plan (Grant No. W099102), Yunnan National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 62066045).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, P., Guo, H., Zhang, H. et al. The role of punishment in the spatial public goods game. Nonlinear Dyn 102, 2959–2968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05965-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05965-0

Keywords

Navigation