Skip to main content
Log in

A novel long short-term memory neural-network-based self-excited force model of limit cycle oscillations of nonlinear flutter for various aerodynamic configurations

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the strong nonlinear properties of the entire flutter process [including growth stages, decay stages and steady limit cycle oscillations (LCOs)], the generalization of the self-excited force model for the entire flutter process of bluff bodies is a very critical issue. This paper proposes a self-excited force model based on a novel long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to simulate the entire flutter process for various leading-edge configurations. To obtain the dataset, the nonlinear flutter with the growth stages, decay stages and steady LCOs for different leading-edge aerodynamic configurations is investigated by a series of two-degrees-of-freedom spring-suspended sectional model tests. Based on the measured flutter responses and self-excited forces in the tests, a data-driven self-excited force model is proposed on the basis of a novel LSTM neural network. Considering that the nonlinear dynamic system is very sensitive to the accuracy of the model parameters, the Newmark-\(\beta \) method is incorporated into the LSTM networks and forms a closed-loop process to restrain the error amplification effects and improve the model robustness, that is, the response calculated from the output of LSTM (the self-excited force) by the Newmark-\(\beta \) method is set as the input of LSTM at the next step rather than the measured response. To validate the performance of the proposed model, the flutter critical wind speed, time history of oscillation and self-excited forces, steady-state oscillation amplitude and flutter development process predicted by the model are compared with the test results. The comparison indicates that the predicted results agree well with the test results, meaning that the proposed model has high accuracy, generalization and robustness in describing the nonlinear characteristics of the flutter for various aerodynamic configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scanlan, R.H., Tomko, J.J.: Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97, 1717–1737 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scanlan, R.H., Lin, W.H.: Effects of turbulence on bridge flutter derivatives. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 104, 719 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sarkar, P.P., Jones, N.P., Scanlan, R.H.: Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges. J. Eng. Mech. 120(8), 1718–1742 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scanlan, R.H.: Amplitude and turbulence effects on bridge flutter derivatives. J. Struct. Eng. 123, 232–236 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, A., He, X., Xiang, H.: Identification of 18 flutter derivatives of bridge decks. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90, 2007–2022 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Argentini, T., Rocchi, D., Muggiasca, S., Zasso, A.: Cross-sectional distributions versus integrated coefficients of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances identified with surface pressure measurement. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104, 152–158 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, F., Zhu, L., Ge, X., Zhang, Z.: Some new insights into the identification of bridge deck flutter derivatives. Eng. Struct. 75, 418–428 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, Z., Gu, M.: Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks using CFD-based discrete-time aerodynamic models. Wind Struct. 18, 215–233 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto, M.: Aerodynamic damping of prisms. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 59, 159–175 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto, M., Daito, Y., Yoshizumi, F., Ichikawa, Y., Yabutani, T.: Torsional flutter of bluff bodies. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 69, 871–882 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto, M., Shirato, H., Yagi, T., Shijo, R., Eguchi, A., Tamaki, H.: Effects of aerodynamic interferences between heaving and torsional vibration of bridge decks: the case of tacoma narrows bridge. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91, 1547–1557 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amandolese, X., Michelin, S., Choquel, M.: Low speed flutter and limit cycle oscillations of a two-degree-of-freedom flat plate in a wind tunnel. J. Fluids Struct. 43, 244–255 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arena, A., Lacarbonara, W., Marzocca, P.: Post-critical behavior of suspension bridges under nonlinear aerodynamic loading. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 11(1), 1–11 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, M., Xu, F., Ying, X.: Experimental investigations on the nonlinear torsional flutter of a bridge deck. J. Bridge Eng. 22(8), 04017048 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, R., Ge, Y., Yang, Y., Du, Y., Zhang, L.: Wind-induced nonlinear behaviors of twin-box girder bridges with various aerodynamic shapes. Nonlinear Dyn. 94(2), 1095–1115 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bhat, S.S., Govardhan, R.N.: Stall flutter of NACA 0012 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluids Struct. 41, 166–174 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Náprstek, J., Pospíšil, S., Hračov, S.: Analytical and experimental modelling of non-linear aeroelastic effects on prismatic bodies. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 95, 1315–1328 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gao, G., Zhu, L., Han, W., Li, J.: Nonlinear post-flutter behavior and self-excited force model of a twin-side-girder bridge deck. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177, 227–241 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, M., Xu, F., Zhang, Z., Ying, X.: Energy budget analysis and engineering modeling of post-flutter limit cycle oscillation of a bridge deck. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 188, 410–420 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matsumoto, M., Yoshizumi, F., Yabutani, T., Abe, K., Nakajima, N.: Flutter stabilization and heaving-branch flutter. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 83, 289–299 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Graves, A.: Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 (2013)

  22. Groueix, T., Fisher, M., Kim, V. G., Russell, B. C., Aubry, M.: AtlasNet: A Papier-Mâché approach to learning 3D surface generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05384 (2018)

  23. Wei, S., Jin, X., Li, H.: General solutions for nonlinear differential equations: a rule-based self-learning approach using deep reinforcement learning. Comput. Mech. 64, 1361–1374 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mannarino, A., Mantegazza, P.: Nonlinear aeroelastic reduced order modeling by recurrent neural networks. J. Fluids Struct. 48, 103–121 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, R., Kalnay, E., Balachandran, B.: Neural machine-based forecasting of chaotic dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn. 98, 2903–2917 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, W., Wang, B., Ye, Z., Quan, J.: Efficient method for limit cycle flutter analysis based on nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order models. AIAA J. 50(5), 1019–1028 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, K., Kou, J., Zhang, W.: Deep neural network for unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic modeling across multiple Mach numbers. Nonlinear Dyn. 96(3), 2157–2177 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gao, G., Zhu, L.: Nonlinearity of mechanical damping and stiffness of a spring-suspended sectional model system for wind tunnel tests. J. Sound Vib. 355, 369–391 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grants Nos. U1711265, 51878230).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Laima, S., Jin, X. et al. A novel long short-term memory neural-network-based self-excited force model of limit cycle oscillations of nonlinear flutter for various aerodynamic configurations. Nonlinear Dyn 100, 2071–2087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05631-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05631-5

Keywords

Navigation