Abstract
Earthquakes cause many losses of life and property with their devastating effects. Scientists conduct studies to predict the hazards by examining the anomalies that occur before the earthquake. In this study, mathematical and statistical relationships are examined between soil radon (Rn-222) gas and earthquake and atmospheric total electron content (TEC). Furthermore, an Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) simulation model is proposed to predict Rn concentrations. The model is evaluated for the M 4.2 Sivas, Susehri earthquake in Türkiye that took place on the North Anatolian Fault Zone in 2007 and a relationship is determined between soil Rn gas and micro-seismic activity. In parallel with the earthquake–radon relationship, some meteorological variables [5, 10, 20, 50 cm soil temperature (°C), vapour pressure (hPa), wet bulb temperature, dry bulb temperature] are identified as associated with the earthquake. It is also observed that the TEC increases with the relative Rn gas concentration as the time of the main shock is approached. This provides meaningful results for further seismo-ionospheric change interpretations. In addition, the ARIMA model detects possible future Rn gas concentration values.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akdi Y (2003) Zaman Serileri Analizi, Birim Kökler ve Kointegrasyon (pp. 47–112). Bıçaklar Kitabevi, Ankara.
Antsilevich M, Vilenskiy I, Gerasimov G, Grishkevich L, Yelizar’yev Y, Karpenko A, Kolokolov L, Levin M, Leshchenko L, Ovezgel’Dyyev O, Samorokin N, Sukhodol’Skaya A (1971) Effect of the September 22, 1968, Solar Eclipse in the F2-Layer. Geomagnet Aeron 11:458
ArunKumar KE, Kalaga DV, Sai Kumar CM, Chilkoor G, Kawaji M, Brenza TM (2021) Forecasting the dynamics of cumulative COVID-19 cases (confirmed, recovered and deaths) for top-16 countries using statistical machine learning models: Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Seasonal Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Averag. Appl Soft Compu 103:107161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107161
Başçiftçi F, İnal C, Yıldırımm O, Bülbül S (2018) Comparison Of Regional And Global TEC Values: Turkey Model. Int J Eng Geosci 3(2):61–72. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.382604
Bhattarai N, Chapagain NP, Adhikari B (2018) Total electron content and electron density profile observations during geomagnetic storms using COSMIC satellite data. 52(250):1979–1990. arXiv. http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/ow.html.
Boğaziçi Ü (2021) B.Ü. Kandilli Rasathanesi BDTİM Deprem Sorgulama Sistemi. In: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü Bölgesel Deprem-Tsunami İzleme ve Değerlendirme Merkezi. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/zeqdb/
Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Box G, Jenkins G, Reinsel G, Ljung G (2015) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Wiley, New York
Çepni M, Şentürk E (2015) İyonosferik Değişim ve Deprem İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Deneme: Van Depremi Örneği. 5. Uluslararası Deprem Sempozyumu, 603–611.
Cheung YW, La KS (1995) Lag order and critical values of the augmented dickey-fuller test. J Bus Econ Stat 13(3):277–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524601
Ciotoli G, Lombardi S, Annunziatellis A (2007) Geostatistical analysis of soil gas data in a high seismic intermontane basin: Fucino Plain, central Italy. J Geophys ResSolid Earth 112(5):5407. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004044
Crockett RGM, Gillmore GK, Phillips PS, Denman AR, Groves-Kirkby CJ (2006) Radon anomalies preceding earthquakes which occurred in the UK, in summer and autumn 2002. Sci Total Environ 364(1–3):138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.003
Datchenko EA, Ulomov VI (1972) Anomalies in the electron density of the ionosphere as a possible forerunner of a Tashkent earthquake. Institute of Seismology, Tashkent.
Dautermann T, Calais E, Haase J, Garrison J (2007) Investigation of ionospheric electron content variations before earthquakes in southern California, 2003–2004. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 112(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004447
Davies K, Baker DM (1965) Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964. J Geophys Res 70(9):2251–2253. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz070i009p02251
Freund F (2000) Time-resolved study of charge generation and propagation in igneous rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105(B5):11001–11019. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900423
Freund FT (2007) Pre-earthquake signals—Part II: Flow of battery currents in the crust. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7(5):543–548. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-543-2007
Fuying Z, Yun W, Yiyan Z, Jian L (2011) A statistical investigation of pre-earthquake ionospheric TEC anomalies. Geodesy Geodyn 2(1):61–65. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1246.2011.00061
Garrison JL, Lee S-CG, Haase JS, Calais E (2007) A method for detecting ionospheric disturbances and estimating their propagation speed and direction using a large GPS network. Radio Sci 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RS003657
Gautam PK, Chauhan V, Sathyaseelan R, Kumar N, Pappachen JP (2019) NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics Co-seismic ionospheric GPS-TEC disturbances from different source characteristic earthquakes in the Himalaya and the adjoining regions Co-seismic ionospheric GPS-TEC disturbances from different source characterist. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 7(2):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2018.05.009
Ge L, Zhao J, Luo Y (2014) The research on earthquake radon anomalies. J Geosci Environ Protect 2(5):38–40. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2014.25006
Ghosh D, Deb A, Sengupta R (2009) Anomalous radon emission as precursor of earthquake. J Appl Geophys 69(2):67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.06.001
Ghosh D, Deb A, Sengupta R, Bera S, Sahoo SR, Haldar S, Patra KK (2011) Comparative study of seismic surveillance on radon in active and non-active tectonic zone of West Bengal. India Radiation Meas 46(3):365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.07.016
Gregorič A, Zmazek B, Džeroski S, Torkar D, Vaupotič J (2012) Radon as an earthquake precursor - methods for detecting anomalies. In S. D’Amico (Ed.), Earthquake Res Anal. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/29108
Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis, 1st edn. Princeton Universty Press, New Jersey, pp. 43–72.
Hattori K, Hirooka S, Kunimitsu M, Ichikawa T, Han P (2014) Ionospheric anomaly as an earthquake precursor: Case and statistical studies during 1998–2013; 2012 around Japan. 2014 XXXIth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS), 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ursigass.2014.6929866
Hauksson E (1981) Radon content of groundwater as an earthquake precursor: evaluation of worldwide data and physical basis. J Geophys Res 86(B10):9397–9410. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086iB10p09397
Hauksson E, Goddard JG (1981) Radon earthquake precursor studies in Iceland. J Geophys Res 86(B8):7037–7054. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086iB08p07037
Huang F, Li M, Ma Y, Han Y, Tian L, Yan W, Li X (2017) Studies on earthquake precursors in China: A review for recent 50 years. Geodesy Geodyn 8(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2016.12.002
Hyndman RJ, Athanasopoulos G (2021) Forecasting: principles and practice, 2rd edn. Monash University, Australia. https://otexts.com/fpp3/index.html
Igarashi G, Saeki S, Takahata N, Sumikawa K, Tasaka S, Sasaki Y, Takahashi M, Sano Y (1995) Ground-water radon anomaly before the kobe earthquake in Japan. Science 269(5220):60–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5220.60
Igarashi G, Wakita H (1990) Groundwater radon anomalies associated with earthquakes. Tectonophysics 180(2–4):237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90311-U
Imme G, Morelli D (2012) Radon as earthquake precursor. In: Sebastiano D’Amico (ed) Earthquake research and analysis - statistical studies, observations and planning (pp. 143–160). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/29917
Izhovkina NI, Prutensky IS, Pulinets SA, Klos Z, Rothkaehl H (2006) Plasma wave radiation in the main ionospheric trough in the region of the terminator from the APEX satellite data. Geomagnet Aeron 46(6):717–723. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793206060065
Jin S, Han L, Cho J (2011) Lower atmospheric anomalies following the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake observed by GPS measurements. J Atmos Solar-Terrestrial Phys 73(7–8):810–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.023
Kalita S, Devi M, Barbara KA, Talukdar P (2012) Soft Computing Technique for Recognition of Earthquake Precursor from Low Latitude Total Electron Content (TEC) Profiles. International Journal of Computer Applications 44(17):11–14. https://doi.org/10.5120/6354-8775
Khan HA, Tufail M, Qureshi AA (1990) Radon signals for earthquake prediction and geological prospection. J Islamic Acad Sci 3(3):229–231.
Kim JW, Joo HY, Kim R, Moon JH (2018) Investigation of the relationship between earthquakes and indoor radon concentrations at a building in Gyeongju, Korea. Nuclear Eng Technol 50(3):512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.12.010
King CY (1980) Episodic radon changes in subsurface soil gas along active faults and possible relation to earthquakes. J Geophys Res 85(B6):3065–3078. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB06p03065
Külahcı F (2020) Environmental distribution and modelling of radioactive lead (210): a Monte Carlo simulation application. 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21638-2_2
Külahcı F, Çiçek Ş (2015) Time-series analysis of water and soil radon anomalies to identify micro–macro-earthquakes. Arab J Geosci 8(7):5239–5246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1513-9
Külahcı F, Şen Z (2014) On the correction of spatial and statistical uncertainties in systematic measurements of 222Rn for earthquake prediction. Surv Geophys 35(2):449–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9273-8
Kuo T, Fan K, Kuochen H, Han Y, Chu H, Lee Y (2006) Anomalous decrease in groundwater radon before the Taiwan M6.8 Chengkung earthquake. J Environ Radioactivity 88(1):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.01.005
Kuo T, Liu C, Su C, Chang C, Chen W, Chen Y, Lin C, Kuochen H, Hsu Y, Lin Y, Huang Y, Lin H (2013) Concurrent concentration declines in groundwater-dissolved radon, methane and ethane precursory to 2011 MW 5.0 Chimei earthquake. Radiation Meas 58:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.04.006
Kuo T, Tsunomori F (2014) Estimation of fracture porosity using radon as a tracer. J Petrol Sci Eng 122:700–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.09.012
Laakso H (2002) Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere: Vol. SP-514 (European Space Agency (ed.); pp. 41–50). ESA Space Science Department. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ESASP.514...41L/abstract
Li M, Parrot M (2018) Statistical analysis of the ionospheric ion density recorded by DEMETER in the epicenter areas of earthquakes as well as in their magnetically conjugate point areas. Adv Space Res 61(3):974–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.047
Lin JW (2012) Potential reasons for ionospheric anomalies immediately prior to China’s Wenchuan earthquake on 12 May 2008 detected by nonlinear principal component analysis. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 14(1):178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.09.011
Liperovsky VA, Meister CV, Liperovskaya EV, Bogdanov VV (2008) On the generation of electric field and infrared radiation in aerosol clouds due to radon emanation in the atmosphere before earthquakes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8(5):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-1199-2008
Liu JY, Chen YI, Chen CH, Liu CY, Chen CY, Nishihashi M, Li JZ, Xia YQ, Oyama KI, Hattori K, Lin CH (2009) Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed. before the 12 May 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake. J Geophys Res Space Phys 114(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013698
Liu JY, Chen YI, Chuo YJ, Chen CS (2006) A statistical investigation of preearthquake ionospheric anomaly. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 111(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011333
Liu JY, Chuo YJ, Shan SJ, Tsai YB, Chen YI, Pulinets SA, Yu SB (2004) Pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies registered by continuous GPS TEC measurements. Ann Geophys 22(5):1585–1593. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-1585-2004
Lognonné P, Artru J, Garcia R, Crespon F, Ducic V, Jeansou E, Occhipinti G, Helbert J, Moreaux G, Godet PE (2006) Ground-based GPS imaging of ionospheric post-seismic signal. Planet Space Sci 54(5):528–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.021
Martin PM, Schorlemmer D, Page M et al (2016) The earthquake-source ınversion validation (SIV) project. Seismol Res Lett 87(3):690–708. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150231
Mogro-Campero A, Fleischer RL, Likes RS (1980) Changes in subsurface radon concentration associated with earthquakes. J Geophys Res 85(B6):3053–3057. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB06p03053
Mun J (2006) Modeling risk: applying monte carlo simulation, real options analysis, forecasting, and optimization techniques. Wiley, New York, pp 261–296
Namgaladze A, Karpov M, Knyazeva M (2018) Aerosols and seismo-ionosphere coupling: aa review. J Atmospheric Solar-Terrestrial Phys 171:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.01.014
Nishizawa S, Igarashi G, Sano Y, Shoto E, Tasaka S, Sasaki Y (1998) Radon, Cl- and SO42- anomalies in hot spring water associated with the 1995 earthquake swarm off the east coast of the Izu Peninsula, central Japan. Appl Geochem 13(1):89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(97)00058-9
Noguchi M, Wakita H (1977) Method for continuous measurement of radon in groundwater for earthquake prediction. J Geophys Res 82(8):1353–1357
Oikonomou C, Haralambous H, Muslim B (2016) Investigation of ionospheric TEC precursors related to the M7.8 Nepal and M8.3 Chile earthquakes in 2015 based on spectral and statistical analysis. Nat Hazards 83(S1):97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2409-7
Okabe S (1956) Time variation of atmospheric radon content near the ground surface with relation to some geophsical phenomenon. Mem Sci Coll Univ Kyoto Ser A28:99–115
Perrone L, De Santis A, Abbattista C, Alfonsi L, Amoruso L, Carbone M, Cesaroni C, Cianchini G, De Franceschi G, De Santis A, Di Giovambattista R, Marchetti D, Pavòn-Carrasco FJ, Piscini A, Spogli L, Santoro F (2018) Ionospheric anomalies detected by ionosonde and possibly related to crustal earthquakes in Greece. Ann Geophys 36(2):361–371. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-361-2018
Pulinets SA, Kotsarenko AN, Ciraolo L, Pulinets IA (2007) Special case of ionospheric day-to-day variability associated with earthquake preparation. Adv Space Res 39(5):970–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.04.032
Pulinets SA, Liu JY (2004) Ionospheric variability unrelated to solar and geomagnetic activity. Adv Space Res 34(9):1926–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.06.014
Pulinets S, Ouzounov D (2011) Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) model - An unified concept for earthquake precursors validation. J Asian Earth Sci 41(4–5):371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.005
Pulinets Sergei, Boyarchuk K (2004) The basic components of seismo-ionospheric coupling. in: ionospheric precursors of earthquakes. In: The basic components of seismo-ionospheric coupling. In: Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes (pp. 1–47). Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26468-x_1
Pulinets S (2004) Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes: recent advances in theory and practical applications. Terrestrial Atmos Oceanic Sci 15(3):413–435. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2004.15.3.413(EP)
Randall AW, David HH (1993) Destructive upper-crustal earthquakes of Central America since 1900. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83(4):1115–1142. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0830041115
Roy S, Bhunia GS, Shit PK (2020) Spatial prediction of COVID-19 epidemic using ARIMA techniques in India. Model Earth Syst Environ 7(2):1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00890-y
Schaffer AL, Dobbins TA, Pearson SA (2021) Interrupted time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models: a guide for evaluating large-scale health interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01235-8
Schekotov A, Hayakawa M, Potirakis SM (2021) Does air ionization by radon cause low-frequency atmospheric electromagnetic earthquake precursors? Nat Hazards 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04487-7
Schunk RW, Nagy AF (2010) Ionospheres. Physics, Plasma physics, and chemistry. CUP, Cambridge.
Şen Z (1992) Standard cumulative semivariograms of stationary stochastic processes and regional correlation. Math Geol 24(4):417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891272
Şen Z (2016) Spatial modeling principles in earth sciences. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41758-5.pdf
Şen Z (2019) Earth systems data processing and visualization using MATLAB. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01542-8
Şen Z (2009) Spatial modeling principles in earth sciences. In Zekai S¸en(Istambul technical university) (Ed.), Spatial modeling principles in earth sciences. Springer US, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9672-3
Şentürk E, Çepni MS (2018) 2016 Yılı 6 Mw ≥ 7.0 Depremin İyonküre Değişimlerinin İncelenmesi. Geomatik 3(1):35–47. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.331208
Sevüktekin M, Çınar M (2017) Ekonometrik Zaman Serisi Analizi EViews Uygulamalı (5. Baskı, pp. 147–311). DORA Basım-Yayın Dağıtım. Bursa.
Sezen U, Arikan F, Arikan O, Ugurlu O, Sadeghimorad A (2013) Online, automatic, near-real time estimation of GPS-TEC: IONOLAB-TEC. Space Weather 11(5):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20054
Shah M, Jin S (2018) Pre-seismic ionospheric anomalies of the 2013 Mw = 7.7 Pakistan earthquake from GPS and COSMIC observations. Geodesy Geodyn 9(5):378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.11.008
Sharma G, Champati Ray PK, Mohanty S, Kannaujiya S (2017) Ionospheric TEC modelling for earthquakes precursors from GNSS data. Quat Int 462:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.05.007
Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2017) ARIMA models, 4th edn. Springer, Cham, pp. 75–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52452-8_3
Singh M, Kumar M, Jain RK, Chatrath RP (1999) Radon in ground water related to seismic events. Radiat Meas 30(4):465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00049-9
Tanner AB (1964) Radon migration in the ground: a review. In: Adams JAS, Lowder WM (eds) Proceeding of the Natural Radiation Environment, Chap. 9, pp 161–190.
Tortum A, Gözcü O, Çodur MY (2014) Türkiye’de hava ulaşım talebinin arıma modelleri ile tahmin edilmesi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 4(2):39–54
Ulomov VI, Mavashev BZ (1971) The Tashkent earthquake of 26 April, 1966. Acad. Nauk. Uzbek SSR FAN, 188–192.
Ulukavak M, Yalçınkaya M (2017a) Investigatıon of The Relationship Between Ionospheric TEC Anomaly Variatıons and Fault Types Before The Earthquakes. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, IV-4/W4, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-383-2017
Ulukavak M, Yalcinkaya M (2017b) Precursor analysis of ionospheric GPS-TEC variations before the 2010 M7.2 Baja California earthquake. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1208684
Wang X, Li Y, Du J, Zhou X (2014) Correlations between radon in soil gas and the activity of seismogenic faults in the Tangshan area, North China. Radiat Meas 60:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.11.001
Woith H (2015) Radon earthquake precursor: a short review. Euro Phys J Spec Topics 224(4):611–627. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-02395-9
Yaffee R, McGee M (1996) An introduction to time series analysis and forecasting, 1t edn, pp. 69–149. Academic Press, New York.
Yalım A, Sandıkçıoĝlu A, Ertuĝrul O, Yıldız A (2012) Determination of the relationship between radon anomalies and earthquakes in well waters on the Akşehir-Simav Fault System in Afyonkarahisar province, Turkey. J Environ Radioactivity 110:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.01.015
Zhang X, Zhang T, Young AA, Li X (2014) Applications and comparisons of four time series models in epidemiological surveillance data. PLoS ONE 9(2):88075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088075
Zhao XD, Du AM, Xu WY, Hong MH, Liu LB, Wei Y, Wang CG (2008) The origin of the prenoon-postnoon asymmetry for Sq current system. Acta Geophys Sinica 51(3):643–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1236
Zolotov OV, Namgaladze AA, Zakharenkova IE, Martynenko OV, Shagimuratov II (2012) Physical interpretation and mathematical simulation of ionospheric precursors of earthquakes at midlatitudes. Geomagn Aeron 52(3):390–397. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212030152
Acknowledgements
Soil Rn data were obtained from the Turkish Prime Ministry General Directorate of Disaster Affairs (https://en.afad.gov.tr/). The earthquake data used in the study were obtained from Boğaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring and Evaluation Centre (http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/zeqdb/). Meteorological data (5, 10, 20, and 50 cm soil temperature (℃), vapour pressure (hPa), wet and dry bulb temperatures) we used in our research were obtained from the Turkish Meteorology General Directorate (https://www.mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx). TEC data is taken from IONOLAB-Ionospheric Research Laboratory (http://www.ionolab.org/index.php?page=index&language=en). Finally, we would like to thank the referees and especially Editor Prof. Dr. Thomas Glade for his extraordinary management and patience.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Keskin, S., Külahcı, F. ARIMA model simulation for total electron content, earthquake and radon relationship identification. Nat Hazards 115, 1955–1976 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05622-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05622-2