Abstract
Public participation in disaster preparedness and mitigation activities become an important part of disaster risk management. The impact of risk perception and protection motivation theory on preparedness in various types of disasters have been widely reported, and risk attitudes have similarly been studied as a factor influencing preparedness decisions. However, the adaptability of the results on the impact of risk perception on preparedness behavior was questioned in recent years. Especially in the field of geological disasters, very limited studies about the protection motivation theory and risk attitudes have been conducted in China. Therefore, this study designed a questionnaire of people’s risk perceptions and the perception of protective measures based on the protection motivation theory and individual risk attitude factors. The involved field research was conducted in Ganluo County, Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province in 2020. Based on the research data, the structural equation modeling method was used to analyze the effects of threat appraisal, coping appraisal and risk attitudes on people’s willingness to engage in protective behaviors. The results show that individual coping appraisals have a significant effect on the willingness to engage in adaptive behavior, and the risk attitude factor added to the extended model also shows a significant effect on the willingness to prepare for disasters. The results of the study have important practical implications for the encouragement of multilevel participation in risk management in geological hazard-prone areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguila JO, ElMaraghy W, ElMaraghy H (2019) Impact of risk attitudes on the concurrent design of supply chains and product architectures. Procedia CIRP 81:974–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.237
Akhtar S, Li GC, Ullah R, Nazir A, Iqbal MA, Raza MH, Iqbal N, Faisal M (2018) Factors influencing hybrid maize farmers’ risk attitudes and their perceptions in Punjab Province. Pak J Integrat Agric 17(6):1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61796-9
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Ardaya AB, Evers M, Ribbe L (2017) What influences disaster risk perception? Intervention measures, flood and landslide risk perception of the population living in flood risk areas in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 25:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.006
Baan PJ, Klijn F (2004) Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in the netherlands. Int J River Basin Manag 2(2):113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226
Babcicky P, Seebauer S (2019) Unpacking protection motivation theory: evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior. J Risk Res 22(12):1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1485175
Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR (2013) Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness. Risk Anal 33(9):1710–1727. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12014
Birkholz S, Muro M, Jeffrey P, Smith H (2014) Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Sci Total Environ 478:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
Boholm A (1998) Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research. J Risk Res 1(2):135–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377231
Borrelli L, Ciurleo M, Gullà G (2018) Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in granitic rocks using GIS-based statistical methods: the contribution of the weathering grade map. Landslides 15:1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0947-7
Botzen WW, van den Bergh JC (2012) Risk attitudes to low-probability climate change risks: Wtp for flood insurance. J Econ Behav Organ 82(1):151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.01.005
Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Aerts JC (2012) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analy: an Int J 32(9):1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
Bureau of Natural Resources of Liangshan Yi autonomous prefecture (2020a) Liangshan state natural resources 2020 first half year work summary and second half year work plan. http://dnr.lsz.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/tjsj/202007/t20200722_1655031.html
Bureau of Natural Resources of Liangshan Yi autonomous prefecture (2020b) Ganluo county, liangshan prefecture, successfully avoided 2 landslides and geological disasters. http://dnr.lsz.gov.cn/yw/gzdt/202007/t20200709_1645040.html
Chen MF (2020) Moral extension of the protection motivation theory model to predict climate change mitigation behavioral intentions in Taiwan. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07963-6
Damm A, Eberhard K, Sendzimir J, Patt A (2013) Perception of landslides risk and responsibility: a case study in eastern Styria. Austria Nat Hazards 69(1):165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0694-y
de Mendonca MB, Gullo FT (2020) Landslide risk perception survey in Angra dos Reis (Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil): a contribution to support planning of non structural measures. Land Use Policy 91:104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104415
Djalante R, Holley C, Thomalla F (2011) Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-011-0015-6
Finlay P, Fell R (1997) Landslides: risk perception and acceptance. Can Geotech J 34(2):169–188. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-108
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gao X, Roder G, Jiao Y, Ding Y, Liu Z, Tarolli P (2020) Farmers’ landslide risk perceptions and willingness for restoration and conservation of world heritage site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces. China Landslides 17(8):1915–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01389-4
Godschalk DR, Rose A, Mittler E, Porter K, West CT (2009) Estimating the value of foresight: aggregate analysis of natural hazard mitigation benefits and costs. J Environ Planning Manage 52(6):739–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560903083715
Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
Hernández-Moreno G, Alcántara-Ayala I (2017) Landslide risk perception in Mexico: a research gate into public awareness and knowledge. Landslides 14(1):351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0683-9
Hostettler S, Jöhr A, Montes C, D’Acunzi A (2019) Community-based landslide risk reduction: a review of a red cross soil bioengineering for resilience program in Honduras. Landslides 16(9):1779–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01161-3
Hou J, Lv J, Chen X, Yu S (2016) China’s regional social vulnerability to geological disasters: evaluation and spatial characteristics analysis. Nat Hazards 84:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1931-3
Jackson G (2020) The influence of emergency food aid on the causal disaster vulnerability of indigenous food systems. Agric Hum Values 37(3):761–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-10006-7
Keller B (2017) Massive rock slope failure in Central Switzerland: history, geologic–geomorphological predisposition, types and triggers, and resulting risks. Landslides 14:1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0803-1
Klimeš J, Rosario AM, Vargas R, Raška P, Vicuña L, Jurt C (2019) Community participation in landslide risk reduction: a case history from Central Andes. Peru Landslides 16(9):1763–1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01203-w
Kreibich H, Thieken A, Petrow T, Müller M, Merz B (2005) Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures–lessons learned from the Elbe flood in august 2002. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-117-2005
Lechowska E (2018) What determines flood risk perception? a review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements. Nat Hazards 94(3):1341–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z
Li M, Lv J, Chen X, Jiang N (2015) Provincial evaluation of vulnerability to geological disaster in China and its influencing factors: a three-stage DEA-based analysis. Nat Hazards 79:1649–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1917-1
Li Z, Liu L, Shi J, Sui Y (2021) Health insurance, risk attitudes, and household financial behavior. Health Econ 30:1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4235
Lin S, Shaw D, Ho MC (2008) Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Nat Hazards 44(2):305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z
Lt Hu, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
MacCallum RC, Hong S (1997) Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivar Behav Res 32(2):193–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
Marsh HW, Hocevar D (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 97(3):562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
Mertens K, Jacobs L, Maes J, Poesen J, Kervyn M, Vranken L (2018) Disaster risk reduction among households exposed to landslide hazard: a crucial role for self-efficacy? Land Use Policy 75:77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.028
Mikoš M, Yin Y, Sassa K (2017) The fourth world landslide forum, Ljubljana, 2017. Landslides 14(5):1843–1854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0889-5
Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a metanalytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(1):106–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x
MNR (Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China) (2020) Response to the recommendations on strengthening geological disaster prevention and control. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202010/t20201009_2563507.html
Nascimento JCHBd, Macedo MAdS (2016) Structural equation models using partial least squares: an example of the application of smartpls® in accounting research. Journal of Education and Research in Accounting (REPeC) 10(3). https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v10i3.1376
Nathan F (2008) Risk perception, risk management and vulnerability to landslides in the hill slopes in the city of la paz, bolivia. a preliminary statement. Disasters 32(3):337–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01043.x
NBS (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2019) China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing
O’Neill E, Brereton F, Shahumyan H, Clinch JP (2016) The impact of perceived flood exposure on flood-risk perception: the role of distance. Risk Anal 36(11):2158–2186. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12597
Pavlova I, Makarigakis A, Depret T, Jomelli V (2017) Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness at world heritage sites. J Cult Herit 28:51–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.001
Peng R, Zhao Y, Elahi E, Benhong P (2021) Does disaster shocks affect farmers’ willingness for insurance? Mediating effect of risk perception and survey data from risk-prone areas in East China. Nat Hazards 106:2883–2899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04569-0
Qazi A, Daghfous A, Khan MS (2021) Impact of risk attitude on risk, opportunity, and performance assessment of construction projects. Proj Manag J 52(2):192–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820985673
Rahman Au, Khan AN, Collins AE (2014) Analysis of landslide causes and associated damages in the Kashmir Himalayas of Pakistan. Nat Hazards 71:803–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0918-1
Rogers RW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. J Psychol 91(1):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook pp 153–176
Rohrmann B (2008) Risk perception, risk attitude, risk communication, risk management: A conceptual appraisal. In: 15th Internaional Emergency Management Society (TIEMS) Annual Conference, vol 2008
Schmidt-Thomé P, Tatong T, Kunthasap P, Wathanaprida S (2018) Community based landslide risk mitigation in thailand. Episodes J Int Geosci. 41(4):225–233. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2018/018017
Seebauer S, Babcicky P (2020) The sources of belief in personal capability: antecedents of self-efficacy in private adaptation to flood risk. Risk Anal 40:1967–1982. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13531
Sim T, Hung LS, Su GW, Cui K (2018) Interpersonal communication sources and natural hazard risk perception: a case study of a rural chinese village. Nat Hazards 94(3):1307–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3478-6
Sims JH, Baumann DD (1983) Educational programs and human response to natural hazards. Environ Behav 15(2):165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583152003
Sufri S, Dwirahmadi F, Phung D, Rutherford S (2020) Enhancing community engagement in disaster early warning system in Aceh, Indonesia: opportunities and challenges. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04098-2
Tang JS, Feng JY (2018) Residents’ disaster preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan Earthquake: a test of protection motivation theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(7):1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071434
Tanwattana P (2018) Systematizing community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM): case of urban flood-prone community in Thailand upstream area. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 28:798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.010
The Local Records Compiling Committee of Ganluo County (1996) The Local Gazetteers of Ganluo County. SICHUAN PEOPLE’S PUBLISHING HOUSE, Chengdu
The People’s Government of Yongtai County (2019) Create a new model of geological disaster insurance to help the construction of geological disaster prevention and control system. http://www.yongtai.gov.cn/xjwz/zwgk/gzdt/bmdt/201909/t20190930_3052298.htm
van den Berg M, Fort R, Burger K (2009) Natural hazards and risk aversion: Experimental evidence from latin america. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE 2009), 2009, no. 1005–2016–79151 in Contributed Paper, p 34. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.51394
Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C (2013) The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33(6):1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
Weinstein ND (1989) Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychol Bull 105(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.31
Weston R, Gore PA Jr (2006) A brief guide to structural equation modeling. Couns Psychol 34(5):719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
Wood MM, Mileti DS, Kano M, Kelley MM, Regan R, Bourque LB (2012) Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards. Risk Analy: Int J 32(4):601–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01645.x
Wu SN, Lei Y, Cui P, Chen R, Yin PH (2020) Chinese public participation monitoring and warning system for geological hazards. J Mt Sci 17(7):1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5933-6
Xu Y, Qiu X, Yang X, Lu X, Chen G (2020) Disaster risk management models for rural relocation communities of mountainous southwestern China under the stress of geological disasters. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 50:101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101697
Zaalberg R, Midden C, Meijnders A, McCalley T (2009) Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: Flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Analy: an Int J 29(12):1759–1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01316.x
Zhu H, Deng F (2020) How to influence rural tourism intention by risk knowledge during COVID-19 containment in China: mediating role of risk perception and attitude. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(10):3514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103514
Acknowledgements
We thank the many individuals who helped with the data collection process, especially the research team and local participants. We also gratefully acknowledge support provided through the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFC1510705) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A20111). Critical comments by the anonymous reviewers greatly improved the initial manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix Detailed questionnaire with statistical results and item wording
Appendix Detailed questionnaire with statistical results and item wording
Factor | Item | Response scale | N | Mean | Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived severity | If a geological disaster were to occur in my location: | Five-step 5 = fully agree | |||
Public facilities (e.g., roads) in my area would be severely damaged | 165 | 3.68 | 1.141 | ||
There would be serious damage to my house and its contents | 165 | 3.43 | 1.236 | ||
My daily life and work would be seriously affected | 165 | 3.49 | 1.252 | ||
Perceived probability | In my subjective view: | Five-step 5 = fully agree | |||
My property may one day be threatened by geological disasters | 165 | 3.22 | 1.181 | ||
The safety of my family and myself may be threatened by geological disasters in future | 165 | 3.20 | 1.180 | ||
There is a possibility that the next geological disaster will occur within five years in the vicinity of where I live | 165 | 2.92 | 1.139 | ||
Fear | In my life: | Five-step 5 = fully agree | |||
I worry about geological disasters regularly | 165 | 3.73 | 1.038 | ||
Once the rainy season comes, I become very worried about geological hazards | 165 | 4.24 | 0.890 | ||
When I think of a geological disaster, I feel scared | 165 | 3.82 | 0.977 | ||
I worry about a geological disaster affecting our families and our village | 165 | 4.01 | 0.904 | ||
Response efficacy | In my subjective view: | Five-step 5 = fully agree | |||
Afforestation can effectively reduce the occurrence of geological disasters | 165 | 3.82 | 1.047 | ||
The disaster early warning system and previous geological disaster education and evacuation training have been effective in preventing geological disasters from threatening my life | 165 | 4.18 | 0.796 | ||
Self-efficacy | Based on my experience and subjective view, to reduce losses in the event of a geological disaster: | Five-step 5 = fully agree | |||
I plant trees on dangerous slopes in front of and behind my house | 165 | 3.89 | 0.931 | ||
I can evacuate in time before geological hazards occur from early warning of hazards and familiarity with evacuation routes and shelters | 165 | 4.00 | 0.757 | ||
Response costs | What are your estimates of the costs (in terms of time, money, effort, etc.) of the following measures? | Five-step 5 = very high | |||
Planting trees in more dangerous areas such as on slopes | 165 | 2.80 | 0.964 | ||
Constant attention to early warnings and participation in evacuation training | 165 | 2.90 | 1.117 | ||
Risk attitudes | If the cost of investing in geological disaster mitigation measures were roughly equal to the results you expect to achieve, would you adopt mitigation measures? | Five-step 5 = definitely | 165 | 1.74 | 0.833 |
In the event of a geological disaster, would you discard valuables that would affect your running speed? | 165 | 1.59 | 1.024 | ||
Willingness | In your subjective view: | Five-step 5 = very much so | |||
Would you like to plant trees on some of the slopes in front of your house? | 165 | 4.30 | 0.798 | ||
Would you like to participate in evacuation drills and other similar activities? | 165 | 4.22 | 0.832 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, Sy., Yu, M., Que, T. et al. Individual willingness to prepare for disasters in a geological hazard risk area: an empirical study based on the protection motivation theory. Nat Hazards 110, 2087–2111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05026-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05026-8