Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How resilient is the labour market against natural disaster? Evaluating the effects from the 2010 earthquake in Chile

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural disasters are one of the main channels through which ecological and socio-economic systems interact. In particular, the severe impacts of earthquakes could disrupt activities in the labour market. However, the literature barely researched the long-term effects of such events. To investigate this issue, this article is concentrated in Chile that is subject to recurring seismic movements. The 27 February 2010 Bío-Bío Chile earthquake (Mw 8.8) was the second strongest in the history of the country. This natural disaster can be used to evaluate the response of the labour market to an exogenous shock. Besides, the capacity for resilience in the labour market is crucial for people who rely on their job. This document analyses the impacts of the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake and tsunami on Chilean labour market outcomes, in particular, the quality of employment. With this objective, different data are combined for analysing the effect in the short and long term. Also, distinct econometric techniques and exogenous measurements of seismic acceleration are used. The evidence shows that these catastrophes harmed the labour market in the short term. However, in the long term, the government’s reconstruction efforts and other factors could have attenuated the adverse effects over some variables in the most affected zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: own elaboration based on Scopus and Web of Science

Fig. 2

Source: Own elaboration based on USGS Shakemap data

Fig. 3

Source: Own elaboration based on USGS Shakemap data

Fig. 4

Source: own elaboration based on CASEN

Fig. 5

Source: own elaboration based on USGS Shakemap data

Fig. 6

Source: own elaboration based on CASEN

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. By counting only once the studies in both databases, the final sample involved 118 articles.

  2. Although other earthquakes occurred between 2011 and 2017 in Chile, these did not produce severe damage to housing and infrastructure or loss of life, such as the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake.

  3. Since the tsunami-affected cities and coastal towns in the regions of Maule and Bío-Bío that were also affected by the earthquake (ECLAC 2010), the treatment and control group identified using these parameters is expected to be similar to those that would arise if similar measures related to the tsunami were available.

  4. In the robustness check section, other quartiles were used as thresholds.

  5. To obtain these results, 2015 CASEN survey was used with information on the place of residence 5 years ago, that is, in 2010, when the earthquake and tsunami occurred.

  6. This expenditure is related to the reconstruction activities of public infrastructures that were carried out after the earthquake and tsunami. Indeed, the regional expenditure per capita (in constant pesos) of the Ministry of Public Works of Chile shows a significant increase in the affected regions after 2009. Although it would be convenient to have an adequate measure of the total public consolidated expenditure during the recovery process, it is not easy to collect all the necessary information per community (and even per region).

  7. This estimation is available upon request.

  8. This estimation is available upon request.

  9. This information came from Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (2019).

  10. This variable allows controlling for regional differences in the level and temporal change of the value of exports from the agricultural sector during the period of analysis. Although the variable does not capture what happened to the exports of the rest of the sectors, in the affected regions, the share of the agricultural sector in exports is considerably higher than in the control group regions. Moreover, the affected zones comprised 40% of national employment in the agricultural sector (ECLAC 2010).

  11. As mentioned previously, although it would be convenient to have an adequate measure of the total public consolidated expenditure executed by the government during the recovery process, it is very difficult to collect all the necessary information per community (and even per region) throughout all period of analysis.

  12. The Mercalli intensity was used as instrumental variable by Kirchberger (2017) and treatment variable by Porcelli and Trezzi (2019). However, this measure could be potentially endogenous because it is related to the effects of an earthquake on people or structures.

References

  • Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econ Lett 80(1):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athey S, Imbens GW (2006) Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 74(2):431–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00668.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auzzir Z, Haigh R, Amaratunga D (2018) Impacts of disaster to SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia Eng 212:1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch Y, Wordsworth R, Mills C, Wright S (2016) Career and work attitudes of blue-collar workers, and the impact of a natural disaster chance event on the relationships between intention to quit and actual quit behaviour. Eur Work Org Psychol 25(3):459–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1113168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastaminia A, Rezaei MR, Saraei MH (2017) Evaluating the components of social and economic resilience: after two large earthquake disasters Rudbar 1990 and Bam 2003. Jàmbá 9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v9i1.368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belasen A, Polachek S (2008) How hurricanes affect wages and employment in local labor markets. Am Econ Rev 98(2):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belasen A, Polachek SW (2009) How disasters affect local labor markets: the effects of hurricanes in Florida. J Hum Resour 44(1):251–276. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2009.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondonio D, Greenbaum RT (2018) Natural disasters and relief assistance: empirical evidence on the resilience of US counties using dynamic propensity score matching. J Reg Sci 58(3):659–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, Kathleen Tierney MS, Wallace WA, Von Winterfeldt D (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectr 19(4):733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J (2013) Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras M, Winckler P (2013) Pérdidas de vidas, viviendas, infraestructura y embarcaciones por el tsunami del 27 de Febrero de 2010 en la costa central de Chile. Obras y Proyectos 14:6–19. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132013000200001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo Cuaresma J, Hlouskova J, Obersteiner M (2008) Natural disasters as creative destruction? Evidence from developing countries. Econ Inq 46(2):214–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00063.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva CDC, Ribeiro FG, Regis AE (2017) Desastres Naturais e Mercado de Trabalho: O Caso das Chuvas de 2008 em Santa Catarina 1. Espacio abierto: cuaderno venezolano de sociología. 26(3):189–209

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Llera JC, Rivera F, Mitrani-Reiser J, Jünemann R, Fortuño C, Ríos M, Hube M, María HS, Cienfuegos R (2017) Data collection after the 2010 Maule earthquake in Chile. Bull Earthq Eng 15(2):555–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9918-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deryugina T, Kawano L, Levitt S (2018) The economic impact of hurricane katrina on its victims: evidence from individual tax returns. Am Econ J Appl Econ 10(2):202–233. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresdner J, Sehnbruch K (2010) El impacto del sismo 2010 sobre el mercado laboral de la Región del Biobío. Sociedad Hoy. 19:71–96

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC (2010) Terremoto en Chile: una primera mirada al 10 de marzo de 2010. Samaniego J. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/32838. Accessed 4 Nov 2019

  • Ewing BT, Kruse JB, Sutter D (2007) Hurricanes and economic research: an introduction to the hurricane Katrina symposium. South Econ J 74(2):315–325. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabling R, Grimes A, Timar L (2016) Labour market dynamics following a regional disaster. Motu working paper 16-07, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research

  • Friedman J, Yévenes C, Mulder N, Faúndez S, Caldentey EP, Velásquez M, Baizán M, Reinecke G (2012) Openness, wage gaps and unions in chile: a micro-econometric analysis. Policy priorities for international trade and jobs, 145. OECD

  • Gignoux J, Menéndez M (2016) Benefit in the wake of disaster: long-run effects of earthquakes on welfare in rural Indonesia. J Dev Econ 118:26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovene di Girasole E, Cannatella D (2017) Vulnerabilidad social a los peligros naturales en los sistemas urbanos. Una aplicación en Santo Domingo (República Dominicana). Sostenibilidad 9(11):2043

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Chile (2010) Plan de reconstrucción. Terremoto y tsunami del 27 de febrero de 2010. Technical report prepared by the Government of Chile. Government of Chile, Santiago de Chile

  • Government of Chile (2012) Informe de cumplimiento de reconstrucción tras terremoto 27 de febrero de 2010. Technical report prepared by the Government of Chile. Government of Chile, Santiago de Chile

  • Government of Chile (2014) Diagnóstico del estado de reconstrucción. Terremoto y Tsunami de febrero de 2010. Technical report prepared by the Government of Chile.Government of Chile, Santiago de Chile

  • Grandón F, Acuña M, Briese M, Chovar M, Hernández F, Orellana E (2014) Saqueos y autodefensa Impacto social en Chile post terremoto. Ajayu Órgano de Difusión Científica del Departamento de Psicología UCBSP 12(2):187–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Liu S, Peng L, Wang H (2014) The impact of severe natural disasters on the livelihoods of farmers in mountainous areas: a case study of Qingping township, Mianzhu city. Nat Hazards 73(3):1679–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1165-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornbeck R (2012) The enduring impact of the American Dust Bowl: short-and long-run adjustments to environmental catastrophe. Am Econ Rev 102(4):1477–1507. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2002) Decent work and the informal economy. Report VI submitted to the 90th Session of International Labour Conference, Geneva

  • ILO (2018) El mercado laboral en Chile: Una mirada de mediano plazo. Technical Reports ILO Southern Cone, No. 4. ILO Office for the Southern Cone of Latin America, Santiago de Chile

  • Jiménez AE, Cubillos RA (2010) Estrés percibido y satisfacción laboral después del terremoto ocurrido el 27 de febrero de 2010 en la zona centro-sur de Chile. Terapia Psicológica 28(2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082010000200007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchberger M (2017) Natural disasters and labor markets. J Dev Econ 125:40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner M (2011) The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Found Trends Econ 4(3):165–224. https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter AM, Oberhofer H, Raschky PA (2009) Creative disasters? Flooding effects on capital, labour and productivity within European firms. Environ Resour Econ 43(3):333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9273-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Reyes C (2014) Factores de vulnerabilidad y reconstrucción posterremoto en tres localidades costeras chilenas: ¿generación de nuevas áreas de riesgo? Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’études Andines 43(3):529–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina JP, Naudon A (2012) Dinámica Del mercado laboral en Chile: El rol de los términos de intercambio. Economía Chilena 15(1):32–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (2019) Reporte Plan de reconstrucción. Terremoto y tsunami 27F. Detalle de avances por región y comuna. Technical report prepared by the Ministry of Housing and Urbanism. Government of Chile, Santiago de Chile

  • Ministry of Social Development (2019). Encuesta CASEN (http://observatorio.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/casen/casen_obj.php). Ministry of Social Development. Chile

  • Mueller V, Quisumbing A (2011) How resilient are labour markets to natural disasters? The case of the 1998 Bangladesh flood. J Dev Stud 47(12):1954–1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2011.579113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omaña RIA, Santander AD, Oropeza CF (2017) Amenaza sísmica en Latinoamérica. Revista Geográfica Venezolana 58(2):258–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecha Garzón CJ (2017) The effects of natural disasters on the labour market: do hurricanes increase informality? IDB Working Paper Series IDB-WP-854, Inter-American Development Bank

  • Petersen MD, Harmsen SC, Jaiswal KS, Rukstales KS, Luco N, Haller KM, Mueller ChS, Shumway AM (2018) Seismic hazard, risk, and design for South America. Bull Seism Soc Am 108(2):781–800. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanco MM (2012) Efectos sociales del terremoto en chile y gestión política de la reconstrucción durante el gobierno de Sebastián Piñera (2010–2011). Revista Enfoques 10(16):19–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Porcelli F, Trezzi R (2019) The impact of earthquakes on economic activity: evidence from Italy. Empir Econ 56(4):1167–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1384-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddatz CE (2009) The Wrath of God: macroeconomic costs of natural disasters. Policy Research Working Paper WPS5039, World Bank

  • Reinecke G, Posthuma A (2019) The link between economic and social upgrading in global supply chains: experiences from the Southern Cone. ILR 158(4):677–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Oreggia E, Olvera AR (2011) ¿Cómo afectan los huracanes al mercado laboral mexicano? Realidad, datos y espacio. Revista Internacional de Estadística y Geografía 2(1):124–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem S, Campidelli M, El-Dakhakhni WW, Tait MJ (2019) Resilience-based design for blast risk mitigation: learning from natural disasters. In: Resilient structures and infrastructure. Springer, Singapore. pp 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7446-3_7

  • Sanhueza C, Contreras D, Denis A (2012) Terremoto y sus efectos sobre el bienestar: un análisis multidimensional. Persona y Sociedad 26(1):43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardana GD, Dasanayaka WSB (2013) Economic recovery from natural disaster: spotlight on interventions in Tsunami affected micro and SMEs in Sri Lanka’s Galle district. Compet Rev 23(4/5):384–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-03-2013-0032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seismological Centre of Chile (2010) Informe Técnico Terremoto Cauquenes 27 de febrero de 2010. Seismological Centre of Chile

  • Silva N, Mena C (2020) Identifying the underlying risk factors of local communities in Chile. Disaster Prev Manag Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2020-0105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore M, Toya H (2002) Do natural disasters promote long-run growth? Econ Inq 40(4):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/40.4.664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoufias E (2003) Economic crises and natural disasters: coping strategies and policy implications. World Dev 31(7):1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00069-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka A (2015) The impacts of natural disasters on plants’ growth: evidence from the Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) earthquake. Reg Sci Urban Econ 50:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toya H, Skidmore M (2007) Economic development and the impacts of natural disasters. Econ Lett 94(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2019) https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20100227063411530_30/shakemap/intensity. National Earthquake Information Center

  • Valencia AM, Valencia BJ (2019) Natural disasters and informality: are local labor markets impacted after an earthquake? Reg Sci Assoc Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venn D (2012) Helping Displaced workers back into jobs after a natural disaster: recent experiences in OECD countries (No. 142). OECD Publishing

  • Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthq Spectr 15(3):557–564. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, F, Yohannes Y, Quisumbing A (2008b) Risks, ex-ante actions, and public assistance: impact of natural disasters on child schooling in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Malawi. Policy Research Working Paper 4910, World Bank

  • Yamauchi F, Yohannes Y, Quisumbing A (2008a) Natural disasters, self-insurance, and human capital investment: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Malawi. Policy Research working paper 4909, World Bank

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Comunidad de Madrid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maribel Jiménez Martínez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Table 4 Baseline characteristics of treatment and control group, 2009.
Table 5 Effect of the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake and tsunami on probability of migration from a community of the affected area
Table 6 Short-term effects of the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake and tsunami on labour market with additional controls
Table 7 Long-term effects of the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake and tsunami on the labour market with additional controls
Table 8 Effects of the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake and tsunami on labour market considering the number of rebuilt houses
Table 9 Long-term effects of the 2010 Bío-Bío earthquake and tsunami on labour market by different pre-event periods.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiménez Martínez, M., Jiménez Martínez, M. & Romero-Jarén, R. How resilient is the labour market against natural disaster? Evaluating the effects from the 2010 earthquake in Chile. Nat Hazards 104, 1481–1533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04229-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04229-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation