Abstract
This article presents the difference in patterns of NGOs’ post-disaster reconstruction between the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and the 2013 Lushan earthquake based on a case study of the One Foundation. The comparative studies of the One Foundation’s activities during the two responses illustrate that the organizational strategy gradually shifted from “resource-based” to “learning-based”. Their approach evolved from the providing of resources to the providing of knowledge, as they transformed both aid providers and recipients into collaborative learners, changed a resource-delivery organization into a learning organization and shaped a decentralized partnership of organizations into a mutual learning ecosystem in which knowledge flowed in multiple directions. This example of the One Foundation illustrates the potential future directions of NGOs' participation in disaster response in China.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davidson CH, Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Dikmen N, Sliwinski A (2007) Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International 31(1):100–115
Dimaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160
Eikenberry AM, Arroyave V, Cooper T (2007) Administrative failure and the international NGO response to Hurricane Katrina. Public Adm Rev 67:160–170
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
Goto A, Reich MR, Suzuki Y, Tsutomi H, Watanabe E, Yasumura S (2014) Parenting in Fukushima city in the post-disaster period: short-term strategies and long-term perspectives. Disasters 38(s2):s179–s189
Hutton NS, Tobin GA, Whiteford LM (2016) Modeling Nonprofit Resilience in Long-Term Recovery in Christchurch, New Zealand. Prof Geogr 68(4):603–612
Johnson C (2007) Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. Disasters 31(4):435–458
Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Davidson CH (2006) A systems view of temporary housing projects in post-disaster reconstruction. Construct Manag Econ 24(4):367–378
Kapucu N (2005) Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: networks in emergency response management. Connections 26(2):33–48
Lee AS (1991) Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organ Sci 2(4):342–365
Lu Q, Zhang Q (2016) Generation mechanism for social organization alliance of stable situation. Chin Public Adm 12:36–42
Mandell M, Keast R (2007) Evaluating network arrangements: toward revised performance measures. Public Perform Manag Rev 30(4):574–597
Marshall C, Rossman GB (2014) Designing qualitative research. Sage publications, California
Marsick VJ, Watkins KE (1999) Facilitating learning organizations: making learning count. Gower Publishing Ltd., United Kingdom
Mercer J, Kelman I, Taranis L, Suchet-Pearson S (2010) Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Disasters 34(1):214–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01126.x
Provan KG, Milward HB (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev 61(4):414–423
Samaddar S, Okada N (2006) Participatory approach for post-earthquake reconstruction in the villages of Kachchh, India. Ann Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ B 49:197–205
Scott WR (2014) Institutions and organizations : ideas, interests and identities, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, California
Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with Case Studies. Acad Manag J 50(1):20–24
Simchi-Levi D, Simchi-Levi E, Kaminsky P (1999) Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies, and cases. McGraw-Hill, New York
Smith G, Martin A, Wenger DE (2018) Disaster recovery in an era of climate change: the unrealized promise of institutional resilience. Springer, Cham
Stettner U, Lavie D (2015) Ambidexterity under scrutiny: exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strateg Manag J 35(13):1903–1929
Szczepanska K (2020) NGO capacity building in the wake of Japan’s triple disaster of 2011: the case of the TOMODACHI NGO leadership programme (TNLP). Asian Stud Rev, pp 1–21
Telford J, Cosgrave J (2007) The international humanitarian system and the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunamis. Disasters 31(1):1–28
UNDP (2009) Capacity development: a UNDP primer. UNDP, New York
Webb GR, Tierney KJ, Dahlhamer JM (2002) Predicting long-term business recovery from disaster: a comparison of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Hurricane Andrew 1. Glob Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards 4(2):45–58
Williams TA, Shepherd DA (2016) Building resilience or providing sustenance: different paths of emergent ventures in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake. Acad Manag J 59(6):2069–2102
Xu J, Xu D, Lu Y, Wang Q (2017) A bridged government–NGOs relationship in post-earthquake reconstruction: the Ya'an service center in Lushan earthquake. Nat Hazards 90(2):537–562
Yin RK (2013) Case study research: design and methods. Sage publications, California
Zhang Q, Lu Q, Hu Y, Lau J (2015) What constrained disaster management capacity in the township level of China? Case studies of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 77(3):1915–1938
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to special issue guest editors, and anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments on previous versions of this article. The research is supported by the China Scholarship Council, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Interdisciplinary Research Foundation for the First-Year Doctoral Candidates (Grant No. BNUXKJC1820).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Deping Zhong—Co-first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Q., Zhong, D. & Zhang, Q. The evolving pattern of NGOs’ participating in post-disaster community reconstruction in China: cases study on the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and the 2013 Lushan earthquake. Nat Hazards 104 (Suppl 1), 167–184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04130-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04130-5