Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling the effect of urbanization on flood risk in Ayamama Watershed, Istanbul, Turkey, using the MIKE 21 FM model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization is one of the most important factors that affect flood risk. Flood risk is, thus, expected to increase in the future with further urbanization in various parts of the world. In order to overcome flood risk, appropriate measures need to be taken based on a deep understanding of the risk levels under various urban extents as such studies are essential to formulate effective measures. In this study, the dynamic cellular automata-based urbanization model called SLEUTH was used to model urbanization in Ayamama Watershed, a watershed located in Istanbul, Turkey, under three landuse policy scenarios: current trend, east–west-oriented growth trend and growth trend under Project Canal Istanbul (PCIT). The outputs of the urbanization modeling, together with hydrographs of various return periods determined using the Peak-Over-Threshold value method and other required inputs, were used to investigate the effects of urbanization on flood risk using the hydrodynamic two-dimensional flexible mesh model, known as MIKE 21 FM. The results of the study showed that allowing unrestricted urbanization (dense development under PCIT scenario) in Ayamama Watershed will lead to considerable increase in the size of land inundated by flood when compared to the other scenarios. Thus, not allowing further development in the watershed is the best alternative. However, if the implementation of the PCIT scenario is inevitable, limiting the level of development in such a way that it does not result in considerable change in the flood risk is recommended. In addition, improving the drainage system in the watershed could further reduce the flooding risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adejumo LA, Adeniran KA, Salami AW, Abioye T, Adebayo KR (2016) Development of peak runoff hydrographs for Oba and Otin Rivers in Osun State, Nigeria. Int J Latest Eng Res Appl (IJLERA) 1(3):7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTER-GDEM) (2014). http://gdem.ersdac.jspacesystems.or.jp/search.jsp. Accessed 12 Oct 2014

  • Akkaya U, Dogan E (2016) Generation of 2D flood inundation maps of Meric and Tunca Rivers passing through Edirne city center. Geofizika 33(1):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AKOM Report (2010) Hydraulic model report of flood risk map study of Ayamama River. ASL Engineering, Construction, Otomotive Industry and Trade Limited Company, Istanbul

  • Berkoz L, Turk SS (2010) Intrametropolitan determinants of foreign investment firms in Istanbul. J Urban Plan Deve 136(3):234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caires S (2009) A comparative simulation study of the annual maxima and the peaks-over-threshold methods. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8fb0/69aa8d4bd99bba177ddac5a26efbae9e6847.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 2016

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciavola SJ, Jantz CA, Reilly J, Moglen GE (2014) Forecast changes in runoff quality and quantity from urbanization in the DelMarVa Peninsula. J Hydrol Eng 19:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1996) Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a cellular automaton model of urban growth. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/Pub/SLEUTHPapers_Nov24/Clarke_Hoppen_Gaydos_1996.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2014

  • Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1997) A Self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environ Plan 24:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davison AC, Smith RL (1990) Models for exceedances over high thresholds. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol) 52:237–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurer I, Ucar I (2009) Flood disasters’ inventory in Turkey in 2009. In: International symposium on water management and hydraulic engineering, 1–5 September. Ohrid, Macedonia, pp 371–380

  • Huong HTL, Pathirana A (2013) Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city,Vietnam. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) (2011) Istanbul metropolitan area urban transportation master plan. http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/kurumsal/Birimler/ulasimPlanlama/Documents/%C4%B0UAP_Ana_Raporu.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2016 (in Turkish)

  • Jakob D, Karoly DJ, Seed A (2011) Non-stationarity in daily and sub-daily intense rainfall-Part 1: Sydney, Australia. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:2263–2271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Shelley MK (2003) Using SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore–Washington metropolitan area. Environ Plan B 30:251–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson F, White CJ, Van Dijk A, Ekstrom M, Evans JP, Jakob D, Kiem AS, Leonart M, Rouillard A, Westra S (2016) Natural hazards in Australia: floods. Clim Change 139(1):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadam P, Sen D (2012) Flood inundation simulation in Ajoy River using MIKEFLOOD. ISH J Hydraul Eng 18(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazezyilmaz-Alhan CM, Gulbaz S, Simsek A (2014) Hydrologic Modeling of flooding event in Ayamama Watershed in Istanbul, Turkey. In: 2nd Annual international conference on architecture and civil engineering (ACE 2014). 24th–25th March 2014 Singapore, Global Science and Technology Forum Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5176/2301-394x_ace14.39

  • Kiem AS, Verdon-Kidd DC (2013) The importance of understanding drivers of hydroclimatic variability for robust flood risk planning in the coastal zone. Aust J Water Res 17(2):126–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundak S, Baypinar M (2011) The crazy project–Canal Istanbul. Trimest Lab Territ Mob Ambient 4:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Li GF, Xiang XY, Tong YY (2013) Impact assessment of urbanization on flood risk in the Yangtze River Delta. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1683–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Misik M, Bajcan J, Sklenar P, Kucera M (2013) Hydrodynamic simulation of flooding scenarios for crisis management in prague. In: 13th International symposium on water management and hydraulic engineering, September 9–12, 2013. Bratislava, Slovakia. http://www.dhigroup.com/upload/publications/floodforecasting/Misik_2013.pdf. Accessed on 25 Jan 2017

  • Misra AK (2011) Impact of urbanization on the hydrology of Ganga Basin (India). Water Resour Manage 25:705–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers J (2016) Which natural disasters hit most frequently? World economic forum: environment. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/which-natural-disasters-hit-most-frequently/. Accessed on 27 Feb 2017

  • Najafi MR, Moazami S (2016) Trends in total precipitation and magnitude–frequency of extreme precipitation in Iran, 1969–2009. Int J Climatol 36:1863–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigussie TA, Altunkaynak A (2016a) Modeling urbanization of Istanbul under different scenarios using SLEUTH urban growth model. J Urban Plan Dev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigussie TA, Altunkaynak A (2016b) Assessing the hydrological response of Ayamama Watershed from urbanization predicted under various landuse policy scenarios. Water Resour Manage 30:3427–3441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nirupama N, Simonovic SP (2007) Increase of flood risk due to urbanisation: a Canadian example. Nat Hazards 40:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou G, Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Aronica GT (2016) Flood inundation mapping sensitivity to riverine spatial resolution and modelling approach. Nat Hazards 83:S117–S132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickands J (1975) Statistical reference using extreme order statistics. Ann Stat 3:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poretti I, De Amicis M (2011) An approach for flood hazard modelling and mapping in the medium Valtellina. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(4):1141–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project Gigalopolis (2017) http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/. Accessed 12 Dec 2017

  • Salami AW, Bilewu SO, Ibitoye AB, Ayanshola AM (2017) Runoff hydrographs using snyder and SCS synthetic unit hydrograph methods: a case study of selected rivers in Southwest Nigeria. J Ecol Eng 18(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmonson A (2015) MIKE 21 FM in urban flood risk analysis. A comparative study relating to the MIKE 21 Classic model. Master of Science Thesis Stockholm, Sweden, 2015

  • Taubenbock H, Wurm M, Netzband M, Zwenzner H, Roth A, Rahman A, Dech S (2011) Flood risks in urbanized areas—multi-sensoral approaches using remotely sensed data for risk assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toros H, Geertsema, G, Cats G (2010) Evaluation of Hirlam and Harmonie precipitation forecasts for the Istanbul flash flood event of September 2009. HIRLAM Newsletter. No 56, November 2010. De Bilit, the Netherlands

  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2016) http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. Accessed 25 Jan 2017

  • Turoglu H (2011) Flash floods and floods in Istanbul. J Ecol Ank Univ 3:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architect (UCTEA) (2013) The 3rd bridge project evaluation report. http://www.cmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/f4b9735130ead31_ek.pdf?tipi=67&turu=H&sube=2. Accessed on 25 Sept 2015

  • United States Geological Survey Global Visualization Viewer (2017) http://glovis.usgs.gov/. Accessed 25 Jan 2017

  • World Meteorological Organization/Global Weather Partnership (WMO/GWP) (2008) Urban flood risk management, a tool for integrated flood management. Associated Programme on Flood Management. World Meteorological Organization

  • Yilmaz AG, Perera BJC (2015) Spatiotemporal trend analysis of extreme rainfall events in Victoria, Australia. Water Resour Manage 29:4465–4480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz AG, Hossain I, Perera BJC (2014) Effect of climate change and variability on extreme rainfall intensity–frequency–duration relationships: a case study of Melbourne. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 11:6311–6342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yucel I (2015) Assessment of a flash flood event using different precipitation datasets. Nat Hazards 79:1889–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeman E, Tacheci P, Hartnack JN, Vondrak V, Martinovic J (2014) HPC for DRM—operational flood management in urban environment. CUNY Academic Works. http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_conf_hic/203. Accessed 18 Jan 2017

  • Zhang H, Ma WC, Wang XR (2008) Rapid urbanization and implications for flood risk management in hinterland of the Pearl River Delta, China: the Foshan study. Sensors 8:2223–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tewodros Assefa Nigussie.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nigussie, T.A., Altunkaynak, A. Modeling the effect of urbanization on flood risk in Ayamama Watershed, Istanbul, Turkey, using the MIKE 21 FM model. Nat Hazards 99, 1031–1047 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03794-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03794-y

Keywords

Navigation