Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Household vulnerability and resilience in flood hazards from disaster-prone areas of Punjab, Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An environmental variation has caused Pakistan an alarming portrait of vulnerability in flood disasters. The government has focused on a number of realistic actions, heartening insertion of disaster risk-lessening measure by local disaster management policies instead of conventional dealings of aid-based approach due to the destructive outcome of floods and other natural disasters. In this study, household vulnerability and resilience of flood disaster in three districts of Punjab province were detailed. Data of a sample of the 840 inhabitant respondents of flood-prone areas of three districts of Punjab, which were severely affected in flooding of 2010, were collected from household respondent by face-to-face meeting and from Provincial Disaster Management Authority Punjab. A subjective method was used in the study to weight the components of vulnerability and resilience. In the empirical finding, higher vulnerability and lower resilience to the flood were found in these study areas. Muzaffargarh and Rajanpur districts were more vulnerable (higher composite vulnerable index score) and less resilient (lower composite resilience index score) in contrast to Rahim Yar Khan. The mutual contribution of local and provincial disaster management authorities can play the significant role in reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience of the inhabitants of flood-prone areas through strengthening awareness and vigilance, training regarding improving capacity of building and lessening flood costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas A, Amjath-Babu TS, Kächele H, Müller K (2015) Non-structural flood risk mitigation under developing country conditions: an analysis on the determinants of willingness to pay for flood insurance in rural Pakistan. Nat Hazards 75(3):2119–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337(4):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2005) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander DE (2000) Confronting catastrophe: new perspectives on natural disasters. Terra, Harpenden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur AV, Ibrahim M, Tanner T (2010) The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters.

  • Balica SF, Douben N, Wright NG (2009) Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales. Water Sci Technol 60(10):2571–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohensky EL, Leitch AM (2014) Framing the flood: a media analysis of themes of resilience in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Reg Environ Change 14(2):475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosher L, Dainty A, Carrillo P, Glass J, Price A (2009) Attaining improved resilience to floods: a proactive multi-stakeholder approach. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 18(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford RA, O’Sullivan JJ, Van der Craats IM, Krywkow J, Rotko P, Aaltonen J, Bonaiuto M, De Dominicis S, Waylen K, Schelfaut K (2012) Risk perception—issues for flood management in Europe. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(7):2299–2309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun B, Aßheuer T (2011) Floods in megacity environments: vulnerability and coping strategies of slum dwellers in Dhaka/Bangladesh. Nat Hazards 58(2):771–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ, Deyle RE, Godschalk DR, Olshansky RB (2000) Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Nat Hazards Rev 1(2):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center H (2002) Dam removal: science and decision making. Heinz Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct 32(11):3639–3649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 7(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson MA (2006) Designing for disasters. Massachusetts Coastal Hazards Commission, NOAA Coastal Services Center, Silver Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Doocy S, Daniels A, Packer C, Dick A, Kirsch TD (2013) The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents 5:213

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufty N (2008) A new approach to community flood education. Aust J Emerg Manag 23(2):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Elena-Ana P, Costache A, Dan B, Dogaru D, Sima M (2013) Vulnerability assessment of rural communities to floods in the western part of Romania (Banat Plain). In: International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference: SGEM: surveying geology & mining ecology management, vol 1, p 1161

  • Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, De Sherbinin A (2005) Environmental sustainability index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs S, Thaler T (eds) (2018) Vulnerability and resilience to natural hazards. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2003) Box 1. A systemic synthesis of the relations between vulnerability, hazard, exposure, and impact, aimed at policy identification. In: Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (ed) Handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters. ECLAC, LC/MEX/GS, Mexico, DF, pp 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gbetibouo GA, Ringler C (2009) Mapping South African farming sector vulnerability to climate change and variability: a subnational assessment. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Center for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa (CEEPA), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR (2007) Mitigation. Emergency management: principles and practice for local government, pp 89–112

  • Gwimbi P (2007) The effectiveness of early warning systems for the reduction of flood disasters: some experiences from cyclone-induced floods in Zimbabwe. J Sustain Dev Afr 9(4):152–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (2014) Regions of risk: a geographical introduction to disasters. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S, Konoshima L, Yamazaki D et al (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Change 3:816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, vol 1. United Nations Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2017) Global warming of 1.5 °C summary for policy makers special report 2017, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf

  • Joerin J, Shaw R, Takeuchi Y, Krishnamurthy R (2012) Assessing community resilience to climate-related disasters in Chennai, India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 1:44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmaoui A, Balica SF, Messouli M (2016) Analysis of applicability of flood vulnerability index in pre-Saharan region, a pilot study to assess flood in Southern Morocco. LHEA (URAC 33), Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco

  • Khan AN (2013) Analysis of 2010-flood causes, nature and magnitude in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 66(2):887–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissi AE, Abbey GA, Agboka K, Egbendewe A (2015) Quantitative assessment of vulnerability to flood hazards in downstream area of Mono Basin, South-Eastern Togo: Yoto District. J Geogr Inf Syst 7(06):607

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein D, Luderer G, Kriegler E, Strefler J, Bauer N, Leimbach M, Popp A, Dietrich JP, Humpenöder F, Lotze-Campen H, Edenhofer O (2014) The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE. Climatic change 123(3–4):705–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann E, Mushtaq F (2008) A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities. Nat Hazards 46:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludy J, Kondolf GM (2012) Flood risk perception in lands “protected” by 100-year levees. Nat Hazards 61(2):829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maantay J, Maroko A (2009) Mapping urban risk: flood hazards, race, & environmental justice in New York. Appl Geogr 29(1):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli R, Sotgiu I, Settanni M (2008) Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol 28(2):164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motsholapheko MR, Kgathi DL, Vanderpost C (2012) Rural livelihood diversification: a household adaptive strategy against flood variability in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Agrekon 51(4):41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Kokic P, Crimp S, Martin P, Meinke H et al (2010) The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: part II—integrating impacts with adaptive capacity. Environ Sci Policy 13:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41(1–2):127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papathoma-Koehle M, Thaler T, Fuchs S (2016) Physical resilience of buildings to torrential hazards-relationship and interaction with physical vulnerability. In: EGU General Assembly conference abstracts, vol 18, p 11769

  • Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: social resilience and natural disaster. Earthscan, London, p 212

    Google Scholar 

  • Piya L, Maharjan KL, Joshi NP (2012) Vulnerability of rural households to climate change and extremes: Analysis of Chepang households in the Mid-Hills of Nepal. In: 2012 conference, August, pp 18–24

  • Poussin JK, Botzen WW, Aerts JC (2014) Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environ Sci Policy 40:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proag V (2014) The concept of vulnerability and resilience. Proc Econ Finance 18:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provencal Disaster Management Authority (2014) Punjab disaster response plan report

  • Qasim S, Khan AN, Shrestha RP, Qasim M (2015) Risk perception of the people in the flood-prone Khyber Pukhthunkhwa province of Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2004) Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 13(4):307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2007) Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environ Hazards 7(4):383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer S, Haase D, Meyer V (2011) Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability. Nat Hazards 58(2):731–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schinke R, Kaidel A, Golz S, Naumann T, López-Gutiérrez JS, Garvin S (2016) Analysing the effects of flood-resilience technologies in urban areas using a synthetic model approach. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 5(11):202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck H (2000) “An Act of Allah”: religious explanations for floods in Bangladesh as survival strategy. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 18(1):85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafique M, Khan MY (2015) Earthquake hazards and risk mitigation in Pakistan. In Disaster risk reduction approaches in Pakistan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 101–117

  • Shah AA, Ye J, Abid M, Ullah R (2017) Determinants of flood risk mitigation strategies at household level: a case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 88(1):415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ye J, Abid M, Khan J, Amir SM (2018) Flood hazards: household vulnerability and resilience in disaster-prone districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 93(1):147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq MAUR (2013) Risk-based flood zoning employing expected annual damages: the Chenab River case study. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(8):1957–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney K (2009) Disaster response: research findings and their implications for resilience measures, CARRI research report, vol 6. Oak Ridge, TN

  • Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2002) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 11(3):222–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent K (2004) Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research. Working paper, vol 56, no 41

  • Vincent K (2007) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Glob Environ Change 17(1):12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson E, Brenes A (2014) Risk-informed decision-making: an agenda for improving risk assessments under HFA2. Produced for the climate and development knowledge network (CDKN) learning network on the use of climate and disaster risk assessments project, London

  • World Health Organization (2011) World Bank. World report on disability, 206

  • Yaqub M, Eren B, Doğan E (2015) Flood causes, consequences and protection measures in Pakistan. Disaster Sci Eng 1(1):8–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Dilshad Ahmad

  2. Department of Economics, Preston University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Afzal

Authors
  1. Dilshad Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Afzal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilshad Ahmad.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, D., Afzal, M. Household vulnerability and resilience in flood hazards from disaster-prone areas of Punjab, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 99, 337–354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03743-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03743-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation