Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatiotemporal characteristics of earthquake disaster losses in China from 1993 to 2016

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of data obtained from China Earthquake Administration and China National Statistics Bureau, this paper focuses on the earthquake disaster loss characteristics in 31 provinces or municipalities of China from 1993 to 2016. The trends of direct economic losses, casualties and affected population are also analyzed by constructing two relative earthquake loss indexes (losses/GDP and losses/E) and employing gray correlation theory. Results show that during the 24 years, without taking Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake into account, the direct economic losses exhibit a significant increasing trend while losses/GDP also increases but is not significant. Meanwhile, the injuries and affected population both witness a decline trend but the fatalities show the opposite. According to the correlational degree of each year, 8 years (1995, 1996, 1998, 2003, 2008, 2010, 2013 and 2014) suffered losses of equal or above moderate grade. Regionally, the western China suffered the most accumulative direct economic losses and losses/GDP. However, the ranking results of losses/E demonstrate that the central China is the most vulnerable when confronting with the same earthquake. Specifically, Sichuan and Yunnan suffered losses of extra-large grade, Qinghai of large grade and Tibet, Xinjiang and Guangdong of moderate grade. These discoveries are helpful for earthquake mitigation and preparedness as well as earthquake loss evaluation in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anton B, Gurcan C (2016) Short-term freeway traffic parameter prediction: application of grey system theory models. Expert Syst Appl 62(15):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bath Markus (1979) Introduction to seismology. Birkhauser, Basel, Boston, Stuttgart

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borden KA, Cutter SL (2008) Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States. Int J Health Geogr 7:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-7-64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruijn KMD, Green C, Johnson C, Mcfadden L (2007) Evolving concepts in flood risk management: searching for a common language. In: Begum S, Stive MJF, Hall JW (eds) Flood risk management in Europe. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • CEA and NBS (China Earthquake Administration and National Bureau of Statistics) (1996) Compilation of earthquake loss evaluation (1990–1995). Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Zheng TY (2016) A review of earthquake damage losses in mainland China in 2015. J Catastrophol 31(3):133–137 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Chen QF, Huang J et al (2003) Reduction of earthquake disasters. Acta Seismol Sin 25(6):621–629 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • DEERCEA (Department of Earthquake Emergency Rescue of China Earthquake Administration) (2010) Compilation of earthquake loss evaluation (2001–2005). Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • DEERCEA (Department of Earthquake Emergency Rescue of China Earthquake Administration) (2015) Compilation of earthquake loss evaluation (2006–2010). Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMPCEA (Department of Earthquake Monitoring and Prediction of China Earthquake Administration) (2001) Compilation of earthquake loss evaluation (1996–2000). Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng JL (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • DEPCEA (Department of Earthquake Prevention of China Earthquake Administration) (1993) Workbook for earthquake prediction and evaluation. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong YB, Duan ZS (2008) A new determination method for identification coefficient of grey relational grade. J Xi’an Univ Arch Technol (Nat Sci Edn) 40(4):589–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao MT (2003) The characteristics of earthquake disasters and countermeasures for their mitigation in metropolitans. Earthq Res China 17(4):297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong Z, Forrest JYL (2014) Special issue on meteorological disaster risk analysis and assessment: on basis of grey systems theory. Nat Hazards 71:995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0864-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He CR, Zhang R et al (2011) Earthquake characteristics and building damage in high-intensity areas of Wenchuan earthquake I: Yingxiu town. Nat Hazards 57:435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9624-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He BS, Huang XL et al (2018) Analysis of flash flood disaster characteristics in China from 2011 to 2015. Nat Hazards 90:407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3052-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe P, Pielke R (2006) Report of the workshop on ‘‘Climate change and disaster losses: understanding and attributing trends and projections’’. Hohenkammer, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang SM, Dong RY (2017) Research on the characteristics and repeatability of strong earthquake activity in Sichuan–Yunnan. Earthq Res China 31(4):491–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia HC, Chen F, Fan YD, Pan DH (2016) Comparison of two large earthquakes in China: the Ms 6.6 Yunnan Jinggu Earthquake and the Ms 6.5 Yunnan Ludian Earthquake in 2014. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 16:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang N, Xu XR, Hu BQ et al (2016) Analysis of spatial and temporal pattern of earthquake in China in recent 20 years. Popular Sci Technol 18(9):29–31 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JL, Wei YM et al (2012) Risk evaluation of China’s natural disaster systems: an approach based on triangular fuzzy numbers and stochastic simulation. Nat Hazards 62:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei H, Wang XL et al (2018) The earthquake in Jiuzhaigou County of Northern Sichuan, China on August 8, 2017. Nat Hazards 90:1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3064-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZQ, Yuan YF et al (2009) Preliminary research on the characteristics of the Ms8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake hazard. Earthq Res China 23(3):278–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SF, Dang YG, Fang ZG (2004) Gray system theory and application. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu AW et al (2017) Analysis on characteristics of the hazards of the 2015 Pishan Ms6.5 earthquake in Xinjiang. Earthq Res China 31(1):116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Mi HL, Li Y, Hou JS (2006) A review of earthquake damage loss in Chinese mainland in 2005. J Nat Disasters 15(3):164–168 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad SM, Young HL, Sonia IM (2015) Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory. Expert Syst Appl 42(21):7951–7959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu JL, Wang XL, He SY et al (2017a) The catastrophic landside in Maoxian County, Sichuan, SW China on June 24, 2017. Nat Hazards 89(3):1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3026-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu JL, Xie YL, Fan HB, Wang ZC, Zhang YW (2017b) Centrifuge modelling of twin-tunnelling induced ground movements in loess strata. Arab J Geosci 10:493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3297-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu JL, Liu HQ, Lai JX et al (2018) Investigating the long term settlement of a tunnel built over improved loessial foundation soil using jet grouting technique. J Perform Constr Facil 32(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q (1994) Study on characteristics of earthquake disaster economical losses in China recently. J Catastraphol 9(4):35–39 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YH, Li M et al (2012) An urban rail transit hazard evaluation methodology based on grey system theory. Proc Soc Behav Sci 43:764–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen HP, Tang LH et al (2016) Present situation investigation of rural housing project in Xinjiang and analysis of its actual disaster reduction effectiveness. J Nat Disasters 25(5):184–190 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZL, Ma TF, Jiang H, Jiang CS (2013) Multi-scale seismic hazard and risk in the China mainland with implication for the preparedness, mitigation, and management of earthquake disasters: an overview. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 4:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie NM, Xin JH et al (2014) China’s regional meteorological disaster loss analysis and evaluation based on grey cluster model. Nat Hazards 71:1067–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0662-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XM, Zheng FL et al (2015) Spatiotemporal characteristics of earthquake disasters and their damages within 2013 in China. Res Soil Water Conv 22(4):321–325 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang PZ, Deng QD, Zhang ZQ et al (2013) Active faults, earthquake hazards and associated geodynamic processes in continental China. Sci Sin Terrae 43:1607–1620 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Xu WY (2014) Background and reflections on Dingxi earthquake of July 22, 2013. Nat Hazards 90:407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3052-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Gong ZW, Wang WH et al (2014) The comprehensive risk evaluation on rainstorm and flood disaster losses in China mainland from 2004 to 2009: based on the triangular gray correlation theory. Nat Hazards 71:1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0698-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng TY, Zheng Y (2015) Review of earthquake damage losses in Chinese mainland in 2013. J Nat Disasters 24(1):239–246. https://doi.org/10.13577/j.jnd.2015.0130 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou GQ, Shi WH et al (2003) Main features of earthquake losses in Yunnan. J Nat Disasters 12(3):81–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li N et al (2013) Exploring the characteristics of major natural disasters in China and their impacts during the past decades. Nat Hazards 69:829–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0738-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou WH, Qin HY, Qiu JL et al (2017) Building information modelling review with potential applications in tunnel engineering of China. R Soc Open Sci 4(8):170–174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Grant No. IGCEA1610), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41,601,390) and Special Project Funding for Seismic Research (Grant No. 20130801805). The authors are grateful to Li Yang from Department of Earthquake Emergency Rescue, China Earthquake Administration and Zheng Tongyan from China Earthquake Networks Center, China Earthquake Administration for the help in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Li, Z., Yang, J. et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of earthquake disaster losses in China from 1993 to 2016. Nat Hazards 94, 843–865 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3425-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3425-6

Keywords

Navigation