Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prioritization of hazard profile for Istanbul using Analytical Hierarchy Process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The compilation of the data for past disasters is vital for taking lessons from the past, investigating their reasons, preventing the loss in the future and for disaster planning-related works. In Turkey, especially in Istanbul which has a historical background of more than 8000 years, the demand for backdated disaster data increases to determine the dangers that the city is faced with and to analyze them. The purpose of our work is to develop a hazard profile identification model for Istanbul by using “Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Therefore, we searched for different types of disasters and hazard classifications in various national and international databases. We scrutinized the kinds of disasters, hazards and hazard characteristics that should be used for a proposed model. By examining “Istanbul’s 2000 Years of Disaster Database” and 100 years of Republic’s statistics prepared for Istanbul, we identified the disaster categories and criteria, ran the Analytic Hierarchy Process and created a hazard profile model for Istanbul. Consequently, we proved that the most important types of disasters that affect Istanbul are geophysical disasters followed by climatological, hydrological, meteorological and technological disasters. The work also shows us that the districts which have a high rate of the population such as Bagcilar, Kucukcekmece and Esenyurt are more vulnerable to these hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFAD (2015) İstanbul Afet Müdahale Planı-İSTAMP. İstanbul Valiliği, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltalar H (2016) Analitik hiyerarşi süreci. http://www.hasanbaltalar.com. Accessed 8 May 2016

  • Below R, Wirtz A, Guhasapir D (2009) Disaster category classification and peril terminology for operational purposes. Working paper, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, Belgium

  • FEMA (2015) Principles of emergency management course book. https://training.fema.gov/emiweb/downloads/is230.pdf/. Accessed 21 Aug 2016

  • Gasimov RN (2004) Karar Analizi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Ders Notları. Osman Gazi Üniversiesi, Eskişehir, p 26

  • Guha-Saphir D, Hoyois P, Below S (2016) Annual disaster statistical review 2015. CRED. http://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/ADSR_2015.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2017

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolies J (2014) New York city hazard mitigation plan. http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/em/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016

  • Özeyranlı Ergenc N (2016) İstanbul ili için 2000 yıllık afet veritabanı hazırlanması. Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli

    Google Scholar 

  • Özşahin E (2014) CBS ve AHS Kullanılarak Orman Yangını Duyarlılık Analizi: Antakya Orman İşletme Müdürlüğü Örneği, pp 50–71

  • Öztürk D, Batuk F (2010) Konumsal Karar Problemlerinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin Kullanılması. Yıldız Teknik Üniv Sigma Mühendis Bilim Derg 28:124–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Şengül Ü, Eren M, Eslamian Shiraz S (2012) Bulanık AHP ile Belediyelerin Toplu Taşıma Araç Seçimi. Erciyes Univ İktisadi İdari Bilim Fak Derg 40:143–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddayao GP, Valdez SE, Fernandez PL (2014) Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in spatial modeling for floodplain risk assessment. Int J Mach Learn Comput 4(5):450–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TUİK (2014) Genel nufus sayım sonucları. TÜİK. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/. Accessed 20 Sept 2015

  • Türkoğlu H, Yiğiter R (2005) Acil Durum Planlaması. İtu Press, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzer E, Gülersoy NZ (2011) Kentsel Kültür Mirası için Risk Analizi, Büyükada Örneği. İtü Derg Mimar Plan Tasar 10(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaralioglu K (2017) Analitik hiyerarsi prosesi. www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/k.yaralioglu/dosyalar/Analitik_Hiyerarsi_Proses.doc. Accessed 4 Apr 2017

  • Yüksel İ, Akın A (2006) Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses Yöntemiyle İşletmelerde Strateji Belirleme. Doğuş Üniv Derg 7(2):254–268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. O. Metin ILKISIK for his contribution to the development of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Özeyranlı Ergenç.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7.

Table 7 The weighted score of the types of disasters by districts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özeyranlı Ergenç, N., Barış, Ş. Prioritization of hazard profile for Istanbul using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Nat Hazards 90, 325–336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3041-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3041-x

Keywords

Navigation