Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping joint hurricane wind and surge hazards for Charleston, South Carolina

  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combined effects of hurricane wind and surge can pose significant threats to coastal cities. Although current design codes consider the joint occurrence of wind and surge, information on site-specific joint distributions of hurricane wind and surge along the US Coast is still sparse and limited. In this study, joint hazard maps for combined hurricane wind and surge for Charleston, South Carolina (SC), were developed. A stochastic Markov chain hurricane simulation program was utilized to generate 50,000 years of full-track hurricane events. The surface wind speeds and surge heights from individual hurricanes were computed using the Georgiou’s wind field model and the Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model, respectively. To validate the accuracy of the SLOSH model, the simulated surge levels were compared to the surge levels calculated by another state-of-the-art storm surge model, ADCIRC (Advanced Circulation), and the actual observed water elevations from historical hurricane events. Good agreements were found between the simulated and observed water elevations. The model surface wind speeds were also compared with the design wind speeds in ASCE 7-10 and were found to agree well with the design values. Using the peak wind speeds and maximum surge heights, the joint hazard surfaces and the joint hazard maps for Charleston, SC, were developed. As part of this study, an interactive computer program, which can be used to obtain the joint wind speed and surge height distributions for any location in terms of latitude and longitude in Charleston area, was created. These joint hazard surfaces and hazard maps can be used in a multi-hazard design or risk assessment framework to consider the combined effects of hurricane wind and surge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-05). ASCE, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2006) Flood resistant design and construction (ASCE/SEI 24-05). ASCE, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10). ASCE, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Apivatanagul P, Davidson R, Blanton B, Nozick L (2011) Long-term regional hurricane hazard analysis for wind and storm surge. Coast Eng 58(6):499–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2010) “ATC wind speed by location.” Wind Speed by Location. http://www.atcouncil.org/windspeed 16 Feb 2013

  • Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML) (2012) “Easy to read HURDAT 2012.” Easy to Read HURDAT 2012. http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/easyread-2012.html 18 March 2012

  • Avila LA, Cangialosi J (2012) Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Irene, 21–28 August 2011. National Hurricane Center, Miami

  • Blake ES, Landsea CW, Gibney EJ (2011) The deadliest, costliest and most intense United States tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2010 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts). NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS NHC-6, National Weather Service, National Hurricane Center, Miami

  • Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH (1999) A third-generation wave model for coastal regions, Part I, model description and validation. J Geophys Res 104(C4):7649–7666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher JC (2008) Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations, second edition. Wiley, West Sussex, England

  • Crossett K, Ache B, Pacheco P, Haber K (2013) National coastal population report: population trends from 1970 to 2020. NOAA State of the Coast Report Series, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington

  • Darling RWR (1991) Estimating probabilities of hurricane wind speeds using a large-scale empirical model. J Clim 4(10):1035–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel K, Rotunno R (2011) Self-stratification of tropical cyclone outflow Part I Implications for storm structure. J Atm Sci 68(10):2236–2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel K, Ravela S, Vivant E, Risi C (2006) A statistical deterministic approach to hurricane risk assessment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87(3):299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2008) Managing floodplain development through the National Flood Insurance Program. FEMA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012a) HAZUS-MH 2.1 hurricane model technical manual. FEMA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012b) HAZUS-MH 2.1 flood model technical manual. FEMA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland C, Levitan M (2011) Development of a loss-consistent wind and flood damage scale for residential buildings. In Solutions to Coastal Disasters 2011. ASCE, Reston, pp 666–677

  • Georgiou PN (1985) Design wind speeds in tropical cyclone-prone regions. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario

  • Glahn B, Taylor A, Kurkowski N, Shaffer WA (2009) The role of the SLOSH model in National Weather Service storm surge forecasting. Natl Weather Digest 33(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper BA, Kepert JD, Ginger JD (2008) Guidelines for converting between various wind averaging periods in tropical cyclone conditions. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston SH, Shaffer WA, Powell MD, Chen J (1999) Comparisons of HRD and SLOSH surface wind fields in hurricanes: implications for storm surge modeling. Weather Forecast 14(5):671–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Rosowsky DV, Sparks PR (2001) Hurricane simulation techniques for the evaluation of wind-speeds and expected insurance losses. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89(7–8):605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irish JL, Resio DT, Ratcliff JJ (2008) The influence of storm size on hurricane surge. J Phys Oceanogr 38(9):2003–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvinen BR, Neumann CJ, Davis MAS (1984) A tropical cyclone data tape for the north Atlantic basin, 1886–1983: contents, limitations, and uses. NOAA Technical Memorandum No. HWS NHC 22, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington

  • Jelesnianski CP (1967) Numerical computation of storm surges with bottom stress. Mon Weather Rev 95(11):740–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelesnianski CP, Chen J, Shaffer WA (1992) SLOSH: sea, lake, and overland surges from hurricanes. NOAA Technical Report NWS 48, National Weather Service, Silver Spring

  • Knabb RD, Rhome JR, Brown DP (2005) Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina, 23–30 August 2005. National Hurricane Center, Miami

  • Lee K, Rosowsky D (2007) Synthetic hurricane wind speed records: development of a database for hazard analyses and risk studies. Nat Hazards Rev 8(2):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg MR, Nozick LK, Davidson RA (2010) Optimizing the selection of hazard-consistent probabilistic scenarios for long-term regional hurricane loss estimation. Struct Saf 32(1):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, van de Lindt JW, Dao T, Bjarnadottir S, Ahuja A (2012) Loss analysis for combined wind and surge in hurricanes. Nat Hazards Rev 13(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Emanuel K, Oppenheimer M, Vanmarcke E (2012) Physically based assessment of hurricane surge threat under climate change. Nat Clim Change 2(6):462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Pang W (2013) Projections of future U.S. design wind speeds due to changes in hurricane frequency and sea surface temperature. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn (in review)

  • Luettich RA Jr, Westerink JJ, Scheffner NW (1992) ADCIRC: an advanced three-dimensional circulation model for shelves, coasts, and estuaries. Report 1. theory and methodology of ADCIRC-2DDI and ADCIRC-3DL. Technical Report DRP-92-6, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS

  • McInnes KL, Walsh KJE, Hubbert GD, Beer T (2003) Impact of sea-level rise and storm surges on a coastal community. Nat Hazards 30(2):187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado A (1994) On the use of NOAA’s storm surge model, SLOSH, in managing coastal hazards—the experience in Puerto Rico. Nat Hazards 10(3):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers VA, Malkin W (1961) Some properties of hurricane wind fields as deduced from trajectories. National Hurricane Research Project Report No. 49, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington

  • Pei B, Pang W, Testik FY, Ravichandran N (2012) Joint distributions of hurricane wind and storm surge for the City of Charleston in South Carolina. Advances in Hurricane Engineering. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, pp 703–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan LT, Simiu E, McInerney MA, Taylor AA, Glahn B, Powell MD (2007) Methodology for development of design criteria for joint hurricane wind speed and storm surge events: proof of concept. NIST Technical Note 1482, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  • Pielke RA Jr, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders MA, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platzman GW (1963) The dynamical prediction of wind tides on Lake Erie. In: Meteorological Monographs, American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 1–44

  • Powell M, Soukup G, Cocke S, Gulati S, Morisseau-Leroy N, Hamid S, Dorst N, Axe L (2005) State of Florida hurricane loss projection model: atmospheric science component. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93(8):651–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RH (1974) The hurricane disaster potential scale. Weatherwise 27(8):169

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AB, Katz RW (2013) US billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: data sources, trends, accuracy and biases. Nat Hazards 67(2):387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A (2011) National Weather Service SLOSH pages. SLOSH Model, http://slosh.nws.noaa.gov/sloshPub 16 Sept 2012

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2000) Generic depth-damage relationships. USACE, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PJ (2005) Simple empirical models for estimating the increase in the central pressure of tropical cyclones after landfall along the coastline of the United States. J Appl Meteorol 44(12):1807–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PJ, Twisdale LA (1995) Wind-field and filling models for hurricane wind-speed predictions. J Struct Eng 121(11):1700–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PJ, Wadhera D (2008) Statistical models of Holland pressure profile parameter and radius to maximum winds of hurricanes from flight level pressure and H*Wind data. J Appl Meteorol 47(10):2497–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PJ, Skerlj PF, Twisdale LA (2000) Simulation of hurricane risk in the US using empirical track model. J Struct Eng 126(10):1222–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery P, Lin J, Skerlj P, Twisdale L Jr, Huang K (2006) HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. I: Hurricane hazard, terrain, and wind load modeling. Natural Hazards Review, 7, SPECIAL ISSUE: multihazards loss estimation and HAZUS, pp 82–93

  • Vickery PJ, Wadhera D, Powell MD, Chen Y (2009a) A hurricane boundary layer and wind field model for use in engineering applications. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(2):381–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery P, Wadhera D, Twisdale L Jr, Lavelle F (2009b) U.S. hurricane wind speed risk and uncertainty. J Struct Eng 135(3):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Glenn Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

    Bin Pei, Weichiang Pang, Firat Y. Testik, Nadarajah Ravichandran & Fangqian Liu

Authors
  1. Bin Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weichiang Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Firat Y. Testik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nadarajah Ravichandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fangqian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weichiang Pang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pei, B., Pang, W., Testik, F.Y. et al. Mapping joint hurricane wind and surge hazards for Charleston, South Carolina. Nat Hazards 74, 375–403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1185-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1185-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation