Abstract
China has suffered from severe earthquake disasters in recent years. In order to explore the impact of severe earthquakes on public risk perception on different time scales, four surveys were conducted twice each after the severe Wenchuan and Yushu earthquakes. t tests were performed between two consecutive surveys to explore the change of public risk attitudes. The results demonstrated that after the two severe earthquakes, the public seismic risk acceptance has increased over time, and the comparison between pre- and post-Yushu earthquake illustrated that the severe disaster had more impact on vulnerable population such as females, children and low-income people. Moreover, linear regression models were employed to find the determining factors of public acceptance towards earthquake risks. It was discovered that the public perceived earthquake effect had significant negative relationship with seismic risk acceptance, and public trust towards local government had positive relationship with the risk acceptance. This study could help government to gain better understanding of public mental status and take more effective disaster preparedness measures when preventing and responding to a severe earthquake.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armas I (2006) Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest. Romania Risk Anal 26(5):1223–1234
Bi J, Yang J, Li QL (2006) Regional environmental risk analysis and management. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing
Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2012) Trying not to get burned: understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environ Manage 50:1139–1151
Coles R, Hodgkinson GP (2008) A psychometric study of information technology risks in the workplace. Risk Anal 28(1):81–93
Cutchin MP, Martin KR, Owen SV, Goodwin JS (2008) Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion. Risk Anal 28(3):589–601
Dogaru D, Zobrist J, Balteanu D et al (2009) Community perception of water quality in a mining-affected area: a case study for the Certej catchment in the Apuseni mountains in Romania. Environ Manage 43:1131–1145
Eraybar K, Okazaki K, Ilki A (2010) An exploratory study on perceptions of seismic risk and mitigation in two districts of Istanbul. Disasters 34(1):71–92
Fordham M (2000) The place of gender in earthquake vulnerability and mitigation. Paper presented at the second Euro conference on global change and catastrophic risk management—earthquake risks in Europe. International Institute of Advanced Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria 6–9 July 2000
Frewer L (2004) The public and effective risk communication. Toxicol Lett 149(1–3):391–397
Fu TT, Liu JT, Hammitt JK (1999) Consumer willingness to pay for low-pesticide fresh produce in Taiwan. J Agr Econ 50(2):220–233
Goodfellow MJ, Williams HR, Azapagic A (2011) Nuclear renaissance, public perception and design criteria: an exploratory review. Energ Policy 39:6199–6210
Granger K, Hayne M (2001) Natural hazards and the risk they pose to South-East Queensland. Technical Report, Australian Geological Survey Organization, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra
Granger K, Jones T, Leiba M, Scott G (1999) Community risk in cairns: a provisional multi hazard risk assessment. AGSO Cities Project Report No. 1, Australian Geological Survey Organisation, Canberra
Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120
Huang L, Sun K, Ban J, Bi J (2010) Public perception of blue-algae bloom risk in Hongze Lake of China. Environ Manage 45(5):1065–1075
Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T et al (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian Coast. Risk Anal 31(7):1055–1068
Kunreuther H, Easterling D, Desvousges W, Slovic P (1990) Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Anal 10(4):469–484
Li S, Rao LL, Ren XP et al (2009) Psychological typhoon eye in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS ONE 4(3):e4964
Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav 32:461–501
Lindell MK, Arlikatti S, Prater CS (2009) Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes. Risk Anal 29(8):1072–1088
McCaffrey SM, Stidham M, Toman E, Shindler B (2011) Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk? Environ Manage 48:475–488
Paul BK, Bhuiyan RH (2010) Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Disasters 34(2):337–359
Renn O (1998) The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 59(1):49–62
Shi XM, He F (2012) The environmental pollution perception of residents in coal mining areas: a case study in the Hancheng Mine Area, Shaanxi Province, China. Environ Manage 50:505–513
Sjöberg L (2000) Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal 20(1):1–11
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322
Soffer Y, Goldberg A, Adini B et al (2011) The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel. Disasters 35(1):36–44
Tekeli-Yesil S, Dedeoglu N, Braun-Fahrlaender C, Tanner M (2010) Factors motivating individuals to take precautionary action for an expected earthquake in Istanbul. Risk Anal 30(8):1181–1195
Tucker M, Napier TL (1998) Perceptions of risk associated with use of farm chemicals: implications for conservation initiatives. Environ Manage 22(4):575–587
Vassanadumrongdee S, Matsuoka S (2005) Risk perceptions and value of a statistical life for air pollution and traffic accidents: evidence from Bangkok, Thailand. J Risk Uncertain 30(3):261–287
Zhai GF, Suzuki T (2008) Effects of risk representation and scope on willingness to pay for reduced risks: evidence from Tokyo Bay, Japan. Risk Anal 28(2):513–522
Zhu DQ, Xie XF, Gan YQ (2011) Information source and valence: how information credibility influences earthquake risk perception. J Environ Psychol 31(2):129–136
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Chinese Natural Sciences Foundation (41271014 and 41171411) and 863 Program (2013AA06A309).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, L., Bao, W., Chen, K. et al. The comparison analysis of Chinese public perception of earthquakes on different time scales. Nat Hazards 73, 613–625 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1095-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1095-6