Skip to main content
Log in

The comparison analysis of Chinese public perception of earthquakes on different time scales

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China has suffered from severe earthquake disasters in recent years. In order to explore the impact of severe earthquakes on public risk perception on different time scales, four surveys were conducted twice each after the severe Wenchuan and Yushu earthquakes. t tests were performed between two consecutive surveys to explore the change of public risk attitudes. The results demonstrated that after the two severe earthquakes, the public seismic risk acceptance has increased over time, and the comparison between pre- and post-Yushu earthquake illustrated that the severe disaster had more impact on vulnerable population such as females, children and low-income people. Moreover, linear regression models were employed to find the determining factors of public acceptance towards earthquake risks. It was discovered that the public perceived earthquake effect had significant negative relationship with seismic risk acceptance, and public trust towards local government had positive relationship with the risk acceptance. This study could help government to gain better understanding of public mental status and take more effective disaster preparedness measures when preventing and responding to a severe earthquake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armas I (2006) Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest. Romania Risk Anal 26(5):1223–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi J, Yang J, Li QL (2006) Regional environmental risk analysis and management. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2012) Trying not to get burned: understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environ Manage 50:1139–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles R, Hodgkinson GP (2008) A psychometric study of information technology risks in the workplace. Risk Anal 28(1):81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin MP, Martin KR, Owen SV, Goodwin JS (2008) Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion. Risk Anal 28(3):589–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogaru D, Zobrist J, Balteanu D et al (2009) Community perception of water quality in a mining-affected area: a case study for the Certej catchment in the Apuseni mountains in Romania. Environ Manage 43:1131–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraybar K, Okazaki K, Ilki A (2010) An exploratory study on perceptions of seismic risk and mitigation in two districts of Istanbul. Disasters 34(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordham M (2000) The place of gender in earthquake vulnerability and mitigation. Paper presented at the second Euro conference on global change and catastrophic risk management—earthquake risks in Europe. International Institute of Advanced Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria 6–9 July 2000

  • Frewer L (2004) The public and effective risk communication. Toxicol Lett 149(1–3):391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu TT, Liu JT, Hammitt JK (1999) Consumer willingness to pay for low-pesticide fresh produce in Taiwan. J Agr Econ 50(2):220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow MJ, Williams HR, Azapagic A (2011) Nuclear renaissance, public perception and design criteria: an exploratory review. Energ Policy 39:6199–6210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger K, Hayne M (2001) Natural hazards and the risk they pose to South-East Queensland. Technical Report, Australian Geological Survey Organization, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger K, Jones T, Leiba M, Scott G (1999) Community risk in cairns: a provisional multi hazard risk assessment. AGSO Cities Project Report No. 1, Australian Geological Survey Organisation, Canberra

  • Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Sun K, Ban J, Bi J (2010) Public perception of blue-algae bloom risk in Hongze Lake of China. Environ Manage 45(5):1065–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T et al (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian Coast. Risk Anal 31(7):1055–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Easterling D, Desvousges W, Slovic P (1990) Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Anal 10(4):469–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Rao LL, Ren XP et al (2009) Psychological typhoon eye in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS ONE 4(3):e4964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav 32:461–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Arlikatti S, Prater CS (2009) Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes. Risk Anal 29(8):1072–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey SM, Stidham M, Toman E, Shindler B (2011) Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk? Environ Manage 48:475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul BK, Bhuiyan RH (2010) Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Disasters 34(2):337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (1998) The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 59(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi XM, He F (2012) The environmental pollution perception of residents in coal mining areas: a case study in the Hancheng Mine Area, Shaanxi Province, China. Environ Manage 50:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L (2000) Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal 20(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer Y, Goldberg A, Adini B et al (2011) The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel. Disasters 35(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli-Yesil S, Dedeoglu N, Braun-Fahrlaender C, Tanner M (2010) Factors motivating individuals to take precautionary action for an expected earthquake in Istanbul. Risk Anal 30(8):1181–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Napier TL (1998) Perceptions of risk associated with use of farm chemicals: implications for conservation initiatives. Environ Manage 22(4):575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassanadumrongdee S, Matsuoka S (2005) Risk perceptions and value of a statistical life for air pollution and traffic accidents: evidence from Bangkok, Thailand. J Risk Uncertain 30(3):261–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai GF, Suzuki T (2008) Effects of risk representation and scope on willingness to pay for reduced risks: evidence from Tokyo Bay, Japan. Risk Anal 28(2):513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DQ, Xie XF, Gan YQ (2011) Information source and valence: how information credibility influences earthquake risk perception. J Environ Psychol 31(2):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Chinese Natural Sciences Foundation (41271014 and 41171411) and 863 Program (2013AA06A309).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, L., Bao, W., Chen, K. et al. The comparison analysis of Chinese public perception of earthquakes on different time scales. Nat Hazards 73, 613–625 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1095-6

Keywords

Navigation