Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of energy supply vulnerability between China and USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

USA and China are the two largest energy-consuming countries, and energy supply vulnerability is a prior topic on energy policy. Then, we develop energy supply vulnerability assessment index including the sustainability, the stability, the reliability, and the diversification indicators to assess and compare the change of energy supply vulnerability between China and USA based on the data in 2001–2010. We found that the fluctuations of energy supply vulnerability in China are more than those of USA. In 2001–2006, the index of China’s energy supply vulnerability presented a quick uptrend, but it presented a slow downtrend in 2007–2010 due to the uncertainty of some indicators; energy supply vulnerability of USA presented smaller change from 2000 to 2008 because of the stable and comprehensive energy supply system, but in 2009 and 2010, it became obviously less than those in other years due to the decline of energy consumption per capita. Additionally, Chinese energy supply also faces higher maritime transportation and geopolitical vulnerability than that of USA. The comparisons of the change of energy supply vulnerability between China and USA show that it is important to develop comprehensive energy supply system to reduce the uncertainty of main effect indicators, such as the control of energy consumption growth, and the diversification of energy supply and import.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhattacharyya SC (2009) Fossil-fuel dependence and vulnerability of electricity generation: case of selected European countries. Energy Policy 37:2411–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (2011) BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2011. British Petroleum (BP), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2001) China’s Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Yearbook 2001. China Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2002) China’s Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Yearbook 2002. China Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2003) China’s Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Yearbook 2003. China Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2004) China Commerce Yearbook 2004. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2005) China Commerce Yearbook 2005. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2006) China Commerce Yearbook 2006. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2007) China Commerce Yearbook 2007. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2008) China Commerce Yearbook 2008. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2009) China Commerce Yearbook 2009. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2010) China Commerce Yearbook 2010. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Department (2011) China Commerce Yearbook 2011. China Commerce Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ediger VS, Berk I (2011) Crude oil import policy of Turkey: historical analysis of determinants and implications since 1968. Energy Policy 39:2132–2142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2011) Spot prices for crude oil and petroleum products. Energy Information Administration of Department of Energy, U.S. http://www.eia.doe.gov/

  • General Administration of Customs of China (2011) The statistical data of customs of China. www.customs.gov.cn/

  • General Administration of Customs of China (GACC) (2010) China Custom Statistical Yearbook 1997–2010. General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnansounou E (2008) Assessing the energy vulnerability: case of industrialized countries. Energy Policy 36:3734–3744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta E (2008) Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries. Energy Policy 36:1195–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena AFP, Szklo AS et al (2009) The vulnerability of renewable energy to climate change in Brazil. Energy Policy 37:879–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer R, Szklo AS et al (2012) Energy sector vulnerability to climate change: a review. Energy 38:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Statistical Bureau (2011) China Statistical Yearbook 2011. China Statistical Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei YM, Liao H et al (2010) China energy report (2010): energy efficiency research. Science Press. (in Chinese)

  • Wu G, Wei YM, Fan Y, Liu LC (2007) An empirical analysis of the risk of crude oil imports in China using improved portfolio approach. Energy Policy 35:4190–4199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Liu LC, Wei YM (2009) Comparison of China’s oil import risk: results based on portfolio theory and a diversification index approach. Energy Policy 37:3557–3565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71173207, 70903028, and 71373099. And we would like to sincerely thank for the reviewers helpful suggestions and feedback on an early draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan-Cui Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, LC., Wu, G. Assessment of energy supply vulnerability between China and USA. Nat Hazards 75 (Suppl 2), 127–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1071-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1071-1

Keywords

Navigation