Abstract
Assessment of social vulnerability has been recognized as a critical step to understand natural hazard risks and to enhance effective response capabilities. Although significant achievements have been made in social vulnerability researches, little is know about the comprehensive profile of regional social vulnerability in China. In this study, the social vulnerability to natural hazards was firstly divided into socioeconomic and built environmental vulnerability. Then, using factor analysis, we identified the dominant factors that influence the provincial social vulnerability in China to natural hazards based on the socioeconomic and built environmental variables in 2000 and 2010 and explored the spatial patterns of social vulnerability. The results indicated that the provincial social vulnerability in China showed significant regional differences. The social vulnerability in the southeastern and eastern regions of China was greater than its northern and central parts over the past decade. Economic status, rural (proportion of agricultural population and percentage of workers employed in primary industries), urbanization, and age structure (children) were the dominant driving forces of variations in provincial socioeconomic vulnerability in two studied years, while lifelines and housing age could explain most of changes in built environmental vulnerability in 2000 and 2010. There were no statistically significant correlations between social vulnerability and disaster losses (p > 0.05), indicating the impact of disasters was also related to the intensity of hazards and exposure. Disaster relief funds allocated to each province of China depended more on its disaster severity than the regional integrated social vulnerability over the past decade. These findings would provide a scientific base for the policy making and implementation of disaster prevention and mitigation in China.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Disaster-related fatalities, economic losses were obtained from the China Civil Affairs Statistical Yearbook, which is collected by the Ministry of Civil Affairs of China (MCAC) and publicly published by China Statistics Press (MCAC, 2012). This type of data is available during the period of 2000–2010 at the provincial level in addition to Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.
Data on the total disaster relief funds allocated to each province in China are currently unavailable, but the China Rural Statistical Yearbook, which is published by Chinese Statistics Press, records the disaster relief funds in rural areas for each province since 1980. Therefore, the disaster relief funds allocated to cities are beyond the scope of the present study.
References
Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269
Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364
Alliance Development Works (Bundnis Entwicklund Hilft) (2012) World Risk Report 2012. Focus: environmental degradation and disasters
Bernard HR (2006) Research methods in anthropology, qualitative and quantitative approaches. Altamira Press, Oxford
Birkmann J, Fernando N, Hettige S (2006) Measuring vulnerability in Sri Lanka at the local level. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. UNU-Press, Tokyo
Borden KA, Schmidtlein MC, Emrich CT, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2007) Vulnerability of US cities to environmental hazards. J Homel Secur A 4(2):1–21
Bouwer LM, Crompton RP, Faust E, Höppe P, Pielke RA (2007) Confronting disaster losses. Science 318:753
Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre working paper no. 38, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, p 4
Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implication for adaptation. Global Environ Chang 15(2):151–163
Chakraborty J, Tobin GA, Montz B (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6(1):23–33
Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geog 20(4):529–539
Cutter SL (2010) Social science perspectives on hazards and vulnerability science. In: Beer T (ed) Geophysical hazards: minimizing risk maximizing awareness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–30
Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(7):2301–2306
Cutter SL, Mitchell J, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann As Am Geogr 90(4):713–737
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261
Dow K, Downing TE (1995) Vulnerability research: where things stand. Hum Dimens Q 1:3–5
Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O, Day S, Roberts S (2004) Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards. Australian Government, Geoscience Australia, Canberra
Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403
Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ, Heitgerd JL, Lewis B (2011) A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J Homel Secur A 8(1):1–22
Gallopin GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16:293–303
Ge Y, Dou W, Gu Z, Qian X, Wang J, Xu W, Shi P, Ming X, Zhou X, Chen Y (2013) Assessment of social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(8):1899–1908
Holand IS, Lujala P, Rod JK (2011) Social vulnerability assessment for Norway: a quantitative approach. Nor Geogr Tidsskr 65:1–17
Huang J, Liu Y, Ma L, Sun F (2013) Methodology for the assessment and classification of regional vulnerability to natural hazards in China: the application of a DEA model. Nat Hazards 65:115–134
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: a special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Janssen MA, Schoon MK, Weimao BK (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 16(3):240–252
Kaiser W (1974) The spectral sensitivity of the honeybee’s optomotor walking response. J Comp Physiol A 90:405–408
Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (1999) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio 28:182–187
Kuhlicke C, Scolobig A, Tapsell S, Steinfuhrer A, Marchi BD (2011) Contextualizing social vulnerability: findings from case studies across Europe. Nat Hazards 58:789–810
Mileti D (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington
Myers C, Slack T, Singelmann J (2008) Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: the case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Popul Environ 29:271–291
Olga VW, Donald AW (2002) Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: a Nebraska case study. Nat Hazards 25(1):37–58
Qiu J (2012) Urbanization contributed to Beijing storms. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11086
Qiu J (2013) China earthquake points to future risk sites. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12833
Sang YF, Wang ZG, Liu CM (2013) What factors are responsible for the Beijing storm? Nat Hazards 65(3):2399–2400
Schmidtlein MC, Deutsch RC, Cutter SL, Piegorsch WW (2008) A sensitivity analysis of ht social vulnerability index. Risk Anal 28:1099–1114
Schumacher I, Strobl E (2011) Economic development and losses due to natural disasters: the role of hazard exposure. Ecol Econ 72:97–105
Tapsell SM, Penning-Rowsell EC, Tunstall SM, Wilson TL (2002) Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 360:1511–1525
Tapsell S, McCarthy S, Faulkner H, Alexander M (2010) Social vulnerability and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP4 Report, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London. http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz-Net_WP4_Social-Vulnerability.pdf
UN-ISDR (2009) Risk and poverty in a changing climate: invest today for a safer tomorrow. United Nations International Strategy for Natural Disaster Reduction Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, pp 207
Wei Y, Fan Y, Lu C, Tsai HT (2004) The assessment of vulnerability to natural disasters in China by using the DEA method. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(4):427–439
Wilhelmi OV, Morss RE (2013) Integrated analysis of societal vulnerability in an extreme precipitation event: a Fort Collins case study. Environ Sci Policy 26:49–62
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London, p 11
Wu SY, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Clim Res 22:255–270
Yuan Y (2008) Impact of intensity and loss assessment following the great Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 7:247–254. doi:10.1007/s11803-008-0893-9
Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood causalities in Texas. Disaster 32(4):537–560
Zhang Q, Wu L, Liu Q (2009) Tropical cyclone damages in China 1983–2006. B Am Meteorol Soc 90:489–495
Zhou BZ, Gu LH, Ding YH, Shao L, Wu ZM, Yang XS, Li GZ, Li ZC, Wang XM, Cao BS, Yu MK, Wang MY, Wang SK, Sun HG, Duan AG, An YF, Wang X, Kong WJ (2011) The great 2008 Chinese ice storm its socioeconomic ecological impact and sustainability lessons learned. BB Am Meteorol Soc 92(1):48–60
Zhou Y, Li N, Wu W, Wu J, Gu X, Ji Z (2013) Exploring the characteristics of major natural disasters in China and their impacts during the past decades. Nat Hazards 69(1):829–843
Zong YQ, Chen X (2000) The 1998 flood on the Yangtze, China. Nat Hazards 22:165–184
Zou LL (2012) The impacting factors of vulnerability to natural hazards in China: an analysis based on structural equation model. Nat Hazards 62:57–70
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2012CB955402), International Cooperation Project funded by Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012DFG20710) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41171401). The authors also would like to thank anonymous reviewers who gave valuable suggestion that has helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Li, N., Wu, W. et al. Assessment of provincial social vulnerability to natural disasters in China. Nat Hazards 71, 2165–2186 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1003-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1003-5