Skip to main content
Log in

Displacement prediction model of landslide based on a modified ensemble empirical mode decomposition and extreme learning machine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an M–EEMD–ELM model (modified ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD)-based extreme learning machine (ELM) ensemble learning paradigm) is proposed for landslide displacement prediction. The nonlinear original surface displacement deformation monitoring time series of landslide is first decomposed into a limited number of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and one residual series using EEMD technique for a deep insight into the data structure. Then, these sub-series except the high frequency are forecasted, respectively, by establishing appropriate ELM models. At last, the prediction results of the modeled IMFs and residual series are summed to formulate an ensemble forecast for the original landslide displacement series. A case study of Baishuihe landslide in the Three Gorges reservoir area of China is presented to illustrate the capability and merit of our model. Empirical results reveal that the prediction using M–EEMD–ELM model is consistently better than basic artificial neural networks (ANNs) and unmodified EEMD–ELM in terms of the same measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen FL, Ou TY (2011) Sales forecasting system based on Gray extreme learning machine with Taguchi method in retail industry. Expert Systems with Applications 38:1336–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HQ, Zeng ZG (2011) Deformation prediction of landslide based on genetic-simulated annealing algorithm and BP neural network. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on advanced computational intelligence, Wuhan, China, pp 675–679

  • Drucker H, Cun YL (1992) Improving generalization performance using double backpropagation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(6):991–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng GR, Qian ZX, Dai NJ (2012) Reversible watermarking via extreme learning machine prediction. Neurocomputing 82:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo ZH, Zhao WG, Lu HY, Wang JZ (2012) Multi-step forecasting for wind speed using a modified EMD-based artificial neural network model. Renew Energy 37:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72:272–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K (1991) Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw 4(2):251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GB (2003) Learning capability and storage capacity of two-hidden-layer feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(2):274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GB, Babri HA (1998) Upper bounds on the number of hidden neurons in feedforward networks with arbitrary bounded nonlinear activation functions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9(1):224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GB, Chen L, Siew CK (2006a) Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17(4):879–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2006b) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1–3):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 454:903–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaroudi AE, Makhoul J (1990) A new error criterion for posterior probability estimation with neural nets. In: Proceedings of iteration joint conference on neural networks, pp 185–192

  • Kaunda RB (2010) A linear regression framework for predicting subsurface geometries and displacement rates in deep-seated, slow-moving landslides. Eng Geol 114:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata D, Bandibas J (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using geological data, a DEM from ASTER images and an artificial neural network (ANN). Geomorphology 113:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchiorre C, Matteucci M, Azzoni A, Zanchi A (2008) Artificial neural networks and cluster analysis in landslide susceptibility zonation. Geomorphology 94:379–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Msilimba GG (2010) The socioeconomic and environmental effects of the 2003 landslides in the Rumphi and Ntcheu Districts (Malawi). Nat Hazards 53:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol 97:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focussing on different training sites. Int J Phys Sci 4(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010) A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34:216–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin SQ, Jiao JJ, Wang SJ (2001) The predictable time scale of landslides. Bull Eng Geol Environ 59(4):307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin SQ, Jiao JJ, Wang SJ (2002) A nonlinear dynamical model of landslide evolution. Geomorphology 43:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun ZL, Choi TM, Au KF, Yu Y (2008) Sales forecasting using extreme learning machine with applications in fashion retailing. Decision Support Syst 46:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbino G, Sica C, Cascini L (2010) Susceptibility analysis of shallow landslides source areas using physically based models. Nat Hazards 53:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura S, Tateishi M (1997) Capabilities of a four-layered feedforward neural network: four layers versus three. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8(2):251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZH, Huang NE (2009) Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv Adapt Data Anal 1(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Wang Y, Du J, Ye J (2011) Study of displacement prediction model of landslide based on time series analysis. Chin J Rock Mechan Eng 30(4):746–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Wang SY, Lai KK (2008) Forecasting crude oil price with an EMD-based neural network ensemble learning paradigm. Energy Econ 30:2623–2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu QY, Qin AK, Suganthan PN, Huang GB (2005) Evolutionary extreme learning machine. Pattern Recogn 38(10):1759–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zong WW, Huang GB (2011) Face recognition based on extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 74:2541–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 60974021 and 61203286, the 973 Program of China under Grant 2011CB710606, the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant 20100142110021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Zeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lian, C., Zeng, Z., Yao, W. et al. Displacement prediction model of landslide based on a modified ensemble empirical mode decomposition and extreme learning machine. Nat Hazards 66, 759–771 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0517-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0517-6

Keywords

Navigation