Skip to main content
Log in

Developing an agricultural flood loss estimation function (case study: rice)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, flood control has been replaced by flood management concept in terms of living with flood, making benefit of it, and minimizing its losses. Succeeding in flood management in any region depends on the evaluation of different types of flood losses. Because of providing water resources and suitable arable lands, especially in arid and semiarid countries, floodplains are very important for agricultural activities. These lands are naturally vulnerable to flood; henceforth, determining the degree of protection and acceptable risk in flood damage-reduction projects without agricultural flood loss evaluation could be unrealistic. In this research, effective hydraulic parameters for flood loss estimation were determined and a set of laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the loss of rice, as the main crop in the study region, under different hydraulic conditions. In this regard, flow parameters like depth, velocity, multiplication of depth and velocity, shear stress, the Froude number, and the Reynolds number were employed for different rice growth stages including after transplanting, shooting, clustering, and harvesting. Analyzing the results showed that the Reynolds number, as a dimensionless parameter, is the best one for simulation of flood physical factor-loss function. Statistical analysis revealed that the logarithmic function is the best regression equation fitted to the Reynolds number-loss function. The amount of loss depends on growth stage; therefore, the time of flood occurrence is of vital importance for agricultural loss estimation. In this research, it was realized that the amount of loss is increased in the following order: after transplanting, shooting, harvesting, and clustering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Iranian currency unit.

References

  • Berning C, Viljoen MF, Plessis LD (2000) Loss functions for sugar-cane: depth and duration of inundation as determinants of extent of flood damage. Water SA 26(4):527–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Berning C, Viljoen MF, Plessis LD (2001) Loss function for structural flood mitigation measures. Water SA 27(1):35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ (1998) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, p 356

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S (2003) Integrated flood management case study India: flood management—Damodar River basin, a report prepared by World Meteorological Organization and Global Water Partnership Associated Programme on Flood Management, p 11

  • Chereni A (2007) The problem of institutional fit in integrated water resources management: a case of Zimbabwe’s Mazowe catchment. Phys Chem Earth 32:1246–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D (2003) A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J Hydrol 277:24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2008) HAZUS: multi-hazard loss estimation model methodology-flood model technical manual. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC

  • Funke N, Oelofse SHH, Hattingh J, Ashton PJ, Turton AR (2007) IWRM in developing countries: lessons from the Mhlatuze catchment in South Africa. Phys Chem Earth 32:1237–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway G (2004) Integrated flood management case study USA: flood management—Mississippi river. World Meteorological Organization and Global Water Partnership Associated Programme on Flood Management, p 12

  • Grigg NS, Heiweg OJ (1975) State-of-the-art of estimating flood damage in urban areas. Water Resour Bull 11(2):379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambira WL (2007) Natural resources accounting: a tool for water resources management in Botswana. Phys Chem Earth 32:1310–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes H (2007) Integrating socio-economic analysis into decision-support methodology for flood risk management at the development scale (Scotland). Water Environ J 22:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEC-FDA (2008) Flood damage reduction analysis. User Manual Version 1.2.4, Us Army Corps of for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center

  • Huang X, Tan H, Zhou J, Yang T, Benjamin A, Wen SW, Li S, Liu A, Li X, Fen S, Li X (2008) Flood hazard in Hunan province of China: an economic loss analysis. Nat Hazards 47:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN (2007) Loss of life estimation in flood risk assessment. PhD thesis Delft University, p 360

  • Jonkman SN, Maaskant B, Boyd E, Levitan M (2008a) Loss of life caused by the flooding of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina: a preliminary analysis of the relationship between flood characteristics and mortality. 4th International Symposium on Flood Defence: Managing Flood Risk, Reliability and Vulnerability Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  • Jonkman SN, Vrijling JK, Vrouwenvelder ACWM (2008b) Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods; a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Nat Hazard 46:353–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang JL, Su M, Chang L (2005) Loss function and framework for regional flood damage estimation in residential area. J Mar Sci Technol 13(3):193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • KGS Group (2000) Red river basin-stage-damage curves update and preparation of flood damage maps. Report prepared for International Joint commission, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

  • Kluge T, Liehr S, Lux A, Moser P, Niemann S, Umlauf N, Urban W (2008) IWRM concept for the Cuvelai Basin in northern Namibia. Phys Chem Earth 33:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouwen N (1989) Field estimation of the biomechanical properties of grass Estimation sur le terrain des caracteristiques mecaniques de l herbe. J Hydraul Res 26(5):559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malekmohammadi B, Zahraei B, Karachian R, Ziaei A (2007) Combining a dam flood control optimization model with flood loss zoning model in the downstream river. 6th hydraulic conference of Iran, Shahre Kord University, p 11

  • Mesbahi M, Atari J, Sabzivand R (2007) Risk analysis and flood management with HEC-RAS and GIS and economical loss evaluation. 6th hydraulic conference of Iran, Shahre Kord University, p 10

  • Messner F, Penning-Rowsell EC, Green CH, Moyer V (2006) Guidelines for socio-economic flood damage evaluation, sixth framework programme for European Research and Technological Development, Integrated Project FLOOD site (2002–2006)

  • Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, p 351

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulwafu WO, Msosa HK (2005) IWRM and poverty reduction in Malawi: a socio-economic analysis. Phys Chem Earth 30:961–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAP (1999) Impacts of natural disasters: a framework for loss estimation. National Academy Press, Washington, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DI, Greenaway M (1988) The computer assessment of urban flood damage: ANUFLOOD. Technical Report, Desktop Planning, Melbourne, Hargreen, Australia

  • The ministry of Energy (2006) The manual of flood loss evaluation. Draft paper No. 296-a

  • WMO (2007) Economic aspects of integrated flood management. World Meteorological Organization and Global Water Partnership Associated Programme on Flood Management, No 1010, p 53

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Shokoohi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganji, Z., Shokoohi, A. & Samani, J.M.V. Developing an agricultural flood loss estimation function (case study: rice). Nat Hazards 64, 405–419 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0250-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0250-1

Keywords

Navigation