Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Copula-based evaluations of drought variations in Guangdong, South China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changing characteristics of hazardous weather-related events have been arousing considerable public interest in recent years. Guangdong is an economically developed province in China and is prone to natural hazards. Using monthly precipitation data covering a period of 1956–2008 from 127 rain gauge stations, the probabilistic behaviors of SPI-based droughts were investigated with copulas functions. Results indicated a higher risk of droughts along the coastal regions and the western Guangdong, particularly the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region. Joint probabilities of droughts with higher intensity and longer duration were found to have relatively even geographical distribution across Guangdong. The northern parts of Guangdong are higher in altitude and have a lower risk of droughts. Identification of regions characterized by droughts of different severity and durations across Guangdong is important for scientific management of water resource and agricultural activities and also the development of social resilience under the influence of climate changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bordi I, Fraedrich K, Gerstengarbe F-W, Werner PC, Sutera A (2004) Potential predictability of dry and wet periods: Sicily and Elbe-Basin (Germany). Theor Appl Climatol 77:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calanca P (2007) Climate change and drought occurrence in the Alpine region: How severe are becoming the extremes? Global Planet Change 57:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere A, Salas DJ (2010) Drought probabilities and return period for annual streamflow series. J Hydrol 391:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TG, Zeng X, Zhang JY (2007) Precipitation and drought/flood trends in Guangdong under the background of global warming. Guangdong Meteorol 29(1):5–10 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Du YD, Liu JL, Song LL (2004) Characteristics and forming causes of drought and its controlling measures in Leizhou peninsula. Agri Res Arid Areas 22(1):28–31 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleig AK, Tallaksen LM, Hisdal H, Demuth S (2006) A global evaluation of streamflow drought characteristics. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:535–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha DK, Chulsang Y, Tae-Woong K (2011) Application of spatial EOF and multivariate time series model for evaluating agricultural drought vulnerability in Korea. Adv Water Resour 34:340–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MJ, Svoboda MD, Wilhite DA, Vanyarkho OV (1999) Monitoring the 1996 Drought Using the Standardized Precipitation Index. B Am Meteorol Soc 80:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He HY (1998) Features of dryness and wetness in Guangdong province during a period of nearly 40 years. J Tropic Meteorol 14(4):297–305 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal H, Tallaksen ML (2003) Estimation of regional meteorological and hydrological drought characteristics: a case study for Denmark. J Hydrol 281:230–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao S-C, Govindaraju SR (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livada I, Assimakopoulos VD (2007) Spatial and temporal analysis of drought in Greece using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). Theor Appl Climatol 89:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Hughes B, Saunders M (2002) A drought climatology for Europe. Int J Climatol 22:1571–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu XX, Zhang SR, Xie SP, Ma PK (2007) Rapid channel incision of the lower Pearl River (China) since the 1990s as a consequence of sediment depletion. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1897–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Preprints Eighth Conf on Applied Climatology Anaheim CA. Am Meteor Soc 179–184

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1995) Drought monitoring with multiple time scales, Preprints, Ninth Conf Appl Climatol, Dallas, Am Meteorol Soc 233–236

  • Mishra KA, Singh PV (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira EE, Coelho CA, Paulo AA, Pereira SL, Mexia TJ (2008) SPI-based drought category prediction using loglinear models. J Hydrol 354:116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao SL, Ciais P, Huang Y, Shen ZS, Peng S, Li J, Zhou L, Liu H, Ma Y, Ding YH, Friedlingstein P, Liu CZ, Tan K, Yu YQ, Zhang T, Fang JY, Piao SL (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serinaldi F, Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Grimaldi S (2009) Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas. Phys Chem Earth 34:596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Res Manage 20(5):795–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Shen HW (2001) Recurrence analysis of hydrologic droughts of differing severity. J Water Res Plan Manage 127(1):30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Y, Takahashi K, Chávez R (2007) Dry and wet rainy seasons in the Mantaro River basin (Central Peruvian Andes). Adv Geosci 14:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA (2000) Drought as a natural hazard: concepts and definitions. In: Drought: a global assessment Wilhite DA (Ed.), Routledge, London, pp 3–18

  • Wilhite DA, Glantz MH (1985) Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of definitions. Water Inter 10(3):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1995) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. London, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yevjevich V (1967) An objective approach to definitions and investigation of continental hydrologic droughts, hydrology paper 23. Colorado State University, Fort Collins

  • Zelenhastic E, Salvai A (1987) A method of streamflow drought analysis. Water Resour Res 23(1):156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai PM, Zou XK (2005) Changes of temperature and precipitation and their effects on drought in China during 1951–2003. Adv Clim Change Res 1:16–18 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Singh VP (2006) Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. J Hydrol Eng 11:150–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Singh VP (2007) Bivariate rainfall frequency distributions using Archimedean copulas. J Hydrol 332:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang CL, Luo XL (2000) Climatic causes of drought in Guangdong and its disaster reduction. Trop Geograp 20(1):17–21 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xu C-Y, Chen YD, Yang T (2009a) Spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration across the Pearl River Delta, China, and possible underlying causes. Hydrol Process 23:1565–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xu C-Y, Zhang ZX (2009b) Observed changes of drought/wetness episodes in the Pearl River basin, China, using the Standardized Precipitation Index and Aridity Index. Theor Appl Climatol 98:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Jiang T, Chen YD, Chen XH (2010) Changing properties of hydrological extremes in south China: natural variations or human influences? Hydrol Process 24(11):1421–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhang W, Chen YD, Jiang T (2011) Flood, drought and typhoon disasters during the last half century in the Guangdong province, China. Nat Hazard, doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9611-9

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 41071020; 50839005), the Project from Guangdong Science and Technology Department (Grant No.: 2010B050800001; 2010B050300010)), the Program for Outstanding Young Teachers of the Sun Yat-sen University (Grant No.: 1132381) and by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. CUHK405308). Cordial gratitude should be extended to the editor-in-chief, Prof. Dr. T. S. Murty, and two reviewers for their insightful review and professional comments, which greatly help to improve the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Zhang.

Appendix

Appendix

The Copula family is described as the follows:

  1. (1)

    Gumbel–Hougaard (GH) family

The GH family can be formulated as:

$$ C(u,v) = \exp \{ - [( - \ln u)^{\theta } + ( - \ln v)^{\theta } ]^{1/\theta } \} , \quad \theta \in [1,\infty ) $$
(13)

where u and v are the marginal distribution functions of two hydrological variables; θ is the parameter of GH family; C is the copula having the function of capturing the essential features of the dependence among random variables. Parameters u, v, and θ in the following equations have the same meaning as those in Eq. 13; so, no further explanations are provided thereafter. The copula generator of GH family (Zhang and Singh 2007) is

$$ \varphi (t) = ( - \ln t)^{\theta } $$
(14)

t is the u 1 or v 1, being specific values of u and v in Eq. 13 varying from 0 to 1. The relationship between the parameter, θ, and the Kendall’s coefficient of correlation, τ, between X and Y is τ = 1 − θ −1. The GH copula performs well in the description of correlation structure of two variables characterized by positive correlation.

  1. (2)

    Clayton family

The Clayton family can be formulated as:

$$ C(u,v) = (u^{ - \theta } + v^{ - \theta } - 1)^{ - 1/\theta } ,\quad \theta \in (0,\infty ) $$
(15)

The copula generator of the Clayton family is

$$ \varphi (t) = (t^{ - \theta } - 1)/\theta ,\quad \theta \in (0,\infty ) $$
(16)

The relationship between the parameter, θ, and Kendall’s coefficient of correlation, τ, between X and Y is

$$ \tau = \frac{\theta }{2 + \theta },\quad \theta \in (0,\infty ) $$
(17)

The Clayton family is good at the description of two variables having positive correlation.

  1. (3)

    Frank family

The Frank family can be formulated as:

$$ C(u,v) = - \frac{1}{\theta }\ln \left[1 + \frac{{(e^{ - \theta u} - 1)(e^{ - \theta v} - 1)}}{{(e^{ - \theta } - 1)}}\right],\quad \theta \in R $$
(18)

The copula generator of the Frank family is

$$ \varphi (t) = - \ln \frac{{e^{ - \theta t} - 1}}{{e^{ - \theta } - 1}},\quad \theta \in R $$
(19)

The relationship between parameter, θ, and Kendall’s coefficient of correlation, τ, between X and Y is

$$ \tau = 1 + \frac{4}{\theta }\left[ {\frac{1}{\theta }\int\limits_{0}^{\theta } {\frac{t}{{e^{t} - 1}}dt - 1} } \right],\quad \theta \in R $$
(20)

The Frank family describes two variables in positive correlation well.

  1. (1)

    t copula family

The t family can be formulated as:

$$ C_{v,R}^{t} \left( {u,v} \right) = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^{{t_{v}^{ - 1} \left( u \right)}} {\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{{t_{v}^{ - 1} \left( v \right)}} {\frac{1}{{2\pi (1 - \theta^{2} )^{\frac{1}{2}} }}\left[ {1 + \frac{{s^{2} - 2\theta st + t^{2} }}{{v\left( {1 - \theta^{2} } \right)}}} \right]} }^{{ - \frac{{\left( {v + 2} \right)}}{2}}} dsdt $$
(21)

\( t_{v,R}^{n} \) is the R-dimensional standard t distribution with degree of freedom of v. \( t_{v}^{ - 1} \) is the inverse function of \( t_{v,R}^{n} \).

The relationship between parameter, θ, and Kendall’s coefficient of correlation, τ, between X and Y is

$$ \theta = \sin \left( {\frac{\pi \tau }{2}} \right) $$
(22)

1.1 Conditional copula

Let X and Y be random variables with marginal distributions as u = F X (x) and v = F Y (y). The conditional distribution function of X given Y = y can be expressed by the copula method as

$$ H(X < x|Y = y) = C_{\theta } (u|v = v_{1} ) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\Updelta v \to 0} \frac{{C_{\theta } (u,v + \Updelta v) - C_{\theta } (u,v)}}{\Updelta v} = \frac{\partial }{\partial v}C_{\theta } (u,v)|v = v_{1} $$
(23)

An equivalent formula for the conditional distribution function for Y given X = x can be obtained. The conditional distribution function of X given Y ≥ y can be expressed by the copula method as

$$ C_{\theta } (u|v < v_{1} ) = \frac{{C_{\theta } (u,v)}}{v} $$
(24)

Similarly, an equivalent formula for the conditional distribution function for Y given X < x can be obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, CL., Zhang, Q., Singh, V.P. et al. Copula-based evaluations of drought variations in Guangdong, South China. Nat Hazards 59, 1533–1546 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9850-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9850-4

Keywords

Navigation