Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional landslide susceptibility: spatiotemporal variations under dynamic soil moisture conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantification of landslide susceptibility variability in space and time in response to static and dynamic conditions is a fundamental research challenge. Here, we identify and apply new modeling and remote sensing observation techniques to statistically characterize susceptibility distributions under dynamic moisture conditions. The methods are applied at two study regions: Cleveland Corral, California, US and Dhading, Nepal. The results show that the temporal variability of safety factors is lower during the wet season than the dry season, but this variability, when scaled by mean seasonal stability, is constant annually. Relative variability differs by region with lower variability in Nepal, the highly susceptible region. L-Moment evaluations indicate that Nepal has a consistent, regional probability distribution, but that California has two distinct distributions. The variability in time is not normally distributed for either region. For both regions, transitional characteristic of safety factors show a strong power law relationship between the average duration and number of periods during which sites are highly susceptible. Because the mapped landslide locations typically had frequent crossings with brief unstable conditions, a consistent physical mechanism is pointed to as a possible cause of slope failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya G, De Smedt F, Long NT (2006) Assessing landslide hazard in GIS: a case study from Rasuwa, Nepal. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(1):99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler R, Hong Y, Huffman GJ (2006) An experimental global prediction system for rainfall-triggered landslides. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on landslide risk analysis and sustainable disaster management (IPL 2007), 21–25 Jan 2007, United Nations University, Tokyo

  • Bathurst JC, Bovolo CI, Cisneros F (2010) Modelling the effect of forest cover on shallow landslides at the river basin scale. Ecol Eng 36:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnard CH, Tacher L, Beniston M (2008) Prediction of landslide movements caused by climate change: modelling the behaviour of a mean elevation large slide in the Alps and assessing its uncertainties. In: Chen et al. (eds) Proceedings of 10th international symposium on landslides and engineered slopes, Xi’an, vol 1, pp 217–227

  • Borga M, Dalla Fontana G, Da Ros D, Marchi L (1998) Shallow landslide hazard assessment using physically based model and digital elevation data. Env Geol 35(2–3):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzdyka AM (1974) Failure of austenitic steel under conditions of cyclic stress relaxation at 750°C. Strength Mater 6(1):47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton A, Bathurst JC (1998) Physically based modeling of shallow landslide sediment yield at a catchment scale. Env Geol 35(2–3):89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Gegrafiska Annaler Ser A Phys Geogr 62(1–2):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda J, Hoeg K, Nadim F (2010) Landslide-triggering rainfall thresholds: a conceptual framework. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 43:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi M, Jacobs JM (2011) Soil moisture structure for different topographies during Soil Moisture Experiment 2005 (SMEX05). Hydrol Process 25(6):926–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi M, Jacobs JM, Cosh M (2007) Scaled spatial variability of soil moisture fields. Geophys Res Lett 34:L01401. doi:10.1029/2006GL028247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp RB, Hornberger GM (1978) Empirical equations for some soil hydrologic properties. Water Resour Res 14(4):601–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Current Landslide Status”. USGS Landslide Hazards Program. 21 Jan 2011. <http://landslides.usgs.gov/monitoring/hwy50/status.php>

  • Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M (2008) Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence. Geomorphology 102:496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis TJ, Keller CP (1997) Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11(5):409–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deoja BB, Dhital M, Thapa B, Wagner A (1991) Mountain risk engineering handbook. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, p 875

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingman SL (2002) Physical hydrology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 646

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner J, Dec D, Peng X, Horn R (2009) Change of shrinkage behavior of an Andisol in southern Chile: effects of land use and wetting/drying cycles. Soil Tillage Res 106:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (1998) Establishing the frequency and magnitude of landslide-triggering rainstorm events in New Zealand. Env Geol 35(2–3):160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Gessler PE, Boll J, Elliot WJ, Foltz RB (2006) Spatially and temporally distributed modelling of landslide susceptibility. Geomorphology 80:178–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulla G, Antronico L, Iaquinta P, Terranova O (2008) Susceptibility and triggering scenarios at a regional scale for shallow landslides. Geomorphology 99:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1–4):181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JRM (1990) L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J R Stat Soc B 52:105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis. An approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36(7):1897–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Major JJ (1987) Rainfall, ground-water flow, and seasonal movement at Minor Creek landslide, northwestern California: physical interpretation of empirical relations. Geol Soc Am Bull 99:579–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs JM, Mohanty BP, Hsu E, Miller DA (2004) Field scale soil moisture variability and similarity from point measurements during SMEX02. Remote Sens Environ 92:436–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal P, van Westen CJ (2009) Estimating temporal probability of landslide initiation along transportation routes based on rainfall thresholds. Geomorphology 112:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan HX, Zhou CH, Martin CD (2005) Dynamic characteristics analysis of shallow landslides in response to rainfall event using GIS. Env Geol 47:254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26(7):1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CT, Huang CC, Lee JF, Pan KL, Lin ML, Dong JJ (2008) Statistical approach to storm event-induced landslides susceptibility. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:941–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Ma T, Zhu X (2010) aiNet- and GIS-based regional prediction system for the spatial and temporal probability of rainfall-triggered landslides. Nat Hazards 52:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for GSMs. J Geophys Res 99(D7):14415–14428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisina C, Scarabelli S (2007) A comparative analysis of terrain stability models for predicting shallow landslides in colluvial soils. Geomorphology 87:207–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DA, White RA (1998) A conterminous United States multi-layer soil characteristics data set for regional climate and hydrology modeling. Earth Interact 2. Available on-line at http://EarthInteractions.org

  • Mitchell KE, Lohman D, Houser PR, Wood EF, Schaake JC, Robock A, Cosgrove BA, Sheffield J, Duan Q, Luo L, Higgins RW, Pinker RT, Tarpley JD, Lettenmaier DP, Marshall CH, Entin JK, Pan M, Shi W, Koren V, Meng J, Ramsay BH, Bailey AA (2004) The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and parameters in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res 109:Do7S90. doi:1029/2003JD003823

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30(4):1153–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhuber W, Hofbauer W, Kofler W (2001) Mortality and growth anomalies of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growing on drought exposed sites at the Tschirgant Landslide (Tyrol). Ber Nat Med 88:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack RT, Tarboton DG, Goodwin CN (1998) The SINMAP approach to terrain stability mapping. In: Moore DP, Hungr O (eds) Proceedings of international congress of the international association for engineering geology and the environment 8, v. 2, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1157–1165

  • Pelletier JD, Malamud BD, Blodgett T, Turcotte DL (1997) Scale-invariance of soil moisture variability and its implications for the frequency-size distribution of landslides. Eng Geol 48(3–4):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires LF, Cooper M, Cassaro FAM, Reichardt K, Bacchi OOS, Dias NMP (2008) Micromorphological analysis to characterize structure modifications of soil samples submitted to wetting and drying cycles. Catena 72:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porporato A, Laio F, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2001) Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress III. Vegetation water stress. Adv Water Resour 24:725–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahardjo H (2000) Rainfall-induced slope failures. Research Rep. No. NSTB 17/6/16. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray RL (2004) Slope stability analysis using GIS on a Regional Scale: a case study from Dhading, Nepal. MSc. thesis in Physical Land Resources, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, p 98

  • Ray RL, De Smedt F (2009) Slope Stability Analysis using GIS on a Regional Scale: a case study from Dhading, Nepal. Env Geol 57(7):1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray RL, Jacobs JM, de Alba P (2010a) Impact of unsaturated zone soil moisture and groundwater table on slope instability. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(10):1448–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray RL, Jacobs JM, Cosh M (2010b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using downscaled AMSR-E soil moisture: a case study from Cleveland Corral, California, US. Remote Sens Environ 114:2624–2636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid ME, Brien DL, LaHusen RG, Roering JJ, de la Fuente J, Ellen SD (2003) Debris-flow initiation from large, slow-moving landslides. In: Rickenmann and Chen (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Millpress, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 77017 78X

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation-with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Lehmann P, Or D (2010) Quantifying lateral root reinforcement in steep slopes—from a bundle of roots to tree stands. Earth Surf Proc Land 35:354–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seguel O, Horn R (2006) Structure properties and pore dynamics in aggregate beds due to wetting—drying cycles. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle RC, Ochiai H (2006) Landslides: processes, prediction, and land use. American Geophysical Union. Water Resour Monogr 18:312

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW, DeLory FA (1957) Stability of natural slopes in London clay. In: Proceedings 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, London, vol 2, pp 378–381

  • Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. US General Soil Map (STATSGO) for CA, 4 Jan 2008, http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov

  • Spittler TE, Wagner DL (1998) Geology and slope stability along highway 50. Calif Geol 51(3):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1993) Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 18.1–18.66

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanini MC (2004) Spatio-temporal analysis of a complex landslide in the Northern Apennines (Italy) by means of dendrochronology. Geomorphology 63:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi A, Uijlenhoet R, Troch PA (2008) A low-dimensional physically based model of hydrologic control of shallow landsliding on complex hillslopes. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:1964–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosattig G (2006) The unusual Ca’ Bonettini landslide (Province of Modena, Italy). Atti Soc Nat Mat Modena 137:145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner TR, Duke SD, Fransen BR, Reiter ML, Kroll AJ, Ward JW, Bach JL, Justice TE, Bilby RE (2010) Landslide densities associated with rainfall, stand age, and topography on forested landscapes, southwestern Washington, USA. For Ecol Manag 259:2233–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, Terlien TJ (1996) An approach towards deterministic landslide hazard analysis in GIS: a case study from Manizales (Colombia). Earth Surf Proc Land 21:853–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1993) L moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams. Water Resour Res 29(6):1745–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Wilson I (1996) Probability distribution of annual maximum, mean, and minimum streamflows in the United States. J Hydrol Eng 1(2):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Sidle RC (1995) A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resour Res 31(8):2097–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Zhang L (2010) The mechanism of a railway landslide caused by rainfall. Landslides 7:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemenu G, Martine A, Roger C (2009) Analysis of the behaviour of a natural expansive soil under cyclic drying and wetting. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zezere JL, Trigo RM, Trigo IF (2005) Shallow and deep landslides induced by rainfall in the Lisbon region (Portugal): assessment of relationships with the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge NASA’s research funding through Earth System Science Fellowship, Grant No: NNG05GP66H, for this research. We would also like to thank Dr. M. E. Reid for providing information about Cleveland Corral Landslide area and in situ groundwater measurements. We are also indebted to three reviewers whose extensive comments greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ram L. Ray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ray, R.L., Jacobs, J.M. & Ballestero, T.P. Regional landslide susceptibility: spatiotemporal variations under dynamic soil moisture conditions. Nat Hazards 59, 1317–1337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9834-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9834-4

Keywords

Navigation