Skip to main content
Log in

Rainfall intensity–duration thresholds for postfire debris-flow emergency-response planning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following wildfires, emergency-response and public-safety agencies can be faced with evacuation and resource-deployment decisions well in advance of coming winter storms and during storms themselves. Information critical to these decisions is provided for recently burned areas in the San Gabriel Mountains of southern California. A compilation of information on the hydrologic response to winter storms from recently burned areas in southern California steeplands is used to develop a system for classifying magnitudes of hydrologic response. The four-class system describes combinations of reported volumes of individual debris flows, consequences of debris flows and floods in an urban setting, and spatial extents of the hydrologic response. The range of rainfall conditions associated with different magnitude classes is defined by integrating local rainfall data with the response magnitude information. Magnitude I events can be expected when within-storm rainfall accumulations (A) of given durations (D) fall above the threshold A = 0.4D 0.5 and below A = 0.5D 0.6 for durations greater than 1 h. Magnitude II events will be generated in response to rainfall accumulations and durations between A = 0.4D 0.5 and A = 0.9D 0.5 for durations less than 1 h, and between A = 0.5D 0.6 and A = 0.9D 0.5 or durations greater than 1 h. Magnitude III events can be expected in response to rainfall conditions above the threshold A = 0.9D 0.5. Rainfall threshold-magnitude relations are linked with potential emergency-response actions as an emergency-response decision chart, which leads a user through steps to determine potential event magnitudes and identify possible evacuation and resource-deployment levels. Use of this information in planning and response decision-making process could result in increased safety for both the public and emergency responders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruington AE (1982) Fire-loosened sediment menaces the city. In: Proceedings of the symposium on dynamics and management of mediterranean-type ecosystems, US Dep Agric For Serv, Pac Southwest for range Exp Stn Gen Tech Rep PSW-58, pp 420–422

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geogr Ann 62A:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE (2005) Wildfire-related debris flow from a hazards perspective, chapter 15. In: Hungr O, Jacob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Praxis Books in Geophysical Sciences, USA pp 321–344

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Wilson RC, Laber JL (2008) Storm rainfall conditions for floods and debris flows from recently burned areas in southwestern Colorado and southern California. Geomorphol 96:250–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Rupert MG, Michael JA, Staley DB, Worstell BB (2009) Emergency assessment of postfire debris-flow Hazards for the 2009 Station Fire, San Gabriel Mountains, southern California. US Geological Surv Open-File Rep 2009–1227

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Rupert MG, Michael JA, Rea AH, Parrett C (2010) Predicting the probability and volume of post-wildfire debris flows in the intermountain west, USA. Geol Soc Am Bul 122:127–144; doi: 10.1130/B26459.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawner WD (1934) The Montrose-La Crescenta (California) flood of January 1, 1934, and its sedimentary aspects California Institute of Technology, MS thesis http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-07242007-092251

  • Chawner WD (1935) Alluvial fan flooding: the Montrose, California flood of 1934. Geogr Rev 25:235–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins L (2008) Mud & debris flow rescue concepts. Tech Rescue, Issue 53

  • Eaton EC (1936) Flood and erosion control problems and their solution. Proc Am Soc Civil Eng 62:1302–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW, Baum RL, Chleborad AF (2006) Rainfall characteristics for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington, USA. Earth Surf Proc Land 31:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoretti C, Dalla Fontana G (2007) Rainfall threshold for the initiation of debris flows by channel-bed failure in the Dolomites. In: Chen CL, Major JJ (eds) Debris-flow mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment. Milpress, Netherlands, pp 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows—an update. Landslides 5:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flow. Reviews in Geophysics 35:245–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M (2005) A size classification for debris flows. Eng Geol 79:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen MC, Simon A (1993) Rainfall intensity-duration threshold for landslides in a humid-tropical environment, Puerto Rico. Geogr Ann 75A:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee JA (1989) The control of nature: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 272 p

  • Moody JA, Martin DA (2009) Synthesis of sediment yields after wildland fire in different rainfall regimes in the western United States. Int J Wildland Fire 18:94–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Interagency Fire Center (2009) Station Fire Situation Report, http://www.nifc.gov/nicc/index.htm

  • Reid ME, Iverson RM, LaHusen RG, Logan M, Godt JW, Griswold JP, Swinford KJ, Denlinger RP (2009) Entrainment of bed sediment by debris flows–large-scale experiments: Geological Soc Am. Abstracts with Programs 41:610

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM, de Wolfe VG, Higgins JD, Cannon SH, Gartner JE (2008) Source of debris flow material in burned areas. Geomorphol 96:310–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott KM (1971) Origin and sedimentology of 1969 debris flows near Glendora, California: US Geological Surv Professional Pap 750-C:C242–C247

  • Scott KM, Williams RP (1978) Erosion and sediment yields in the Transverse Ranges. southern California: US Geological Survey Professional Pap 1030:38

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuriman G, Slosson JE (1992) Forensic engineering: environmental case histories for civil engineers and geologists, Chap 8. Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Javanovich, San Diego, pp 168–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley DM, Schmidt KM, Hanshaw MN, Kean JW, Stock JD (2008) Assessing the influence of multiple rainfall pulses on soil moisture dynamics during long duration frontal storms: Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union, v 89, no 53, Fall Meeting Supplement Abstract H51D-0849

  • Troxell HC, Peterson JQ (1937) Flood in La Canada Valley, California, US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 796-C, 53–98

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (2005) Analyses of the debris sedimentation impacts at selected debris basins associated with the wildfires of 2003 the December 25, 2003 storm: after action report, hydrology hydraulics Section. US Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District 45 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Water R (2000) Burned area emergency rehabilitation lesson plan, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Klamath National Forest. Yreka, Calif 21 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Glade T (2005) Climatic factors influencing the occurrence of debris flows. In: Hungr O, Jacob M (eds) Debris flow hazards and related phenomena: Praxis. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan H. Cannon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cannon, S.H., Boldt, E.M., Laber, J.L. et al. Rainfall intensity–duration thresholds for postfire debris-flow emergency-response planning. Nat Hazards 59, 209–236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9747-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9747-2

Keywords

Navigation