Skip to main content
Log in

Coupling between internal and surface waves

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a fluid system in which two immiscible layers are separated by a sharp free interface, there can be strong coupling between large amplitude nonlinear waves on the interface and waves in the overlying free surface. We study the regime where long waves propagate in the interfacial mode, which are coupled to a modulational regime for the free-surface mode. This is a system of Boussinesq equations for the internal mode, coupled to the linear Schrödinger equations for wave propagation on the free surface, and respectively a version of the Korteweg-de Vries equation for the internal mode in case of unidirectional motions. The perturbation methods are based on the Hamiltonian formulation for the original system of irrotational Euler’s equations, as described in (Benjamin and Bridges, J Fluid Mech 333:301–325, 1997, Craig et al., Comm Pure Appl Math 58:1587–1641, 2005a, Zakharov, J Appl Mech Tech Phys 9:190–194, 1968), using the perturbation theory for the modulational regime that is given in (Craig et al. to appear). We focus in particular on the situation in which the internal wave gives rise to localized bound states for the Schrödinger equation, which are interpreted as surface wave patterns that give a characteristic signature of the presence of an internal wave soliton. We also comment on the discrepancies between the free interface-free surface cases and the approximation of the upper boundary condition by a rigid lid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjamin TB (1966) Internal waves of finite amplitude and permanent form. J Fluid Mech 25:241–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin TB (1967) Internal waves of permanent form of great depth. J Fluid Mech 29:559–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin TB, Bridges TJ (1997) Reappraisal of the Kelvin-Helmholtz problem. I. Hamiltonian structure. J Fluid Mech 333:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bona JL, Lannes D, Saut J-C (2008) Asymptotic models for internal waves. J Math Pures Appl 89:538–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi W, Camassa R (1999) Fully nonlinear internal waves in a two-fluid system. J Fluid Mech 396:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coifman R, Meyer Y (1985) Nonlinear harmonic analysis and analytic dependence. Pseudodifferential operators and applications (Notre Dame, 1984), 71–78. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 43. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI

  • Colin T, Lannes D (2001) Long-wave short-wave resonance for nonlinear geometric optics. Duke Math J 107:351–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Groves M (1994) Hamiltonian long-wave approximations to the water-wave problem. Wave Motion 19:367–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Groves M (2000) Normal forms for waves in fluid interfaces. Wave Motion 31:21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Guyenne P, Kalisch H (2004) A new model for large amplitude long internal waves. C R Mecanique 332:525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Guyenne P, Kalisch H (2005a) Hamiltonian long-wave expansions for free surfaces and interfaces. Comm Pure Appl Math 58:1587–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Guyenne P, Nicholls DP, Sulem C (2005b) Hamiltonian long-wave expansions for water waves over a rough bottom. Proc R Soc A 461:839–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Guyenne P, Sulem C (2010) A Hamiltonian approach to nonlinear modulation of surface water waves. Wave Motion. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2010.04.002

  • Craig W, Nicholls DP (2002) Traveling gravity water waves in two and three dimensions. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 21:615–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W, Sulem C (1993) Numerical simulation of gravity waves. J Comput Phys 108:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias F, Ilichev A (2001) Interfacial waves with free-surface boundary conditions: an approach via a model equation. Physica D 150:278–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne V (2009) Asymptotic shallow water models for internal waves in a two-fluid system with a free surface. Preprint, ArXiv:0906.0839v1

  • Fazioli C, Nicholls DP (2008) Parametric analyticity of functional variations of Dirichlet-Neumann operators. Diff Int Eq 21:541–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Gear J, Grimshaw R (1984) Weak and strong interactions between internal solitary waves. Stud Appl Math 70:235–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Ocean Associates (2002) Contribution to An atlas of internal solitary waves: The Andaman Sea. Report prepared for the Office of Naval Research, code 322PO

  • Hashizume Y (1980) Interaction between short surface waves and long internal waves. J Phys Soc Japan 48:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1960) Mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford-London-New York-Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne AR, Burch TL (1980) Internal solitons in the Andaman Sea. Science 208:451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parau E, Dias F (2001) Interfacial periodic waves of permanent form with free-surface boundary conditions. J Fluid Mech 437:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters AD, Stoker JJ (1960) Solitary waves in liquids having non-constant density. Comm Pure Appl Math 13:115–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakharov VE (1968) Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 9:190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Walter Craig is partially supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program and NSERC through grant number 238452–06. Philippe Guyenne acknowledges support from the NSF through grant numbers DMS–0625931 and DMS–0920850. Catherine Sulem is partially supported by NSERC through grant number 46179–05.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Craig.

Appendix

Appendix

We present here a recursion formula for the higher-order terms in the Taylor series expansion for \(G_{j\ell}^{(m)}(\eta,\eta_1).\) We distinguish two cases. The first is the special case where m = (m 0, 0) or (0, m 1), and the second is the more general case, where m = (m 0, m 1) where neither m 0, m 1 = 0. In the first case, let m = (m 0, 0). Then we can read from the matrix Eqs. 11, using 30, 31, 32 and 33, the following expressions for the matrix coefficients: the (11)-coefficient is

$$ \begin{aligned} G_{11}^{(m_0,0)}(\eta) & = \frac{1}{m_0!} D \eta^{m_0}(x) D^{m_0} \left( \frac{e^{-h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}+\frac{(-1)^{m_0}e^{h_1D}} {e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right)\\ & + \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0 \geq 1 \\ q_0+p_0=m_0\\ q_1 = 0 = p_1\end{subarray}} G_{11}^{(q_0,0)}(\eta) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{e^{-h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}+ \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}e^{h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right), \end{aligned} $$
(64)

the (21)-coefficient is

$$ G_{21}^{(m_0,0)}(\eta) = \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0 \geq 1 \\ q_0+p_0=m_0 \\ q_1 = 0 = p_1 \end{subarray}} G_{21}^{(q_0,0)}(\eta) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{e^{-h_1D}} {e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}e^{h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right), $$
(65)

the (12)-coefficient is

$$ \begin{aligned} G_{12}^{(m_0,0)}(\eta) & = -\frac{1}{m_0!} D \eta^{m_0}(x) D^{m_0} \left(\frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{m_0}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} \right) \\ & -\sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0 \geq 1 \\ q_0+p_0=m_0 \\ q_1 = 0 = p_1 \end{subarray}} G_{11}^{(q_0,0)}(\eta) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}} {e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right), \end{aligned} $$
(66)

and the (22)-coefficient is

$$ G_{22}^{(m_0,0)}(\eta) = - \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0 \geq 1 \\ q_0+p_0=m_0 \\ q_1 = 0 = p_1 \end{subarray}} G_{21}^{(q_0,0)}(\eta) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} \right). $$
(67)

A recursive computation of \(G_{j\ell}^{(m_0, 0)}(\eta)\) can be based upon formula (64) for \(G_{11}^{(m_0, 0)}(\eta), m_0 > 0\) and formula (65) for \(G_{21}^{(m_0, 0)}(\eta), m_0 > 0.\) This is sufficient information in order to calculate \(G_{12}^{(m_0, 0)}(\eta)\) and \(G_{22}^{(m_0, 0)}(\eta)\) from respectively (66) and (67).

It is a general fact that

$$ G_{j\ell}^{(m_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) = G_{\ell j}^{(m_1,m_0)}(-\eta_1,-\eta) $$
(68)

which allows us to deduce the form of \(G_{j\ell}^{(0,m_1)}(\eta_1),\) with j, ℓ = 1, 2 from the above expressions. As well, each matrix operator \(G_{j\ell}^{(m)}\) is self adjoint, which is not necessarily self-evident from the above formulae. Thus in particular \(\left(G_{12}^{(m)}\right)^{\ast} = G_{21}^{(m)}.\) Therefore, the latter can be obtained from (66), which itself depends upon the recursion (64) alone.

The second case consists of those multi indices m = (m 0, m 1) where neither m 0 nor m 1 vanish. The m-order terms on the right-hand side of the relation (11) are zero, as is seen in (32, 33). Working as in the first case, we find an expression for the (11)-coefficient to be

$$ \begin{aligned} G_{11}^{(m_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) & = \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq p_0\leq m_0 \\q_0+p_0=m_0\\ p_1 = 0\end{subarray}} G_{11}^{(q_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{e^{-h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}e^{h_1D}} {e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right) \\ & + \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0=0 \\ 1\leq p_1\leq m_1 \\ q_1+p_1=m_1\end{subarray}} G_{12}^{(m_0,q_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_1!} \eta_1^{p_1}(x) D^{p_1} \left( \frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_1+1}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right). \end{aligned} $$

The (21)-coefficient is

$$ \begin{aligned} G_{21}^{(m_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) & = \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} 1\leq p_0\leq m_0 \\q_0+p_0=m_0\\ p_1 = 0\end{subarray}} G_{21}^{(q_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{e^{-h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}e^{h_1D}} {e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right) \\ & + \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0=0 \\ 1\leq p_1\leq m_1 \\ q_1+p_1=m_1\end{subarray}} G_{22}^{(m_0,q_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_1!} \eta_1^{p_1}(x) D^{p_1} \left( \frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_1+1}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right). \end{aligned} $$

The (12)-coefficient is the operator

$$ \begin{aligned} G_{12}^{(m_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) & = -\sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq p_0\leq m_0 \\ q_0+p_0=m_0\\ p_1 = 0\end{subarray}} G_{11}^{(q_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right)\\ & -\sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c}p_0=0 \\ 1\leq p_1\leq m_1 \\ q_1+p_1=m_1\end{subarray}} G_{12}^{(m_0,q_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_1!} \eta_1^{p_1}(x) D^{p_1} \left( \frac{e^{h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_1+1}e^{-h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right). \end{aligned} $$

Finally, the (22)-coefficient is

$$ \begin{aligned} G_{22}^{(m_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) & = -\sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq p_0\leq m_0 \\ q_0+p_0=m_0\\ p_1 = 0\end{subarray}} G_{21}^{(q_0,m_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_0!} \eta^{p_0}(x) D^{p_0} \left( \frac{1}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_0+1}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right) \\ & -\sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c} p_0=0 \\ 1\leq p_1\leq m_1 \\ q_1+p_1=m_1\end{subarray}} G_{22}^{(m_0,q_1)}(\eta,\eta_1) \frac{1}{p_1!} \eta_1^{p_1}(x) D^{p_1} \left( \frac{e^{h_1D}} {e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}} + \frac{(-1)^{p_1+1}e^{-h_1D}}{e^{h_1D} - e^{-h_1D}}\right). \end{aligned} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craig, W., Guyenne, P. & Sulem, C. Coupling between internal and surface waves. Nat Hazards 57, 617–642 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9535-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9535-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation