Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting community earthquake preparedness: a cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a study investigating cross-cultural equivalence in predictors of earthquake preparedness. Data were collected from Napier (New Zealand) and Kyoto (Japan). These locations were selected because they face comparable levels of seismic risk but differ with respect to their cultural characteristics. This mix of hazard similarity and cultural differences provided an opportunity to assess the degree of cross-cultural equivalence in predictors of earthquake preparedness. Cross-cultural equivalence was examined by assessing the degree to which individual hazard beliefs (outcome expectancies) and social characteristics (community participation, collective efficacy, empowerment, trust) could explain levels of hazard preparedness in each location. Structural equation modelling analyses revealed similarity in the pattern of relationships between predictor variables and intention prepare in the Napier and Kyoto data. It is argued that this provides support for the existence of some universal, cross-cultural equivalence in how hazard beliefs and social characteristics interact to predict the degree to which people adopt earthquake preparedness measures. Differences between the data sets are discussed in the context of the fundamental cultural differences between Japan and New Zealand. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anckermann S, Dominguez M, Sotol N, Kjaerulf F, Berliner P, Mikkelsen EN (2005) Psycho-social support to large numbers of traumatized people in post-conflict societies: an approach to community development in guatemala. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 15:136–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle JL (2006) Amos 6.0 user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajek R, Matsuda Y, Okada N (2008) Japan’s Jishu-bosai-soshiki community activities: analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management. Nat Hazards 44:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy and agency of change. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet P, Murphy S (1997) Psychology and health promotion. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin R (2000) Understanding culture’s influence on behaviour. Wadsworth, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Child I (2008) Emergence of new Volunteerism: increasing community resilience to natural disasters in Japan. In: Gow K, Paton D (eds) The phoenix of natural disasters: community resilience. Nova, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Suh EM (2000) Culture and subjective well-being. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Okut H, Strycker LA, Hix-Small H (2003) A multilevel contextual model of neighbourhood collective efficacy. Am J Community Psychol 32:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval TS, Mulilis JP (1999) A person-relative-to-event (PrE) approach to negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a field study. J Appl Soc Psychol 29:495–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle TC (2004) Thinking aloud about trust: a protocol analysis of trust in risk management. Risk Anal 24:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle TC, Cvetkovich GT (1995) Social trust: towards a cosmopolitan society. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Eng E, Parker E (1994) Measuring community competence in the Mississippi Delta: the interface between program evaluation and empowerment. Health Educ Q 21:199–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg CE, Houghton BF (2006) Natural hazards. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang L, LaMendola W (2006) The Hakka spirit as a predictor of resilience. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee H, Knox RT (1970) Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. J Conflict Resolut 14:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Nicholls R, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazard 5:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2000) Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Anal 20:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lion R, Meertens RM, Bot I (2002) Priorities in information desire about unknown risks. Risk Anal 22:765–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee TK, Russell S (2003) “Its just a natural way of life…” an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia. Environ Hazard 5:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano L (2005) Community volunteers in Japan: everyday stories of social change. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan A, Heine SJ (2005) Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know? Psychol Bull 131:763–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2000) Emergency planning: integrating community development, community resilience and hazard mitigation. J Am Soc Prof Emerg Manag 7:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2006a) Disaster resilience: building capacity to co-exist with natural hazards and their consequences. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2006b) Disaster resilience: integrating individual, community, institutional and environmental perspectives. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2008) Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectiveness. Int J Glob Environ Issues 8:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Bishop B (1996) Disasters and communities: promoting psychosocial well-being. In: Paton D, Long N (eds) Psychological aspects of disaster: impact, coping, and intervention. Dunmore Press, Palmerston North

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Jang L (2010) Disaster resilience: exploring all-hazards and cross cultural perspectives. In: Miller D, Rivera J (eds) Community disaster recovery and resiliency: exploring global opportunities and challenges. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Johnston D (2006) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Wright L (2008) Preparing for bushfires: the public education challenges facing fire agencies. In: Handmer J, Haynes K (eds) Community bushfire safety. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Smith LM, Johnston D (2005) When good intentions turn bad: promoting natural hazard preparedness. Aust J Emerg Manag 20:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, McClure J, Bürgelt PT (2006) Natural hazard resilience: the role of individual and household preparedness. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Bürgelt PT, Prior T (2008a) Living with bushfire risk: social and environmental influences on preparedness. Aust J Emerg Manag 23:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Lachman R, Lachman J, Johnston DM, Wongbusarakum S (2008b) The impact of the December 26th 2004 tsunami on coastal Thai communities: assessing adaptive capacity. Disasters 32:106–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga Y (1997) Towards convergence? In: Berry J, Poortinga Y, Pandey J (eds) Theory and method: Vol. 1. Handbook of cross cultural psychology, 2nd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 347–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich RC, Edelstein M, Hallman WK, Wandersman AH (1995) Citizen participation and empowerment: the case of local environmental hazards. Am J Community Psychol 23:657–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G (2000) Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 20:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L (1999) Consequences of perceived risk: demand for risk mitigation. J Risk Res 2:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer PW, Peterson NA (2000) Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: testing cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains. Soc Work Res 24:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuki S (2000) The Kobe earthquake and the renaissance of volunteerism in Japan. Kwansei Gakuin Univ Dep Sociol Stud 87:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC (1995) Individualism and collectivism. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RH, Nigg JM, Paz DH (1986) Waiting for disaster: earthquake watch in California. University of California Press, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro SJ, Blair V, Peterson C, Zazanis M (1995) Collective efficacy. In: Maddux JE (ed) Self efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: theory, research, and application. Plenum Press, New York, pp 305–328

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia

    Douglas Paton & David McIvor

  2. Research Center for Disaster Reduction Systems, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, 611-0011, Japan

    Robert Bajek & Norio Okada

Authors
  1. Douglas Paton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Bajek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norio Okada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David McIvor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Paton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paton, D., Bajek, R., Okada, N. et al. Predicting community earthquake preparedness: a cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand. Nat Hazards 54, 765–781 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9500-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9500-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation