Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of selected global disaster risk assessment results

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compare country risk rankings derived from two recently published global disaster risk analyses. One set of country rankings is based on the Disaster Risk Index (DRI) developed by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Division of Early Warning and Assessment Global Resource Information Database project under a contract to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The other is based on an index of disaster mortality risk developed by the Global Natural Disaster Risk Hotspots project implemented by Columbia University, the World Bank and associated partners. We convert data from these sources into two comparable indexes of disaster mortality risk and rank countries according to the resulting values for a set of natural hazards common to both studies. The country rankings are moderately correlated, ranging from .41 to .56 for individual hazards to .31 for multi-hazard mortality risks. We identify the top 25 countries according to the mortality risk values we recomputed from each study’s results to show the degree to which countries are highly ranked in common. The numbers of countries common to both lists for individual hazards range from 7 to 16 out of 25. The correspondence among the top 25 ranked countries is lowest for earthquakes and floods. Only 6 out of 25 countries are common to both lists in the multi-hazard case. We suggest that while the convergence in the results for some hazards is encouraging, more work is needed to improve data and methods, particularly with respect to assessing the role of vulnerability in the creation of risk and the calculation of multi-hazard risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DRI:

Disaster Risk Index

EM-DAT:

Emergency events database

GIS:

Geographic information system

ISDR:

International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

UNDP:

United Nations Development Program

UNEP:

United Nations Environment Program

GSHAP:

Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program

GPW:

Gridded population of the world

PGA:

Peak ground acceleration

References

  • Cardona OD (2005) Indicators of disaster risk and risk management: program for Latin America and the Caribbean. Summary report. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 43 pp

  • CIESIN IFPRI, WRI (2000) Gridded population of the world (GPW), version 2. http://sedac.ciesin.org/plue/gpw/

  • Dilley M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam AL, Arnold M, Agwe J, Buys P, Kjekstad O, Lyon B, Yetman G (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and Columbia University, Washington, DC, 132 pp

  • Hays WL (1973) Statistics for the social sciences, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 954 pp

  • IEG-World Bank (Independent Evaluation Group-World Bank) (2006) IEG good practice awards: 2006 winners. http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/awards/2006_winners_natural_disasters.html

  • Instituto de Estudios Ambientales (IDEA), National University of Colombia-Manizales (2005) Indicators of disaster risk and risk management: program for Latin America and the Caribbean. Main technical report. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 216 pp

  • International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) (2005) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015, 22 pp. http://www.unisdr.org/asiapacific/ap-hfa/hf-ap.htm

  • IRI/Columbia University, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Climate Prediction Center (2002) Merged analysis of precipitation (CMAP) monthly gridded precipitation. http://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu

  • Pelling M (2004) Visions of risk: a review of global indicators of disaster risk and its management. Report for the ISDR inter-agency task force on Disaster Reduction Working Group 3: risk, vulnerability and disaster impact assessment, 73 pp

  • United Nations Development Programme-UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York, 137 pp. http://www.undp.org/bcpr/disred/documents/publications/rdr/english/rdr_english.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Gregory Yetman and Randolph Pullen from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) at the Earth Institute of Columbia University for providing the raw Hotspots data in a timely manner. We also wish to thank Pascal Peduzzi, Christian Herold and Hy Dao from the UNEP/DEWA/GRID Geneva for providing the raw mortality risk data from the DRI project. Two anonymous reviewers made helpful comments that substantially strengthened the paper. Any errors of fact or interpretation are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Mosquera-Machado.

Additional information

The views expressed are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of SM² Consulting Multi-Hazards and Risk Holistic Solutions or the United Nations Development Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mosquera-Machado, S., Dilley, M. A comparison of selected global disaster risk assessment results. Nat Hazards 48, 439–456 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9272-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9272-0

Keywords

Navigation