Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of site effects in Montreal, Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent destructive earthquakes have clearly shown that near-surface geological conditions play a major role in the level of ground shaking in urban areas. In Canada, Montreal is ranked second for seismic risk after Vancouver considering its population and regional seismic hazard. The city is largely built on recent unconsolidated marine and river deposits and most of its infrastructure is old and deteriorated. A seismic risk project that includes a combined methodology for site effects zoning in large cities, using microtremor measurements (H/V method) coupled with 1D numerical modelling (SHAKE91), has been initiated. The experimental approach gives good estimates of the fundamental frequency of soft deposits, while the numerical approach provides good estimates of the soil response in terms of amplification factor related to frequency. Main mechanical properties of soft soils were compiled from various data available, and a sample of input rock motions from real and synthetic earthquakes was used to compute soil response. The influence of marine clays on soil response is significant and is well correlated with thickness of these deposits. PGA amplification factors range from 2 to 4 at frequencies from 2 to 7 Hz, with some occasional larger values. The results demonstrate that the methodology used for our study is both fast and efficient to determine the influence of soft soils in urban environments. Such studies are essential for the effective deployment of seismic instrumentation, land-use planning and seismic mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J, Halchuk S (2003) Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada. Open File Report, Geological Survey of Canada, 4459, 115 pp

  • Adams J, Atkinson G (2002) Development of seismic hazard maps for the proposed 2005 National Building Code of Canada. Can J Civ Eng 30(2 Special Issue):255–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams J, Basham PW (1991) The seismicity and seismotectonics of eastern Canada. In: Slemmons DB, Engdhal ER, Zoback MD, Blackwell DD (eds) Neotectonic of North America, vol 1. Geological Society of America, Boulder Colorado Decade Map

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams J, Rogers G, Halchuck S, McCormack D, Cassidy J (2002) The case of an advanced national earthquake monitoring system for Canada’s cities at risk. Proceedings of the 7th NCEE conference, Boston, 10 pp

  • Atkinson GM, Beresnev IA (1998) Compatible ground-motion time histories for new national seismic hazard maps. Can J Civ Eng 25:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard, P.-Y. (1999). Microtremor measurements: a tool for site estimation? State-of-the-art paper. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion, Yokohama, December 1–3, 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam, 3, pp 1252–1279

  • Benjumea B, Hunter JA, Pullan SE, Burns RA, Good RL (2001) Near-surface seismic studies to estimate potential earthquake ground motion amplification at a thick soil site in the Ottawa river valley. Proceedings, SAGEEP’2001, symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, Denver, CO (CDROM), 11 pp

  • Bent AL (1996a) An improved source mechanism for the 1935 Timiskaming, Quebec earthquake from regional waveforms. Pure Appl Geophys 146(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bent AL (1996b) Source parameters of the damaging Cornwall-Massena earthquake of 1944 from regional waveforms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2:489–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefoy-Claudet S (2004) Nature du bruit de fond sismique: implications pour les études des effets de site. Doctoral Thesis, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, 241 pp (in French)

  • Chouinard LE, Rosset P, de la Puente A, Madriz R, Mitchell D, Adams J (2004) Seismic hazard analysis for Montreal. Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Paper No. 7010, 12 pp

  • Chouinard LE, Rosset P (2007) Seismic site effects and seismic risk in the Montreal urban area. The influence of marine clays. Proceedings of the Ninth Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp 26–29

  • De la Puente A, Rosset P (2002) Excel-shake interface user’s manual. Structural Engineering Series, McGill University, Report No. 2002-02, 43 pp

  • Decroix D (1984) Etude préliminaire de la carte géotechnique de l’île de Montréal. Mémoire de maîtrise en Science de la Terre, UQAM (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeh D, Kind F, Giardini D (2001) A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios. Geophys J Int 145:535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Sun JI (1992) User’s Manual for SHAKE91. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis

  • Jacques M (1985) Etude Géologique – Quartier Pointe-aux-Trembles, coupes stratigraphiques. Laboratoire de Contrôle et de Recherche, Service des Travaux Publics, ville de Montréal, plan P.I.D.T. 8288

  • Jacques M (1987) Etude Géologique – Centre ville, coupes stratigraphiques. Laboratoire de Contrôle et de Recherche, Service des Travaux Publics, ville de Montréal, 8 maps

  • Lachet C, Bard PY (1994) Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of Nakamura technique. J Phys Earth 42(5):377–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc G (1981) A closer look at the September 16, 1732, Montreal earthquake. Can J Earth Sci 18:539–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1994) Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation? Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1350–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Madriz R (2004) Seismic microzonation of Montreal. Masters thesis, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, 135 pp

  • Munro PS, Weichert D (1989) The Saguenay earthquake of November 25, 1988, processed strong motion records. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File Report No. 1996

  • Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rep Railway Tech Res Inst 30(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (2000) Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its application. Proceedings of XII World conference Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Paper no 2656

  • National resource Canada (2003) Borehole geophysical logs in surficial sediments of Canada: a compilation of GSC data. Internet database http://tsdmaps.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca

  • NBCC (1985) National Building Code of Canada 1985. National Research Council of Canada, NRCC, 23174, Ottawa, 454 pp

  • NBCC (2005) Code National du bâtiment. New national seismic hazard maps. Can J Civ Eng 25:305–318

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER (2000) PEER, strong motion database. The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center and the University of California, database on the web

  • Prest VK, Hode-Keyser J (1977) Geology and engineering characteristics of surficial deposits, Montreal island and vicinity, Quebec. Geological Survey Paper 75–27, 28 pp and 2 maps

  • Robert Y (1980) Etude géotechnique des sols de l’île de Montréal: prédiction de comportement pendant les séismes. Mémoire de maîtrise de l’Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Département de Génie Civil, CI80RO, ca 150 pp (in french)

  • Rodriguez VHS, Midorikawa S (2002) Applicability of the H/V spectral ratio of microtremors in assessing site effects on seismic motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset P (2002) SPCRATIO User’s Manual: a tool to analyze ambient noise records. Structural Engineering Series, University McGill, Montreal, Report No. 2002-01, 20 pp

  • Rosset P, de la Puente A, Chouinard L, Mitchell D (2003a) Seismic risk mitigation for the Montreal urban community: evaluation of soil amplification, development and applications. 91st Journée Luxembourgeoise de Géophysique May 23–25, Walferdange. Electronic book on the Internet. http://www.ecgs.lu, 8 pp

  • Rosset P, de la Puente A, Madriz R, Chouinard L, Mitchell D, Adams J (2003b) Identification of site effects in the Montreal Urban Community, Canada: Pilot study and methodological developments. Open File Report Geological Survey of Canada, 70 pp and 1 Cdrom in review

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by research grants from the Geological Survey of Canada, the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et la Technologie. The authors would like to acknowledge Michel Jacques from City of Montreal for his help in the compilation of the geological database, John Adams from the Geological Survey of Canada for his support all along the project. Alejandro de la Puente and Ricardo Madriz were involved in the development of the methodology and the surveys. The manuscript was improved thanks to the comments of two anonymous reviewers and Myriam Bour.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Rosset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosset, P., Chouinard, L.E. Characterization of site effects in Montreal, Canada. Nat Hazards 48, 295–308 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9263-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9263-1

Keywords

Navigation