Skip to main content
Log in

Reference Policies for Non-myopic Sequential Network Design and Timing Problems

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite a growing number of studies in stochastic dynamic network optimization, the field remains less well defined and unified than other areas of network optimization. Due to the need for approximation methods like approximate dynamic programming, one of the most significant problems yet to be solved is the lack of adequate benchmarks. The values of the perfect information policy and static policy are not sensitive to information propagation while the myopic policy does not distinguish network effects in the value of flexibility. We propose a scalable reference policy value defined from theoretically consistent real option values based on sampled sequences, and estimate it using extreme value distributions. The reference policy is evaluated on an existing network instance with known sequences (Sioux Falls network from Chow and Regan 2011a): the Weibull distribution demonstrates good fit and sampling consistency with more than 200 samples. The reference policy is further applied in computational experiments with two other types of adaptive network design: a facility location and timing problem on the Simchi-Levi and Berman (1988) network, and Hyytiä et al.’s (2012) dynamic dial-a-ride problem. The former experiment represents an application of a new problem class and use of the reference policy as an upper bound for evaluating sampled policies, which can reach 3 % gap with 350 samples. The latter experiment demonstrates that sensitivity to parameters may be greater than expected, particularly when benchmarked against the proposed reference policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan N, Kateri M (2008) On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data. Stat Probab Lett 78(17):2971–2975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry K (2013) New Helsinki bus line lets you choose your own route. Wired, http://www.wired.com/2013/10/on-demand-public-transit/, accessed June 28, 2014

  • Berbeglia G, Cordeau JF, Laporte G (2010) Dynamic pickup and delivery problems. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriere JF (1996) Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Insurance Math Econ 19(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Zhou Z, Chootinan P, Ryu S, Yang C, Wong SC (2011) Transport network design problem under uncertainty: a review and new developments. Transp Rev 31(6):743–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow JYJ, Regan AC (2011a) Network-based real option models. Transp Res B 45(4):682–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow JYJ, Regan AC (2011b) Real option pricing of network design investments. Transp Sci 45(1):50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow JYJ, Regan AC (2011c) Resource location and relocation models with rolling horizon forecasting for wildland fire planning. INFOR 49(1):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow JYJ, Regan AC, Ranaiefar F, Arkhipov DI (2011) A network option portfolio management framework for adaptive transportation planning. Transp Res A 45(8):765–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow JYJ (2014) Policy analysis of third party electronic coupons for public transit fares. Transp Res A 66:238–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung SH, Kwon C (2015) Multi-period planning for electri-car charging station locations: a case of Korean expressways. Eur J Oper Res 242(2):677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clément E, Lamberton D, Protter P (2002) An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing. Finance Stochast 6(4):449–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortazar G, Gravet M, Urzua J (2008) The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method. Comput Oper Res 35(1):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortés CE, Sáez D, Núñez A, Muñoz-Carpintero D (2009) Hybrid adaptive predictive control for a dynamic pickup and delivery problem. Transp Sci 43(1):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figliozzi MA, Mahmassani HS, Jaillet P (2007) Pricing in dynamic vehicle routing problems. Transp Sci 41(3):302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Tippett LHC (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Proc Camb Philos Soc 24(2):180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamba A (2002) An extension of least squares Monte Carlo simulation for multi-options problems. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Real Options Conference, Paphos, Cyprus, July 2002

  • García D (2003) Convergence and biases of Monte Carlo estimates of American option prices using a parametric exercise rule. J Econ Dyn Control 27(10):1855–1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, NY, republication by Dover

    Google Scholar 

  • He F, Yin Y, Zhou J (2013) Integrated pricing of roads and electricity enabled by wireless power transfer. Transp Res C 34:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Li S, Qian ZS (2015) Optimal deployment of alternative fueling stations on transportation networks considering deviation paths. Netw Spat Econ 15(1):183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyttiä E, Penttinen A, Sulonen R (2012) Non-myopic vehicle and route selection in dynamic DARP with travel time and workload objectives. Comput Oper Res 39(12):3021–3030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichoua S, Gendreau M, Potvin JY (2006) Exploiting knowledge about future demands for real-time vehicle dispatching. Transp Sci 40(2):211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung J, Chow JYJ, Jayakrishnan R, Park JY (2014) Stochastic dynamic itinerary interception refueling location problem with queue delay for electric taxi charging stations. Transp Res C 40:123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp RM (1992) On-line algorithms versus off-line algorithms: how much is it worth to know the future? Proc. IFIP 12th world computer congress on algorithms, software, architecture – information processing’92, 1:416–429

  • Kirschenmann T, Popova E, Damien P, Hanson T (2014) Decision dependent stochastic processes. Eur J Oper Res 234(3):731–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless JF (2003) Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ouyang Y (2011) Reliable sensor deployment for network traffic surveillance. Transp Res B 45(1):218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev Financ Stud 14(1):113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnanti TL, Wong RT (1984) Network design and transportation planning: models and algorithms. Transp Sci 18(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MirHassani SA, Ebrazi R (2013) A flexible reformulation of the refueling station location problem. Transp Sci 47(4):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrović-Minić S, Krishnamurti R, Laporte G (2004) Double-horizon based heuristics for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transp Res B 38(8):669–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosheiov G (1994) The travelling salesman problem with pick-up and delivery. Eur J Oper Res 79(2):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novoa C, Storer R (2009) An approximate dynamic programming approach for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Eur J Oper Res 196(2):509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell WB (2011) Approximate dynamic programming: solving the curses of dimensionality, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powell WB, Simao HP, Bouzaiene-Ayari B (2012) Approximate dynamic programming in transportation and logistics: a unified framework. EURO J Transp Logist 1(3):237–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayarshad HR, Chow JYJ (2015) A scalable non-myopic dynamic dial-a-ride and pricing problem. Transp Res B. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Secomandi N (2001) A rollout policy for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Oper Res 49(5):796–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi D, Berman O (1988) A heuristic algorithm for the traveling salesman location problem on 817 networks. Oper Res 36(3):478–484

  • Spivey MZ, Powell WB (2004) The dynamic assignment problem. Transp Sci 38(4):399–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stentoft L (2004) Convergence of the least squares Monte Carlo approach to American option valuation. Manag Sci 50(9):1193–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeto WY, Jiang Y, Wang DZW, Sumalee A (2013) A sustainable road network design problem with land use transportation interaction over time. Netw Spat Econ. doi:10.1007/s11067-013-9191-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BW, White CC III (2004) Anticipatory route selection. Transp Sci 38(4):473–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BW (2007) Waiting strategies for anticipating service requests from known customer locations. Transp Sci 41(3):319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Lam WHK, Chen BY (2013) A stochastic vehicle routing problem with travel time uncertainty: trade-off between cost and customer service. Netw Spat Econ 13(4):471–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs program. Constructive feedback provided by participants of the 3rd Annual INFORMS TSL Workshop held in Chicago, IL, and two anonymous referees is much appreciated. Helpful comments from Dr. Arnold Yuan from Ryerson University are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Y. J. Chow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chow, J.Y.J., Sayarshad, H.R. Reference Policies for Non-myopic Sequential Network Design and Timing Problems. Netw Spat Econ 16, 1183–1209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9315-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9315-5

Keywords

Navigation