Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, Type IV Collagen and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Adamantinous Craniopharyngioma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neurochemical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To explore the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), type IV collagen (Col IV) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) and analyze the correlation between the level of these markers and adamantimous craniopharyngiomas recurrence. Expressions of MMP-9, Col IV and VEGF were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 40 cases of ACP, including 24 cases of primary group and 16 cases of recurred group. The expression level of MMP-9 and VEGF in recurred group were significantly higher than primary group (93.7% vs. 41.7%, P < 0.05, 87.5% vs. 45.8%, P < 0.05, respectively). The expression of Col IV in the recurred group was significant different from the primary group (Z = −2.619, P < 0.05). MMP-9, Col IV and VEGF may be the potential specific bio-marker related to the recurrence of ACP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACP:

Adamantimous craniopharyngiomas

AE:

Adamantine epithelioma

SCP:

Squamous cell papillary

MMP-9:

Matrix metalloproteinase-9

Col IV:

Type IV collagen

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

BM:

Basement membrane

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

References

  1. Janzer RC, Burger PC, Giangaspero F, Paulus W (2000) Craniopharyngioma. In: Kleihues P, Cavenee WK (eds) World Health Organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 244–246

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asa SL (1997) Craniopharyngioma. In: Asa SL (ed) Atlas of tumor pathology: tumors of the pituitary gland, 3rd series, Fascicle 22. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, pp 167–172

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akachi K, Takahashi H, Ishijima B et al (1987) Malignant changes in a craniopharyngioma. No Shinkei Geka 15:843–848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rushing EJ, Giangaspero F, Paulus W, Burger PC (2007) Craniopharyngioma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the centralnervous system. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 238–240

  5. Agozzino L, Ferraraccio F, Accardo M, Esposito S, Agozzino M, Cuccurullo L (2006) Morphological and ultrastructural findings of prognostic impact in craniopharyngiomas. Ultrastruct Pathol 30:143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duo D, Gasverde S, Benech F et al (2003) MIB-1 immunoreactivity in craniopharyngiomas: a clinico-pathological analysis. Clin Neuropathol 22:229–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raghavan R, Dickey WT, Margraf LR et al (2000) Proliferative activity in craniopharyngiomas: clinicopathological correlations in adults and children. Surg Neurol 54:241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Losa M, Vimercati A, Acerno S et al (2004) Correlation between clinical characteristics and proliferative activity in patients with craniopharyngioma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:889–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gong J, Zhao Y, Abdel-Fattah R, Amos S, Xiao A, Lopes MB, Hussaini IM, Laws ER (2008) Matrix metalloproteinase-9, a potential biological marker in invasive pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 11(1):37–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubansu A, Ruchoux MM, Brotchi J et al (2003) Cathepsin B, D and K expression in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas relates to their levels of differentiation as determined by the patterns of retinoic acid receptor expression. Histopathology 43:563–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mattern J, Koomagi R, Volm M (1996) Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with intratumoral microvesseldensity and tumour cell proliferation in human epidermoidlung carcinoma. Br J Cancer 73:931–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu-li, Jian-hua, Hui-qiu (2006) Relationship between expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9, IV collagen and invasive metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Res 1(23):1201–1203

  13. Barua KK, Ehara K, Kohmura E et al (2003) Treatment of recurrent craniopharyngiomas. Kobe J Med Sci 49(5–6):123–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yasargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, Seigenthaler G, Teddy PJ, Roth P (1990) Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg 73:3–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amacher AL (1980) Craniopharyngioma: the controversy regarding radiotherapy. Childs Brain 6:57–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baskin DS, Wilson CB (1986) Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas: a review of 74 cases. J Neurosurg 65:22–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiner HL, Wisoff JH, Rosenberg ME (1994) Craniopharyngiomas: a clinicopathological analysis of factors predictive of recurrenceand functional outcome. Neurosurgery 35:1001–1011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wisoff JH (1994) Surgical management of recurrent craniopharyngiomas. Pediatric Neurosurg 21(suppl 1):108–113

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fuentes S, Metellus P, Dufour H et al (2002) Postoperative in tracranial seeding of craniopharygioma. Three case reports and a review of the literature. Neurochirurgie 48(4):345–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu JM, Garonzik IM, Eberhart CG et al (2002) Ectopic recurrence of craniopharyngioma after an interhemispheric transcallosal approach: a case report. Neurosurgery 50(3):639–645

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawamata T, Kubo O, Hori T (2005) Histological findings at the boundary of craniopharyngiomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 22(2):75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Willard MF, Syephen JW, Kent EV (1999) Quantitative RT-PCR: pitfall and potential. Biotechniques 26(1):112–125

    Google Scholar 

  23. Curran S, Murray GI (2000) Matrix metalloproteinases: molecular aspects of their roles in tumour invasion and metastasis. Eur J Cancer 36:1621–1630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Birkedal-Hansen H, Moore WG, Bodden MK et al (1993) Matrix metalloproteinases: a review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 4:197–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kähäri VM, Saarialho-Kere U (1999) Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in tumour growth and invasion. Ann Med 31:34–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. RamosDesimone N, HahnDantona E, Sipley J et al (1999) Activation of mat rix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) via a converging plasmin/st romelysin, cascade enhances tumor cell invasion. Biol Chem 27(19):13066–13076

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kawamoto H, Uozumi T, Kamamtot K et al (1996) Type IV colla-genase activity and cavenous sinus invasion in human pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138(4):390–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith ER, Manfredi M, Scott RM et al (2007) A recurrent craniopharyngioma illustrates the potential usefulness of urinary matrix metalloproteinases as noninvasive biomarkers: case report. Neurosurgery 60(6):1148–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Daniel KG, Kuhn DJ, Kazi A et al (2005) Anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor properties of proteasome inhibitors. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 5:529–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Demirag F, Unsal E, Yilmaz A et al (2005) Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor, tumor necrosis, and mitoticactivity index in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Chest 128:3382–3387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sauter ER, Nesbit M, Watson JC et al (1999) Vascular endothelial growth factor is a marker of tumor invasion and metastasis in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 5:775–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stiver SI, Tan X, Brown LF et al (2004) VEGF-A angiogenesis induces a stable neovasculature in adult murine brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63:841–855

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pan LX, Liu YS, Cheng ZP (2003) Correlation expression of MVD and VEGF with invasion of hypophysoma. Chin J Neurosurg 19:285–287

    Google Scholar 

  34. Unemori EN, Ferrara N, Bauer EA et al (1992) Vascular endothelial growth factor induces interstitial collagenase expression in human endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 153(3):557–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by National Natural Funding, Beijing New Star of Technology Funding and Ningxia Natural Science Funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xia, Z., Liu, W., Li, S. et al. Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, Type IV Collagen and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Adamantinous Craniopharyngioma. Neurochem Res 36, 2346–2351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-011-0560-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-011-0560-9

Keywords

Navigation